Tag Archives: mental health research

National Ethnic mental health Carer Forum : August Update 2026

By Matthew McKenzie – Chair, National Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum

The August meeting of the National Ethnic Mental Health Carer Forum brought together unpaid carers, NHS leaders, healthcare professionals, academic researchers, and voluntary sector advocates from across the country. The session provided a vital space to address race equity, systemic racism, lived experience, and ongoing research into minoritised caring experiences.

Matthew McKenzie opened the meeting by welcoming attendees and reinforcing the core purpose of the national forum. He reflected on how the platform has grown into a crucial space where family carers can directly challenge health structures, influence decision-makers, and learn about national policy developments such as the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF). Matthew acknowledged that while discussions around institutional racism and health inequalities can be heavy and emotional, the forum remains a safe, respectful, and healing space dedicated to driving real, actionable change across the NHS.

Minute of Silence: Professor Jason Ardey

The forum opened with a poignant minute’s silence led by Debbie Best in honour of the life, legacy, and memory of Professor Jason Ardey following his passing.

Members paused to reflect on his landmark contributions to racial equality, education, and social justice. His legacy of challenging institutional barriers and amplifying minoritised voices continues to inspire the core work and mission of the forum.

Reflections on Race Equality: Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust (NSFT)

Speakers: Cath Byford (Deputy Chief Executive / Chief Nurse / Director of Patient Experience) & Annie (PCREF Carer Lead)

Cath Byford opened the trust’s update by offering an open and unvarnished reflection on NSFT’s ongoing race equity journey. Acknowledging that the trust has faced significant scrutiny and structural challenges over recent years, Cath emphasized that building genuine trust with minoritised communities requires moving beyond policy statements to deliver measurable, lasting systemic change. She explained that over the past 18 months, NSFT has embarked on a deliberate path to rebuild its patient experience framework, ensuring that health equity, anti-racism, and lived experience are embedded into every layer of clinical governance and strategic planning.

PCREF Carer lead Annie brought a vital lived-experience perspective to the presentation, sharing how the trust is working to bridge the gap between executive decision-making and the everyday realities of unpaid family carers. Together, they outlined the core pillars driving NSFT’s current equity transformation:

  • Dedicated Health Equity Team & Clinical Reform: The trust has invested heavily in establishing a specialist Health Equity team, created to audit clinical pathways and directly confront institutional disparities. The team’s operational focus is centered on dismantling disproportionate clinical interventions, specifically working to significantly reduce the use of physical and chemical restrictive practices, address the over-representation of Black and minority ethnic service users detained under the Mental Health Act, and monitor and reduce the disproportionate application of Community Treatment Orders (CTOs).
  • Diversifying Governance & Locality Councils: Cath shared candidly that an internal review of the trust’s governance structures revealed a stark under-representation of global majority voices across its five locality councils. Recognizing that local health strategies cannot succeed if key decision-making bodies remain ethnically unrepresentative, NSFT has launched targeted community outreach initiatives designed to recruit diverse community members, carers, and experts by experience onto these councils to ensure grassroot priorities shape service delivery.
  • Workforce Transformation & Reciprocal Mentorship: Highlighting broader organizational culture, Cath detailed how workforce race equity has been integrated into the trust’s 12 major transformation programmes. A central highlight of this work is the Transformational Reciprocal Mentorship Programme, coordinated by Ethan Charles, which was recently recognized nationally for healthcare excellence. The initiative pairs senior trust executives and board members with staff members from minoritised backgrounds in a reciprocal learning partnership, helping leadership understand systemic workplace barriers while creating clear pathways for career progression and equity across the trust.

Questions and Discussion

Q1. How is Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust embedding cultural awareness within service evaluation and PCREF implementation?

A question was raised regarding how patient and carer feedback is systematically captured, and whether cultural awareness is meaningfully integrated into trust surveys, service audits, and PCREF rollouts rather than treated as a tick-box exercise.

Response:

Cath Byford acknowledged that standard feedback mechanisms often fail to capture the nuanced experiences of minoritised communities. She explained that the trust is refining its data collection tools alongside its Health Equity team and local carers to ensure feedback loops directly inform clinical practice and PCREF operational plans.

Q2. How are intersectional barriers such as neurodivergence and criminal justice involvement being addressed for minoritised families?

A detailed discussion focused on the severe intersectional challenges faced by minoritised families, particularly where mental health conditions overlap with neurodivergence or involvement in the criminal justice system. Concerns were raised that carers face immense financial and logistical hurdles to attend meetings or advocate for relatives.

Response:

Cath and Annie agreed that intersectionality must be at the forefront of service design. The panel emphasized that research teams and trust steering groups must formally budget for carer access needs—including funding for sitters, respite, and transport—to enable equitable participation from grassroot carers.

Q3. How can NHS trusts move away from generic terminology like “BAME” to build trust with specific communities?

Contributors stressed the importance of discarding outdated, homogenized labels such as “BAME” in favor of recognizing specific ethnic and cultural identities. Members questioned how trusts plan to engage directly with local grassroot organizations rather than relying on top-down communications.

Response:

The presenters affirmed that language matters deeply in establishing trust. NSFT is focusing on direct partnerships with Voluntary, Community, and Social Enterprise (VCSE) sector organizations that already hold trusted relationships within specific cultural communities, ensuring engagement is authentic and localized.

Keynote Address: Competence, Leadership, and Race Equity

Speaker: Lord Victor Adebowale (Chair, NHS Confederation & Founder, NHS Race and Health Observatory)

Lord Victor Adebowale delivered a sweeping keynote address that fundamentally challenged traditional healthcare perspectives on race equity, anti-racism, and organizational accountability. Moving the discussion away from performative pledges and symbolic gestures, Lord Victor framed racial equity not as an optional moral, social, or political stance, but as a core requirement of clinical and operational competence.

He began by reframing the definition of leadership within the healthcare ecosystem, asserting that unpaid family carers act as leaders every single day. Through their daily advocacy, continuous care coordination, and tireless protection of vulnerable family members, carers demonstrate true leadership long before health systems officially acknowledge their presence.

Lord Victor drew stark attention to the persistent impact of the Inverse Care Law, illustrating how individuals from the global majority routinely receive poorer quality services and face worse health outcomes despite presenting with the highest levels of clinical need. He warned that system-wide failure to serve minoritised families cannot be viewed as an isolated issue; when a healthcare trust tolerates substandard, culturally unsafe care for Black and ethnic minority service users, the overall quality, safety, and effectiveness of care inevitably degrades for every patient using that service.

A central theme of his address focused on moving the national conversation away from an endless reliance on individual conscious or unconscious bias training. Lord Victor argued that over-emphasizing implicit bias often allows healthcare systems to evade operational accountability. Instead, anti-racism must be treated as a strict benchmark of professional capability. Leaders and clinicians who fail to deliver equitable care across diverse populations are not simply displaying personal bias they are actively choosing to operate incompetently. He insisted that health trust boards must begin holding executive leadership to the exact same rigorous accountability standards for race equity as they do for clinical safety and financial management.

Furthermore, Lord Victor emphasized that unpaid family carers represent the primary early-warning system within the entire healthcare structure. Carers are routinely the first to spot subtle signs of deterioration or service failure, often weeks before clinical teams become aware of an emerging crisis. He condemned the institutional practice of dismissing carer insights under the blanket rationale of “patient confidentiality,” warning that using information governance as an excuse to shut out family members discards the most valuable clinical intelligence available and actively compromises patient safety.

Four Rules for Authentic Community Engagement

To guide health trusts and Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) toward genuine structural reform, Lord Victor outlined four non-negotiable rules of engagement when working alongside minoritised communities and family carers:

  1. Listen with Evidence of Being Heard: Listening exercises and consultation events are entirely meaningless unless community members and carers are provided with clear, practical evidence showing exactly how their feedback altered decisions, policies, or service delivery.
  2. Transfer Real Power: Authentic engagement requires a fundamental shift in traditional power dynamics. Healthcare institutions must share authority and transfer tangible resources so that minoritised communities are empowered to act independently and lead changes themselves.
  3. Equal Partnership over Superficial Co-production: Health systems must move beyond tokenistic co-production exercises, which often amount to seeking quick feedback on pre-written plans—and commit to long-term, equal governance partnerships where carers sit at the decision-making table from inception to evaluation.
  4. Describable and Transparent Outcomes: Any service alteration or policy development resulting from community engagement must produce clear, tangible outcomes that are easily understood, described, and validated by the community itself, rather than hidden behind dense NHS jargon.

Matthew’s Question

Matthew raised concerns regarding the persistent barriers unpaid carers face—specifically questioning how health systems can stop excluding ethnic minority carers through medical jargon and information gatekeeping (such as using “confidentiality” as an excuse to exclude families), and how trusts can be held genuinely accountable under frameworks like the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF).

