Tag Archives: peer support

Lewisham Mental Health Carers forum September 2020

Welcome to September’s 2020 update of the Lewisham Mental Health carer forum. The forum is run via Zoom to protect attendees from the risk of Corona Virus. The forum usually runs from Carers Lewisham centre, but is now online. The carer forum gives carers in the borough a chance to engage with Mental Health and Local authority services. It is a form of empowerment for carers and a way to gain insight and knowledge.

The forum also gives carers a chance to work together with health providers as co-production often gets raised. For the month of September we had a special “Carer Peer support” event, where many other carers were invited from my other carer groups, especially some from Greenwich who were wondering what does it mean when a mental health trusts champions peer support. Carer peer support has a different focus though, as it is aimed at families and carers. It also must be mentioned that peer support does not have to be a service that comes from the mental health trust, but carers themselves can also practice it.

We were joined by Peer speciallist and carer Donald robertson from sussex NHS partnership over in Brighton, we were also joined by Shelagh Musgrave from Birmingham and Soulihil NHS trust. Both were at the forum to educate and explain the importance of carer peer support at NHS trusts and services. We were also joined by Rachel Ellis who is South London & Maudsley NHS deputy head of inclusion and lead for peer work.

As usual the forum was supported by SLaM Jane Lyons who is the Croydon & Lewisham Involvement lead, however our CQC member could not make the forum today and has requested an update. Some of the things mentioned by the other NHS trusts peer leads should be of an interest to NHS England as there were views regarding peer support pilots across 3 NHS sites.

Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Carer peer support

Donald Robertson spoke at length of his role over at Sussex MH NHS Trust. He started off as a carer who cared for his wife for many years before slowly becoming more involved as peer specialist at his mental health trust. He now works within the NHS. So he feels like he can inhabit all three corners of the triangle of care in different ways. Due to being a carer, going through difficult times and being a health professional. Donald was trained as a social worker based on his own lived experience.

Donald mentioned peer support is about using his lived experience as a resource. It’s about changing things and how he wouldn’t go back to some of the times his been through, he wouldn’t even give his worst enemy back to some of those times he had, but his glad it that happened, because it made him a stronger person for today. Don pointed out peer working is a bit special. and it’s not just about having the the lived experience, it’s about how you use it. Peer support is how you support somebody with without having to be competing to see who has got the worse symptoms.

HOW PEER SUPPORT WORKS

Donald usually meets or chats to carers reffered to the trusts peer support via video link or phone and asks them “What would be helpful for you” “We can talk regularly as one to one around 15 minutes at a time. He would then confirm that the peer support can be flexible for carers to engage with him or donald could even be in contact with carers by text.

Donald spoke about the carers groups. One of the main groups actually existed before the COVID situation. Don mentioned that he sort od reshaped the carers group and things started settling in their place. The peer group has good numbers where 10 to 16 carers attend. So the peer group is really became very successful. Don asked that people to come to that carers peer group first or to call because he understands that when a carer is struggling? especially if its isolation or if they feel like they are the only one in such situation. Then being in the group where people just get it and understand where you’re coming from almost without having to say anything.

Don was glad to see veteran carers take the lead and set up a workshop to showcase the aim of peer support and the peer support group. There were challenges and struggles as other means to connect were difficult, especially connecting through social media or trying to work out how carers connected through whatsapp, plus NHS England set up something that is aimed to protect people’s anonymity which is very important, but also reduces the chance for carers to connect with each other.

It was also reported that when COVID-19 arrived around spring time, it shook peer support up a bit, because Don was not fully comfortable providing peer support online. This was especially when someone is telling you a difficult and emotional story only for the connection to drop, plus it misses several aspects of peer support including reading body language and giving others the chance to speak. Donald wanted to make the most of his time as being part of the NHS team when it comes to providing carer peer support, he did not want to duplicate what was provided there already and wanted to focus on giving more options for carers.

DESCRIPTION OF CARER PEER PATHWAY

I then took the oppertunity to ask Donald Robertson about his NHS Trusts flow chat regarding carer peer support. This was one way carers can examine how a mental health trust can provide support without having to read into any difficult jargon. It also gives an idea that the NHS trust is interested in carers and has a pathway on carers.

Donald told the forum that the chart is focused on carers supporting people having a first episode of psychosis, it’s about the evidence. So if you put some more intensive support in for some carers, that will mean that they will not end up in a long term service user. So the client service user is taken on and our standard assessment period is about six weeks.

There’s a lot of getting to know somebody before it’s completely clear, whether it is psychosis, or if there’s other factors, and Don actually gets involved earlier to help signpost to other services. Still, the lead practitioner identifies the carers and if the carer does not want support so close to the NHS Team then there is always independant carer support at Brighton’s carers hub. The mental health support team will always endeavor to keep the carer involved as much as they can.

You can find out more about Sussex NHS Partnership below.

https://www.sussexpartnership.nhs.uk/

QUESTIONS FROM THE FORUM

I then opened up the forum for carer members to ask questions regarding carer peer support at Sussex mental health NHS partnership.

A question on Older adults was of interest to a carer member. He was interested on what information did Donald give out the to older adult carers who are caring for someone with dementia. The carer was wondering if the pathways were more of a one shoe fits all policy. The carer member was also interested in sigma from the BAME community over in Brighton and wondered if Donald had any connection to that group.

Donald responded that it’s important to avoid the one size fits all policy. He engages with carers more as a person centered approach. So Donald is asking what the person in front of me needs. In the Services Donald works in it is all about people who have experience psychosis for the first time, traditionally that’s dominated by people in their late teens or 20s. So there’s a lot of work to be done about helping carers to acknowledge that they are carers. Donald feels his stereotype of a carer is somebody who is helping someone getting dressed, and maybe spoon feeds them, but he himself has never done that. His caring was much more about emotional support. And, rather than kind of fairly practical stuff even though they’re both important, but they are quite different.

