Tag Archives: carer advocacy

National Ethnic mental health Carer Forum : May Update 2026

Blog by Ethnic Mental Health Carer forum Chair – Matthew McKenzie

The May 2026 Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum brought together carers, researchers, clinicians, community leaders, and representatives from mental health organisations across England. Although attendance was smaller than usual, the discussion was rich, honest, and highly informative, covering Mental Health Act reform, carers’ experiences, service inequalities, innovative approaches to care, and new research opportunities.

For those who were unable to attend, this blog provides a comprehensive overview of the meeting, including key presentations, audience questions, responses from speakers, and useful resources shared during the session.

Opening Remarks

As the chair, I welcomed attendees and outlined the agenda. The meeting focused on following:

  • Mental Health Act research and reform
  • Carers’ experiences supporting loved ones through detention
  • Findings from a major East Sussex carers research project
  • Resources for carers under the Mental Health Act
  • Electronic Health Records and future developments
  • Wider discussions on racial trauma, inequalities, and service improvement

The meeting also provided opportunities for networking, sharing lived experiences, and highlighting innovative projects happening across the country.

Research Study: Supporting a Loved One Through Mental Health Detention

Dr Maeve Conneely from University College London opened the meeting with a presentation on a new research study exploring the experiences of people who have been assessed or detained under the Mental Health Act, as well as the experiences of family members and carers who supported them through that process. The study has been commissioned as part of the wider programme of Mental Health Act reform and aims to understand how the current “Nearest Relative” provisions operate in practice before changes are introduced under the new legislation.

Dr Conneely explained that researchers are particularly interested in hearing from carers who were involved in supporting a loved one but who were not formally recognised as the “Nearest Relative” under the existing legal framework. She highlighted that these experiences are especially important because they can reveal where carers have been excluded from decision-making, denied access to information, or prevented from contributing to assessments despite playing a significant role in supporting the individual concerned. The study is open to anyone aged 16 or over who has direct experience of Mental Health Act assessments, detentions, Community Treatment Orders, holding powers, or related interventions, whether as a patient or as a supporter.

The research is linked to ongoing reforms of the Mental Health Act and seeks to understand how the “Nearest Relative” provisions currently operate before changes are implemented.

Who Can Take Part?

The study is looking for:

  • People who have been detained under the Mental Health Act
  • Family members and carers who supported someone during detention or assessment
  • Individuals who should have been involved as a nearest relative but were not
  • Anyone aged 16 or over with relevant experience

Interviews are conducted online and participants receive a £30 shopping voucher as a thank-you for their time.

Key Question from Participants

Q: Does the study include situations where someone should have been involved but wasn’t?

Response: Yes. Researchers are particularly interested in understanding experiences where carers or family members were excluded from decision-making processes despite playing a significant caring role.

Another Important Question

Q: Do carers need permission from the person who was detained before participating?

Response: No. Carers are sharing their own experiences and therefore only need to provide their own consent.

Discussion Themes

Participants highlighted:

  • Long-standing inequalities affecting Black communities under the Mental Health Act.
  • The overuse of psychiatric labels without sufficient exploration of trauma.
  • The need to understand why some individuals receive significantly different experiences of care, including access to private mental health facilities.
  • Concerns about trust in mental health services and the lasting impact of poor experiences across generations.

Several carers committed to taking part in the study to ensure lived experience informs future policy.

East Sussex Carers Research Project: What Carers Told Us

Age Angiolini presented findings from a year-long carers-led research project examining the experiences of family carers supporting people with serious mental illness across East Sussex. The study was developed in response to repeated concerns raised by carers at local support meetings and sought to capture their experiences of interacting with mental health services provided by the Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust (SPFT).

Although the research received 71 responses, representing only a proportion of the carers population in the region, the findings revealed a striking consistency in the challenges carers face. The survey explored themes including carers’ involvement in care planning, communication with services, consent and confidentiality, quality of care, crisis support, and priorities for improvement. Among the most significant findings were that 72% of carers reported being only sometimes involved or not involved at all in their loved one’s care, 73% felt services relied too heavily on carers, and 72% said they regularly had to advocate to secure appropriate support. The research concluded that many carers feel undervalued, excluded from decision-making, and left carrying significant responsibilities without adequate recognition or support.