Lord Victor Adebowale’s Response

Lord Victor addressed this by framing race equity and carer involvement as a matter of operational and clinical competence rather than optional policy:

  • Reframing Carer Insights: He emphasized that family carers are the primary early-warning system in healthcare who spot signs of deterioration weeks before clinical teams. Dismissing carer insights using “confidentiality” throws away vital clinical data and actively compromises patient safety.
  • Competence over Bias: He stated that leaders who fail to provide equitable care to minoritised families or exclude carers are choosing to operate incompetently. Boards must hold executive leadership accountable for race equity to the exact same standards as clinical safety and financial management.
  • Rules of Engagement: He outlined that genuine engagement requires health trusts to listen with evidence of being heard, transfer real power to communities, build equal partnerships, and deliver transparent, describable outcomes that the community can easily see and verify.

Questions and Discussion

Q1. Why are Black men in mental health services disproportionately subjected to high doses of medication rather than holistic therapies?

A critical question was raised regarding why Black men entering acute mental health pathways are frequently managed through high-dose psychiatric medications and prolonged admissions rather than being offered timely talking therapies, early intervention, and holistic community support.

Response:

Lord Victor emphasized that over-reliance on medication and restrictive practices reflects systemic clinical failure and risk-averse institutional cultures. He stressed that true clinical competence requires services to offer culturally appropriate psychological interventions and preventative care early in the care pathway, rather than defaulting to chemical containment during crises.

Q2. How can healthcare systems better support the emotional, financial, and legal well-being of long-term family carers?

A forum contributor shared their personal experience as a sole carer managing a mother with vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s in rural Gloucestershire. They highlighted the severe isolation, legal hurdles, and financial exhaustion experienced by carers, asking directly: “Who is caring for the carer?”

Response:

Lord Victor and forum members acknowledged the systemic neglect of carer well-being. The discussion highlighted that supporting carers is a clinical necessity, not an optional luxury. Practical signposting was shared, pointing members toward specialist support networks and helplines, including Dementia UK, while calling on Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) to fund dedicated carer respite initiatives.

Research Updates: Amplifying Carer Voices

1. Black Carers and Learning Disability Services

Presenter: Lorraine Heath (Trainee Clinical Psychologist, University of Southampton)

Lorraine Heath introduced her doctoral research project exploring the complex, intersectional barriers that Black family carers encounter when navigating mental health and learning disability services on behalf of their relatives. Lorraine explained that while national policy increasingly highlights health equity, Black families caring for loved ones with learning disabilities continue to face profound structural, institutional, and cultural hurdles. These challenges frequently result in delayed access to vital support, misdiagnosis, or total exclusion from essential statutory services.

The research focuses on capturing the lived realities of Black carers across both child and adult services including Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) and adult community mental health teams to understand how healthcare systems can better support families before crisis points occur. Lorraine emphasized that unpaid Black carers often have to act as fierce advocates, interpreters of complex care systems, and primary safety nets, often without receiving adequate recognition or formal support from service providers.

  • Research Objectives: The study aims to map out the specific diagnostic pathways, institutional barriers, and negative experiences that Black families face when seeking care. By identifying where services fail to provide culturally sensitive, timely support, the project seeks to build a robust evidence base to influence future clinical practice, service design, and commissioning standards across NHS mental health and learning disability teams.
  • Methodology & Care for Participants: Recognizing that discussing institutional barriers and negative service interactions can be emotionally draining, the study utilizes 90-minute flexible online interviews via Microsoft Teams, designed around the participant’s schedule and comfort. To ensure lived experience is meaningfully valued rather than exploited, all participants receive a £25 shopping voucher as a token of appreciation for their time and contribution. Furthermore, strict data protection protocols are embedded throughout the study to guarantee complete anonymity for all participating carers.

Lorraine invited members of the forum to share details of the study within their local networks, encouraging Black family carers with relevant lived experience to participate and ensure their voices shape future mental health provision.

Questions and Discussion

Q1. How will the study protect Black carers from re-traumatisation when discussing negative service experiences?

Forum members inquired about the safeguarding protocols in place for participants who may experience distress while recalling challenging interactions with health and social care services.

Response:

Lorraine confirmed that emotional safety is central to the study design. Pre-interview briefings, built-in debriefing sessions, and immediate signposting to culturally sensitive psychological support are provided to all participants.

2. Supporting the Supporters: Integrating Informal Carers

Presenter: Carol Garbutt (King’s College London)

Carol Garbutt introduced her master’s research project, Supporting the Supporters, which addresses the critical breakdown in communication and partnership between professional healthcare services and informal family carers. Carol explained that despite longstanding national directives highlighting the importance of involving family members, unpaid carers from minoritised backgrounds are routinely sidelined, excluded from decision-making, or left without basic support when supporting a relative through the mental health system.

The study explores the organizational culture, professional attitudes, and systemic practices that dictate how informal carers are treated across clinical settings. Carol highlighted that while professional staff often view safety and treatment solely through the lens of individual patient care, unpaid carers are the ones managing day-to-day crises, monitoring medication side effects, and providing essential emotional and practical stabilization at home. Failing to integrate these informal support networks into formal care planning not only places an overwhelming burden on family members, but actively compromises patient safety and recovery.

  • Research Scope & Focus: The study focuses on gathering perspectives from across the mental health ecosystem including professional healthcare workers, clinical staff, patient advocates, and voluntary sector leaders. By examining how professionals define, view, and interact with family carers, the research aims to pinpoint the precise organizational obstacles and misalignments that lead to carer exclusion.
  • Project Goals & Impact: The overarching objective is to build a robust, practice-informed evidence base that pushes mental health trusts to embed family carers into standard clinical workflows. Carol emphasized that true integration requires moving beyond informal signposting toward establishing clear communication protocols, ensuring carers are formally identified at the point of admission, and treating them as equal, valued partners in care planning and discharge processes.

Questions and Discussion

Q1. How does the research address instances where professionals hide behind confidentiality rules to exclude carers?

Members highlighted that staff frequently cite information governance to withhold basic care updates from family members.

Response:

Carol explained that her study specifically examines professional attitudes and organizational policies surrounding communication. The goal is to highlight best-practice frameworks that allow clinicians to share essential care planning details with families while respecting patient rights.

3. Partners’ Experiences of Gynaecological Cancer

Presenter: Lara (Trainee Clinical Psychologist, University of Hertfordshire)

Lara introduced her doctoral research exploring the lived experiences of partners supporting individuals diagnosed with gynaecological cancer.

  • Research Focus: Examining the complex emotional, physical, relational, and financial impacts on partners navigating a gynaecological cancer diagnosis.
  • Project Goal: Tackling cultural taboos and stigma surrounding gynaecological health, providing evidence to help cancer charities and NHS trusts design tailored psychological and practical support packages for partners.

Questions and Discussion

Q1. How does the study account for cultural stigmas surrounding gynaecological health within minoritised communities?

Carers noted that discussion of gynaecological health remains heavily stigmatized in many ethnic communities, which can prevent partners from seeking external help.

Response:

Lara acknowledged these cultural complexities, explaining that the interview frameworks are designed to be sensitive to diverse cultural norms, allowing participants to share their experiences in a safe, non-judgmental environment.

Creative Advocacy: Combatting Gatekeeping Through Poetry

Matthew McKenzie presented a video poem developed as part of his ongoing advocacy work surrounding the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF).

Using creative media and spoken word, the poem visually and emotionally illustrates the everyday barriers faced by ethnic minority carers including institutional gatekeeping, dense medical jargon, exclusion from multi-disciplinary team meetings, and the sensation of being rendered invisible by healthcare professionals.

Matthew emphasized that creative media and arts-based advocacy are powerful mechanisms for staff training. By translating complex policy frameworks like PCREF into lived emotional narratives, creative media helps NHS staff understand the human impact of structural exclusion and drives empathetic, anti-racist practice across clinical teams.

Key Takeaways and Next Steps

The August meeting highlighted several critical action points for the forum and its partner organizations:

  • Accountability over Intent: Moving beyond policies, anti-racism charters, and pledges to demand measurable, transparent outcomes in patient care and carer satisfaction.
  • Dismantling Institutional Gatekeeping: Working with NHS trusts to ensure family carers are identified and involved early in treatment pathways, dismantling the misuse of confidentiality as a barrier.
  • Embedding Co-Production: Supporting minoritised carers to join trust boards, steering groups, and PCREF advisory panels to ensure lived experience directly shapes local health delivery.

Looking Ahead to September:

The next national forum meeting will feature updates from Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, the Race Equality Foundation, Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, and regional carer networks.

Oxford University study seeks unpaid carers supporting someone with severe mental illness

By Matthew McKenzie – facilitator of carer groups

Dr Eiluned Pearce, a trainee clinical psychologist and researcher at the University of Oxford, is seeking help recruiting participants for an important study about unpaid carers’ wellbeing.

The study will explore whether attending social and community groups, including carer support groups, clubs and other group activities is associated with improved wellbeing among people supporting someone with a severe mental illness.

This is particularly relevant to what I promote at my site because many unpaid carers rely on peer groups and carer forums for understanding, information and a sense of connection. However, you do not need to attend any kind of group to participate. The researchers need to hear from carers who attend groups and those who do not.

Who can take part?

