As I continue developing my poetry collection Unpaid, Unseen and Yet Unbroken: Poetry about Ethnic Mental Health Carers, I wanted to share another poem from the collection called Fear Has Roots.
The poem explores something I feel mental health services need to understand more deeply: mistrust does not always begin with the person standing in front of you.
Sometimes it has a history.
A carer may have experienced years of being dismissed, misunderstood or having their concerns minimised. They may have watched other carers from their community struggle to be heard. Experiences of discrimination can also travel through families and communities, influencing how safe people feel when approaching services.
By Matthew McKenzie, Co-Facilitator – South West London Mental Health Carers Forum
Our September forum brought carers together with Nisha from the South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust Recovery College.
We explored the courses available to carers, how to join them, and a question that matters well beyond the college: what happens when a carer still needs support after a time-limited service ends?
On Monday 24 August, I facilitated another meeting of the South London Mental Health Carers Forum. The forum brings together unpaid carers and carer representatives from Lewisham, Lambeth, Southwark and Croydon, giving people a space to share experiences, learn about their rights and influence the development of local mental health services.
We welcomed carers with many different experiences, including parents supporting adult children with serious mental illness, autism and substance misuse, as well as people involved in advocacy, peer support, staff training and service development. Some members had been navigating the mental health system for many years, while others were newer to caring and looking for guidance.
By Matthew McKenzie – Carers UK ambassador / Chair of National ethnic mental health carers forum
Are you a Black unpaid carer supporting a family member with a learning disability (sometimes referred to as an intellectual disability) who has experienced mental health difficulties?
Have you ever tried to access mental health support on their behalf? This could include contacting services such as Community Learning Disability Teams, CAMHS, Community Mental Health Teams, Talking Therapies or other mental health services.
If so, your experiences matter.
Lauren Heath, a second-year Trainee Clinical Psychologist at the University of Southampton, is conducting doctoral research exploring the experiences of Black carers who have accessed, or attempted to access, mental health support for a family member with a diagnosed learning disability.
We know that Black unpaid carers often face additional challenges when trying to navigate health and social care systems. Too often, their experiences are unheard or underrepresented in research. This study aims to better understand those experiences and help inform more culturally sensitive and inclusive services in the future.
You may be eligible to take part if you:
Identify as Black.
Have significant caring responsibilities for a family member with a diagnosed learning disability (or intellectual disability).
Have accessed, or attempted to access, mental health services on their behalf.
Taking part will involve:
A confidential interview lasting approximately 1.5 hours via Microsoft Teams.
Your responses will be anonymised once all interviews have been completed.
You will receive a voucher to thank you for your time and contribution.
Lauren previously worked within Community Learning Disability Teams across the UK and became interested in understanding why so few Black families appeared to be accessing these services. Her doctoral research hopes to amplify the voices of Black carers and contribute towards improving culturally sensitive support for families in the future.
If you think this research may apply to you, or someone you know, please consider taking part or sharing this opportunity within your networks.
To find out if you are eligible, you can complete the short questionnaire or contact Lauren directly at L.Heath@soton.ac.uk.
Your lived experience could help shape future services for Black families and carers.
By Matthew McKenzie – Triangle of Care – Community group chair
Putting Carers at the Centre of Care
The latest Triangle of Care Community Group brought together carers, professionals and partner organisations from across England to share learning, celebrate progress and identify where further improvements are needed. The meeting highlighted the growing influence of the Triangle of Care across mental health and acute services, whilst reinforcing that there is still much work to do to ensure carers are consistently recognised, valued and supported.
One of the most powerful aspects of the meeting was hearing directly from carers about their experiences. Whilst many spoke positively about the progress that has been made over recent years, there was a shared view that carer involvement remains inconsistent across services.
On Wednesday 3 June 2026, colleagues from all eight London Mental Health Trusts, alongside carers, service users, community organisations, researchers, regulators and system leaders, gathered at ISH Venues in central London for the Pan London Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) Conference.
Chaired by Erica deti from North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT), the conference provided a unique opportunity to showcase progress, share learning and strengthen London’s collective commitment to race equity within mental health services.
Blog by Ethnic Mental Health Carer forum Chair – Matthew McKenzie
The May 2026 Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum brought together carers, researchers, clinicians, community leaders, and representatives from mental health organisations across England. Although attendance was smaller than usual, the discussion was rich, honest, and highly informative, covering Mental Health Act reform, carers’ experiences, service inequalities, innovative approaches to care, and new research opportunities.
For those who were unable to attend, this blog provides a comprehensive overview of the meeting, including key presentations, audience questions, responses from speakers, and useful resources shared during the session.
