Healthwatch Lambeth is inviting patients and unpaid carers to share their experiences of leaving hospital.
The survey is part of a nationwide Healthwatch England project examining hospital discharge. Healthwatch Lambeth is particularly seeking responses from people living in Lambeth who have experienced a difficult hospital discharge within the past 12 months.
This may include situations where:
Discharge was delayed.
The patient was sent home before they felt ready.
Information about the discharge was unclear or incomplete.
Essential equipment or support was not available.
Follow-up care had not been properly arranged.
An unpaid carer was not sufficiently involved, informed or prepared.
The survey can be completed by patients themselves or by an unpaid carer describing the experience of someone they care for.
Healthwatch Lambeth is especially interested in hearing from people whose experiences may not always be represented in health and care feedback, including men and people from ethnic minority communities.
Hospital discharge can place significant responsibility on families and unpaid carers. When carers are not recognised, involved or given the right information, they may suddenly find themselves managing medication, personal care, appointments and recovery without adequate preparation.
Sharing these experiences can help identify what needs to improve and highlight the importance of involving carers as genuine partners throughout discharge planning.
Please share this survey with Lambeth residents, patients and unpaid carers who may have had a difficult hospital discharge experience during the past year.
By Matthew McKenzie, Co-Facilitator – South West London Mental Health Carers Forum
The South West London Mental Health Carers Forum met again during August 2026, bringing together unpaid carers to share experiences, discuss how the forum is developing and look at ways we can strengthen the voice of carers across South West London.
The forum continues to be a peer-led space shaped by carers themselves. An important message from the August meeting was that this is a group for carers, run with carers and influenced by carers. Members spoke about wanting people who join the forum to feel recognised, valued and able to support one another, rather than the group becoming overly formal or service-led.
Co-producing our new forum poster
A significant part of the August meeting was devoted to reviewing a new promotional poster for the forum.
Rather than simply designing a poster and distributing it, we wanted members to see the draft first and help shape the final version. This became a useful co-production exercise in its own right.
Members were generally positive about the design and felt it was clear and welcoming. There was discussion about the wording “We are here for carers – Your voice matters”, and what the word “we” represents. The intention is that “we” means the forum collectively rather than any individual facilitator. The poster therefore needs to communicate that the forum belongs to its members.
Members also discussed the importance of showing what actually happens at the forum. This includes giving carers a stronger voice, influencing services, building connections, raising awareness, providing peer support and occasionally inviting relevant guest speakers.
There was a particularly useful suggestion to make “safe and confidential space” more prominent. Members felt that carers considering joining should know that they can talk about their experiences in an environment where confidentiality and respect are taken seriously.
The discussion also reinforced that guest speakers are useful, but they should support rather than dominate the forum. Speakers can help carers understand services and, importantly, give carers opportunities to raise common concerns directly with people who may be able to influence change.
Keeping the forum safe online
Another important discussion concerned how people access our Zoom meetings.
Members considered whether the Zoom link should simply appear on the poster. We decided against this. Previous experiences of open Zoom links have shown why online carer spaces need some protection.
Instead, the promotional material will direct people towards registration or contact information. This gives us a better idea of who is joining and helps maintain a safer environment for carers discussing potentially sensitive experiences.
The QR code was tested during the meeting and members were able to use it successfully to reach the registration information.
At the same time, an important accessibility point was raised: not every carer has a smartphone or feels comfortable using QR codes. For that reason, the poster includes conventional contact information so nobody is excluded simply because they are less confident with technology.
Making the forum easier to find
We also talked about getting the poster beyond our existing membership.
Members suggested continuing to circulate promotional material through local carer organisations and displaying posters in appropriate NHS and community settings. There was discussion about posters appearing on carer noticeboards and, where possible, reaching wards and other places where families may see them.
The intention is to have both a general poster containing the forum’s regular dates and updated promotional material for individual meetings.
This matters because there are unpaid carers across South West London who may have no idea that a peer forum such as ours exists.
Creating a stronger identity for the forum
One suggestion that came from members was to develop a more independent identity for the forum, including a dedicated email address.
Members felt this could make the forum easier to recognise and give carers a clearer point of contact instead of relying on individual personal accounts. There was also a feeling that having a dedicated identity would help the forum look more established while still remaining a voluntary, carer-led group.
Since the August meeting, I have acted on that suggestion.
The forum now has its own domain and dedicated contact address:
This is a small development, but I think it represents an important step in giving the forum an identity that belongs to the group.
Valuing carers’ time in research
Our meeting also led to a wider discussion about research involving unpaid carers.
I shared information about an Oxford University study exploring caregiver wellbeing and participation in social groups. The proposed survey takes around 40 minutes to complete.
This prompted some strong and thoughtful feedback.
Members were supportive of research that can improve understanding of unpaid caring, but questioned the repeated expectation that carers should contribute substantial amounts of their time without any recognition or reimbursement.
Carers already give enormous amounts of unpaid time. Members felt universities and research organisations should think more carefully about recognising lived-experience contributions, whether through vouchers, reimbursement or even a contribution to an appropriate charity.
This was not about carers being unwilling to help research. In fact, the opposite is often true. Carers repeatedly give their experiences because they hope things will improve for others.
The question raised by the forum was:
If lived experience is valuable enough to research, shouldn’t the time of the people providing that lived experience also be valued?
I agreed to feed this point back.
Moving forward together
What I particularly valued about August’s meeting was that something as straightforward as reviewing a poster developed into a much broader conversation about what kind of forum we want to be.
Members want a welcoming and confidential peer space. They want carers to have a stronger voice. They want relevant speakers and opportunities to influence services, but they also want the forum to remain somewhere carers can simply connect with people who understand the realities of caring.
As one part of the discussion emphasised, we are not a large organisation or charity. We are a group of people coming together to support one another and help ensure carers feel recognised and valued.
That is something worth protecting as the forum grows.
Our next forum
The South West London Mental Health Carers Forum will next meet online on:
Monday 28 September 2026 4:00 pm – 5:30 pm Online via Zoom
The September session will include a peer session and Recovery College discussion.
The forum covers carers across Kingston, Merton, Richmond, Sutton and Wandsworth.
For information about joining or future meetings, contact:
On Monday 24 August, I facilitated another meeting of the South London Mental Health Carers Forum. The forum brings together unpaid carers and carer representatives from Lewisham, Lambeth, Southwark and Croydon, giving people a space to share experiences, learn about their rights and influence the development of local mental health services.