You may be eligible if you:

  • Are aged 18 or over
  • Live in the United Kingdom
  • Speak English fluently
  • Provide unpaid emotional or practical support to someone aged 16 or over
  • Support someone experiencing psychosis, bipolar disorder, an eating disorder, or complex emotional needs/personality disorder
  • Do not personally experience a severe mental illness

You do not have to describe yourself as a “carer” or “caregiver”. You might consider yourself a relative, partner, parent, sibling or friend who provides essential support.

What does participation involve?

Participants will complete an anonymous online survey lasting approximately 40 minutes. You can take breaks and return to it using the same internet browser, provided it is completed within one week of starting.

Questions will cover your wellbeing and mental health, the support you provide, its impact on you, any groups you attend and some information about your background.

Individual responses will not be shared outside the research team, and IP addresses will not be recorded.

Take part in the study

To read more about the research and access the survey, visit:

https://tinyurl.com/CaregiverSMIWellbeingOrgs

The study has been approved by the University of Oxford Central University Research Ethics Committee (reference: MS IDREC 2204969).

For questions about the research, please contact:

Dr Eiluned Pearce
Email: eiluned.pearce@psy.ox.ac.uk
Telephone: 07775 229377

Dr Lorna Hogg
Email: lorna.hogg@hmc.ox.ac.uk

Dr Shama El-Salahi
Email: Shama.ElSalahi@oxfordhealth.nhs.uk

Research into carers’ wellbeing remains limited, and it is important that the experiences of people supporting someone with a severe mental illness are properly heard and understood.

National Ethnic mental health Carer Forum : July Update 2026

By Matthew McKenzie – Chair, National Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum

The July meeting welcomed unpaid carers, NHS organisations, universities, researchers and community groups from across England to discuss how mental health services can become more inclusive for carers from ethnic communities.

Matthew McKenzie opened the meeting by reflecting on over thirteen years of facilitating the forum and explained how its purpose has grown alongside national initiatives such as the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) and the Triangle of Care. The forum continues to provide a national platform where carers can influence NHS services, hear about new research and share experiences with professionals and decision-makers.

Matthew introduced the day’s programme, which included research presentations, NHS England engagement, updates from mental health trusts and national organisations, and opportunities for carers to influence future policy

Dr Ida Doherty – King’s College London

Supporting Ethnic Carers in South West London

Dr Ida Doherty presented her doctoral research exploring how adult mental health services support ethnic minority families where a parent experiences mental illness.

She explained that despite national policy promoting a Think Family approach, implementation across England remains inconsistent. Many parents receiving mental health support are never asked about their children, meaning opportunities for preventative family support are often missed.

Discussion Highlights

This presentation generated one of the longest discussions of the meeting.

Carers highlighted:

  • Adult and children’s services continue to work separately.
  • Families often have to repeat their stories to multiple organisations.
  • Parents fear seeking support because of concerns about children being removed.
  • Structural racism continues to affect safeguarding and mental health services.
  • Disabled parents and carers experience multiple layers of discrimination.
  • Services often respond only during crisis rather than providing early intervention.

There was also an important discussion about safeguarding carers who participate in research. Participants stressed that research should include emotional support, culturally appropriate safeguarding and co-produced approaches to prevent re-traumatisation. Dr Doherty welcomed these suggestions and explained the safeguarding measures built into her study.

Dr Doherty encouraged forum members to promote the study across South West London to help ensure ethnic families are represented within the research.

Certainly. Here’s a more professional version that focuses on the discussion rather than identifying who asked each question.

Questions and Discussion

Q1. How can mental health services better implement the “Think Family” approach?

A question was raised about the continuing separation between children’s and adult mental health services, with concern that families are often required to navigate multiple systems that fail to communicate with one another. It was suggested that supporting one family member in isolation overlooks the wider impact of mental illness on the entire household.

Response

Dr Doherty agreed that this is a significant challenge and explained that her research is centred on improving whole-family support. She highlighted that current services often operate in silos, limiting opportunities for early intervention and joined-up care. The aim of her research is to identify practical ways of embedding the Think Family approach more effectively within adult mental health services.

Q2. How will the research address the inequalities experienced by ethnic minority families?

A discussion focused on the additional challenges faced by ethnic minority families, particularly where disability, poverty, language barriers and mental health intersect. Concerns were raised about institutional racism, unequal treatment and the fear some parents experience when engaging with services.

Response

Dr Doherty acknowledged that these intersecting inequalities can significantly affect families’ experiences. She recognised that services can often adopt a risk-focused rather than strengths-based approach and explained that her research seeks to identify earlier, more supportive interventions that better meet the needs of ethnic minority families.

Q3. How will carers participating in the research be protected from emotional harm?

The discussion explored the importance of safeguarding participants involved in research. It was suggested that sharing lived experiences can be emotionally challenging and that researchers should have appropriate support mechanisms in place before, during and after participation.

Response

Dr Doherty explained that safeguarding had been a key consideration throughout the development of the study. She described how support, supervision, training and ongoing review have been built into the project, alongside close collaboration with Experts by Experience from the earliest stages of the research.

Q4. Will participants receive ongoing emotional support after difficult discussions?

A further question explored whether structured debriefing and emotional support would be available for participants who may experience distress after discussing traumatic experiences.

Response

Dr Doherty confirmed that the study includes a comprehensive safeguarding framework, including debrief sessions and wellbeing support. She explained that the project had undergone rigorous NHS ethics approval and that participant welfare continues to be reviewed throughout the research process.

Q5. How is co-production embedded within the research?

The final discussion focused on ensuring that the research is genuinely co-produced with ethnic communities rather than being designed solely from a professional perspective. There was also support for developing safeguarding approaches jointly with carers.

Response

Dr Doherty explained that co-production is fundamental to the project. She has worked alongside Experts by Experience since the study was first developed and described the research as something being undertaken in partnership with people who have lived experience. She also welcomed suggestions for strengthening carer-led safeguarding approaches as the project progresses.

Dr Maeve (King’s College London)

Research Study: The Nearest Relative under the Mental Health Act

Dr Maeve introduced a new King’s College London research project examining experiences of the Nearest Relative provisions within the Mental Health Act. She explained that the study aims to understand how the current legislation works in practice and gather views ahead of the proposed reforms to mental health law. The researchers are interested in hearing directly from people who have lived experience of the system, recognising that the Nearest Relative can play a crucial role in supporting someone during assessment, detention and treatment.

The study is seeking participants from a range of backgrounds, particularly unpaid carers who have supported someone detained or assessed under the Mental Health Act, as well as individuals who have themselves experienced detention or assessment. The research team is especially keen to hear from Black and other ethnic minority communities, along with younger people, to ensure that a wide range of perspectives help inform future policy and practice. Interviews are conducted online via Microsoft Teams at a convenient time for participants, last approximately one hour, and participants receive a £30 shopping voucher as a thank-you for contributing their experiences. Dr Maeve encouraged anyone interested to contact the research team or share the opportunity with others who may wish to participate.

Ruby Neish – University College London

Cancer Care and Black Women

Research Study: Supporting Carers of Women with Endometrial (Womb) Cancer

Ruby Neish, a Master’s researcher from University College London working in collaboration with the Centre for Early Detection, introduced a research project exploring the experiences of family members, friends and unpaid carers supporting women diagnosed with endometrial (womb) cancer. She explained that while much research focuses on the experiences of patients themselves, comparatively little is known about the challenges faced by those providing informal care throughout diagnosis, treatment and recovery. The study aims to build a more complete picture by understanding how carers experience the cancer pathway, the support they receive and the barriers they encounter. Ruby emphasised that carers often play a vital role in navigating appointments, providing emotional support, helping with treatment decisions and managing the practical realities of living with cancer, yet their experiences are frequently overlooked in research.

Following the presentation, forum members shared a wealth of lived experience highlighting why this research is particularly important for Black and minority ethnic communities. The discussion explored how delayed diagnosis, language barriers, cultural expectations, disability, poor communication and wider health inequalities can all contribute to poorer experiences for both patients and their families. Members also reflected on the importance of improving awareness of cancer symptoms within communities, encouraging uptake of screening programmes and ensuring services are culturally responsive. Several contributors stressed that carers often become advocates, interpreters and navigators of the healthcare system, particularly where individuals experience multiple forms of disadvantage. The discussion reinforced the importance of ensuring that future cancer services recognise and support carers as an essential part of the patient’s journey.

Questions and Discussion

Q1. Why is it particularly important to understand the experiences of Black and minority ethnic women living with cancer?

Forum members discussed how people from Black and minority ethnic communities can face additional barriers throughout the cancer pathway. These included language differences, lower awareness of symptoms, cultural beliefs about illness, disability, mental health needs and difficulties accessing appropriate support. It was suggested that these factors can contribute to delayed diagnosis and poorer outcomes if services fail to respond to people’s individual circumstances.

Response

Ruby welcomed these observations and explained that hearing directly from carers is essential to understanding these inequalities. She noted that while patients’ experiences are being explored separately, the research hopes to capture the perspectives of carers to identify barriers that may otherwise remain invisible. Together, these findings will help build a more complete understanding of how cancer services can better support families from diverse communities.

Q2. How can cancer services improve early diagnosis within ethnic communities?