Opening Remarks
As the chair, I welcomed attendees and outlined the agenda. The meeting focused on following:
Mental Health Act research and reform
Carers’ experiences supporting loved ones through detention
Findings from a major East Sussex carers research project
Resources for carers under the Mental Health Act
Electronic Health Records and future developments
Wider discussions on racial trauma, inequalities, and service improvement
The meeting also provided opportunities for networking, sharing lived experiences, and highlighting innovative projects happening across the country.
Research Study: Supporting a Loved One Through Mental Health Detention
Dr Maeve Conneely from University College London opened the meeting with a presentation on a new research study exploring the experiences of people who have been assessed or detained under the Mental Health Act, as well as the experiences of family members and carers who supported them through that process. The study has been commissioned as part of the wider programme of Mental Health Act reform and aims to understand how the current “Nearest Relative” provisions operate in practice before changes are introduced under the new legislation.
Dr Conneely explained that researchers are particularly interested in hearing from carers who were involved in supporting a loved one but who were not formally recognised as the “Nearest Relative” under the existing legal framework. She highlighted that these experiences are especially important because they can reveal where carers have been excluded from decision-making, denied access to information, or prevented from contributing to assessments despite playing a significant role in supporting the individual concerned. The study is open to anyone aged 16 or over who has direct experience of Mental Health Act assessments, detentions, Community Treatment Orders, holding powers, or related interventions, whether as a patient or as a supporter.
The research is linked to ongoing reforms of the Mental Health Act and seeks to understand how the “Nearest Relative” provisions currently operate before changes are implemented.
Who Can Take Part?
The study is looking for:
People who have been detained under the Mental Health Act
Family members and carers who supported someone during detention or assessment
Individuals who should have been involved as a nearest relative but were not
Anyone aged 16 or over with relevant experience
Interviews are conducted online and participants receive a £30 shopping voucher as a thank-you for their time.
Key Question from Participants
Q: Does the study include situations where someone should have been involved but wasn’t?
Response: Yes. Researchers are particularly interested in understanding experiences where carers or family members were excluded from decision-making processes despite playing a significant caring role.
Another Important Question
Q: Do carers need permission from the person who was detained before participating?
Response: No. Carers are sharing their own experiences and therefore only need to provide their own consent.
Discussion Themes
Participants highlighted:
Long-standing inequalities affecting Black communities under the Mental Health Act.
The overuse of psychiatric labels without sufficient exploration of trauma.
The need to understand why some individuals receive significantly different experiences of care, including access to private mental health facilities.
Concerns about trust in mental health services and the lasting impact of poor experiences across generations.
Several carers committed to taking part in the study to ensure lived experience informs future policy.
East Sussex Carers Research Project: What Carers Told Us
Age Angiolini presented findings from a year-long carers-led research project examining the experiences of family carers supporting people with serious mental illness across East Sussex. The study was developed in response to repeated concerns raised by carers at local support meetings and sought to capture their experiences of interacting with mental health services provided by the Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust (SPFT).
Although the research received 71 responses, representing only a proportion of the carers population in the region, the findings revealed a striking consistency in the challenges carers face. The survey explored themes including carers’ involvement in care planning, communication with services, consent and confidentiality, quality of care, crisis support, and priorities for improvement. Among the most significant findings were that 72% of carers reported being only sometimes involved or not involved at all in their loved one’s care, 73% felt services relied too heavily on carers, and 72% said they regularly had to advocate to secure appropriate support. The research concluded that many carers feel undervalued, excluded from decision-making, and left carrying significant responsibilities without adequate recognition or support.
The study gathered responses from carers supporting people with:
Schizophrenia
Bipolar disorder
ADHD
Autism
Complex neurodiverse conditions
Although the sample size was relatively modest, the findings revealed significant and consistent concerns.
Key Findings from the report
Carers Feel Excluded
72% reported being only sometimes involved or not involved at all.
73% felt services relied too heavily on carers.
72% said they had to advocate strongly to secure appropriate care.
Communication Failures
Participants reported poor communication between:
Mental health services
Assessment teams
Social services
Mental health liaison teams
Many carers described communications as inconsistent, unclear, and difficult to navigate.
Consent and Confidentiality
A recurring concern was that confidentiality procedures are often applied rigidly, preventing carers from sharing vital information during crises.
Carers argued that this can actively undermine effective care.
Quality of Care Concerns
The research found:
90% reported insufficient care.
Significant concerns around continuity of care.
A strong desire for dedicated care coordinators.
Widespread frustration with crisis services.
Crisis Support is Not Working
Many carers reported that:
NHS 111 is often inadequate for mental health crises.
A&E is frequently unsuitable for people experiencing mental distress.
Services remain reactive rather than preventative.
Calls for Change
Recommendations included:
Better crisis pathways
Improved coordination between services
More trauma-informed approaches
Greater therapeutic support
Increased family involvement
Better support for neurodiverse individuals
The presentation sparked considerable discussion, with many attendees noting that the findings reflected experiences they had encountered for years.