I mentioned to the carer that since Sussex NHS partnership was a large trust that maybe Donald was not involved in the dementia service or BAME engagement, but there can always be a forum where we examine how other trusts engage with the BAME community.

Another carer member wanted to make a statement rather than a question, she felt so much resonates with her on what Donald spoke about. She pointed out 3 things, the First point was on how Donald mentioned the typical age group, that someone gets psychosis and some of the other illnesses or some of the other mental health illnesses. Her son fell ill when he was in his late teens. She still is not sure that her son’s illness has been fully identified and what caused it. Her Second statement was how it affected her so much that she couldn’t move on with her life, it was very difficult for her to move on.

Her Third and last statement was on how she was assisting my brother and even though her mother had 10 of us, she ended having to be the one taking on the caring for her brother, while most of the other members of the family want to know what’s going on with him they are not offering to help.

Donald responded and agreed that when one of the carers who was in that situation he remembered them telling him to “help them is help the people around me to not come through me” Donald remembered that he did a work with about four or five different people from that family. He felt it’s quite natural, because people are scared, it’s easier to get it second hand in some ways, because the main carer is that kind of buffer.

Another carer raised the point about my recently released book and if the CCG would take the oppertunity to help promote the book due to my high profile of raising carer awareness. A recent update is SLaM has purchased my book to the library under their carer’s section, although the carer mentioned the book should be standard reading on training staff about carer identity.

Birmingham and Soulihil NHS Trust carer peer support

The forum was given a chance to hear from another mental health trust on carer peer support. We heard from Shelagh Musgrave who is the Family Carer Peer Support Worker on the Women’s Secure Blended Service Team.

She started in her role nine months ago, but she was honest that there are challenges as she felt there are still NHS collegues who do not embrace family/carer involvement in getting peer support. She felt there can be a lack of communication to the carer and it needs to happen more often. This is particularly a problem when confidentiality continues to block carer involvement and then causes families to back out of recieving any other means of support.

She mentioned it can also be quite challenging to encourage colleagues at the NHS to understand that actually families and carers have shared information with them so then it’s no longer confidential. So if they have shared something with us and I tried to speak with colleagues about it, I surely can talk about it to them because it isn’t confidential anymore. Yet, this is not often the case as if something keeps blocking that triangle of care regarding families and carers.

Another issue with confidentiality is Shelagh’s role is actually with a charity rather than embedded with the NHS trust and even then confidentiality can sometimes block her off from getting involved or finding out what is going on. For example because she is peer support worker she might have picked up on a self harm incident and would need to update the family on what could be happening. She felt it’s really hard to get information as a carer and they just have to sit with it. It is like the carer is left wondering what’s happened this time.

The reality is that the carer be informed of these incidents, because it’s relevant to the person that cares for them, but unfortunately the culture of care is that carer may get shut out, which leads to impact or the trauma that might be taking place with the family and carer is left, as it always has been.

Shelagh mentioned that the NHS Trust actually have a family/carer pathway modeled within the trust, although it’s in the very early days. Still there is a problem as there is a seperate service user pathway and that process has created challenges as well, because it has led to some of her works going on hold.

Still there has been good engagement where it has made a great difference for families. Shelagh mentions she goes on to contact carers and get feedback from them, which is incredibly positive. Shelagh stats that she has a very proactive approach to being in touch with families and carers and she essentially makes my initial contact with them introduce herself explaining what her role is.

Shelagh does ask carers, what would be helpful for them. But she also makes them aware that she will be touching base with them regularly. So her approach tends to be, and she will call and if you don’t want to speak to me, that’s absolutely fine. I will check in on a monthly basis and I wouldn’t take offense, if you tell me you don’t want to hear back from me going forwards. Oddly enough no carer has actually told her that they do not want to hear from her.

Still Shelagh does not speak to every carer that’s on the books and she does make contact with as many of them as she can, but is not permitted to contact some because there are some for clinical reasons that I’ve been asked not to be in touch with, which she felt was a shame, but she can’t argue with that because she does agree with that everybody should be entitled to access peer support, if they wish and she do think it should be your decision, I do think it should be a clinical decision.

So she has ongoing contact, which ranges from anything from every fortnight to every two months. What she also do is feed concerns that the family have back into the a clinician. So for example, we had a young woman who was being discharged. Her family had attended the discharge CTA section 117 meeting, but actually hadn’t been given any contact details for the community care coordinator or the accommodation manager. So I was able to feed that information in the team to get contact details from the team and was able to get information to that family.

As far as the NHS knows they were aware that she has ongoing contact with families, but what she finds really interesting is a professional at the NHS states to her that our contract has to be meaningful. What does this mean?

Well meaningful to who and when you drill down, meaningful contact seems to be viewed as contact that is going to provide information that’s relevant to the service user. So if Shelagh’s contact with the family is not going to provide the clinician with information that is useful and valuable to the service users care then there is little point in meeting the family, but Shelegh is against this culture, because in her role she is there to support the families and carers and I, if they happen to share something about services or have a team.

Shelagh does tell NHS professionals she works with right in the beginning, that she works for a charity in partnership with the NHS and has an honorary contract with the NHS. However she is not sure if it’s because she works in the charity or because the NHS hears the word peer that NHS professionals might stand back.

Shelegh feels the feedback she gets is the value of talking with somebody who has lived experience is “that you just get it” and the carer does not have to explain what things are like to me. Shelagh has lived through it. She feels because carers might be limited in communication if they are talking to an NHS professional, nurse or psychiatrist. There’s often a sense of well, what do you know? What do you know, you haven’t experienced it from my carer’s side? So how can you stand there and say this to me. Whereas carers sense if she says something to do them or listening to them, and they will often say to her but you do understand this, don’t you?