We welcomed carers with many different experiences, including parents supporting adult children with serious mental illness, autism and substance misuse, as well as people involved in advocacy, peer support, staff training and service development. Some members had been navigating the mental health system for many years, while others were newer to caring and looking for guidance.
A powerful message emerged from the introductions: even experienced carers can struggle to understand how different parts of the mental health system fit together. Services can feel fragmented, with carers passed between teams or excluded from discussions despite holding important information about their loved one’s history, warning signs and support needs.
Supporting the Supporters research
We were joined by Carol, an unpaid carer and postgraduate student studying psychology and neuroscience of mental health at King’s College London.
Carol introduced her research project, Supporting the Supporters: Professional Perspectives on Integrating Informal Care into the Mental Health Ecosystem. The study explores how professionals understand the contribution made by unpaid carers, how information and support could be improved, and how carers could be more meaningfully involved alongside mental health professionals.
As part of the research, Carol is interviewing people with professional or advocacy perspectives, including psychologists, psychiatrists, GPs, commissioners, teachers, service providers and carer advocates. I have already taken part in an interview, and several forum members expressed an interest in contributing.
The discussion highlighted why it is so important for carers’ experiences to be represented in academic research. Research can help shape future policy and practice, but carers also stressed that participants should be kept informed about what happens to the findings. Too often, people share deeply personal experiences with research projects and never hear about the outcome.
I also informed members about a separate University of Oxford study exploring wellbeing and social-group attendance among people caring for someone with a serious mental illness. We hope to hear more about this opportunity at a future meeting.
Triangle of Care: more than an accreditation badge
The main presentation focused on the Triangle of Care, a framework developed by Carers Trust to improve cooperation between the person receiving mental health services, the professionals supporting them and their unpaid carer.
As facilitator, I explained that the framework should be something carers experience in practice, not simply an accreditation badge displayed by an organisation.
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust has achieved Triangle of Care Star 1 for inpatient services and Star 2 for community services. With this work now being reviewed, there is an important opportunity for carers to help examine whether the standards are making a noticeable difference across local services.
Carers should be recognised and recorded, listened to when they provide relevant information, given clear explanations about confidentiality, offered appropriate information and support, and involved at important points in care and discharge planning. Staff should also understand that carers have needs and rights of their own.
Confidentiality should not become exclusion
Confidentiality produced one of the most detailed and passionate discussions of the meeting. Several carers described situations in which confidentiality had been used to shut down communication completely.
Respecting the service user’s privacy is essential, but confidentiality does not prevent professionals from listening to a carer’s concerns. A carer may hold vital information about changes in behaviour, medication, relapse indicators, risks or what the person is like when well.
Even when professionals cannot disclose personal clinical information, they can usually provide general information about how a service works, explain how a carer can submit concerns and signpost the carer towards available support. Carers should not simply be told, “We cannot speak to you,” and then left without guidance.
Members also discussed situations where a person experiencing a serious deterioration may withdraw consent for family involvement. These cases require careful professional judgement, particularly where there may be questions about safety, insight or decision-making ability. Carers felt that staff need more confidence and training to manage these situations without automatically treating the family as a problem.
Carers were encouraged to ask whether their role has been recorded, how they can share information with the clinical team, how they will be involved in care and discharge planning, and who they can approach if their perspective is being overlooked. Where serious concerns are ignored, carers should raise them in writing so there is a clear record.
Carer involvement in discharge
The discussion then moved to hospital discharge. Carers can sometimes be contacted shortly before someone returns home, without a proper conversation about whether they are able or prepared to provide the expected support.
A safer discharge should include an early discussion with the carer about the help they can realistically offer. Information about medication, warning signs, follow-up arrangements and points of contact should be explained clearly. Professionals should not assume that a family member can take on intensive caring responsibilities simply because they are related to the person.
Carers also need to know that they can request a carer’s assessment from their local authority. An assessment can help identify the effect caring is having on their own wellbeing and what support may be needed. Existing assessments should be reviewed when circumstances or caring responsibilities change.
What carers raised during the forum
A substantial part of the meeting was led by carers sharing what they had experienced while supporting relatives through mental health services. Although everyone’s circumstances were different, many common concerns emerged across Lewisham, Lambeth, Southwark and Croydon.
Several carers described the mental health system as fragmented and difficult to navigate. Families may deal with inpatient wards, community mental health teams, crisis services, supported accommodation, GPs and social care, but these services do not always appear to communicate effectively with one another. One carer reflected that even after years of involvement, it can still be difficult to know whom to contact when a new crisis develops. This raised concerns about how much harder the system must be for people who are new to caring.
Carers also felt that decisions made at senior levels do not always reflect what happens in practice. Policies, pathways and strategies may appear clear on paper, but families can experience delays, poor communication and a lack of coordination. Members wanted more people with direct experience of using or working within mental health services to influence decisions at the highest levels.
A major concern was the failure to listen when carers report early signs of deterioration. Carers often recognise changes in sleep, behaviour, medication use, substance misuse or communication long before a situation reaches crisis point. Some members described situations in which their warnings were overlooked, only for the person’s condition to worsen later. Carers felt that their observations should be recorded and considered as part of risk assessment and relapse prevention, even when professionals cannot share confidential clinical information in return.
Confidentiality was one of the most strongly debated issues. Carers understood that people using mental health services have a right to privacy. However, they felt that confidentiality is sometimes interpreted too rigidly and used to exclude families from almost every conversation.
The group stressed that professionals can still listen to information provided by a carer. They can also explain how the service operates, receive concerns, provide general guidance and direct the carer towards support. Saying “we cannot tell you anything” should not bring all communication to an end.
Some carers described being excluded after their relative had withdrawn consent for family involvement, sometimes during a period of serious illness or limited insight. Members questioned how consent is considered when someone’s mental state or decision-making ability may be changing. They felt staff should look carefully at the individual circumstances, risks and history instead of applying confidentiality as an automatic barrier.
The inconsistency between professionals was another concern. Some staff members communicate sensitively and recognise the value of family knowledge, while others refuse even to listen. Carers felt that the quality of their involvement should not depend on which professional happens to answer the telephone. Better training, management support and accountability are needed so that good carer practice becomes consistent across services.
There was also discussion about inaccurate or outdated information remaining in health records. Carers described how an early diagnosis, allegation or misunderstanding can continue to influence future treatment long after it has been challenged. Correcting such information can be extremely difficult, yet it may affect how professionals view both the person receiving care and their family. Members wanted clearer ways to challenge inaccuracies and ensure that corrections or alternative professional opinions are properly recorded.