Carers Speak Out: Frustration, Trauma and the Need for Change
One of the most powerful aspects of the meeting was hearing directly from carers.
Several participants reflected on decades of involvement with mental health services and expressed concern that despite repeated reviews, consultations, and reforms, many of the same issues continue to persist.
Common themes included:
Institutional racism
Poor communication
Exclusion of carers
Over-medicalisation
Lack of trauma-informed care
Inadequate support during crises
A number of attendees emphasised that families often become de facto care coordinators, managing appointments, services, medications, and crises while receiving little support themselves.
One participant observed:
“They plan, medicate and treat. We care. Our worlds don’t meet.”
Others highlighted the impact of racial trauma and the way mental health services can fail to recognise the cultural context of distress.
Open Dialogue: A Different Way Forward?
Ren Reins introduced the concept of Open Dialogue, an internationally recognised approach to mental health care that focuses on relationships, networks, and collaborative conversations.
Open Dialogue aims to:
Bring families and professionals together
Reduce fragmentation between services
Focus on lived experience
Build trust
Improve recovery outcomes
Ren explained that major NHS-funded trials are underway and encouraged carers to learn more about the approach.
The discussion generated significant interest, particularly from attendees looking for alternatives to traditional medical models of care.
Nearest Relative Resources Project
Professor Judy Laing from the University of Bristol provided an update on an innovative project designed to support family members and carers who hold, or may hold, responsibilities under the Mental Health Act’s “Nearest Relative” provisions. Drawing on previous research with carers and mental health professionals, Professor Laing explained that many family members who find themselves in the Nearest Relative role often receive little information, guidance, or emotional support despite carrying significant legal responsibilities. In response, her team secured funding to develop a free, co-produced online resource that helps carers understand their rights, responsibilities, and options when supporting a loved one through mental health assessment, detention, and treatment.
Developed in partnership with carers, family members, mental health professionals, and organisations including Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, and Carers Trust, the website provides practical information, downloadable tools, guidance for conversations with professionals, and resources to help carers look after their own wellbeing. Professor Laing stressed that the project has been shaped directly by the experiences of those who have undertaken the role themselves, ensuring that the guidance reflects the realities and challenges carers face in practice rather than simply explaining legal processes.
The project emerged from research identifying significant gaps in information and support for people carrying out the “Nearest Relative” role.
What Has Been Developed?
The project has created a free online resource containing:
Information about legal rights
Guidance on conversations with professionals
Practical tools for meetings
Support for carers’ wellbeing
Resources explaining upcoming legal changes
The materials have been co-produced with carers and family members.
Questions Raised
How are diverse communities included?
Participants asked how the project ensures equity and accessibility.
Professor Laing explained that:
People from ethnic minority backgrounds have contributed to development.
Resources are being improved to increase accessibility.
Additional funding is supporting work around inclusion and accessibility.
Translation and alternative formats are being explored.
How is the project promoted?
Discussion focused on ensuring communities are aware of available support rather than resources existing only online.
Professor Laing outlined efforts involving:
Mind
Carers Trust
Mental health services
Local media
Carer forums
How will the new Nominated Person role protect carers who have traditionally been involved in supporting a loved one?
Several participants expressed concern that replacing the Nearest Relative role could unintentionally weaken the involvement of family members who have historically provided substantial support during periods of mental ill-health. Questions were raised about situations where a person may choose someone other than their primary carer to act as their Nominated Person, potentially reducing carers’ ability to access information or participate in key decisions. Professor Laing acknowledged that these concerns have been raised by many carers and explained that the practical details of how the new system will operate are still being developed. She stressed the importance of carers contributing their experiences to ensure that future guidance recognises the valuable role families often play in supporting recovery and maintaining continuity of care.
What support is available when professionals fail to recognise or understand carers’ legal rights?
Attendees also discussed the reality that many mental health professionals are not always familiar with the legal powers and rights associated with the Nearest Relative role. Participants described situations where carers were excluded from discussions, not informed of important decisions, or felt unable to challenge professional opinions because they lacked confidence in their understanding of the law. In response, Professor Laing highlighted that one of the main objectives of the Bristol resources project is to bridge this knowledge gap by providing practical tools, suggested questions, and clear explanations of carers’ rights. She noted that the project is also developing resources aimed at professionals themselves, with the goal of increasing awareness and ensuring that carers’ legal rights are better understood and respected across mental health services.
Attendees welcomed the commitment to increasing visibility.
Electronic Health Records and Future Developments
Dr Anna De Simoni, an Academic GP and Associate Professor of Primary Care at Queen Mary University of London, presented an early-stage research proposal focused on how electronic health records could be used to better understand and map the social support networks surrounding people living with multiple long-term health conditions.