The study gathered responses from carers supporting people with:

  • Schizophrenia
  • Bipolar disorder
  • ADHD
  • Autism
  • Complex neurodiverse conditions

Although the sample size was relatively modest, the findings revealed significant and consistent concerns.

Key Findings from the report

Carers Feel Excluded

  • 72% reported being only sometimes involved or not involved at all.
  • 73% felt services relied too heavily on carers.
  • 72% said they had to advocate strongly to secure appropriate care.

Communication Failures

Participants reported poor communication between:

  • Mental health services
  • Assessment teams
  • Social services
  • Mental health liaison teams

Many carers described communications as inconsistent, unclear, and difficult to navigate.

Consent and Confidentiality

A recurring concern was that confidentiality procedures are often applied rigidly, preventing carers from sharing vital information during crises.

Carers argued that this can actively undermine effective care.

Quality of Care Concerns

The research found:

  • 90% reported insufficient care.
  • Significant concerns around continuity of care.
  • A strong desire for dedicated care coordinators.
  • Widespread frustration with crisis services.

Crisis Support is Not Working

Many carers reported that:

  • NHS 111 is often inadequate for mental health crises.
  • A&E is frequently unsuitable for people experiencing mental distress.
  • Services remain reactive rather than preventative.

Calls for Change

Recommendations included:

  • Better crisis pathways
  • Improved coordination between services
  • More trauma-informed approaches
  • Greater therapeutic support
  • Increased family involvement
  • Better support for neurodiverse individuals

The presentation sparked considerable discussion, with many attendees noting that the findings reflected experiences they had encountered for years.

Carers Speak Out: Frustration, Trauma and the Need for Change

One of the most powerful aspects of the meeting was hearing directly from carers.

Several participants reflected on decades of involvement with mental health services and expressed concern that despite repeated reviews, consultations, and reforms, many of the same issues continue to persist.

Common themes included:

  • Institutional racism
  • Poor communication
  • Exclusion of carers
  • Over-medicalisation
  • Lack of trauma-informed care
  • Inadequate support during crises

A number of attendees emphasised that families often become de facto care coordinators, managing appointments, services, medications, and crises while receiving little support themselves.

One participant observed:

“They plan, medicate and treat. We care. Our worlds don’t meet.”

Others highlighted the impact of racial trauma and the way mental health services can fail to recognise the cultural context of distress.

Open Dialogue: A Different Way Forward?

Ren Reins introduced the concept of Open Dialogue, an internationally recognised approach to mental health care that focuses on relationships, networks, and collaborative conversations.

Open Dialogue aims to:

  • Bring families and professionals together
  • Reduce fragmentation between services
  • Focus on lived experience
  • Build trust
  • Improve recovery outcomes

Ren explained that major NHS-funded trials are underway and encouraged carers to learn more about the approach.

The discussion generated significant interest, particularly from attendees looking for alternatives to traditional medical models of care.

Nearest Relative Resources Project

Professor Judy Laing from the University of Bristol provided an update on an innovative project designed to support family members and carers who hold, or may hold, responsibilities under the Mental Health Act’s “Nearest Relative” provisions. Drawing on previous research with carers and mental health professionals, Professor Laing explained that many family members who find themselves in the Nearest Relative role often receive little information, guidance, or emotional support despite carrying significant legal responsibilities. In response, her team secured funding to develop a free, co-produced online resource that helps carers understand their rights, responsibilities, and options when supporting a loved one through mental health assessment, detention, and treatment.

Developed in partnership with carers, family members, mental health professionals, and organisations including Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, and Carers Trust, the website provides practical information, downloadable tools, guidance for conversations with professionals, and resources to help carers look after their own wellbeing. Professor Laing stressed that the project has been shaped directly by the experiences of those who have undertaken the role themselves, ensuring that the guidance reflects the realities and challenges carers face in practice rather than simply explaining legal processes.