Carers raised concerns about attitudes towards families. While relationships can sometimes be complicated, relatives should not automatically be viewed as interfering or obstructive. Where disagreements arise, members suggested that an independent person, advocate or senior professional could help everyone understand the different perspectives. Completely blocking communication can damage family relationships and may also undermine the person’s recovery and safety.
The experiences of carers from racialised communities were also recognised. One member spoke about the fear and mistrust that can develop when Black men repeatedly come into contact with mental health services or the criminal justice system. The forum acknowledged the importance of culturally responsive services that understand how race, stigma, previous experiences and unequal treatment can affect whether families feel safe seeking help.
Hospital discharge was another prominent concern. Some carers reported being contacted too late, with an expectation that they would immediately resume significant caring responsibilities. Members felt carers should be involved early enough to discuss what support they can realistically and safely provide. They should receive clear information about medication, warning signs, follow-up arrangements and who to contact if the person’s condition deteriorates.
Carers should not be treated as an unlimited resource. Being a parent, partner, sibling or other relative does not automatically mean someone is physically, emotionally or practically able to provide the level of support being assumed. The carer’s own health, employment, family responsibilities and wellbeing must be considered during care and discharge planning.
Members also discussed the importance of carer’s assessments. Some people had received very few assessments despite caring for many years. Carers were encouraged to request an assessment from their local authority and to seek a review when their responsibilities or personal circumstances change. An assessment creates a formal record of the caring situation and may identify support needed to protect the carer’s wellbeing.
Another recurring issue was accountability. Guidance about involving carers may exist, but families are not always sure what to do when services fail to follow it. Members were encouraged to put important concerns in writing, keep records of correspondence and ask for matters to be escalated when necessary. A clear written record can become particularly important if warnings have been ignored or a serious incident later occurs.
Despite these difficult experiences, the conversation also demonstrated the strength of peer support. Carers shared knowledge, validated one another’s concerns and helped newer members understand that they were not alone. The group strongly encouraged carers not to remain isolated, even when their loved one appears relatively well. Joining a carers’ centre, peer-support group or advocacy forum can provide information and connections before another crisis occurs.
The overall message from carers was clear: they are not asking to take over clinical decisions. They are asking to be recognised as people with valuable knowledge, their own support needs and an important role in safer care. The Triangle of Care will only have meaning if carers can see and feel these principles operating in their everyday contact with services.
Turning shared experience into influence
This meeting demonstrated why independent, carer-led forums remain so important. They reduce isolation, allow newer carers to learn from those with longer experience and help identify patterns that may otherwise be dismissed as individual incidents.
Members involved in SLaM meetings and the forthcoming carers’ listening event were encouraged to raise the Triangle of Care and ask how carers will contribute to its review. I will also seek to invite representatives leading this work at SLaM to a future forum so that they can update carers directly and respond to questions.
Our next South London Mental Health Carers Forum is due to take place on Monday 28 September 2026. We will continue examining the Triangle of Care, with a stronger focus on carers’ experiences and the practical changes they want to see across mental health services.
I would like to thank everyone who attended and spoke so openly. The experiences shared were sometimes difficult, but they reinforced an important principle: carers should not have to fight simply to be recognised, heard and supported.
My latest poetry video, “Gatekeeping Care,” explores the barriers minority ethnic unpaid carers can face when trying to navigate mental health services.
This is where unwritten rules, complicated medical language and unexplained carer rights can leave people struggling to understand how to obtain support.
Unpaid carers can also have their concerns not taken seriously.
The poem also reflects on what it feels like when decisions are made without carers and their cultural or religious beliefs are overlooked.
Through this poem, I want to raise awareness of why the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) matters to carers and families.
I feel mental health services must listen to carers, communicate clearly and recognise them as equal partners rather than leaving them feeling judged, invisible or powerless.
Black unpaid carers can face significant barriers when trying to access mental health support for themselves or the person they care for.
These difficulties may include long waiting times, financial pressure, cultural stigma, fear of statutory services and a shortage of professionals who understand the effects of racism, racial trauma and culturally specific caring experiences.
In my new video, I examine how misdiagnosis, over-policing and expectations that Black families should simply remain “strong” can create mistrust and discourage carers from asking for help.
Drawing on my perspective as a Black lived-experience carer, I also consider what mental health services can do differently. Genuine improvement requires culturally responsive support, greater representation, safe spaces for carers, accessible community-led services and meaningful partnership with Black carers and families.
PCREF provides an important opportunity to challenge racial inequalities, but its success will depend on whether services listen to lived experience and turn commitments into visible action.
By Matthew McKenzie – Member of Southwark Carers Strategy Working Group
Southwark Council is inviting unpaid carers from Southwark to share their experiences and help shape its review of adult safeguarding services.
The council’s Health, Adult Social Care and Community Safety Scrutiny Commission is examining how safeguarding services can better support adults and their carers while promoting independence, dignity, choice and wellbeing.
The Commission would particularly like to hear carers’ experiences of:
Working with safeguarding and other professionals
Accessing information and support
Being included in safeguarding decisions
Preventing abuse, neglect and other forms of harm
Balancing personal safety with independence and choice
Self-neglect and hoarding
The use of technology
Communication with carers
Supporting someone living with dementia or mental ill health
Caring for an adult child or sibling with a disability
Your experiences could help the Commission identify what is working well, where improvements are needed and how carers can be more effectively recognised and involved.
Complete the carers’ survey
Unpaid carers can share their experiences through Southwark Council’s online Adult Safeguarding Review Carers’ Survey:
The survey is anonymous and will remain open until Friday 11 September 2026.
Join the online carers’ workshop
Southwark Council is also holding an online workshop where carers can discuss their experiences in greater detail.
Join the online carers’ workshop
Southwark Council is also holding an online workshop where carers can discuss their experiences in greater detail.
Date: Thursday 20 August 2026 Time: 12:30 pm Location: Online via Microsoft Teams
To request the Microsoft Teams joining details, please contact Julie Timbrell, Scrutiny Project Manager, at:
Please include “Adult Safeguarding Carers’ Workshop” in the subject line.
For safeguarding and meeting security, the direct Teams link and passcode are not being published on this website.
If you cannot attend the workshop, you can still contribute to the review by completing the anonymous survey.
Confidentiality and use of information
Taking part in the survey or workshop is voluntary.
Notes will be taken during the workshop, but participants’ comments will be anonymised before they are included in reports or presented to councillors. Individual participants will not be identified without their explicit consent.
Survey responses will also be analysed and reported anonymously. Southwark Council is interested in identifying common themes and experiences rather than identifying individual carers.