Dr De Simoni sought direct feedback from carers to help shape the project before a formal funding application is submitted. She explained that while healthcare professionals can usually identify a patient’s next of kin and household members through existing GP records, they often have very limited understanding of the wider support networks that play a vital role in a person’s wellbeing.
These networks may include family members, neighbours, friends, faith groups, community organisations, carers, and others who provide practical and emotional support. The research aims to explore whether technology and electronic health records can help healthcare professionals better recognise these support systems and use that information to improve care planning, reduce unnecessary hospital admissions, and enhance quality of life for people living with complex health conditions.
The discussion generated considerable interest, particularly regarding:
Information sharing
Integration across services
Support for carers
Data protection concerns
Improving continuity of care
Several participants expressed enthusiasm about the potential benefits while also raising questions regarding privacy and access to NHS information.
Questions and Answers from Dr Anna De Simoni’s Presentation
Q: What problem is this research trying to solve? A: Dr De Simoni explained that healthcare professionals often know very little about the wider support network surrounding a patient. While medical records may identify a next of kin or people living in the same household, they rarely capture the full picture of who is actually providing practical, emotional, or day-to-day support. The project aims to better understand these social networks and use that information to improve care planning and patient outcomes.
Q: Who is the research aimed at? A: The initial focus is on people living with multiple long-term health conditions, including illnesses such as COPD and other complex health needs e.g mental health. The project seeks to understand how stronger recognition of support networks could improve quality of life, reduce hospital admissions, and support people to remain independent for longer.
Q: How would patients contribute information about their support network? A: The proposal includes the use of a Universal Care Plan through the NHS App. Patients would be able to enter information themselves about what matters to them, who supports them, how they prefer to be treated, and what should happen if their health deteriorates. This information could then be viewed and updated by relevant healthcare professionals.
Q: What role could carers play within the proposed system? A: Participants highlighted that carers often provide the majority of practical support but are frequently invisible within healthcare systems. The proposed approach could make carers more visible by helping professionals understand who is involved in supporting a patient and what role they play in maintaining wellbeing and independence.
Q: How will patient confidentiality and data protection be managed? A: Concerns were raised about privacy and the security of NHS data. Dr De Simoni explained that information governance, GDPR compliance, and data protection would be central to the project. Specialists in privacy and information governance would be involved to ensure that any information collected is handled safely, appropriately, and with proper consent.
Key Discussion: Why Are Carers Still Fighting the Same Battles?
A recurring theme throughout the meeting was the sense that many challenges identified today are the same challenges carers raised ten or twenty years ago.
Questions included:
Why are services still fragmented?
Why do carers continue to feel excluded?
Why are communication problems so persistent?
Why is trauma often overlooked?
Why do inequalities remain entrenched?
Participants reflected on whether the issue is primarily one of resources, leadership, service design, or culture.
Many agreed that meaningful change requires carers to remain actively involved in shaping policy and service delivery.
A carers support group recommended during discussion as a source of peer support and shared experience.
Final Reflections
The May 2026 Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum highlighted both the challenges carers continue to face and the determination across the sector to improve outcomes.
From Mental Health Act reform and carers’ rights to innovative approaches such as Open Dialogue, the meeting demonstrated the importance of bringing together lived experience, research, policy, and practice.
Several speakers reminded attendees that change often begins with carers sharing their stories, participating in research, challenging poor practice, and helping shape future services.
The forum remains an important space where those voices can be heard.
Update by Matthew McKenzie – Chair of South London Mental Health Carers Forum
The South London Mental Health Carers Group met for the month of May for a wide-ranging and thoughtful discussion covering carers’ experiences, mental health support systems, involvement opportunities, and an important research presentation focused on support networks and long-term care.
The group covers areas of Lewisham, Southwark, Lambeth & Croydon, although Mental Health Carers from outside those areas are welcime to attend
The session brought together carers, advocates, involvement leads, and guest speaker Dr Anna De Simone from Queen Mary University of London. As always, the discussion highlighted both the challenges carers continue to face and the value of shared lived experience and peer support.
Opening Discussions: Challenges in Mental Health Care Systems
The meeting began with carers sharing experiences of navigating mental health services for loved ones with complex needs. There was extensive discussion around:
difficulties accessing appropriate placements,
safeguarding concerns,
discharge planning,
lack of continuity between NHS trusts and local authorities,
and ongoing challenges around funding responsibility between different services.
A recurring issue raised was the pressure on inpatient beds and the concern that discharge decisions can sometimes feel driven more by system pressures than by clinical readiness. Carers spoke openly about the emotional impact of repeatedly having to advocate for vulnerable loved ones while navigating fragmented systems.
There was also discussion around the importance of carers being recognised and included in communication and planning processes. Participants highlighted how carers are often the people most aware of deterioration, risks, or safeguarding concerns, and how vital it is that services engage meaningfully with families and informal supporters where appropriate.