The discussion highlighted the importance of encouraging earlier engagement with screening programmes and improving awareness of cancer symptoms within local communities. Examples were shared of women whose diagnoses were delayed after repeated visits to healthcare services, alongside reflections on the positive impact that culturally appropriate information and trusted community support can have in encouraging people to attend screening appointments. Participants emphasised that services need to communicate in ways that are accessible and sensitive to different cultural backgrounds.

Response

The discussion reinforced that improving awareness, reducing communication barriers and working more closely with communities could contribute to earlier diagnosis and improved outcomes. The research aims to identify where carers believe improvements can be made across the diagnostic and treatment journey, helping to inform future service development.

Q3. What role do unpaid carers play throughout the cancer journey?

A final discussion focused on the often unseen contribution of unpaid carers. Members described how carers frequently provide emotional reassurance, accompany relatives to appointments, help explain medical information, advocate for concerns to be taken seriously and support individuals throughout treatment and recovery. It was recognised that carers often become the link between patients, families and healthcare professionals, particularly where communication barriers or additional health conditions exist.

Response

Ruby explained that this is precisely why the study is focusing on carers’ perspectives. Understanding their experiences will provide valuable evidence about the practical and emotional challenges carers face and identify ways that cancer services can better recognise and support them alongside the person receiving treatment.

NHS England – Allied Health Professions Strategy

Steve Tolan (Deputy Chief Allied Health Professions Officer) & Barry O’Donovan (Senior Programme Manager)

Steve Tolan and Barry O’Donovan from NHS England joined the forum to begin an important conversation about developing a new national Allied Health Professions (AHP) Strategy. Rather than presenting a completed strategy for consultation, they explained that NHS England wanted to engage with carers, patients and communities before the strategy was written, ensuring that lived experience would help shape its priorities from the outset.

Steve introduced the Allied Health Professions as the third largest clinical workforce in the NHS, comprising fourteen professions including occupational therapists, physiotherapists, speech and language therapists, dietitians, radiographers and several others. He explained that these professionals work across virtually every part of health and care, from mental health and primary care to acute hospitals, rehabilitation and community services, making their contribution central to improving patient outcomes.

Barry explained that NHS England was seeking honest feedback on what Allied Health Professionals currently do well and, more importantly, where improvements were needed over the next five years. The discussion centred around several key questions, including how AHPs could help people stay healthier for longer, improve prevention, reduce health inequalities, remove barriers to accessing care, and work more effectively across different care settings. Forum members were also encouraged to complete a wider national survey, but NHS England emphasised that hearing directly from unpaid carers during the meeting would provide invaluable insight into the everyday realities experienced by families supporting loved ones with mental illness and other long-term conditions.

What followed was one of the richest discussions of the meeting, with carers sharing personal experiences of navigating health services and offering practical recommendations for change. Contributors acknowledged the important work undertaken by Allied Health Professionals but stressed that future success would depend upon moving beyond clinical interventions alone. Members called for greater emphasis on prevention rather than crisis management, stronger action to address racism and health inequalities, more personalised and culturally responsive care, improved communication with families and better recognition of unpaid carers as essential partners within the healthcare system. NHS England representatives listened carefully throughout the discussion, responding positively to the feedback and confirming that the experiences shared during the forum would help inform the development of the national strategy.

Feedback from Forum Members

There was a lot more feedback, but I have only included 4 feedback to the strategy

Feedback 1 – Prevention must become the priority, not simply responding to crisis

One of the strongest messages from the discussion was that health services often intervene too late. Contributors explained that many families recognise early warning signs long before services become involved, yet support is frequently unavailable until a situation has escalated into crisis. Members argued that Allied Health Professionals are well placed to identify emerging concerns earlier, particularly for people living with long-term mental health conditions, autism, learning disabilities and chronic physical illnesses. Earlier intervention, they suggested, would reduce avoidable hospital admissions while improving outcomes for both patients and carers.

NHS England acknowledged this feedback, explaining that one of the key ambitions of the new strategy is to support the wider NHS objective of shifting from reactive treatment towards prevention. Representatives welcomed examples from carers illustrating where earlier support could make the greatest difference.

Feedback 2 – Tackling racism and health inequalities requires more than training

Forum members spoke candidly about experiences of racism, discrimination and unequal treatment within health services. While acknowledging that cultural awareness training is becoming more common, contributors argued that training alone is insufficient unless accompanied by accountability and meaningful changes in practice. Some described inaccurate clinical records, assumptions based on ethnicity and situations where concerns raised by families were not properly reflected in care planning. There was a strong call for services to improve communication, record keeping and trauma-informed practice, ensuring that staff understand the impact of racism on health outcomes rather than viewing cultural competence as a one-off training exercise.

NHS England representatives recognised that tackling health inequalities and promoting anti-racist practice were already identified as “non-negotiable” priorities within the developing strategy. They explained that this was precisely why engagement with forums such as this was so valuable, helping ensure that policy reflects the real experiences of people using NHS services.

Feedback 3 – Unpaid carers must be recognised as equal partners in care

A recurring theme throughout the discussion was the role of unpaid carers within healthcare systems. Members explained that carers are often the people coordinating appointments, supporting communication, monitoring deterioration, providing emotional support and helping professionals understand an individual’s needs. Despite this, carers frequently remain unidentified by services or receive little information and support themselves. Contributors argued that Allied Health Professionals should routinely identify carers, involve them in care planning where appropriate and recognise them as equal partners whose knowledge can significantly improve patient outcomes.

NHS England welcomed these comments and recognised that carers play a fundamental role in delivering effective, preventative care. The examples shared demonstrated how stronger partnerships with carers could improve continuity of care while helping services better understand the needs of individuals and families.

Feedback 4 – Share and learn from examples of excellent practice

The discussion concluded with examples of positive experiences that illustrated what good care can look like. One contributor described receiving outstanding support from an Occupational Therapist who not only arranged practical adaptations within the home but also followed up afterwards to ensure everything was working well. Members suggested that NHS England should identify and promote examples of excellent practice across the Allied Health Professions so that high standards become the norm rather than the exception. Ideas included involving patients and carers more directly in evaluating services and using lived experience to help identify what compassionate, person-centred care looks like in practice.

West London Health Trust – PCREF Update

Linda Thomas – Co-producing an Independent PCREF Advisory Group

Linda Thomas, Co-production and Partnerships Development Manager at West London NHS Trust, opened the Trust’s presentation by describing how they have developed an independent PCREF Advisory Group designed to challenge, support and hold the Trust to account as a “critical friend.” Rather than creating a traditional advisory panel, West London NHS Trust commissioned three established community organisations GOS&D (Ealing), SHEWISE (Hounslow) and Managing Our Mental (Hammersmith & Fulham) to help design the model and understand how communities genuinely want to engage with mental health services. The approach seeks to increase diversity of voices, identify barriers preventing community involvement and rebuild trust between local communities and the Trust. Linda explained that members of the advisory group now sit alongside Trust leaders as equal partners on the Steering Group, while work is progressing to secure long-term funding to sustain the network and strengthen relationships with community organisations. The initiative demonstrates how co-production can move beyond consultation towards genuine shared decision-making between the NHS and the communities it serves.

Debbie Best – PCREF Carer Lead: Racial Trauma Workshops

Debbie Best, PCREF Carer Lead at West London NHS Trust, presented the development of the Trust’s Racial Trauma Workshops, which were co-designed alongside Natalie Mark (PCREF Lived Experience Lead), Dr Anne Aiyegbusi and Chief Nurse Gillian Kelly. Debbie explained that the workshops were created in response to the persistent racial inequalities experienced within mental health services, including disproportionate detention under the Mental Health Act, restrictive interventions, mistrust of services and the re-traumatisation experienced by many people from ethnic communities.

Rather than delivering traditional equality training, the workshops create reflective spaces where staff openly discuss difficult issues including trust, power, emotional labour, racialised assumptions and barriers to culturally safe care. Debbie emphasised that racial trauma affects not only patients but also carers and NHS staff, and that creating psychologically safe spaces for honest conversations is an essential step towards improving relationships, reducing inequalities and embedding the aims of the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) across mental health services.

Christine – Triangle of Care, Carer Awareness Training and PCREF

Christine, speaking as a carer representative involved in co-production, highlighted how West London NHS Trust has successfully embedded carers within staff training through the Triangle of Care programme. She explained that the Trust achieved Stage 2 Triangle of Care accreditation in March 2026 and has developed Carer Awareness Training that is designed and delivered alongside carers themselves.

The training introduces staff to both the Triangle of Care and the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework, helping colleagues understand the importance of recognising carers as equal partners while strengthening communication and collaboration with families. Christine also announced that West London NHS Trust has been selected as one of only thirteen national pilot sites testing the integration of Triangle of Care and PCREF guidance over the next twelve months. Ten clinical teams will take part in reviewing and implementing the updated guidance, ensuring that national best practice is informed by both professional expertise and lived experience.