It’s like a shortcut has created in connecting with carers and families where you don’t have to explain to people, what it’s like to deal with your child who self harms and you don’t have to hide from people, or you don’t have to explain to people how heart wrenching it is to hear when your child says to you ” I don’t want to live anymore why dont you just let you die?”

You can find out more about Birmingham & Soulihil NHS Trust below.

https://www.bsmhft.nhs.uk/

Family Carer Peer Support Worker view on the future of carer peer support

Shelagh felt that there is a massive need for carer peer support workers. She is aware that carer peer support research is very limited. However, she thinks we have to look at is that the research into peer support itself shows its value. So why do we have to differentiate whether or not peer support is carer or service user we’re looking at here towards the value is of lived experience. Doesn’t matter what your lived experiences?

Personally, she don’t believe it does. And But clearly, there are people who work by the research. That being NICE (National Institute in Care & Excellence) works by the research, Shelagh mentioned that she is very upset wit NICE because of this and she think that’s really sad peer research is not extending to families and carers.

Shelegh feels when carer peer support is established and its on the ground then we can see the difference that it makes, she feels that does not matter, what the background of the lived experiences is and wonders is she the only person in the NHS trust, which has 4 and half thousand staff?

There is a definite barrier of some sort, by changing the way families and carers engaged. Shelagh thinks we need to be doing it. She thinks we need a top down and bottom up approach, which has to come together. Because if you don’t have the support from the senior management’s, you’re not going to have this sense of drive.

Shelagh hopes that over time, she hopes that more and more people will change and understand that families and carers are not just there to provide background information on the service user. Carers are the equal partners in the NHS and NHS professionals also have a responsibility to families and carers. Because if they don’t support the families and carers with somebody is in the inpatient setting and they just discharge them into their community that hasn’t been upskilled or that hasn’t been supported, then it’s good to keep that revolving door going on for decades.

South London & Maudsley Peer worker presents

Rachel who is SLaM’s lead for peer working thanked Don and Shelia for their experience and is eager to see what results in regards to NHS England’s pilot peer project. Rachel is interested in what worked and what didn’t work. She was also thinking very much about what was the feeling or thinking about peer support is it needs to be co produced. Rachel felt that we can’t just take the model from Birmingham or NHS England and then drop it down in South London and hope that it works.

What SLaM needs to look at is that we need to learn from what the carers want to help them relate and be involved and also engaging with the BAME community. We also want to make sure that we have something that we know works from the outset and avoid that one size fits policy, we need to be creative, and we hope to be working alongside our carers to make sure that we get it right.

Rachel feels the big questions and the elephant in the room is about money/resources and how state to the CCG or other people to make sure that kind of professionalized peer support is seen as important and something that they’re willing to fund that and I feel that’s where the carers forums like this really come into its own and making a guideline proposal around what you’d want from care with peer support.

Rachel mentioned it would be really useful for members to write something formal to the Commissioners about your needs and what you think professionalised peer support would look like. Rachel added what carers would think the benefits are to the CCG especially relating to the triangle of care.

So it’s not just around providing peer support and support for carers, but also making sure that that’s all linked in so we get a really good support for when someone’s discharged or someone’s community services. Its not only important support for carers, but it’s also seen as linking up care for the people who use SLaM’s services.

This concludes the September update for the Lewisham Mental Health carer forum.

Lewisham MH Carers forum July 2020

Lewisham Ward MapWelcome to the July edition of the Lewisham Mental Health carers forum. This is one of the carer forums I run in order to help families and carers understand, engage and query mental health services. This can help services become more carer aware and aides in a working relationship with carer’s.

For the Lewisham MH carers forum we were joined by regular carer members, plus Damian Larkin a nurse working on clinical systems. The forum was also joined by Karen Machin a carer peer network campaigner and researcher, plus the communications rep from mental health organisation SANE, Public Health in Lewisham, Maudsley’s complaints department manager Edith Adijobi.

Also in attendance was Beth Brown who is SLaM’s Patient Experience and Quality Manager. We were also joined mental health lead of the Lewishmam & Greenwich hospital trust and lastly the involvement lead for Lewisham & Croydon from maudsley NHS trust.

The Lewisham carers forum runs every last Tuesday of the month and is usually run from Carers Lewisham, but due to the covid-19 outbreak the forum has been running online.

Public Health Lewisham research

First to speak and update carers in Lewisham was Lisa Fannon from Public health in Lewisham. Lisa gave us a brief update on the work that she talked about at another forum I run. Lewisham council is undertaking in a research partnership with Birmingham City Council where they are going to look into health inequalities faced by black, African and Caribbean communities within the borough. Public health Lewisham are part of this process and will be looking at the evidence which have been some of the key issues affecting the community.

Their intention is that they will provide some solution focused approaches which will enable us to tackle such health inequality issues wherever possible. Lisa also wanted to let us know that they are this week opening applications to people within the community to support an advisory board. Lisa mentioned it’s a unique volunteering opportunity to be part of a groundbreaking piece of research that will inform the work that Public health are doing within the local community.

Carer Peer Support

Next to present was on carer peer support networks. Karen who is a peer network speaker spoke about her personal experience of being a carer. She also spoke about the challenges she found on the mental health system and felt being able to sort of stand back and reflect on things.

She did value the networks that she had made when experiencing mental health systems be it locally, regionally and nationally, she had some networks where she could share them with people and hear about what other people have been up to. Karen found those networks really helpful.

wordle

The last 10 years or so, her interest has been around recovery and peer support in a way of focusing on healing and discovery. She mentioned that she doesn’t really like the word ‘recovery’ when compared to carers. Even though it is a word that everybody uses, but she is still interested in recovery because it’s always about the people that we support.

She felt that the focus on recovery is always about the person who’s using mental health services. It’s not necessarily about carers. So she did a write up some years ago about it, but she still think it’s a topic that signals whenever there’s recovery then it might not be for carers and everything could be patient focused.