Despite frustrations, carers also acknowledged examples of good practice and supportive professionals within mental health services. Several attendees noted that they had seen gradual improvements in carer involvement and listening exercises within parts of South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM), particularly in Lambeth.
Updates on Carer Involvement and Support Activities
The group received updates from carers and representatives involved in local mental health engagement work and carers’ organisations.
Carers Week Activities
Karen from Carers Hub Lambeth shared details of upcoming Carers Week activities, including:
outreach events,
wellbeing sessions,
information stalls,
and activities for both adult and young carers.
The events aim to provide carers with opportunities for support, networking, practical advice, and wellbeing activities.
There was also discussion around changes and developments within SLAM involvement structures, including:
continuation of family and carers meetings,
changes to involvement leads,
and ongoing reviews of the involvement register.
Attendees reflected positively on the increasing recognition of carers’ voices in some forums and clinical meetings, while acknowledging that there is still much work to do to ensure consistent involvement across all boroughs and services.
Guest Presentation: Mapping Patient Support Networks
The second half of the meeting focused on a presentation from Dr Anna De Simone, GP and Associate Professor of Primary Care at Queen Mary University of London.
Anna introduced a proposed research project exploring how healthcare systems might better understand and map patients’ support networks using electronic health records and social network tools.
The research proposal focuses particularly on patients with long-term conditions such as COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), many of whom also experience multiple additional health conditions and varying levels of social isolation.
The Core Idea
Anna explained that while healthcare professionals can currently access limited information such as next of kin or household members, they often lack a fuller understanding of:
who actually supports the patient,
how reliable that support is,
whether support networks are connected or fragmented,
and how socially isolated a patient may be.
The proposed research would explore whether creating visual “maps” of support networks could help:
improve care planning,
reduce crises,
improve coordination between services,
and enhance patients’ quality of life.
The project would also examine how social prescribing, community services, online support groups, and carers fit into these wider support networks.
Carers’ Feedback on the Research Proposal
The discussion following Anna’s presentation was extremely rich and constructive, with carers offering both enthusiasm and important cautionary perspectives.
Strong Support for the Concept
Many attendees felt the project addressed an important gap in healthcare planning. Several carers spoke about how informal support networks had been essential to helping them or their loved ones survive periods of crisis.
Participants agreed that professionals often underestimate the role played by:
friends,
neighbours,
online communities,
peer groups,
and unpaid carers.
The ability to visualise these networks was seen as potentially valuable for both professionals and patients themselves.
Importance of Non-Traditional Support Networks
A strong theme throughout the discussion was that support does not always come from family.
Some carers explained that family relationships can sometimes be unsafe or abusive, and that support may instead come from trusted friends, neighbours, carers’ groups, or online communities.
The group stressed that any future system should avoid assuming that family automatically equals safety or support.
Online Communities and Digital Support
Participants also highlighted the increasing importance of online support systems.
Several carers explained that:
Zoom groups,
Facebook communities,
online peer support,
and digital communication can provide essential social connection, especially for disabled or isolated people.
One participant noted that online support networks had directly helped them access practical support and reduce isolation when physical mobility was limited.
At the same time, carers cautioned that not everyone has equal access to digital services. Concerns were raised about:
digital exclusion,
accessibility barriers,
lack of digital skills,
and the risk of widening inequalities.
The importance of offering both digital and non-digital forms of support was strongly emphasised.
Privacy, Consent, and Mental Health
Carers also discussed potential challenges around privacy and consent, particularly for people experiencing paranoia or severe mental illness.
Some attendees noted that patients may not always feel comfortable sharing details about their social networks, and that trust and safeguarding would need to be central to any future system.
There was discussion about the delicate balance between:
confidentiality,
safety,
carer involvement,
and patient autonomy.
Role of Social Prescribers
The group generally agreed that social prescribers could play an important role in helping patients map support networks, because they often have more time and a stronger focus on community support than standard GP appointments allow.
However, concerns were raised about long-term funding and sustainability for social prescribing services.
Looking Ahead
Anna thanked the group for their detailed feedback and explained that carers’ insights would help shape the next stage of the research proposal before submission later this year.
There was strong interest from attendees in remaining involved should the project move forward, particularly around future patient and public involvement opportunities.
The meeting once again demonstrated the depth of knowledge, experience, and expertise held by unpaid carers. The discussion reflected not only the challenges carers continue to face, but also the importance of ensuring carers are recognised as essential partners in both healthcare delivery and future research.
If you’ve supported someone through a stay in mental health services, your experience could help improve care for others.
Researchers at The University of Manchester are inviting people with lived experience—including carers to take part in an online workshop focused on improving how mental health services support people during hospital discharge, particularly for individuals from Black heritage communities.