Debbie Best – Ethnicity Data Capture Project

Debbie concluded the presentation by introducing West London NHS Trust’s Ethnicity Data Capture Project, funded through a small grant from the NHS Race and Health Observatory. She explained that the project aims to improve understanding of why ethnicity information is not always accurately recorded and why some communities remain reluctant to share this information. Working alongside community organisations including SHEWISE, Our Voices and Managing Our Mental, the Trust has co-produced a range of resources including information leaflets, awareness films, social media campaigns, frequently asked questions and staff training materials. The campaign, titled “Seen, Heard, Counted,” aims to reassure communities that ethnicity data is collected to improve healthcare, tackle inequalities and ensure services better reflect the needs of local populations. Debbie explained that the next phase of the project will focus on wider public awareness and rolling out staff training across the Trust to improve confidence, transparency and trust around ethnicity data collection.

Bren McInerney

Race Equality Observatory

Bren McInerney provided an update on behalf of the NHS Race and Health Observatory, explaining that although he works closely with the organisation through its Stakeholder Engagement Group, he was speaking from his role supporting engagement rather than as an NHS employee. He began by outlining the Observatory’s purpose, which is to identify, understand and help reduce ethnic inequalities across health and social care through research, evidence and partnership working.

Bren highlighted that the Observatory has now produced a growing body of evidence to support NHS organisations in tackling inequalities and emphasised that this work must ultimately lead to practical improvements in services rather than simply producing reports. He also noted that the Observatory’s current funding arrangement is due for renewal in 2027, making it increasingly important to demonstrate the value and impact of its work across the NHS. The presentation encouraged attendees to remain engaged with the Observatory’s programmes and continue sharing lived experience to strengthen the evidence base for future policy and service improvement.

Bren also highlighted several recent initiatives designed to strengthen collaboration between the NHS and local communities. These included the publication of the Trauma-Informed Care and Racialised Communities Report, which explores how trauma-informed approaches can better respond to the experiences of people affected by racism and discrimination. He also described the Observatory’s Small Grants Programme, which has supported community-led projects across England, and introduced a new Community Participation and Co-production Resource developed in partnership with the Race Equality Foundation. This resource aims to help NHS organisations and Integrated Care Boards build stronger relationships with communities, improve meaningful involvement in decision-making and ensure that local knowledge helps shape healthcare services. Bren concluded by encouraging carers, voluntary organisations and community leaders to make use of these resources, share them widely and continue influencing the national conversation on race equality within health services.

National Ethnic mental health Carer Forum : May Update 2026

Blog by Ethnic Mental Health Carer forum Chair – Matthew McKenzie

The May 2026 Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum brought together carers, researchers, clinicians, community leaders, and representatives from mental health organisations across England. Although attendance was smaller than usual, the discussion was rich, honest, and highly informative, covering Mental Health Act reform, carers’ experiences, service inequalities, innovative approaches to care, and new research opportunities.

For those who were unable to attend, this blog provides a comprehensive overview of the meeting, including key presentations, audience questions, responses from speakers, and useful resources shared during the session.

Opening Remarks

As the chair, I welcomed attendees and outlined the agenda. The meeting focused on following:

  • Mental Health Act research and reform
  • Carers’ experiences supporting loved ones through detention
  • Findings from a major East Sussex carers research project
  • Resources for carers under the Mental Health Act
  • Electronic Health Records and future developments
  • Wider discussions on racial trauma, inequalities, and service improvement

The meeting also provided opportunities for networking, sharing lived experiences, and highlighting innovative projects happening across the country.

Research Study: Supporting a Loved One Through Mental Health Detention

Dr Maeve Conneely from University College London opened the meeting with a presentation on a new research study exploring the experiences of people who have been assessed or detained under the Mental Health Act, as well as the experiences of family members and carers who supported them through that process. The study has been commissioned as part of the wider programme of Mental Health Act reform and aims to understand how the current “Nearest Relative” provisions operate in practice before changes are introduced under the new legislation.

Dr Conneely explained that researchers are particularly interested in hearing from carers who were involved in supporting a loved one but who were not formally recognised as the “Nearest Relative” under the existing legal framework. She highlighted that these experiences are especially important because they can reveal where carers have been excluded from decision-making, denied access to information, or prevented from contributing to assessments despite playing a significant role in supporting the individual concerned. The study is open to anyone aged 16 or over who has direct experience of Mental Health Act assessments, detentions, Community Treatment Orders, holding powers, or related interventions, whether as a patient or as a supporter.

The research is linked to ongoing reforms of the Mental Health Act and seeks to understand how the “Nearest Relative” provisions currently operate before changes are implemented.

Who Can Take Part?

The study is looking for:

  • People who have been detained under the Mental Health Act
  • Family members and carers who supported someone during detention or assessment
  • Individuals who should have been involved as a nearest relative but were not
  • Anyone aged 16 or over with relevant experience

Interviews are conducted online and participants receive a £30 shopping voucher as a thank-you for their time.

Key Question from Participants

Q: Does the study include situations where someone should have been involved but wasn’t?

Response: Yes. Researchers are particularly interested in understanding experiences where carers or family members were excluded from decision-making processes despite playing a significant caring role.

Another Important Question

Q: Do carers need permission from the person who was detained before participating?

Response: No. Carers are sharing their own experiences and therefore only need to provide their own consent.

Discussion Themes

Participants highlighted:

  • Long-standing inequalities affecting Black communities under the Mental Health Act.
  • The overuse of psychiatric labels without sufficient exploration of trauma.
  • The need to understand why some individuals receive significantly different experiences of care, including access to private mental health facilities.
  • Concerns about trust in mental health services and the lasting impact of poor experiences across generations.

Several carers committed to taking part in the study to ensure lived experience informs future policy.

East Sussex Carers Research Project: What Carers Told Us

Age Angiolini presented findings from a year-long carers-led research project examining the experiences of family carers supporting people with serious mental illness across East Sussex. The study was developed in response to repeated concerns raised by carers at local support meetings and sought to capture their experiences of interacting with mental health services provided by the Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust (SPFT).

Although the research received 71 responses, representing only a proportion of the carers population in the region, the findings revealed a striking consistency in the challenges carers face. The survey explored themes including carers’ involvement in care planning, communication with services, consent and confidentiality, quality of care, crisis support, and priorities for improvement. Among the most significant findings were that 72% of carers reported being only sometimes involved or not involved at all in their loved one’s care, 73% felt services relied too heavily on carers, and 72% said they regularly had to advocate to secure appropriate support. The research concluded that many carers feel undervalued, excluded from decision-making, and left carrying significant responsibilities without adequate recognition or support.

The study gathered responses from carers supporting people with:

  • Schizophrenia
  • Bipolar disorder
  • ADHD
  • Autism
  • Complex neurodiverse conditions

Although the sample size was relatively modest, the findings revealed significant and consistent concerns.

Key Findings from the report

Carers Feel Excluded

  • 72% reported being only sometimes involved or not involved at all.
  • 73% felt services relied too heavily on carers.
  • 72% said they had to advocate strongly to secure appropriate care.

Communication Failures

Participants reported poor communication between:

  • Mental health services
  • Assessment teams
  • Social services
  • Mental health liaison teams

Many carers described communications as inconsistent, unclear, and difficult to navigate.

Consent and Confidentiality

A recurring concern was that confidentiality procedures are often applied rigidly, preventing carers from sharing vital information during crises.

Carers argued that this can actively undermine effective care.

Quality of Care Concerns

The research found:

  • 90% reported insufficient care.
  • Significant concerns around continuity of care.
  • A strong desire for dedicated care coordinators.
  • Widespread frustration with crisis services.

Crisis Support is Not Working

Many carers reported that:

  • NHS 111 is often inadequate for mental health crises.
  • A&E is frequently unsuitable for people experiencing mental distress.
  • Services remain reactive rather than preventative.

Calls for Change

Recommendations included:

  • Better crisis pathways
  • Improved coordination between services
  • More trauma-informed approaches
  • Greater therapeutic support
  • Increased family involvement
  • Better support for neurodiverse individuals

The presentation sparked considerable discussion, with many attendees noting that the findings reflected experiences they had encountered for years.

Carers Speak Out: Frustration, Trauma and the Need for Change

One of the most powerful aspects of the meeting was hearing directly from carers.

Several participants reflected on decades of involvement with mental health services and expressed concern that despite repeated reviews, consultations, and reforms, many of the same issues continue to persist.

Common themes included:

  • Institutional racism
  • Poor communication
  • Exclusion of carers
  • Over-medicalisation
  • Lack of trauma-informed care
  • Inadequate support during crises

A number of attendees emphasised that families often become de facto care coordinators, managing appointments, services, medications, and crises while receiving little support themselves.

One participant observed:

“They plan, medicate and treat. We care. Our worlds don’t meet.”

Others highlighted the impact of racial trauma and the way mental health services can fail to recognise the cultural context of distress.

Open Dialogue: A Different Way Forward?

Ren Reins introduced the concept of Open Dialogue, an internationally recognised approach to mental health care that focuses on relationships, networks, and collaborative conversations.

Open Dialogue aims to:

  • Bring families and professionals together
  • Reduce fragmentation between services
  • Focus on lived experience
  • Build trust
  • Improve recovery outcomes

Ren explained that major NHS-funded trials are underway and encouraged carers to learn more about the approach.