The information collected will only be used to inform the Adult Safeguarding Review and its recommendations. A report containing the Commission’s findings and recommendations will be published after the review has been completed.
By Matthew McKenzie – Triangle of Care – Community group chair
Putting Carers at the Centre of Care
The latest Triangle of Care Community Group brought together carers, professionals and partner organisations from across England to share learning, celebrate progress and identify where further improvements are needed. The meeting highlighted the growing influence of the Triangle of Care across mental health and acute services, whilst reinforcing that there is still much work to do to ensure carers are consistently recognised, valued and supported.
One of the most powerful aspects of the meeting was hearing directly from carers about their experiences. Whilst many spoke positively about the progress that has been made over recent years, there was a shared view that carer involvement remains inconsistent across services. Carers described feeling more included than ever before, with greater awareness of the Triangle of Care principles and more opportunities to participate in steering groups, service developments and community discussions. However, concerns remain around automatic carer identification, information sharing and ensuring that carers are genuinely recognised as partners in care.
Several carers reflected on the importance of having their voices heard early in a patient’s care journey. Examples were shared of services introducing carer contribution templates that ensure family members are involved within 72 hours of admission, whilst others highlighted improvements to confidentiality processes that allow patients to determine what information can be shared with carers at different stages of their recovery. These practical changes demonstrate how relatively small adjustments can have a significant impact on relationships between carers, patients and professionals.
Progress Across the Triangle of Care Programme
Mary Patel, Triangle of Care Programme Lead at Carers Trust, provided an update on developments across the national programme. The Triangle of Care continues to grow, with a number of organisations progressing through the STAR accreditation process and demonstrating their commitment to embedding carer-inclusive practice across services.
Importantly, members were reminded that the STAR awards are not designed to rank organisations, but instead reflect the breadth of implementation across different service areas. STAR I focuses primarily on inpatient and crisis services, STAR II expands into community services, whilst STAR III recognises organisations delivering integrated services across multiple clinical areas.
Several trusts have recently achieved STAR awards, whilst others are progressing through the assessment process over the coming months. The programme’s peer review approach continues to ensure that carers remain central to the assessment process, with carers actively involved in reviewing evidence, identifying good practice and making recommendations for future development.
The Triangle of Care Member Hub continues to provide valuable opportunities for peer learning, resource sharing and collaborative working. Upcoming webinars will include sessions exploring Open Dialogue approaches developed by Devon Partnership NHS Trust, providing members with further opportunities to learn about therapeutic models that place families and carers at the heart of care planning.
Advancing Equality Through the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework
A significant development announced during the meeting was the launch of Phase Two of the Triangle of Care and Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) project.
PCREF represents the first mandatory anti-racism framework within mental health services in England. Recognising that carers from racially marginalised communities often experience poorer outcomes and face additional barriers when accessing support, the Triangle of Care programme has been working collaboratively with carers and mental health providers to strengthen the way services assess and respond to carers’ needs.
The revised self-assessment framework encourages services to move beyond assumptions and adopt a more professionally curious approach to understanding carers’ individual experiences. Rather than viewing carers as a homogenous group, the framework recognises that caring experiences are shaped by culture, identity, language, personal circumstances and wider health inequalities.
Pilot sites from across England are now testing the revised guidance, with learning being shared nationally throughout the project. Importantly, organisations do not need to be participating in the pilot to begin implementing the principles and learning that emerge from this work.
Alongside PCREF, Carers Trust continues to contribute to national policy developments, including the Modern Service Framework for Severe Mental Illness and the forthcoming Mental Health Strategy for England. Throughout these discussions, there has been a consistent message that carers must be recognised as partners in care and have access to appropriate support in their own right.
Confidentiality, Information Sharing and Carer Inclusion
Confidentiality remained one of the most prominent themes throughout the meeting. Whilst participants acknowledged the importance of protecting patients’ rights and preferences, carers highlighted that confidentiality can sometimes become a barrier to meaningful engagement.
Several contributors reflected that confidentiality should never prevent professionals from listening to carers’ concerns or receiving valuable information that may support a patient’s care. Others spoke about the importance of revisiting conversations around consent over time, recognising that patients’ preferences may change as their circumstances and wellbeing improve.
Practical examples of good practice included breaking confidentiality discussions down into specific areas, allowing patients to decide what information can be shared about medication, activities, wellbeing and treatment plans, rather than relying on simple ‘yes or no’ decisions. There was also discussion around the importance of staff training to improve confidence when navigating complex conversations around confidentiality and information sharing.
Participants agreed that carers should never be expected to provide significant levels of support without receiving the information necessary to do so safely and effectively. Achieving the right balance between confidentiality and partnership working remains an important priority for the Triangle of Care community.
Triangle of Care Principles Within Acute Services
The meeting concluded with an inspiring presentation from Wendy Doyle, Head of Patient Experience at St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Epsom and St Helier Hospitals, exploring how Triangle of Care principles can be successfully implemented within acute hospital settings.
Whilst the Triangle of Care originated within mental health services, Wendy demonstrated that its principles are equally applicable across acute care environments. Her organisation supports approximately 19,000 members of staff across multiple hospital sites and has developed a comprehensive approach to identifying, recording and supporting unpaid carers.
Staff are encouraged to identify carers at the earliest possible opportunity, with this information recorded within patient records to ensure continuity throughout the patient’s hospital journey. Comprehensive carer awareness training is delivered through virtual sessions, ward-based education and e-learning resources, helping staff understand both the practical and emotional importance of recognising carers.
Importantly, identifying carers is only the beginning of the process. Every carer recorded within the hospital system receives a follow-up wellbeing check from the Patient Experience Team to discuss their own support needs, identify any challenges and facilitate referrals to local carers’ organisations where appropriate.
Partnership working sits at the heart of this approach, with close collaboration between acute services and local carers’ centres ensuring carers can access a broad range of practical and emotional support. Adult and Young Carers’ Charters have also been co-produced with carers themselves, helping to shape organisational commitments around kindness, inclusion and meaningful engagement.
Perhaps most importantly, Wendy highlighted that supporting carers improves outcomes for everyone. Better communication strengthens discharge planning, reduces avoidable hospital admissions and readmissions, improves patient safety and helps prevent carer burnout. Acute hospital stays can provide valuable opportunities to identify carers who may previously have remained invisible and connect them with longer-term support.
Looking Ahead
The discussions throughout the meeting demonstrated both the progress that has been made and the challenges that remain. There is increasing recognition that carers are essential partners in delivering high-quality care across both mental health and acute services. However, meaningful involvement cannot rely upon individual goodwill alone; it requires consistent systems, robust policies and a genuine commitment to partnership working.