Reason for research
Evidence shows that people from Black communities often face poorer outcomes in mental health care, including barriers to access and challenges during discharge from hospital.
To address this, researchers are working to make future services and research more inclusive, culturally responsive, and grounded in real experiences. Hearing directly from carers is a key part of that work .
Who is running this?
The workshop is being led by Dr Natasha Tyler, a Research Fellow at The University of Manchester, as part of work linked to improving future research and care approaches.
The session will also be supported by facilitators with lived experience, including carers, to ensure discussions are grounded and meaningful .
Who can take part?
You may be interested if you:
Have cared for someone who has been an inpatient in adult mental health services
Have experience of discharge from mental health care
Want to share your perspective to improve future support
What’s involved?
Format: Online (MS Teams)
Duration: 2 hours
Dates: Sessions planned between 23rd April and 8th May 2026
Payment: £60 as a thank-you for your time
Participants will receive questions in advance to help prepare for the discussion.
Why get involved?
Taking part is a chance to:
Help shape future mental health research and services
Ensure carers’ voices are included in decision-making
Contribute to reducing inequalities in care
Share your experience in a supportive environment
How to express interest
If you’d like to take part, you can follow the link in the invitation to share your availability or contact the research team directly.
By Matthew McKenzie – Triangle of Care Community Chair.
The meeting opened with a welcome to carers, professionals, and partner organisations, reinforcing the importance of the Community Group as a collaborative and inclusive space. The Chair highlighted the ongoing commitment to co-production, ensuring that lived experience remains central to all Triangle of Care development and decision-making.
The purpose of the meeting was outlined, with emphasis on shared learning, constructive challenge, and influencing national work. Members were reminded that discussions within the group directly inform improvements to Triangle of Care standards, guidance, and implementation across services.
2. Triangle of Care Update (with Q&A)
Mary Patel – Carers Trust
The Triangle of Care update focused on how the programme continues to evolve as a learning-led, improvement-focused framework rather than a compliance or inspection tool. Members were reminded that the Triangle of Care is designed to support services to reflect honestly on how well carers are recognised, involved, and supported, and to identify practical actions for improvement.
The update highlighted the growing maturity of the self-assessment and peer review process. Increasingly, organisations are using the framework not only to evidence good practice but to challenge themselves, learn from others, and embed carer partnership more consistently across teams and pathways.
Self-Assessment and Peer Review: What’s Working Well
The self-assessment process continues to be a key entry point for organisations engaging with the Triangle of Care. Where we were updated on how self-assessment encourages teams to pause and reflect on everyday practice, policies, and culture, rather than relying solely on written procedures. When combined with peer review, this reflection is strengthened by external challenge and lived-experience insight.
As part of the update, members were updated on emerging learning from Triangle of Care reports, including self-assessment submissions and peer review feedback. These reports were described as an important source of insight into how carer involvement is experienced on the ground, highlighting both areas of strong practice and recurring challenges across services
NOTE: These include reports going back 6 months, so not all NHS trusts listed
Peer review was described as most effective when organisations approach it with openness and curiosity. Lived-experience peer reviewers play a crucial role in asking different questions, highlighting blind spots, and grounding discussions in real-world carer experience.
A key discussion point was how to balance national consistency with local flexibility. Members acknowledged that while the Triangle of Care provides a shared framework and standards, services operate within different contexts, populations, and resource constraints.
Triangle of care and Patient Carer Race Equality Framework updates
The Triangle of Care and PCREF Phase 2 pilot will be launched in April 2026, to test co-produced specialist guidance to support integration of carers from racially marginalised communities into the Triangle of Care.
Alignment with Wider System Priorities
Members discussed how Triangle of Care activity aligns with broader system developments, including Mental Health Act reform, integrated care, and equality frameworks. There was strong agreement that Triangle of Care should not sit in isolation but be embedded within wider quality improvement, safeguarding, and workforce development agendas.
The need to visibly align Triangle of Care with the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework was reiterated. Members emphasised that carers must be able to see how equality commitments translate into tangible actions within standards, training, and evidence.
Key points
Aligning Triangle of Care with Mental Health Act reform
Embedding within wider system and quality frameworks
Stronger visibility of equality and race equity
Carer Voice and Evidence of Impact
A recurring theme was the importance of demonstrating impact. Members discussed how services can better evidence carer involvement and experience beyond policies and training records. This includes qualitative feedback, lived-experience insight, and examples of how carer input has influenced service design and delivery.
Emerging Challenges and Areas for Development
The update also acknowledged ongoing challenges, including workforce pressures, digital transformation, and uneven awareness of the Triangle of Care across organisations. Members noted that carer involvement can become fragile during periods of change unless it is firmly embedded in systems and culture.