The project emerged from research identifying significant gaps in information and support for people carrying out the “Nearest Relative” role.

What Has Been Developed?

The project has created a free online resource containing:

  • Information about legal rights
  • Guidance on conversations with professionals
  • Practical tools for meetings
  • Support for carers’ wellbeing
  • Resources explaining upcoming legal changes

The materials have been co-produced with carers and family members.

Questions Raised

How are diverse communities included?

Participants asked how the project ensures equity and accessibility.

Professor Laing explained that:

  • People from ethnic minority backgrounds have contributed to development.
  • Resources are being improved to increase accessibility.
  • Additional funding is supporting work around inclusion and accessibility.
  • Translation and alternative formats are being explored.

How is the project promoted?

Discussion focused on ensuring communities are aware of available support rather than resources existing only online.

Professor Laing outlined efforts involving:

  • Mind
  • Carers Trust
  • Mental health services
  • Local media
  • Carer forums

How will the new Nominated Person role protect carers who have traditionally been involved in supporting a loved one?

Several participants expressed concern that replacing the Nearest Relative role could unintentionally weaken the involvement of family members who have historically provided substantial support during periods of mental ill-health. Questions were raised about situations where a person may choose someone other than their primary carer to act as their Nominated Person, potentially reducing carers’ ability to access information or participate in key decisions. Professor Laing acknowledged that these concerns have been raised by many carers and explained that the practical details of how the new system will operate are still being developed. She stressed the importance of carers contributing their experiences to ensure that future guidance recognises the valuable role families often play in supporting recovery and maintaining continuity of care.

What support is available when professionals fail to recognise or understand carers’ legal rights?

Attendees also discussed the reality that many mental health professionals are not always familiar with the legal powers and rights associated with the Nearest Relative role. Participants described situations where carers were excluded from discussions, not informed of important decisions, or felt unable to challenge professional opinions because they lacked confidence in their understanding of the law. In response, Professor Laing highlighted that one of the main objectives of the Bristol resources project is to bridge this knowledge gap by providing practical tools, suggested questions, and clear explanations of carers’ rights. She noted that the project is also developing resources aimed at professionals themselves, with the goal of increasing awareness and ensuring that carers’ legal rights are better understood and respected across mental health services.

Attendees welcomed the commitment to increasing visibility.

Electronic Health Records and Future Developments

Dr Anna De Simoni, an Academic GP and Associate Professor of Primary Care at Queen Mary University of London, presented an early-stage research proposal focused on how electronic health records could be used to better understand and map the social support networks surrounding people living with multiple long-term health conditions.

Dr De Simoni sought direct feedback from carers to help shape the project before a formal funding application is submitted. She explained that while healthcare professionals can usually identify a patient’s next of kin and household members through existing GP records, they often have very limited understanding of the wider support networks that play a vital role in a person’s wellbeing.

These networks may include family members, neighbours, friends, faith groups, community organisations, carers, and others who provide practical and emotional support. The research aims to explore whether technology and electronic health records can help healthcare professionals better recognise these support systems and use that information to improve care planning, reduce unnecessary hospital admissions, and enhance quality of life for people living with complex health conditions.

The discussion generated considerable interest, particularly regarding:

  • Information sharing
  • Integration across services
  • Support for carers
  • Data protection concerns
  • Improving continuity of care

Several participants expressed enthusiasm about the potential benefits while also raising questions regarding privacy and access to NHS information.

Questions and Answers from Dr Anna De Simoni’s Presentation

Q: What problem is this research trying to solve?
A: Dr De Simoni explained that healthcare professionals often know very little about the wider support network surrounding a patient. While medical records may identify a next of kin or people living in the same household, they rarely capture the full picture of who is actually providing practical, emotional, or day-to-day support. The project aims to better understand these social networks and use that information to improve care planning and patient outcomes.

Q: Who is the research aimed at?
A: The initial focus is on people living with multiple long-term health conditions, including illnesses such as COPD and other complex health needs e.g mental health. The project seeks to understand how stronger recognition of support networks could improve quality of life, reduce hospital admissions, and support people to remain independent for longer.