The discussion generated significant interest, particularly from attendees looking for alternatives to traditional medical models of care.

Nearest Relative Resources Project

Professor Judy Laing from the University of Bristol provided an update on an innovative project designed to support family members and carers who hold, or may hold, responsibilities under the Mental Health Act’s “Nearest Relative” provisions. Drawing on previous research with carers and mental health professionals, Professor Laing explained that many family members who find themselves in the Nearest Relative role often receive little information, guidance, or emotional support despite carrying significant legal responsibilities. In response, her team secured funding to develop a free, co-produced online resource that helps carers understand their rights, responsibilities, and options when supporting a loved one through mental health assessment, detention, and treatment.

Developed in partnership with carers, family members, mental health professionals, and organisations including Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, and Carers Trust, the website provides practical information, downloadable tools, guidance for conversations with professionals, and resources to help carers look after their own wellbeing. Professor Laing stressed that the project has been shaped directly by the experiences of those who have undertaken the role themselves, ensuring that the guidance reflects the realities and challenges carers face in practice rather than simply explaining legal processes.

The project emerged from research identifying significant gaps in information and support for people carrying out the “Nearest Relative” role.

What Has Been Developed?

The project has created a free online resource containing:

  • Information about legal rights
  • Guidance on conversations with professionals
  • Practical tools for meetings
  • Support for carers’ wellbeing
  • Resources explaining upcoming legal changes

The materials have been co-produced with carers and family members.

Questions Raised

How are diverse communities included?

Participants asked how the project ensures equity and accessibility.

Professor Laing explained that:

  • People from ethnic minority backgrounds have contributed to development.
  • Resources are being improved to increase accessibility.
  • Additional funding is supporting work around inclusion and accessibility.
  • Translation and alternative formats are being explored.

How is the project promoted?

Discussion focused on ensuring communities are aware of available support rather than resources existing only online.

Professor Laing outlined efforts involving:

  • Mind
  • Carers Trust
  • Mental health services
  • Local media
  • Carer forums

How will the new Nominated Person role protect carers who have traditionally been involved in supporting a loved one?

Several participants expressed concern that replacing the Nearest Relative role could unintentionally weaken the involvement of family members who have historically provided substantial support during periods of mental ill-health. Questions were raised about situations where a person may choose someone other than their primary carer to act as their Nominated Person, potentially reducing carers’ ability to access information or participate in key decisions. Professor Laing acknowledged that these concerns have been raised by many carers and explained that the practical details of how the new system will operate are still being developed. She stressed the importance of carers contributing their experiences to ensure that future guidance recognises the valuable role families often play in supporting recovery and maintaining continuity of care.

What support is available when professionals fail to recognise or understand carers’ legal rights?

Attendees also discussed the reality that many mental health professionals are not always familiar with the legal powers and rights associated with the Nearest Relative role. Participants described situations where carers were excluded from discussions, not informed of important decisions, or felt unable to challenge professional opinions because they lacked confidence in their understanding of the law. In response, Professor Laing highlighted that one of the main objectives of the Bristol resources project is to bridge this knowledge gap by providing practical tools, suggested questions, and clear explanations of carers’ rights. She noted that the project is also developing resources aimed at professionals themselves, with the goal of increasing awareness and ensuring that carers’ legal rights are better understood and respected across mental health services.

Attendees welcomed the commitment to increasing visibility.

Electronic Health Records and Future Developments

Dr Anna De Simoni, an Academic GP and Associate Professor of Primary Care at Queen Mary University of London, presented an early-stage research proposal focused on how electronic health records could be used to better understand and map the social support networks surrounding people living with multiple long-term health conditions.

Dr De Simoni sought direct feedback from carers to help shape the project before a formal funding application is submitted. She explained that while healthcare professionals can usually identify a patient’s next of kin and household members through existing GP records, they often have very limited understanding of the wider support networks that play a vital role in a person’s wellbeing.

These networks may include family members, neighbours, friends, faith groups, community organisations, carers, and others who provide practical and emotional support. The research aims to explore whether technology and electronic health records can help healthcare professionals better recognise these support systems and use that information to improve care planning, reduce unnecessary hospital admissions, and enhance quality of life for people living with complex health conditions.

The discussion generated considerable interest, particularly regarding:

  • Information sharing
  • Integration across services
  • Support for carers
  • Data protection concerns
  • Improving continuity of care

Several participants expressed enthusiasm about the potential benefits while also raising questions regarding privacy and access to NHS information.

Questions and Answers from Dr Anna De Simoni’s Presentation

Q: What problem is this research trying to solve?
A: Dr De Simoni explained that healthcare professionals often know very little about the wider support network surrounding a patient. While medical records may identify a next of kin or people living in the same household, they rarely capture the full picture of who is actually providing practical, emotional, or day-to-day support. The project aims to better understand these social networks and use that information to improve care planning and patient outcomes.

Q: Who is the research aimed at?
A: The initial focus is on people living with multiple long-term health conditions, including illnesses such as COPD and other complex health needs e.g mental health. The project seeks to understand how stronger recognition of support networks could improve quality of life, reduce hospital admissions, and support people to remain independent for longer.

Q: How would patients contribute information about their support network?
A: The proposal includes the use of a Universal Care Plan through the NHS App. Patients would be able to enter information themselves about what matters to them, who supports them, how they prefer to be treated, and what should happen if their health deteriorates. This information could then be viewed and updated by relevant healthcare professionals.

Q: What role could carers play within the proposed system?
A: Participants highlighted that carers often provide the majority of practical support but are frequently invisible within healthcare systems. The proposed approach could make carers more visible by helping professionals understand who is involved in supporting a patient and what role they play in maintaining wellbeing and independence.

Q: How will patient confidentiality and data protection be managed?
A: Concerns were raised about privacy and the security of NHS data. Dr De Simoni explained that information governance, GDPR compliance, and data protection would be central to the project. Specialists in privacy and information governance would be involved to ensure that any information collected is handled safely, appropriately, and with proper consent.

Key Discussion: Why Are Carers Still Fighting the Same Battles?

A recurring theme throughout the meeting was the sense that many challenges identified today are the same challenges carers raised ten or twenty years ago.

Questions included:

  • Why are services still fragmented?
  • Why do carers continue to feel excluded?
  • Why are communication problems so persistent?
  • Why is trauma often overlooked?
  • Why do inequalities remain entrenched?

Participants reflected on whether the issue is primarily one of resources, leadership, service design, or culture.

Many agreed that meaningful change requires carers to remain actively involved in shaping policy and service delivery.

Resources and Links Shared During the Meeting

Mental Health Act Research Study

Email:
nrmha@ucl.ac.uk

Eligibility:
People aged 16+ who have experience supporting someone assessed or detained under the Mental Health Act.

Nearest Relative Resources Website

Welcome to the resources

Nearest Relative Resources Impact Report

https://bpb-eu-w2.wpmucdn.com/blogs.bristol.ac.uk/dist/a/1212/files/2026/05/2026-05-Nearest-Relatives-Resources-impact-report.pdf

POPs Facebook Group

https://www.facebook.com/groups/POPSUnitedKingdom

A carers support group recommended during discussion as a source of peer support and shared experience.

Final Reflections

The May 2026 Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum highlighted both the challenges carers continue to face and the determination across the sector to improve outcomes.

From Mental Health Act reform and carers’ rights to innovative approaches such as Open Dialogue, the meeting demonstrated the importance of bringing together lived experience, research, policy, and practice.

Several speakers reminded attendees that change often begins with carers sharing their stories, participating in research, challenging poor practice, and helping shape future services.

The forum remains an important space where those voices can be heard.

Are You a Carer? Help Improve Care Under the Mental Health Act

Post shared by Matthew McKenzie

When someone you care about experiences a mental health crisis, the system needs to work quickly, safely and compassionately. But for many families and carers, the reality can involve delays, uncertainty, and distress especially when assessments or admissions happen under the Mental Health Act.

Now, there is a meaningful opportunity for carers to use their lived experience to shape research that aims to improve this care.

The importance of the Research

In times of crisis, timely support can prevent someone from becoming more unwell or needing more restrictive interventions later. Researchers at King’s College London want to better understand:

  • Experiences of delays in Mental Health Act assessments
  • What happens during admissions to hospital
  • How care pathways could be made safer and more responsive

Crucially, they want carers and service users at the heart of this work.

A Paid Opportunity to Share Your Expertise

Family members and carers of young people or adults who have received care under the Mental Health Act are warmly invited to join a Lived Experience Advisory Board.

As a carer, your insight is invaluable. You will help:

  • Shape the direction of the research
  • Share your views on how care could be improved
  • Ensure the work reflects real-life experiences

Meetings will take place both online and in person (London), making it accessible to a wide range of participants.

Participants will receive £27.50 per hour (plus expenses) in recognition of their time and expertise.

Who Can Get Involved?

The research team would like to hear from:

  • Adults aged 18+ with experience of detention under the Mental Health Act
  • Family members and carers of young people or adults with experience of care under the Mental Health Act

If you have supported someone through assessment, admission, or crisis care, your perspective could directly influence how future services are designed and delivered.