Summary: Where the Programme Is Heading
The Triangle of Care update concluded with a shared understanding that the programme is well-established but still evolving. The focus for the next phase is on deepening impact, strengthening alignment with equality and legislative change, and supporting services to move from intention to consistent, inclusive practice.
Key discussion points
Peer review as a developmental, learning-focused process
Balancing national consistency with local flexibility
Alignment with Mental Health Act reform and equality frameworks
Keeping carer voices central to assessment and review
3. Sharing Experiences as a Peer Reviewer
Carer involved with Avon & whitlshire
A carer presented from her involvement at Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, where she is involved as a lived-experience peer reviewer contributing to Triangle of Care.
She shared reflections from her role as a lived-experience peer reviewer. She spoke about the importance of authenticity, trust, and transparency in the peer review process, and how lived experience strengthens both credibility and impact. Her contribution reinforced the value of co-production and highlighted how peer review can challenge assumptions, surface good practice, and promote more carer-inclusive cultures within organisations.
The discussion reinforced that organisational openness and leadership engagement are critical to turning peer review feedback into real change. Members reflected on how hearing directly from peer reviewers deepens understanding of the practical impact of policies on carers.
Q&A / Discussion
Members asked how organisations typically respond to lived-experience feedback.
The involved carer noted that openness and leadership support were key factors in whether reviews led to meaningful change.
Discussion reinforced the importance of preparing services for peer review so that carers feel genuinely welcomed and listened to.
4. Carer Contingency Planning – Presentation and Local Practice
Mary Patel Local example: Carly Driscoll – Bradford District Care
This session focused on carer contingency planning as a key element of carer support and crisis prevention. The presentation outlined why contingency planning is critical in reducing carer anxiety, preventing emergency admissions, and ensuring continuity of care when carers are unable to continue their role.
Carer Contingency Planning (CCP), as championed by Carers Trust, is designed to support carers by planning ahead for times when they might suddenly be unable to continue caring. This might include illness, emergencies, hospitalisation, or other crises. CCP shifts the focus from reactive support during crisis moments to proactive planning that reduces anxiety and prevents avoidable breakdowns in care.
Carers Trust emphasises that CCP is a conversational, personalised process where the carer’s expertise is central. Carers know the routines, preferences, and cues that matter for the person they care for; the goal of CCP is to capture that knowledge in a way that can be shared quickly and effectively with services, families, and emergency responders when needed.
A local practice example from Bradford District Care demonstrated how contingency planning can work in practice, highlighting practical tools, partnership working, and engagement with carers. Discussion explored the benefits of clear, accessible plans, while also acknowledging challenges around awareness, consistency, and uptake
The local practice example demonstrated how contingency planning can be embedded into routine work through partnership approaches and proactive engagement with carers. Members discussed the importance of introducing plans early and reviewing them regularly.
Key features of the Bradford approach
Routine integration: CCP discussions happen early, not just in crisis moments
Partnership working: Health, social care, and voluntary sector staff work in concert
Accessible documentation: Plans are shared in forms that carers can use and update
Support for carers: Carers are supported to lead the planning, not be passive recipients
Ongoing review: Plans are revisited as needs and circumstances evolve
Benefits seen locally
Carers report feeling more confident and less anxious
Greater clarity across professionals when carers are unavailable
Fewer last-minute, unplanned crises or service escalations
Better use of local support networks when official services are stretched
Q&A / Discussion
Questions focused on how contingency plans are introduced to carers and reviewed over time.
Members raised concerns about low awareness of contingency planning among carers not already engaged with services.
Discussion highlighted the need for flexibility, recognising that carers’ circumstances can change rapidly.
5. Carer Contingency Planning – System Perspective
Sara Lewis – SW London ICB
Sara Lewis’s session focused on Carer Contingency Planning (CCP) as a core, preventative element of carer support rather than a reactive or optional add-on. CCP is a structured way of planning for what should happen if a carer is suddenly unable to continue caring due to illness, crisis, exhaustion, or an emergency. At its heart, CCP is about reducing uncertainty and anxiety for carers while ensuring continuity and safety for the person they support.
Sara emphasised that effective CCP recognises carers as partners with expert knowledge of the person they care for. The process supports carers to articulate what matters most, what routines and support are essential, and who needs to be contacted in an emergency. When done well, CCP helps prevent avoidable crises, emergency admissions, and breakdowns in care by making plans visible, accessible, and shared across relevant services.
Accessibility was a major theme, particularly the risks of digital exclusion. While digital tools can be effective, members stressed the need for non-digital options, language support, and culturally appropriate approaches to ensure equity.