Q: How would patients contribute information about their support network?
A: The proposal includes the use of a Universal Care Plan through the NHS App. Patients would be able to enter information themselves about what matters to them, who supports them, how they prefer to be treated, and what should happen if their health deteriorates. This information could then be viewed and updated by relevant healthcare professionals.

Q: What role could carers play within the proposed system?
A: Participants highlighted that carers often provide the majority of practical support but are frequently invisible within healthcare systems. The proposed approach could make carers more visible by helping professionals understand who is involved in supporting a patient and what role they play in maintaining wellbeing and independence.

Q: How will patient confidentiality and data protection be managed?
A: Concerns were raised about privacy and the security of NHS data. Dr De Simoni explained that information governance, GDPR compliance, and data protection would be central to the project. Specialists in privacy and information governance would be involved to ensure that any information collected is handled safely, appropriately, and with proper consent.

Key Discussion: Why Are Carers Still Fighting the Same Battles?

A recurring theme throughout the meeting was the sense that many challenges identified today are the same challenges carers raised ten or twenty years ago.

Questions included:

  • Why are services still fragmented?
  • Why do carers continue to feel excluded?
  • Why are communication problems so persistent?
  • Why is trauma often overlooked?
  • Why do inequalities remain entrenched?

Participants reflected on whether the issue is primarily one of resources, leadership, service design, or culture.

Many agreed that meaningful change requires carers to remain actively involved in shaping policy and service delivery.

Resources and Links Shared During the Meeting

Mental Health Act Research Study

Email:
nrmha@ucl.ac.uk

Eligibility:
People aged 16+ who have experience supporting someone assessed or detained under the Mental Health Act.

Nearest Relative Resources Website

Welcome to the resources

Nearest Relative Resources Impact Report

https://bpb-eu-w2.wpmucdn.com/blogs.bristol.ac.uk/dist/a/1212/files/2026/05/2026-05-Nearest-Relatives-Resources-impact-report.pdf

POPs Facebook Group

https://www.facebook.com/groups/POPSUnitedKingdom

A carers support group recommended during discussion as a source of peer support and shared experience.

Final Reflections

The May 2026 Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum highlighted both the challenges carers continue to face and the determination across the sector to improve outcomes.

From Mental Health Act reform and carers’ rights to innovative approaches such as Open Dialogue, the meeting demonstrated the importance of bringing together lived experience, research, policy, and practice.

Several speakers reminded attendees that change often begins with carers sharing their stories, participating in research, challenging poor practice, and helping shape future services.

The forum remains an important space where those voices can be heard.

Voices & Verses PCREF Carer event

By Matthew McKenzie, Cygnet PCREF Carer Lead

On Tuesday 28th April 2026, from 2:00pm to 4:00pm, we came together at Cygnet Churchill in Lambeth for what was described as a carers poetry event, but in truth, it became something much deeper.

It became a space where carers could speak, reflect, and be heard.

I hosted the session not just as a PCREF Carer Lead, but as someone with lived experience. That shaped everything the tone, the structure, and the intention behind every part of the agenda.

I made it clear: this was a safe, inclusive, and optional space. No pressure to perform. No expectation to share. Just an invitation.

We began with a simple check-in:
“What’s one word you’re arriving with?”

Opening Readings: Creating a Shared Starting Point

I started with a couple of my own poems, drawn from my work around carers, stigma, and racial inequality in mental health.

As shown above, one piece explored the question of who is listened to and who is overlooked within systems. Another focused on stigma and shame, particularly how cultural expectations and institutional barriers can compound the experience of caring.

These weren’t just readings—they were a way of opening the room.
An invitation for others to see themselves reflected.

Featured Performer: Karen Ibrahim

We then heard from Karen Ibrahim, whose poetry captured something deeply familiar to many carers the quiet, often invisible emotional labour of caring.

Her piece reflected the silence between carer and loved one, the fear of saying the wrong thing, and the reality of sitting with someone in distress without always knowing how to help. It spoke to that fragile balance carers hold every day.