Karen wants carers to query things by asking about the nature of carer support.  Questions like ‘What is it?’ What does that look like for carers? And how do we get current skills involved in that? Her main interest is around peer support, and that’s about people supporting each other.

Family

She feels that even with all these new initiatives around peer support, that carers sometimes still get ignored.  Around 20 years ago, we were asking for what would now be called a carer peer support worker. Unfortunately she does not see many carer support workers, although there’s lots of initiatives and resources and money going into developing peer support workers which are roles within mental health trusts and voluntary sector organisations.

This is not the same issue around carers. She always wanted to hear from somebody who’d been in a similar position when she was caring, who could kind of use their own lived experience to the listen and support carers. Perhaps somebody who was actually paid in such a role and also was valued and supported themselves.

It’s not just about peer support, it isn’t just about volunteers. It’s also about the resources going into paid roles. We in a situation today that we are trying to avoid the new pandemic. She feels that it has created a really abrupt change. It’s been a very serious and traumatic time for many of us carers. That means everybody even those not accessing mental health services. For the whole population it has been very difficult time. The pandemic certainly has highlighted places where there’s been poor services or poor access to services. Karen felt some criticism at the NHS, but she is usually very supportive of it, which has really highlighted some of the challenges in service provision within mental health.

download

Karen also wondered about bereavement services and support for carers among such services. She felt that people have looked for access and support, but Karen mentioned that people have also had to look to communities for support.

She does not think they’ve looked particularly to the NHS and because it has been so overwhelmed with other issues. So people have had to look for that mutual aid into communities.

She included in her talk the use of remote access on how communities now can be national and international, and that is certainly a community that she wants to be  involved with. She recently managed to speak to participants from around the world and heard from a lot of peer support groups where they’ve been questioned whether people can join them. There have been lots of people from the States and from Australia so networks and communities are getting bigger because of the opportunities of remote and virtual platforms coming from avoiding COVID-19.

Embed from Getty Images

Karen stated to the carers forum that perhaps maybe this is an opportunity to do things differently. She knows that commissioners and providers are all asking us those questions of how we’re going to provide things going forward. When she talked to them she keep repeating herself and saying we have to listen to people with lived experience and their carers. Karen felt that’s something that’s been high on the agenda for the last 10 to 20 years anyway and felt providers and commissioners know that they have to listen to communities, they know there’s a gap between what they commission and what people experience.

Lastly Karen spoke about how our communities can help us to get heard and questioned how do we build those communities? She felt it needs to go beyond local. She mentioned that those at the forum are in a great position in London because we have got opportunities that go beyond just our own Mental Health NHS trust into other mental health trusts. We have a chance to hear about how others are providing services and the different teams that are available.

She does wonder how we can expand this nationally because there aren’t any national networks of carers in the UK. She would like to hope in the future a way to develop national carer peer networks and once COVID-19 is over, then we can start to develop those networks ourselves.

Questions from the carer members

The carer members from the forum were inspired to ask questions to Karen. One member asked what was she doing for older carers in the role she is in at the moment, especially with ethnic minority cares? The forum member wanted to know who at the moment could explain the situation of suffering in silence because of stigma?

Karen mentioned that she has not got the expertise around older carers in her local area, But she has heard of lots of other organizations, not here, but around the country, where carers and communities are coming together to provide that support themselves. She understands about those worries about what happens if a loved one goes into a care home? And what’s that going to mean for us? And so people, it’s about, it’s what she has been hearing, it’s about communities doing that work. And that really worries her in many ways, partly because the sustainability of that, how do those local just groups of neighbors basically, and how do they sustain that effort? And how do we scale that up? How do you make sure that that continues?

Another question raised was from a carer who had read in The Guardian newspaper that Boris Johnson is considering amalgamating social care into the NHS. She felt in principle, I think it’s a good idea. But what what concerns her is that does that mean that’s another group getting that is going to push mental health out of the way? Because Health services has made mental health services a Cinderella service and now social care will make it even more irrelevant.

Karen responded that we got to keep an eye on such things and she felt it’s through networks and making sure that we’re all connected within that we can keep an eye on. Karen did agree with the carer and felt perhaps the change could potentially be fine. It could have potential. Still she thinks many will be worried about that gap between health care and social care.

SANE new campaign and project

Next we heard from Emma who is the media and communications officer at the mental health charities SANE. They are a national mental health charity. Emma felt it was a real privilege to hear from carers and to learn from us as well. She thanked us for having her in this space.

sane

Emma introduced herself as the media and communications officer for SANE and they are working on some exciting projects although she could not go into detail at this moment in time because it’s still in the planning stage. The campaign will be launched around autumn time and they are looking to collaborate and work with caregivers, mental health caregivers who care for someone with serious depression.

Emma continued that supporting mental health care givers is also a core campaigning area for the charity and she knows it’s something which SANE’s CEO Margie Wallace is really passionate about. So if there’s anything that SANE can do to support us or if we know if anyone’s interested in reaching out and working with SANE then please do get in contact.

Patient Experience and Quality Manager presentation

Next to speak at the forum was Beth Brown who is SLaM’s Patient Experience and Quality Manager thanked me for inviting her. She was here to talk a little bit about what she does as patient experience and Quality Manager. She then talked a little bit about one of her work streams, which is the patient and carer feedback surveys. She mentioned her role has kind of two main aspects to it. The first one is around patient experience, so she manages the trust wide patient care experience survey program, which some of the group might have heard of which is called PEDIC. Beth also look after the Trust’s participation in any national surveys which are run by the Care Quality Commission. So that’s the means that they participate regularly each year is the National Community Mental Health Survey.

It is her role to look at the themes that come out from all of these places and, and try and kind of track trust wide themes. And that can help inform our services, and to kind of look at their local improvement because the whole point of it is that we can improve services.