Key Takeaways from Sara Lewis’s Session
Carer Contingency Planning is preventative, not reactive
CCP is built on early, ongoing conversations with carers
Plans should reflect what matters to carers and the cared-for person
CCP must be accessible, inclusive, and culturally appropriate
Digital tools can help, but must not increase exclusion
Successful CCP requires shared ownership across services
When embedded well, CCP reduces crisis, anxiety, and system pressure
Q&A / Discussion
Members questioned how to balance digital innovation with the risk of digital exclusion.
Language barriers and accessibility for carers with different communication needs were highlighted.
Discussion emphasised that contingency planning must be embedded into standard care planning processes, not treated as optional or additional.
6. Looking Ahead: Priorities for the Community Group
The “Looking Ahead” discussion focused on how the Triangle of Care Community Group can continue to influence meaningful change for carers in an evolving policy and practice landscape. Members reflected on the increasing complexity of health and care systems and the importance of ensuring that carers are not left behind as reforms, digital transformation, and workforce pressures accelerate.
A strong theme throughout the discussion was visibility, making carer involvement, equality, and partnership explicit in practice, evidence, and outcomes. Participants emphasised that carers must not only be recognised in principle but experience consistent involvement and support in real-world settings. The group agreed that the next phase of work should strengthen both strategic influence and practical implementation.
Mental Health Act Reform and Carer Involvement
Members discussed the implications of upcoming Mental Health Act reform, particularly around carers’ rights, information-sharing, and involvement in decision-making. There was recognition that Triangle of Care principles provide a strong foundation for supporting services to meet new expectations, but that further work will be needed to translate legislation into everyday practice.
The group highlighted the risk that carers could be inconsistently involved if workforce understanding is weak or if systems focus narrowly on legal compliance. Proactive guidance, training, and examples of good practice were seen as essential to ensure carers are meaningfully included rather than consulted as an afterthought.
Equality, Race Equity, and Inclusion
A central priority looking ahead is ensuring that Triangle of Care activity visibly aligns with the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF). Members stressed that carers from racialised and marginalised communities often face additional barriers to involvement, including mistrust, cultural misunderstandings, and unequal access to support.
The group agreed that equality must be embedded into standards, peer review evidence, and training—not treated as a parallel or optional agenda. This includes capturing meaningful data, listening to diverse carer voices, and ensuring culturally responsive practice is clearly demonstrated.
Workforce Training and Education
Workforce development was identified as a critical lever for long-term change. Members highlighted the need to strengthen carer awareness training across all roles, particularly for staff new to mental health and social care settings. Without this foundation, carer involvement remains inconsistent and dependent on individual attitudes rather than organisational culture.
There was strong support for influencing pre-registration education, including universities and training providers, to embed carer awareness earlier. This was seen as an opportunity to normalise partnership with carers from the start of professional careers rather than trying to retrofit it later.
Key points
Strengthening carer awareness across the workforce
Embedding Triangle of Care principles early in training
Influencing universities and pre-registration pathways
Moving from individual goodwill to system-wide culture change
Digital, Data, and Accessibility
Digital transformation featured prominently in the discussion, with members acknowledging both its potential and its risks. While improved data systems and digital tools can support information-sharing and coordination, there was concern that carers without digital access or confidence may be excluded.
Participants emphasised that digital solutions must be designed inclusively, with non-digital alternatives always available. Data collection should support understanding of carer experience and inequality, not become a barrier to support.
Key points
Digital tools should support, not replace, relationships
Risk of digital exclusion for some carers
Importance of non-digital alternatives
Using data to improve equity, not reinforce gaps
Young Carers and Marginalised Groups
Supporting young carers and carers from marginalised communities was highlighted as a continuing priority. Members noted that these groups are often under-identified and less likely to be involved in care planning or decision-making, despite carrying significant caring responsibilities.
The group agreed that future work should focus on visibility, early identification, and tailored approaches that recognise the specific needs and challenges faced by these carers. Partnership with education, community, and voluntary sector organisations was seen as essential.
Key points
Improving identification of young carers
Addressing barriers faced by marginalised carers
Tailored, age-appropriate and culturally sensitive support
Stronger partnership working beyond health services
Collective Commitment Moving Forward
The discussion concluded with a shared commitment to using the Community Group as a platform for influence, learning, and accountability. Members recognised the value of continuing to share practical examples alongside strategic discussion, ensuring that Triangle of Care principles are translated into everyday practice.
Looking ahead, the group aims to remain proactive, inclusive, and responsive—supporting services to recognise carers as equal partners and ensuring that no carer is left unseen or unsupported as systems evolve.
Key discussion points
Preparing for Mental Health Act reform
Embedding the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework
Improving workforce training and education pathways
Supporting young carers and marginalised communities
Improving data and digital systems without exclusion
As Chair I thanked contributors and reaffirmed the importance of continued collaboration to ensure carers are recognised as equal partners in care, with Triangle of Care principles translated into meaningful practice across services.
For those interested to hear more about triangle of care, see details below