Be Part of Making Care Safer

This work is funded by the Better Health & Care Hub at King’s College London and is focused on improving safety and outcomes for people in crisis.

Your lived experience can help ensure future families face fewer delays, clearer communication, and safer care pathways.

To get involved or find out more, visit:
tinyurl.com/MHAcarepathways

If you have any questions, you can contact Phoebe at:
phoebe.averill@kcl.ac.uk

Ethnic mental health Carer Forum : October Update 2025

By Matthew McKenzie, Facilitator, National Ethnic Mental Health Carer Forum

Introduction: A Forum that Connects and Challenges

As the facilitator of the National Ethnic Mental Health Carer Forum, I never take for granted how special these sessions are. Each month, carers, professionals, and researchers from all over the UK log in to share knowledge, raise awareness, and push for change in how mental health services understand and support ethnic minority communities.

Our October 2025 session was a powerful one. Falling on the last day of Black History Month, it brought together crucial themes on race equality, co-production, research, and carer visibility.

We heard from two key areas shaping mental health equity right now:

  • The OSMOSIS Project, led by Dr. Jacqueline Sin and Sharon Galliford, focusing on developing social care-based support for carers of people with psychosis.
  • The Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF), presented by Aboobaker Bhana, Equality and Involvement Manager for South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.
Continue reading →

Calling All Carers: Get Involved with the OSMOSIS Research Project

Blog by Matthew McKenzie – Carer activist

As someone who’s been advocating for carers for years through A Caring Mind, I know how important it is that carers’ experiences influence the way support systems are built. The OSMOSIS project offers a real chance to help improve understanding and services for those of us supporting loved ones with severe mental health conditions.

If you are caring for someone living with psychosis, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder, here’s an opportunity to make your voice heard.

Continue reading →

Triangle of Care Community Meeting: July 2025 update

On 21st of July 2025, carers, professionals, and stakeholders from across the UK gathered virtually for the latest Triangle of Care (ToC) Community Meeting. Chaired by Matthew McKenzie, this session was packed with insight, action points, and open dialogue. Whether you were new to the group or a long-time contributor, there was something valuable for everyone.

This meeting was particularly significant as it marked a turning point for carer participation. The formal recognition of the community group in ToC’s national governance structure. It affirmed that carer lived experience should not be sidelined, and that carers must continue to shape mental health services from the inside out.

If you weren’t able to attend, this blog will bring you up to speed. As the ToC community group covered a wide range of topics, from updates on national strategy and governance, to inclusive language, carer-led training, and advocacy for better research funding. At the heart of it all was a single message: when carers unite, systems must listen.

Official Recognition and Governance Progress

We are delighted to announce that the Triangle of Care Community Group is now formally integrated into the Triangle of Care governance structure. This gives the group a direct route to influence national decisions. The community will now sit alongside steering and regional groups in shaping policy, reviewing practices, and helping determine what carer inclusion should look like across all participating trusts.

What this means practically is improved alignment and visibility. For years, many carers and grassroots contributors have worked tirelessly behind the scenes, often without formal platforms. This change allows community voices to be heard before decisions are made not just consulted afterwards. Matthew described this shift as “a recognition of the years of unpaid care, leadership, and advocacy carers have always provided.”

It also means that our meetings will align with national timelines and decisions, ensuring a timely flow of updates between local groups, regional networks, and national forums. This is a pivotal opportunity to embed carers more meaningfully into NHS structures and accountability.

New Mailing List & Sign-Up System

Mary Patel from Carers Trust announced the launch of a new centralised mailing list for Triangle of Care community members. This will make sure everyone receives meeting invites, resources, and updates reliably. Participants will soon be asked to complete a Microsoft sign-up form, which will securely transfer contact details onto the Carers Trust system for ongoing communications.

The form will include a few demographic questions to help build a picture of the diversity within the ToC community. These questions are entirely optional but are designed to help Carers Trust identify who is engaging, and where gaps might exist—ensuring outreach strategies reflect real needs. For example, better regional balance, or increased visibility for underrepresented carer groups.

There was also discussion about moving from Zoom to Microsoft Teams for future meetings. Teams offers benefits like attendance tracking, secure file sharing, and easier scheduling. However, this won’t be a forced change, Matthew and Mary invited feedback, emphasising that any transition would be made collaboratively with community input.

Stronger Carer Involvement

Carer involvement was at the heart of the meeting. Matthew shared a passionate update on the need for carers particularly those from minority backgrounds or marginalised communities to step forward and engage in all aspects of the Triangle of Care. This includes involvement in peer reviews, shaping surveys, and suggesting new training or webinar content that reflects their lived experience.

The community was reminded that leading change doesn’t require a title or formal position. Sharing your story, participating in surveys, or simply raising your hand during a meeting is a form of leadership. Matthew emphasised that carers hold the kind of insight that no policy or textbook can replicate. As he put it, “This community is only as strong as the carers who show up.”

Peer reviewing was especially encouraged. Carers can play a vital role in reviewing mental health trust practices and making sure those trusts aren’t just ticking boxes but are genuinely improving the carer experience. Anyone interested in joining these review panels was invited to contact Mary Patel directly. The experience is meaningful and empowering and it places carers right where they should be: in positions of influence.

CQC Expectations and Carer Experiences

A powerful part of the meeting focused on the role of the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and how effectively it monitors carer inclusion in mental health services. Several carers and professionals shared their experiences some positive, others deeply concerning about how the CQC engages (or fails to engage) with carers during inspections.

A senior experience lead from an acute trust, explained that when CQC inspectors review services, they typically look for a clear carers policy, systems for identifying and supporting carers, and evidence of staff training. However, the level of scrutiny and the quality of carer-related feedback can vary significantly between inspections. The experience lead noted that while policy is important, it’s the systems around those policies that really matter, things like whether staff actually follow them, and whether carers know where to go for help.

Carers in the meeting shared contrasting experiences. A carer described a disappointing CQC visit where the inspector seemed dismissive, rushed, and uninformed about carers’ rights. Her feedback about lack of communication and exclusion was barely acknowledged, leaving her feeling invalidated. In contrast, Another carer spoke of a more recent inspection where the CQC officer seemed empathetic, asked thoughtful questions, and even disclosed their own possible caring experience. These differing accounts highlighted a common theme: carers’ confidence in the CQC is mixed, and their approach to carers can sometimes feel inconsistent.

There was strong consensus that CQC needs better training in carer engagement and not just understanding legal frameworks like the Care Act 2014, but also how to meaningfully include carers in service reviews. Kelvin added that cultural competence should also be part of the equation, noting that carers from minority backgrounds are too often left out of consultations. Matthew urged carers not to wait for trusts to invite them to speak during inspections ask to be involved, request to meet inspectors, and use carers’ councils or governors to raise visibility. It was clear from this session that carers want the CQC to be more than a compliance body, they want it to be a true advocate for accountability and equity in care.

Confidentiality Roadshow by Donna Bradford

A standout session was led by Donna Bradford, who presented her team’s work on the Confidentiality Roadshow a training programme developed by Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust. Designed to upskill staff on consent, confidentiality, and communication, the roadshow is tailored around carer inclusion and co-produced with the Carers Council.

The training helps staff understand not only what they can share legally, but also how to navigate nuanced emotional and ethical situations with carers. Donna reminded attendees that sharing basic, non-confidential information, such as medication side effects, is not only lawful but essential. “If you can Google it, you can say it,” she noted, driving home the importance of clarity over confusion.

Over 550 staff have already received the training, with 100% reporting that it improved their confidence. The programme includes real-life carer scenarios, emotional video testimonials, and interactive quizzes to help reinforce learning.

Beyond the training content itself, what makes the Confidentiality Roadshow so impactful is its co-production with carers. Donna highlighted that every scenario used in the sessions came from real-life examples shared by carers and families. This ensures the training isn’t theoretical so it’s grounded in lived experience. The emotional and practical realities of caring for someone with mental health needs are at the heart of the learning, helping staff understand why clear, compassionate communication is so essential. The training also underscores the importance of listening to carers, not just as bystanders but as active contributors to a person’s care journey.

Several attendees raised the idea of incorporating this training into broader staff induction and continuing professional development programmes. Others asked about adapting it for use in different trust settings, such as acute hospitals or community services. Donna encouraged trusts to reach out if they’d like to adopt or customise the resource. The message was clear: confidentiality shouldn’t be a barrier, it should be a bridge, and with the right training and tools, staff can navigate those conversations with confidence, legality, and humanity.

Mental Health Research Petition

Irene Harris spoke passionately about a new parliamentary petition calling for improved research funding into serious mental illnesses (SMIs) like psychosis. The petition aims to shine a spotlight on how outdated treatments and under-researched conditions continue to place carers and their loved ones in difficult, often heartbreaking positions.

Here is the video about Psychosis medication and its impact by the Stockport carers forum.

She shared how mental health medications for SMIs haven’t evolved as rapidly as physical health treatments, and how this results in long-term side effects and compromised quality of life. Research is desperately needed, not only to improve diagnosis and treatment, but also to create support structures that ease the burden on unpaid carers.