Beth moved on to talk about how she manages clinical audits and the effectiveness team. They look after a program called perfect Ward, which is a way of tracking clinical audits throughout the trust, which includes things around clinical safety, medicines, infection prevention control. They also have an audit around patient experience and staff experience. Plus they also have someone in the team look after NICE guidelines, so you can have best practice for trusts and national clinical audits which are run by the Royal College of psychiatrists.

Collecting data

At this moment Beth’s team are just preparing for a upcoming National Audit on early intervention in psychosis. Beth started showing the forum presentations from her slides. Where she showed how centrally important that audit team works with the patient and public involvement leads and on complaints.

Beth tends to have a large spread of different people to work with, she went on to why a patient care experience feedback is important, because so they can see what we’re doing well and what we need to do better so that we can improve the services and deliver the as possible care. Plus they need to collect feedback in a lot of ways.

They have kind of lots of more systematic and structured ways of collecting feedback, where Beth showed the data the team  collect it from a trust wide level right down to individual team level. From on the Ward and the NHS friends and family tests, through to kind of trust, consultations and engagement. The team also work through complaints, PALs, service formal and informal effective compliments, a kind of like individual project based feedback.

As Beth showed us her graph and she explained top left graph which is around on the friends and family test score in Lewisham. There was also the national indicator for patient experience. The aim of the graph is what extends as and so what this chart is it tracking the number of positive responses to that to the people that say they’re extremely likely or likely to recommend the service they’ve received.

And there’s tracking over time from April 2017. And you can see from around January 18, to may 2020, if you put a line through it, it’s a very gentle increase in performance. And that reflects trust wide performance. However there has been a significant change, due to this massive dip in June 2020. That is the impact of COVID-19 on our data collection. They had two of our data collection methods suspended due to infection infection control. And now got two out of three open and but we had a massive drop in response rate. So it’s the two that means that the fewer responses you have, the more the data is influenced by extreme responses.

So the forum was shown data for Lewisham over the past year and the members were told that the team had overwhelmingly positive responses, and those numbers of 1169 and 21015, their response rate, so that’s the proportion of positive in comparison. Beth reminded the forum that I was interested in hearing about the FFT school, by ethnicity and by ethnic group. So at the end of our PEDIC surveys, they asked a number of demographic questions and the purpose being that they could see whether any particular groups are reporting different experiences. And that can help inform different work streams.

So for example, there’s just been a piece of work that we found in Lambeth where LGBT patients were reporting poorer experiences. there’s also a trust wide quality reports, which you can get on SLaM site website, which talks about FFT scores.

A piece of work that Beth is doing at the moment, is to allow her to look at positive and negative test results by ethnic group over around 25,000 participants so that they can make more data and say something more about the database quickly to see what it is telling them.

Questions from the carers forum

One carer who is often interested on where mental health services get delivered queried the actual number of people accessing treatment. If it’s a positive outcome, obviously, it’s very good. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that mental health services are delivering good services. The carer felt that SLaM are missing delivering service to the people who struggle to access services via their GP. because sometimes there’s subjectivity as to who goes through and who doesn’t. And as we all know, there’s also financial constraints. And also people who, who don’t feel comfortable with a GPS, therefore can’t get a referral, even with their carer is trying to get their relative to access services.

Another carer agreed and felt it was one of the most stressful things that they found as a carer and that they belonged to several carers groups noticed several people have said this, that it’s it’s especially with children anyway, as well. It’s not so much having the child or the person with the mental illness.

Beth responded on member’s experience of their loved one’s difficulty accessing services and the impact that has been. She continued to mention that they are hearing about that in our patient surveys.

So even the people that are accessing our services are talking about the difficulty that they’ve had to get it and the impact that’s had on them. That is kind of growing in prominence as the you might have seen over the past couple of years. It is an issue and it’s it’s an issue that the trust is aware of, and there are lots of workstreams and programs going on across the trust to tackle access to services, not least Since COVID, so since since before that as well.

BETH application presentation for service user and carer input

Next speaker at the Mental Health carers forum was Damien who spoke about the revamped online patient system called BETH. BETH is an online app and what it does is connect patients or service users peers and staff, they can communicate, they can collaborate. And it’s not an app because it works through a web browser.

Still BETH does it look and behave like an app what’s known as a web app. To access BETH the address is beth.slam.nhs.uk . Since this is a new digital online platform it connects us and it supports the service user’s the treatment that SLaM provide. Damien mentioned that because of COVID-19 that we all have to try just try and communicate in different ways not because it just hasn’t been possible to do what we have done previously, its just BETH really supports this.

BETH-1

BETH takes its name from bethlem and which is the Bethlam hospital that SLaM have in new Beckenham and also the museum of the mind. SLaM’s vision is that BETH will support the care treatment that people receive. Damien then showed the forum some presentation slides of BETH in action. Damien showed the carers how it looks like on a mobile phone. BEETH can be used on a mobile phone, it can use on a tablet and it can used on any kind of device like a laptop, or a desktop.

Damien also showed how service users or patients signup to BETH and how they can securely message the care team, they can also get access to their care plan or consider upcoming appointments. Patients can keep track of mood and sleep and they can use the free online resources that SLaM have included in the BETH online system.

BETH-2

Service users can choose to use certain functions and also carers can choose other BETH functions. There’s more in there for patients at the moment although SLaM want to do obviously develop on this. Damien then showed us how to register for the BETH system in instructing on where to sign in if your patient of services by you putting your first and last name as it appears on SLaMs records.

You would then just put in your email address and you create a password and that becomes your login details for everything. But then in the middle you see that red box there’s two tick boxes, one to indicate if you’re patient one to indicate if your carer, family or friend.

if you’re a patient, the two other boxes appear saying asking for date of birth and NHS number and then they accept the terms and conditions all of that and you get access. If you click on the second box there to be a carer or friend. Once you hit on create account, it’ll ask you if you want to connect the care team of the person that you care for. And you just need to put in the person’s name full name as It appears.