Looking ahead, the Triangle of Care programme will continue to expand opportunities for peer learning, influence national policy developments and support organisations to embed carer-inclusive practices across services. The ongoing work around PCREF and wider mental health policy developments provide important opportunities to ensure that carers’ voices remain central to future service transformation.
Above all, the meeting reinforced a simple but powerful message: carers must not be viewed as an afterthought or an optional addition to care planning. They are experts through experience, invaluable partners in care and individuals with support needs of their own. When carers are identified early, listened to meaningfully and supported appropriately, outcomes improve not only for carers themselves, but for patients, families and services alike.
The Triangle of Care Community Group continues to provide an important space where carers and professionals can learn from one another, challenge existing practices and work collectively towards more compassionate, inclusive and effective care.
If you weren’t able to join our June South London Mental Health Carers Group meeting, here’s a summary of the main discussions and updates. As always, the meeting brought together unpaid carers from across Lambeth, Lewisham, Southwark and Croydon to share experiences, raise concerns and keep each other informed about developments affecting mental health carers.
Why these meetings matter
One of the strongest themes throughout the meeting was the importance of carers staying connected. Many carers cannot attend every committee or involvement meeting due to their caring responsibilities, work or other commitments. By sharing updates, we can help ensure everyone remains informed about changes that may affect them and the people they support.
Several carers commented that services sometimes feel like they are “reinventing the wheel”, with the same issues being raised repeatedly. While progress can be slow, continuing to speak up and share experiences remains essential.
Updates from the Maudsley Family and Carers Committee
Carers who attended the latest South London and Maudsley (SLAM) Family and Carers Committee shared several important developments.
Review of the Involvement Register
SLAM is reviewing its Involvement Register over the coming months. Working groups will look at areas including:
Outcomes
How involvement is delivered
Governance and policy
Carers interested in influencing how services engage with families are encouraged to consider joining the register. Participation is flexible, allowing carers to contribute when they are able.
Triangle of Care
The Triangle of Care continues to be a significant focus, particularly around how carers are identified, involved and supported during someone’s mental health care.
Discussions also covered how Trusts monitor their progress and how carers’ details are recorded to ensure families receive appropriate information and support.
Information for carers
Work is continuing to improve the information provided to carers. Rather than relying on a single handbook that can quickly become outdated, there are plans to develop more flexible information resources that can be updated more easily and provided when carers actually need them.
Mental Health Act reforms
A significant part of the meeting focused on the recent changes to the Mental Health Act and what they could mean for unpaid carers.
Key topics included:
Greater emphasis on patient choice and involvement.
The introduction of the Nominated Person, replacing the traditional “Nearest Relative” in many situations.
The importance of Advance Choice Documents, allowing people to record their wishes while they are well.
The need for carers to understand their legal rights and ask questions during admissions, treatment planning and discharge.
Carers discussed both the opportunities and concerns arising from these changes, particularly where someone may lose insight during periods of illness. There was broad agreement that carers need clear information about how the reforms will be implemented locally and how families will continue to be involved.
Advocacy and complaints
Members shared experiences of trying to access advocacy services and navigate complaints processes.
Concerns included:
Limited access to independent mental health advocacy in some boroughs.
Unclear complaints pathways.
The need for carers to be listened to, even when confidential information cannot be shared with them.
The importance of raising concerns through appropriate safeguarding and governance routes where necessary.
Several carers also shared positive experiences where persistence had led to improvements in care.
Local updates from across South London
One of the strengths of the South London Mental Health Carers Group is the opportunity for carers from different boroughs to share what is happening locally. While each area faces its own challenges, many of the issues raised were common across South London.
Lambeth
Carers discussed the continuing work of the Lambeth Living Well Collaborative, which brings together carers, service users, voluntary organisations and professionals to improve local mental health services. Members were reminded that carers are welcome to attend collaborative meetings and contribute to discussions about service improvements.
The conversation also recognised the wider pressures affecting carers beyond mental health services. Rising living costs, reductions in council tax support for many working-age residents receiving benefits, and the increasing financial pressures on families continue to affect carers’ wellbeing. These wider social issues inevitably have an impact on people’s ability to sustain their caring role.
Lewisham
Carers provided an update on Lewisham’s Community Mental Health Transformation programme. While work continues to redesign community services, concerns remain about what happens when someone is discharged from specialist mental health services back to primary care.
Several carers highlighted unanswered questions around:
How GPs will be supported to manage people with ongoing severe mental health needs.
What support carers can expect once specialist services are no longer involved.
Whether communication between secondary mental health services and GP practices is sufficiently robust.
These are important questions that carers hope local services will continue to address as transformation plans progress.
Croydon and Lewisham carer information
Members also heard that new information resources for carers are being developed in Croydon and Lewisham. Rather than relying on lengthy booklets, services are creating a series of practical information sheets covering different aspects of mental health care. This approach should allow information to be updated more regularly and provided when carers need it most.
Carers welcomed this change, noting that people often need specific information at different stages of their caring journey rather than receiving a large handbook all at once.
The important role of GP practices
An interesting discussion focused on the role of GP practices in supporting unpaid carers.
Members recognised that experiences vary considerably between surgeries. Some GP practices have developed strong support for carers, while others still have some way to go.
One positive example shared was Wells Park Practice, where carers have become actively involved in developing support, including helping to establish a regular carers’ coffee morning. This demonstrates what can be achieved when GP practices actively engage with carers and recognise the valuable role they play.
The meeting reinforced several practical messages for carers:
Make sure your GP practice knows that you are an unpaid carer and ask to be recorded on their carers register.
Ask what support your surgery offers to carers, including health checks, referrals or local support groups.
If your current practice offers limited support for carers, it may be worth exploring what neighbouring GP practices provide, particularly if they have developed a stronger carers programme.
As community mental health services increasingly work alongside primary care, ensuring that GP practices recognise and support unpaid carers is becoming more important than ever.
Learning from each other
Perhaps the most valuable part of the local updates was hearing how carers are finding solutions in different boroughs. Good practice in one area can often inspire improvements elsewhere.
Whether discussing carers’ information, community transformation, GP engagement or involvement opportunities, the message was clear: carers’ experiences are a vital source of learning, and sharing those experiences helps improve services across South London as a whole.
Looking ahead
One of the biggest messages from the meeting was that carers have valuable lived experience that services need to hear. Whether through local carers’ centres, involvement registers, Trust committees or community groups, every contribution helps shape future services.
If you are interested in becoming more involved but can only contribute occasionally, don’t let that put you off. Many opportunities allow carers to participate as much or as little as their circumstances allow.