Irene asked attendees to sign and circulate the petition widely, with a goal of hitting 10,000 signatures by November 15th.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/725846

She also announced plans to launch new social media channels to raise awareness. This initiative is about more than funding it’s about giving carers and service users a louder voice in national healthcare priorities.

For more details feel free to visit https://www.mhcarersgroupstockport.co.uk

or contact Irene on irene@mhcarersgroupstockport.co.uk

Language, Inclusivity, PCREF & the ‘Global Majority’ Debate

Language and inclusivity were major themes of the meeting, particularly around the term “global majority.” Some attendees expressed concern that the phrase could be divisive or misinterpreted, particularly by politically sensitive audiences or media outlets. A carer shared a personal anecdote illustrating how words can carry unintended consequences.

Others responded by highlighting the intention behind the term to emphasise that those historically described as “minorities” are, in fact, the global majority in population terms. They called for continued use of the phrase in contexts that promote empowerment, equity, and lived experience.

The discussion didn’t produce a consensus, but it modelled what respectful disagreement and co-learning should look like. Matthew reinforced that ToC should be a space for constructive dialogue, not debate for its own sake. Ultimately, we are united in our aim to ensure no carer is left behind regardless of background, heritage, or identity.

Next Steps & Community Actions

The session wrapped up with a summary of action points and responsibilities. Carers Trust will soon circulate the new mailing list sign-up form. Matthew will share updated meeting dates for 2026 once confirmed, and he will continue to distribute posters for the upcoming National Ethnic Carers Group, taking place on the last Friday of each month.

There will be support the rollout of the Confidentiality Roadshow materials and follow up with those interested in joining peer review panels. A reminder was issued for everyone to contribute to current surveys, share their feedback, and suggest future topics for community meetings.

Finally, participants were encouraged to stay connected beyond the meetings. Whether through peer networks, local carers centres, or email updates, the message was clear: carers must stay visible, vocal, and valued. You are the change-makers, and this group is your platform.

Final Thoughts: “Carers Are Not Just a Cog in the Wheel”

Matthew ended the session with a rallying call to action: “We’re not just a cog in the wheel as we are the energy behind it.” His words served as a reminder that carers are not passive recipients of services. They are drivers of quality, advocates for change, and protectors of dignity in the mental health system.

He also reminded everyone that systems often change slowly, but they do change when people keep showing up, keep speaking up, and keep sharing their truths. “This isn’t just about the Triangle of Care,” he said. “It’s about reshaping the whole narrative around mental health and care.”

If you missed the meeting and would like to receive the slides, recordings, or further resources, feel free to contact Matthew McKenzie directly:
📧 mmckenzie@carers.org

Thanks to to all who attended, contributed, and championed carers’ voices. The next meeting should in September where we hope to see you there.

Triangle of Care Community group update May 2025

Here is a brief update of the Triangle of Care Community group for the month of May 2025. The Triangle of Care Community group is a collaborative forum that champions the voices of unpaid carers in mental health services. The group works in partnership with service users, carers, and professionals to embed the principles of the Triangle of Care, promoting shared decision-making, improved communication, and recognition of carers as equal partners in care.

Our most recent meeting brought together carers, NHS professionals, researchers, and advocates from across the UK, including representatives from Kent, Bristol, Lewisham, East Sussex, and Hertfordshire. The atmosphere was one of mutual respect, knowledge-sharing, and a shared drive to improve the experience of care for carers and their loved ones.

The meeting covered updates on Triangle of Care developments, including recent accreditations and ongoing pilots to adapt the model for various healthcare and social settings. Presentations were given on research studies related to mental health care, including pharmacist prescribers’ roles and experiences of underserved older male carers. The group also discussed campaigns for increased research funding in serious mental illnesses and initiatives to support carers, such as Carers Roadshows.

Triangle of Care Expansion Updates

Mary Patel one of the Triangle of Care leads, provided an update on Triangle of Care developments and accreditations. Several healthcare providers have recently gained Star awards. There are ongoing pilots to adapt Triangle of Care for social care settings and to incorporate criteria for better support of racially marginalized carers. Mary announced that the Triangle of Care community group will be formally brought on board with Carers Trust, with Matthew as the inaugural chair for a 2-year term. They are looking to bring on co-chairs to support Matthew in his role.

Triangle of Care Implementation Updates

The group discusses recent achievements in implementing the Triangle of Care model across various healthcare organizations. Gabrielle Richards who leads on carers at South London & Maudsley reported that her trust successfully completed their Star 2 accreditation assessment for community services.

Matthew McKenzie shared a video poem he created about the Triangle of Care as it was shown during the peer review at South London & Maudsley.

Kelvin thanked Gabrielle for her contributions as she prepares to leave her role. Louise from Kent and Medway NHS Trust reported they maintained their second star accreditation and have implemented new processes to ensure carer considerations are included in policy development.

https://www.kmpt.nhs.uk/carers/triangle-of-care/

Mental Health Care Research Study

Richard introduced Bashir Al Saeed, a PhD student from the University of Manchester, to present their research study on the experiences of people with mental illness and their carers when receiving care from pharmacist prescribers in the community.

Bashir explains that the study aims to understand and improve care provided by pharmacist prescribers for people with mental illnesses in community-based settings. Participants will be asked to take part in a one-hour interview and will receive £30 as compensation.

The study is seeking individuals aged 18 or older with mental illnesses or their unpaid carers who have received care from pharmacist prescribers in the UK. A discussion follows about the inclusion criteria, particularly regarding the requirement for fluency in English, with concerns raised about potential issues against non-English speakers

Mental Health Research Campaign Initiative

The group discussed a campaign for better research into long-term serious mental illness in working-age people. Irene explained that they have been working on this campaign for a year, collaborating with experts from Oxford and the Welcome Trust.

The campaign aims to gather signatures and includes a short video. Irene emphasizes the importance of this initiative, as many in their group have loved ones who have been ill since their teens and are now in their thirties and forties.

You can find out more about the campaign from the link below.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/725846

Advocating for Psychosis Research Funding

The discussion focuses on a petition to increase government funding for research into psychosis, including its diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Irene passionately advocates for more effective medications with fewer side effects, emphasizing the need for better understanding of the underlying causes of psychosis. A carer shared personal experiences of her son’s struggles with mental illness and medication side effects. The group discusses the importance of signing and sharing the petition to gain government support for accelerated research in this area.

Pharmacist Prescribing for Mental Health

The discussion focuses on pharmacists prescribing for mental health conditions. Richard explains that some pharmacists, especially those with specialized training, are caring for people with mental illnesses in various settings. However, the extent of their involvement in prescribing and monitoring is still unclear. A carer expressed concern about pharmacists prescribing for severe conditions like bipolar disorder without extensive training. The group discusses the need for proper qualifications and access to medical records. Richard emphasizes that the study aims to understand and improve the care provided by pharmacist prescribers in community services.

Carers Roadshows: Community Support Network

Trevor a carer involved at Notts NHS described his Carers Roadshows, which he has been organizing since 2013. These free events bring together various organizations dealing with health, mental health, and social care to provide information and support to carers and patients.

Trevor emphasizes the importance of communication in triangular care and sees the roadshows as an effective, sustainable tool for fostering connections between different organizations and the community. He expresses his ambition to expand the roadshows across the country, particularly in London boroughs, and offers to help others create their own roadshows using his four-step guide.

Older Male Carers Advisory Group

Steve Owen from the University of Hertfordshire presents his research project on exploring the experiences of underserved older male carers. The project aims to set up an advisory group of 7-10 older men, particularly from minority ethnic groups, same-sex relationships, and rural/coastal areas, to meet from June to December 2025.

The research group will discuss the benefits and challenges of caring, gender dynamics, and access to support. The project’s goals are to develop a grant proposal for further research and improve advisory group guidelines. Steve is still recruiting participants and welcomes help in sharing information about the project.

Final Reflections

The session highlighted both the progress and the gaps still faced by carers, particularly around communication, access to services, and recognition. The Triangle of Care model continues to be a vital tool in bridging these gaps, but it is the commitment of carers and professionals alike that drives real change.

“Thank you for another great meeting Matthew and everyone.” – Linda Thomas
“These meetings have been such a resource for us all.” – Gabrielle Richards
“Powerful video, powerful voices. Thank you everyone.” – Claire Wood

I’m proud to be involved and help lead as triangle of care community as Chair and look forward to building our impact together. If you’re interested in co-chairing or getting more involved, please reach out let’s continue to shape mental health care that values and includes carers at every level.

Interview with Karen Machin – Carer Activism series

Welcome back to the fourth carer activism interview video. These interviews discuss with experts of lived carer experience on the focus for unpaid carers. Most carer interviews are based on those caring for someone with mental illness, however in future that might change to include other caring experiences.

The fourth interview was with Karen Machin who is a researcher and carer peer supporter. She raises awareness of the importance of co-production, peer support and research.

You can view Karen’s research in the link below.

Karen Machin Research list

She has a focus on both carer and service user empowered experiences. You can watch the interview in the video below.