BETH-3
Complaints department Presentation

Next we had Edith Adijobi who is SLaM’s complaints manager to engage with carer members at the forum. When you think of complaint’s carers tend to grit their teeth, but I noticed the members were happy to get engagement from complaints because people feel complaints tend to hide away and defend services. Edith opened up her talk by stating that she genuinely love complaints. I noticed one or two carer’s laugh about this, but then they warmed to Edith.

Edith mentioned that she has been working in the field of complaints, panels, patient experience and bereavement services in the NHS for about 21 years. She is very passionate about complaints. So in the trust people sort of have to stop her talking. Edith mentioned that she is also known in the trust for a lot of pushback, because one of the things that frustrates her deeply is if she ever hears somebody say there’s nothing they can do, then Edith feels that carers have to complain.

Edith feels that people shouldn’t ever have to complain to feel heard, she feels people shouldn’t ever have to complain to feel that services are going to do something about something they flag to SLaM. That doesn’t mean services stop people complaining. But if we’re telling people that the only way we’ll hear their voice is if they complain then something’s gone very wrong, and that really frustrates Edith.

Edith does staff training on complaints, So one of the things when she does on training their staff is she is officially their worst nightmare at times. She mentions that officially she acts as a worst nightmare as a patient. Edith then took us through some brief data. She talked a little bit about why we take complaints as a trust and the approach that she finds

She feels it’s about really encouraging and supporting ourselves to think about doing the right thing at the right time, really reflecting on on the information we get. And how do we learn from mistakes, because she thinks the moment you say the C word, as she says complaints, people get their backs up, people get quite anxious. How about we split it into a concern and a complaint? what is actually happening there? What are people trying to tell us? And these are some of the ways in which we get information.

Edith talked to carers about the different organisations that are interested in the types of complaints the NHS Trust gets.  So they get reports from the Care Quality Commission, quite a lot of our patients will go direct to the CQC and to then pass them to us. We also get views from Health watches, SLaM’s CCG commissioners, we even get people tell us first What do we do and how do we did Last year.

complaints presentation -1

Edith spoke more about the charts on the presentation and showed how these are the complaints they got as a trust. Although in one month the figure obviously dropped really sharply because of COVID. Edith showed us a closer look at Lewisham complaint figures and noted if we could see my mouse just scrolling under the Lewisham accounted for 88 out of 558 complaints pulled up through the Directorate.

She then looked at complaint, which was commissioned by Lewisham. So that will go across SLaM’s oldest adults and their CAMHs service, but this was just to give us a trust wide look. Looking across the trust, if you have a look at the Reds or the complaints and the blues are compliments.

Edith moved on to mention that they have tried a new system since last October. They are encouraging people to record directly so that we can actually capture information. So just that was an April to make a March this year. This is this quarter, and you’ll see that a bit had a real impact on just SLaM’s organizational numbers they receive.

Edith mentioned that sometimes it’s just somebody picking up the phone and not being able to get hold of a doctor, not being able to get hold of a nurse, or, in some cases, people wanting access to a service. But the commissioners haven’t actually commissioned us to provide that service. So how do we as an organization feedback to the CCGs or how do we actually tell somebody that what they want is what we Provide that’s not being provided by a third sector partner, or the CCG has different arrangements.

Edith concluded that sometimes we’ve got those type of issues going on and sometimes someone is to blame. Sometimes when something is wrong, it is because of there is a reason. So one of the things maybe we want to look into is culture of the trust. Is it that we’re blaming that member of staff, and that member staff is the one who’s accountable because an appointment failed to be booked? Is that staff member under too much pressure or not supported? What is the cause?

complaints presentation -2

Carers from the forum were surprised, but happy to have a presentation from the complaints manager since the forum has existed for many years and the subject of complaints is often raised.

Lewisham BAME MH Carer Forum July 2020

enteranceWelcome to the July update of the Lewisham BAME mental health carer forum. I’ve been doing this forum for many years now. As a reminder I run carer forums aimed at carers who are looking after those with mental health needs challenges or mental illness.

These forums are just a way for carers and families to get educated in regards to mental health services, or local author services. This forum is specifically aimed at those from the BAME community, the other carer forum I do is just more general mental health carers.

The BAM community have two specific set of issues Hence, the patients may end up using community servies, you know, high secure mental services. So that was the aim to sort of get them to have have an idea about the services created them, see what’s working see what isn’t working. For the July Lewisham BAME ME carer forum we have the Care Quality Comission (CQC) attending, plus regular carer members, along with Oxleas’s Community Development Service Manager and BAME Staff Network Chair. We also had in attendance SLaM’s peer support project lead and Damien Larkin who is a nurse who works at South London & Maudsley developing BETH the online patient health recording system.

The forum was also joined by Bromley, Lewisham and Greenwich mind Peer Project lead who offers support coaching up to £250 funding or people to set up peer support groups in their community. This is to help peers around mental health and well being, especially during this period of lockdown, but also beyond supporting people within the community around their well being and mental health.

Lastly the forum was also joined by Abby who works for lesbian refugee migrant network. They are one of the partners in the community well being service she is also the Community Engagement Manager delivering culturally mental health services.

Although the forum covers mainly Lewisham, we welcomed a member interested in BAME mental health groups and she is a Mental Health well being practitioner who also provides low level mental health support for children/young people under the ages of 25, vulnerable people going back into employment and business startups wanting mental health support.

CQC Presentation

To kick off the forum the CQC spoke about their role and answered questions. I invited the CQC down because I wanted carers and patients to develop more of a relationship with the CQC rather than the CQC engaging with users of services when inspections of services arises.