Thank you to everyone who attended and contributed so openly. Your experiences continue to help improve understanding and influence services across South London.
We look forward to welcoming both new and returning carers to our next meeting.
Blog by Ethnic Mental Health Carer forum Chair – Matthew McKenzie
The May 2026 Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum brought together carers, researchers, clinicians, community leaders, and representatives from mental health organisations across England. Although attendance was smaller than usual, the discussion was rich, honest, and highly informative, covering Mental Health Act reform, carers’ experiences, service inequalities, innovative approaches to care, and new research opportunities.
For those who were unable to attend, this blog provides a comprehensive overview of the meeting, including key presentations, audience questions, responses from speakers, and useful resources shared during the session.
Opening Remarks
As the chair, I welcomed attendees and outlined the agenda. The meeting focused on following:
Mental Health Act research and reform
Carers’ experiences supporting loved ones through detention
Findings from a major East Sussex carers research project
Resources for carers under the Mental Health Act
Electronic Health Records and future developments
Wider discussions on racial trauma, inequalities, and service improvement
The meeting also provided opportunities for networking, sharing lived experiences, and highlighting innovative projects happening across the country.
Research Study: Supporting a Loved One Through Mental Health Detention
Dr Maeve Conneely from University College London opened the meeting with a presentation on a new research study exploring the experiences of people who have been assessed or detained under the Mental Health Act, as well as the experiences of family members and carers who supported them through that process. The study has been commissioned as part of the wider programme of Mental Health Act reform and aims to understand how the current “Nearest Relative” provisions operate in practice before changes are introduced under the new legislation.
Dr Conneely explained that researchers are particularly interested in hearing from carers who were involved in supporting a loved one but who were not formally recognised as the “Nearest Relative” under the existing legal framework. She highlighted that these experiences are especially important because they can reveal where carers have been excluded from decision-making, denied access to information, or prevented from contributing to assessments despite playing a significant role in supporting the individual concerned. The study is open to anyone aged 16 or over who has direct experience of Mental Health Act assessments, detentions, Community Treatment Orders, holding powers, or related interventions, whether as a patient or as a supporter.
The research is linked to ongoing reforms of the Mental Health Act and seeks to understand how the “Nearest Relative” provisions currently operate before changes are implemented.
Who Can Take Part?
The study is looking for:
People who have been detained under the Mental Health Act
Family members and carers who supported someone during detention or assessment
Individuals who should have been involved as a nearest relative but were not
Anyone aged 16 or over with relevant experience
Interviews are conducted online and participants receive a £30 shopping voucher as a thank-you for their time.
Key Question from Participants
Q: Does the study include situations where someone should have been involved but wasn’t?
Response: Yes. Researchers are particularly interested in understanding experiences where carers or family members were excluded from decision-making processes despite playing a significant caring role.
Another Important Question
Q: Do carers need permission from the person who was detained before participating?
Response: No. Carers are sharing their own experiences and therefore only need to provide their own consent.
Discussion Themes
Participants highlighted:
Long-standing inequalities affecting Black communities under the Mental Health Act.
The overuse of psychiatric labels without sufficient exploration of trauma.
The need to understand why some individuals receive significantly different experiences of care, including access to private mental health facilities.
Concerns about trust in mental health services and the lasting impact of poor experiences across generations.
Several carers committed to taking part in the study to ensure lived experience informs future policy.
East Sussex Carers Research Project: What Carers Told Us
Age Angiolini presented findings from a year-long carers-led research project examining the experiences of family carers supporting people with serious mental illness across East Sussex. The study was developed in response to repeated concerns raised by carers at local support meetings and sought to capture their experiences of interacting with mental health services provided by the Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust (SPFT).
Although the research received 71 responses, representing only a proportion of the carers population in the region, the findings revealed a striking consistency in the challenges carers face. The survey explored themes including carers’ involvement in care planning, communication with services, consent and confidentiality, quality of care, crisis support, and priorities for improvement. Among the most significant findings were that 72% of carers reported being only sometimes involved or not involved at all in their loved one’s care, 73% felt services relied too heavily on carers, and 72% said they regularly had to advocate to secure appropriate support. The research concluded that many carers feel undervalued, excluded from decision-making, and left carrying significant responsibilities without adequate recognition or support.
The study gathered responses from carers supporting people with:
Schizophrenia
Bipolar disorder
ADHD
Autism
Complex neurodiverse conditions
Although the sample size was relatively modest, the findings revealed significant and consistent concerns.
Key Findings from the report
Carers Feel Excluded
72% reported being only sometimes involved or not involved at all.
73% felt services relied too heavily on carers.
72% said they had to advocate strongly to secure appropriate care.
Communication Failures
Participants reported poor communication between:
Mental health services
Assessment teams
Social services
Mental health liaison teams
Many carers described communications as inconsistent, unclear, and difficult to navigate.
Consent and Confidentiality
A recurring concern was that confidentiality procedures are often applied rigidly, preventing carers from sharing vital information during crises.
Carers argued that this can actively undermine effective care.
Quality of Care Concerns
The research found:
90% reported insufficient care.
Significant concerns around continuity of care.
A strong desire for dedicated care coordinators.
Widespread frustration with crisis services.
Crisis Support is Not Working
Many carers reported that:
NHS 111 is often inadequate for mental health crises.
A&E is frequently unsuitable for people experiencing mental distress.
Services remain reactive rather than preventative.
Calls for Change
Recommendations included:
Better crisis pathways
Improved coordination between services
More trauma-informed approaches
Greater therapeutic support
Increased family involvement
Better support for neurodiverse individuals
The presentation sparked considerable discussion, with many attendees noting that the findings reflected experiences they had encountered for years.
Carers Speak Out: Frustration, Trauma and the Need for Change
One of the most powerful aspects of the meeting was hearing directly from carers.
Several participants reflected on decades of involvement with mental health services and expressed concern that despite repeated reviews, consultations, and reforms, many of the same issues continue to persist.
Common themes included:
Institutional racism
Poor communication
Exclusion of carers
Over-medicalisation
Lack of trauma-informed care
Inadequate support during crises
A number of attendees emphasised that families often become de facto care coordinators, managing appointments, services, medications, and crises while receiving little support themselves.
One participant observed:
“They plan, medicate and treat. We care. Our worlds don’t meet.”
Others highlighted the impact of racial trauma and the way mental health services can fail to recognise the cultural context of distress.
Open Dialogue: A Different Way Forward?
Ren Reins introduced the concept of Open Dialogue, an internationally recognised approach to mental health care that focuses on relationships, networks, and collaborative conversations.
Open Dialogue aims to:
Bring families and professionals together
Reduce fragmentation between services
Focus on lived experience
Build trust
Improve recovery outcomes
Ren explained that major NHS-funded trials are underway and encouraged carers to learn more about the approach.
The discussion generated significant interest, particularly from attendees looking for alternatives to traditional medical models of care.
Nearest Relative Resources Project
Professor Judy Laing from the University of Bristol provided an update on an innovative project designed to support family members and carers who hold, or may hold, responsibilities under the Mental Health Act’s “Nearest Relative” provisions. Drawing on previous research with carers and mental health professionals, Professor Laing explained that many family members who find themselves in the Nearest Relative role often receive little information, guidance, or emotional support despite carrying significant legal responsibilities. In response, her team secured funding to develop a free, co-produced online resource that helps carers understand their rights, responsibilities, and options when supporting a loved one through mental health assessment, detention, and treatment.
Developed in partnership with carers, family members, mental health professionals, and organisations including Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, and Carers Trust, the website provides practical information, downloadable tools, guidance for conversations with professionals, and resources to help carers look after their own wellbeing. Professor Laing stressed that the project has been shaped directly by the experiences of those who have undertaken the role themselves, ensuring that the guidance reflects the realities and challenges carers face in practice rather than simply explaining legal processes.
The project emerged from research identifying significant gaps in information and support for people carrying out the “Nearest Relative” role.
What Has Been Developed?
The project has created a free online resource containing:
Information about legal rights
Guidance on conversations with professionals
Practical tools for meetings
Support for carers’ wellbeing
Resources explaining upcoming legal changes
The materials have been co-produced with carers and family members.
Questions Raised
How are diverse communities included?
Participants asked how the project ensures equity and accessibility.
Professor Laing explained that:
People from ethnic minority backgrounds have contributed to development.
Resources are being improved to increase accessibility.
Additional funding is supporting work around inclusion and accessibility.
Translation and alternative formats are being explored.
How is the project promoted?
Discussion focused on ensuring communities are aware of available support rather than resources existing only online.
Professor Laing outlined efforts involving:
Mind
Carers Trust
Mental health services
Local media
Carer forums
How will the new Nominated Person role protect carers who have traditionally been involved in supporting a loved one?
Several participants expressed concern that replacing the Nearest Relative role could unintentionally weaken the involvement of family members who have historically provided substantial support during periods of mental ill-health. Questions were raised about situations where a person may choose someone other than their primary carer to act as their Nominated Person, potentially reducing carers’ ability to access information or participate in key decisions. Professor Laing acknowledged that these concerns have been raised by many carers and explained that the practical details of how the new system will operate are still being developed. She stressed the importance of carers contributing their experiences to ensure that future guidance recognises the valuable role families often play in supporting recovery and maintaining continuity of care.
What support is available when professionals fail to recognise or understand carers’ legal rights?
Attendees also discussed the reality that many mental health professionals are not always familiar with the legal powers and rights associated with the Nearest Relative role. Participants described situations where carers were excluded from discussions, not informed of important decisions, or felt unable to challenge professional opinions because they lacked confidence in their understanding of the law. In response, Professor Laing highlighted that one of the main objectives of the Bristol resources project is to bridge this knowledge gap by providing practical tools, suggested questions, and clear explanations of carers’ rights. She noted that the project is also developing resources aimed at professionals themselves, with the goal of increasing awareness and ensuring that carers’ legal rights are better understood and respected across mental health services.
Attendees welcomed the commitment to increasing visibility.
Electronic Health Records and Future Developments
Dr Anna De Simoni, an Academic GP and Associate Professor of Primary Care at Queen Mary University of London, presented an early-stage research proposal focused on how electronic health records could be used to better understand and map the social support networks surrounding people living with multiple long-term health conditions.
Dr De Simoni sought direct feedback from carers to help shape the project before a formal funding application is submitted. She explained that while healthcare professionals can usually identify a patient’s next of kin and household members through existing GP records, they often have very limited understanding of the wider support networks that play a vital role in a person’s wellbeing.
These networks may include family members, neighbours, friends, faith groups, community organisations, carers, and others who provide practical and emotional support. The research aims to explore whether technology and electronic health records can help healthcare professionals better recognise these support systems and use that information to improve care planning, reduce unnecessary hospital admissions, and enhance quality of life for people living with complex health conditions.
The discussion generated considerable interest, particularly regarding:
Information sharing
Integration across services
Support for carers
Data protection concerns
Improving continuity of care
Several participants expressed enthusiasm about the potential benefits while also raising questions regarding privacy and access to NHS information.
Questions and Answers from Dr Anna De Simoni’s Presentation
Q: What problem is this research trying to solve? A: Dr De Simoni explained that healthcare professionals often know very little about the wider support network surrounding a patient. While medical records may identify a next of kin or people living in the same household, they rarely capture the full picture of who is actually providing practical, emotional, or day-to-day support. The project aims to better understand these social networks and use that information to improve care planning and patient outcomes.
Q: Who is the research aimed at? A: The initial focus is on people living with multiple long-term health conditions, including illnesses such as COPD and other complex health needs e.g mental health. The project seeks to understand how stronger recognition of support networks could improve quality of life, reduce hospital admissions, and support people to remain independent for longer.
Q: How would patients contribute information about their support network? A: The proposal includes the use of a Universal Care Plan through the NHS App. Patients would be able to enter information themselves about what matters to them, who supports them, how they prefer to be treated, and what should happen if their health deteriorates. This information could then be viewed and updated by relevant healthcare professionals.
Q: What role could carers play within the proposed system? A: Participants highlighted that carers often provide the majority of practical support but are frequently invisible within healthcare systems. The proposed approach could make carers more visible by helping professionals understand who is involved in supporting a patient and what role they play in maintaining wellbeing and independence.
Q: How will patient confidentiality and data protection be managed? A: Concerns were raised about privacy and the security of NHS data. Dr De Simoni explained that information governance, GDPR compliance, and data protection would be central to the project. Specialists in privacy and information governance would be involved to ensure that any information collected is handled safely, appropriately, and with proper consent.
Key Discussion: Why Are Carers Still Fighting the Same Battles?
A recurring theme throughout the meeting was the sense that many challenges identified today are the same challenges carers raised ten or twenty years ago.
Questions included:
Why are services still fragmented?
Why do carers continue to feel excluded?
Why are communication problems so persistent?
Why is trauma often overlooked?
Why do inequalities remain entrenched?