Quality-Care-Commission

Natalie Austin Parsons who works at the CQC meaning Care Quality Commission as an inspection manager spoke first as 2 CQC staff were present. Natalie was handed the role of engaging the forum because the previous CQC staff member Emma Mcfarlene only works in the directorate of adult social care, so they would inspect residential services for MH/LD/autism as well as nursing and residential homes and domiciliary care agencies. Emma suggested Natalie engage with us since Natalie works in the hospitals directorate who inspect in-patient and outpatient mental health services

Natalie was also joined by Susan Shamash who I have known for many year, were Susan attended my Lambeth Mental Health carers forum when they last inspected South London & Maudsley.

Natalie was kind enough to answer the previous queries I sent her before presenting to the forum.

The first question was on how does how does the CDC engage with slam? And how does it inspect and slam so

Basically they have a named inspector within the London mental health team. Plus they have a named inspection manager within the same team, that being herself. So we meet with senior staff within the trust regularly throughout the year, every two to three months. Face to face it was before COVID they generally would have those meetings at about 2 and or 1 and a half hours. The CQC would talk about previous action plans. So when the CQC came last time, they asked SLaM to improve this.

The CQC also get any kind of information or intelligence from absolutely anyone in the public who contacted them and if the CQC are concerned they will contact them immediately over email or phone.

The CQC use such information to see what’s going well, what are SLaM celebrating at the moment? What are SLaM working on that they they feel really proud of. And that’s really important to remember that there’s lots of things that could be improved in every trust, but there are also things that they’re doing a great and that’s how often the CQC tend to meet them face to face.

The CQC usually have contact with SLaM’s the director of nursing and director of quality. It’s only half an hour meeting every those every two weeks, but there’s a lot of turning in for information.

The CQC also have focus groups throughout the year if there particular errors or teams that the CQC haven’t heard from them for a while, or they want to hear what their improvements are while they’re doing well. The CQC will invite them to attend, but it can be really tricky, as Mental Health staff are really busy and realistically, who wants to go to a CQC focus group sometimes that’s not everyone’s first choice activity.

There will be some changes in how the CQC inspects SLaM due to a change in methodology. The CQC used to do a lot of engagement just prior to an inspection period, but now we’re looking at trying to spread that across the year rather than all in one concentrated amount.

The CQC respond to the first set of questions from Carer members 

The CQC gave the forum space to question them about their first response to my query. A carer member noticed a criteria that caused problems due to getting access to mental health services. The carer felt it meant that less people are getting services. Therefore, you could argue you’re going to get a better output because you’re dealing with a small amount of people getting access via MH service from their GP, which could lead to a false economy of patients quality of service within the mental health trust.

The CQC acknowledged the concern and stated it was a really important point. The CQC are always open and welcoming to any ideas. on how do you think that the CQC could do to help services improve.

The carer suggested sampling on how many people that got rejected for mental health services against those that was accepted. So to see within those within that range who they are, and then do a comparison, and see if there’s any within those samples of rejection and actually had similar cases.

The CQC noted that it was outside of what they would do for an inspection, however they are to happy to feed that back into their colleagues that go into GPS because the ones at this forum inspect mental health trusts only. This was a very important development as the forum is examining how GPs engage with mental health carers, especially if GPs are the first port of call for patients or carers during a mental health crisis.

Another question from a carer was about when the CQC come to South London & Maudsley how do they look for equality and diversity regarding carers? Because the carer has never seen you when the CQC show that in their report. The carer wanted to know if there is anything regarding carers, The carer also asked about queried that there’s never anything regarding carers or support on it. So how do you they show the quality regarding carers. This question was interesting since a mental health carer policy the Triangle of Care wanted the CQC to acredit such inspections regarding services to carers.

Again the CQC admitted that it doesn’t often come through in the reports very much even in the narrative. This is not only in slam but all the other mental health trusts, which the CQC will go away and report that to their team. The carer was also concerned about measurements of stigma and concluded that when it comes to mental health people have got stigma, especially the BAME community. If the BAME community can’t see anything from the CQCs report then they feel that you’re not interested. How can you be supporting us? If you’re not showing what you’re doing for us?

The third question from another carer member was a suggestion mentioning with regards to doing some measurements. Could the CQC not start with an existing data? Are they looking at historic data or working from the bottom as a starting point?

The CQC responded that this is something that they would do. The way they probably go about this is to have the mental health trust to do this. The CQC would ask the trust if they have the data? And if they don’t have the data, why do they not have the data? How do they analyze the data? And what are they doing with it? Have they made actions realizing that they could or couldn’t be doing something better? So certainly there’s work that the trust will have data that they can use to analyze this, but there may well be other areas that they could collect it.

The CQC present on my second query

The CQC responded to the forums questions and moved on the my second query I raised with them before they engaged with my BAME carer forum. The second query was on “How does the CQC engage with patients and carers during an inspection of a trust?”

The CQC presented that as standard when they come and visit a trust as large as slam, they divide services that it provides into something that the CQC would call core services. So examples would be adult inpatient wards. And slam have a number of those adult community mental health services, children, community mental health services, and substance misuse services if a trust provided. So those are examples would be wide across borders, and across all trust, and then the CQC write a final report for the core services.

There can be some difficulty if you are wanting to find out about a specific Ward or a specific team, and it can get quite lost in a report sometimes. if the CQC finds one Ward, or team that is doing particularly well or bad, then they will write about that in the report. But generally, across the trust this team, this type of service is doing well in this area or it could be improved in this area and then if the CQC need an improvement, they put it across the whole Trust.

Later on they inspect the trust about that improvement and in the report, the CQC have the five questions. So is it safe? Is it effective? Is it caring? Is it responsive and is it well led.

Experts by Experience

When the CQC come in with a team of inspectors, they are joined by professional advisors, who are currently working in that in that type of service in another range of interest. The CQC come in with experts by experience who have used that type of service themselves. The CQC do have people who are carers and who come in as the expert by experience as someone who is cared for a loved one with a mental health difficulty. Unfortunately the CQC don’t have many carers, the CQC have more people who have personal experience and the CQC would always welcome many more carriers to join that process as an expert by experience.