Participants reflected on whether the issue is primarily one of resources, leadership, service design, or culture.
Many agreed that meaningful change requires carers to remain actively involved in shaping policy and service delivery.
A carers support group recommended during discussion as a source of peer support and shared experience.
Final Reflections
The May 2026 Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum highlighted both the challenges carers continue to face and the determination across the sector to improve outcomes.
From Mental Health Act reform and carers’ rights to innovative approaches such as Open Dialogue, the meeting demonstrated the importance of bringing together lived experience, research, policy, and practice.
Several speakers reminded attendees that change often begins with carers sharing their stories, participating in research, challenging poor practice, and helping shape future services.
The forum remains an important space where those voices can be heard.
Update by Matthew McKenzie – Chair of South London Mental Health Carers Forum
The South London Mental Health Carers Group met for the month of May for a wide-ranging and thoughtful discussion covering carers’ experiences, mental health support systems, involvement opportunities, and an important research presentation focused on support networks and long-term care.
The group covers areas of Lewisham, Southwark, Lambeth & Croydon, although Mental Health Carers from outside those areas are welcime to attend
The session brought together carers, advocates, involvement leads, and guest speaker Dr Anna De Simone from Queen Mary University of London. As always, the discussion highlighted both the challenges carers continue to face and the value of shared lived experience and peer support.
Opening Discussions: Challenges in Mental Health Care Systems
The meeting began with carers sharing experiences of navigating mental health services for loved ones with complex needs. There was extensive discussion around:
difficulties accessing appropriate placements,
safeguarding concerns,
discharge planning,
lack of continuity between NHS trusts and local authorities,
and ongoing challenges around funding responsibility between different services.
A recurring issue raised was the pressure on inpatient beds and the concern that discharge decisions can sometimes feel driven more by system pressures than by clinical readiness. Carers spoke openly about the emotional impact of repeatedly having to advocate for vulnerable loved ones while navigating fragmented systems.
There was also discussion around the importance of carers being recognised and included in communication and planning processes. Participants highlighted how carers are often the people most aware of deterioration, risks, or safeguarding concerns, and how vital it is that services engage meaningfully with families and informal supporters where appropriate.
Despite frustrations, carers also acknowledged examples of good practice and supportive professionals within mental health services. Several attendees noted that they had seen gradual improvements in carer involvement and listening exercises within parts of South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM), particularly in Lambeth.
Updates on Carer Involvement and Support Activities
The group received updates from carers and representatives involved in local mental health engagement work and carers’ organisations.
Carers Week Activities
Karen from Carers Hub Lambeth shared details of upcoming Carers Week activities, including:
outreach events,
wellbeing sessions,
information stalls,
and activities for both adult and young carers.
The events aim to provide carers with opportunities for support, networking, practical advice, and wellbeing activities.
There was also discussion around changes and developments within SLAM involvement structures, including:
continuation of family and carers meetings,
changes to involvement leads,
and ongoing reviews of the involvement register.
Attendees reflected positively on the increasing recognition of carers’ voices in some forums and clinical meetings, while acknowledging that there is still much work to do to ensure consistent involvement across all boroughs and services.
Guest Presentation: Mapping Patient Support Networks
The second half of the meeting focused on a presentation from Dr Anna De Simone, GP and Associate Professor of Primary Care at Queen Mary University of London.
Anna introduced a proposed research project exploring how healthcare systems might better understand and map patients’ support networks using electronic health records and social network tools.
The research proposal focuses particularly on patients with long-term conditions such as COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), many of whom also experience multiple additional health conditions and varying levels of social isolation.
The Core Idea
Anna explained that while healthcare professionals can currently access limited information such as next of kin or household members, they often lack a fuller understanding of:
who actually supports the patient,
how reliable that support is,
whether support networks are connected or fragmented,
and how socially isolated a patient may be.
The proposed research would explore whether creating visual “maps” of support networks could help:
improve care planning,
reduce crises,
improve coordination between services,
and enhance patients’ quality of life.
The project would also examine how social prescribing, community services, online support groups, and carers fit into these wider support networks.
Carers’ Feedback on the Research Proposal
The discussion following Anna’s presentation was extremely rich and constructive, with carers offering both enthusiasm and important cautionary perspectives.
Strong Support for the Concept
Many attendees felt the project addressed an important gap in healthcare planning. Several carers spoke about how informal support networks had been essential to helping them or their loved ones survive periods of crisis.
Participants agreed that professionals often underestimate the role played by:
friends,
neighbours,
online communities,
peer groups,
and unpaid carers.
The ability to visualise these networks was seen as potentially valuable for both professionals and patients themselves.
Importance of Non-Traditional Support Networks
A strong theme throughout the discussion was that support does not always come from family.
Some carers explained that family relationships can sometimes be unsafe or abusive, and that support may instead come from trusted friends, neighbours, carers’ groups, or online communities.
The group stressed that any future system should avoid assuming that family automatically equals safety or support.
Online Communities and Digital Support
Participants also highlighted the increasing importance of online support systems.
Several carers explained that:
Zoom groups,
Facebook communities,
online peer support,
and digital communication can provide essential social connection, especially for disabled or isolated people.
One participant noted that online support networks had directly helped them access practical support and reduce isolation when physical mobility was limited.
At the same time, carers cautioned that not everyone has equal access to digital services. Concerns were raised about:
digital exclusion,
accessibility barriers,
lack of digital skills,
and the risk of widening inequalities.
The importance of offering both digital and non-digital forms of support was strongly emphasised.
Privacy, Consent, and Mental Health
Carers also discussed potential challenges around privacy and consent, particularly for people experiencing paranoia or severe mental illness.
Some attendees noted that patients may not always feel comfortable sharing details about their social networks, and that trust and safeguarding would need to be central to any future system.
There was discussion about the delicate balance between:
confidentiality,
safety,
carer involvement,
and patient autonomy.
Role of Social Prescribers
The group generally agreed that social prescribers could play an important role in helping patients map support networks, because they often have more time and a stronger focus on community support than standard GP appointments allow.
However, concerns were raised about long-term funding and sustainability for social prescribing services.
Looking Ahead
Anna thanked the group for their detailed feedback and explained that carers’ insights would help shape the next stage of the research proposal before submission later this year.
There was strong interest from attendees in remaining involved should the project move forward, particularly around future patient and public involvement opportunities.
The meeting once again demonstrated the depth of knowledge, experience, and expertise held by unpaid carers. The discussion reflected not only the challenges carers continue to face, but also the importance of ensuring carers are recognised as essential partners in both healthcare delivery and future research.
A Caring Mind 