When the CQC come in they interview staff, they look at case records, they look at the environment, they interview service users. And the CQC do try to interview carers.

The CQC admitted that they think this is where they could do a lot better. The CQC request the contact details and the consent to be contacted by them through the trust, which the CQC think can be one of the barriers, they can’t just request a list of everyone’s names connected to services and then call them out of the blue. And so so that makes it a bit a bit trickier. Obviously, not everyone wants to speak to the CQC as well. Not everyone knows who the CQC are what they do. And that that again can be a barrier. The CQC collect all of that evidence and they make a judgement about specific things, you know, medicines appropriate training. So, that’s kind of an overview of how they do an inspection.

Inspection during COVID

Because of the COVID situation, the CQC are adapting the way they work at the moment. So they actually will give them longer time to spend talking to carers and people using services by telephone or maybe conferencing software.

The CQC then paused the presentation to give carer members a chance to raise questions on that subject. I won’t go into too much details about the questions, but they were very good regarding

1. How the CQC can gather patients and carers to hear abour services.
2. The problem of BAME carers worried about COVID-19 and how this will be captured in reports
3. More questions regarding sampling and data.

The CQC then presented on how well SLaM had performed during the last inspection and also responded on how well Oxleas has performed since Oxleas usually attend this BAME forum at times.

SLaM Peer Support lead presents

Next up we have the Peer support lead for the trust present on her role. Her focus at the moment is around making sure that we get more peer workers, working people, workers or people who have lived experience of mental health. And they are trying to make sure that we get peer workers working in all different departments of SLaM. This is so they can offer the lived experience and support people in navigating through the mental health service and navigating their way through recovery.

Picture4

SLaM have is what she mentions is a values based measurement, which means that they train peer workers to work to a set of values. Those values are the value of lived experience, developing safe and trusting relationships and strength based approach, anti racist, anti oppressive practice.

Training Peer workers

The peer lead continued that they train people and they do an eight week accredited training. They want to train people who have lived experience of mental health and who have used services. It’s really important to say that just because someone’s got lived experience, that doesn’t mean that they’re going to be good peer workers, you need experience to be a peer worker, and for having lived experience doesn’t make you a worker looking for loads of skills and qualities as well including communication, kindness, and the team working at able to support people with certain kind of recovery.

So what SLaM are looking at is a quite a wide skill set, so SLaM train people for eight weeks and then after that, they are working with teams to see where SLaM can have vacancies. At the moment, a lot of her work is trying to to transform their vacancies into pure workarounds. So maybe they’ve got a vacancy for a support worker, and see if we can transfer them to that team.

Carer members raise queries

There was a large number of questions from carer members one was on what support was given to Peer workers in such a demanding role. This being clinical supervision or regular support, support from line managers, etc, because there may be the sharing of quite challenging information

The peer support lead responded that peers get the same support as any member of staff and will have regular supervision with a line manager. Access, reflective practice, team meetings, whatever it is anyone else can do, but will also be put in regular supervisions that will be facilitated by someone who’s had experience of using their lived experience in the workplace, and which SLaM will ask all our new workers to do.

I also raised a query on why there is either a lack of carer peer supports or none at all, especially if service users get the majority of peer workers, peer befrienders, peer supporters. Carers are also using services, so where are all the peers?

It was noted by the peer lead that it has to be an evidence based initiative. So we need to have the evidence before they can start rolling it out. And at the moment, SLaM has evidence in regard to people with lived experience. So we know there’s loads of informal peer support that goes on for carers and meetings like this, but also just people getting to know one another. In her view, there probably will be. And I can’t imagine why wouldn’t work, with peers is supporting one another. Unfortunately at the moment it doesn’t look like SLaM going to follow that path.

Oxleas responded that they have a different view of carer peer workers than SLaM. Oxleas also have lived experienced practitioners who work in the trust and they have trained, experienced practitioners who have been carers, so they have broadened it so that includes anyone and the way that the roles and then people are employed as members of staff. their lived experience is an added extra. So you might be working in the board or in the health care system, but you are there with your lived experience, whether you’re a carer or a service user, and then that is the extra that you add to the role. Oxleas disagreed that carers were seperated from peer evidence based because how can NHS staff even begin to relate to carers?

There was a big discussion on the nature of peer support and on the peer support projects especially on the peer project regarding peer workers being placed in the Emergency department of Guys and St Thomas’s hospital.

There was also a very good question from another carer member regarding peer support and someone in a crisis, I think it went like this. As in terms of peer support, it’s relatively more needed when, when there’s a crisis, when a patient presents to an acute Ward, and this may be their first very first experience of the loved one, and experiencing mental health, rightly or wrongly, whatever the case may be, that is where that peer supporter is needed.

Plus we had several questions regarding if the involvement register was some form of peer support or if peer support was utilised across the involvement register.

The peer support lead did note that there is a problem on the way that the service works and particularly mental health services is that it’s not a very holistic approach. So one of the questions will be that the services not providing care for carers because that’s not their role. The MH services role is to provide care for service users. The problem is this, we know that if you support caregivers, then that’s going to have a beneficial impact on everyone including the service users. She admitted there needs to be a continued challenging of culture on how peer support works. It was mentioned to approach researchers regarding peer support at Kings college, but the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience was also mentioned.

The discussion went on for some time, but I think I have made this a very long blog post. This is the July’s update for the Lewisham BAME MH carers forum.

A celebration of Peer Support

10177241_747738765268892_5890142387668348507_n

Welcome to another blog post from mental health carer Matthew Mckenzie. On this blog I want to raise awareness of peer support. As you know Carers struggle to provide support and care for those suffering mental health distress.  We also can have psychiatrists, care coordinators and therapists who may feel distant from those going through a difficult time.

Continue reading