Karen also shared a series of haiku-style reflections, drawn from carer experiences—short, powerful snapshots of emotion, nature, and coping. They reminded us that even the smallest expressions can carry deep meaning.

Guided Writing Exercise #1: Bringing PCREF to Life

We then moved into the first guided writing exercise.

I paired participants and asked them to:

  • Match PCREF-related concepts (like equity, advocacy, inclusion, resilience) to their meanings
  • Use those words to create a short poem or reflection

It was about translating PCREF from policy into lived language.

The results were powerful. Carers wrote about 4 poems altogether, below were the themes, which will be included in the new PCREF poetry book I am working on.

  • Feeling unseen and unheard
  • Wanting their voice recognised
  • Breaking down barriers in care
  • Finding strength through community

One group asked:
“Is my voice not loud enough to be heard?”

I felt that line stayed with me, because it captures exactly what PCREF is trying to address.

Performer & Open Mic (Round 1)

We then moved into our first round of performances, where carers shared both prepared and newly written work.

I felt Brenda brought something unique, blending cultural storytelling and poetry rooted in Jamaican heritage. She reflected on traditional knowledge, community wisdom, and the use of language and folklore as a way of preserving identity and healing. Her use of dialect and storytelling highlighted how culture shapes how we express and understand care.

Next was Annette Davis shared a piece centred on the identity of being a carer, capturing the emotional strain, lack of recognition, and inner strength that comes with the role. Her poem questioned what it means to be labelled a “carer” while navigating burnout, resilience, and the need for self-care.

Next up was Faith Smith and Nadine sharing a powerful reflection on system inequality, exploring the daily pressures of navigating services, the lack of accessible support, and the feeling of being caught in processes that don’t always respond to real-life needs.

Each piece added another layer to the conversation, with different perspectives, but shared truths.

Break & Connection

We paused for a short break and refreshments provided by the kind and wonderful staff at cygnet, but for the poetry event the conversations didn’t stop.

Carers continued to connect. Share stories. and reflected on what they had heard.

This is something I always emphasise, community doesn’t just happen in structured sessions. It happens in those in-between moments.

Creative Exercise session #2: Exploring PCREF Language

After the break, I introduced a second exercise, which was more interactive and reflective.

Participants worked with a word-search style challenge, identifying key PCREF-related terms such as:

  • Voice
  • Inclusion
  • Equity
  • Community
  • Trust
  • Advocacy
  • Listening
  • Stereotyping

Rather than writing full poems, we focused on discussion:
Which word stands out and why?

The responses were honest and grounded:

  • “Listening builds trust.”
  • “Community is where we belong.”
  • “Inclusion is what drives change.”
  • “Stereotyping still shapes how we’re treated.”

This is where PCREF becomes real, when people recognise themselves within it.

Performer & Open Mic (Round 2)

We continued with a second round of performances.

Carers shared reflections shaped by:

  • Cultural identity
  • Personal caring journeys
  • The emotional impact of systems
  • Hope, resilience, and change

Then ended with cultural carer songs by Brenda, see the video of part of the PCREF poetry session below.

In the end PCREF is about improving outcomes for racialised communities—but it cannot succeed if it remains purely clinical.

We:

  • Translated PCREF into lived experience
  • Used creativity to engage carers meaningfully
  • Created a culturally responsive space
  • Positioned carers as equal voices not passive participants

If you are caring for someone using Cygnet services, contact Family&Friends@cygnethealth.co.uk to join our Voices & Verses poetry group

Attending the West Kent Paddock Wood Carers Group

By Matthew McKenzie – Carer Activist

Recently, I had the privilege of attending and speaking at the West Kent Paddock Wood Group, and I wanted to take a moment to reflect on the experience, not just as a speaker, but as a mental health carer among peers who truly understand the journey.

The session took place at Unit 1 Eastlands, Maidstone Road in Paddock Wood, a welcoming and accessible venue that immediately set the tone for openness and support. From the moment I arrived, it was clear that this was a safe space. The event was hosted by Naomi Muigua who is the Social Care Involvement Officer.

The structure of the morning was thoughtfully organised, with time for introductions, discussion, and shared learning, all underpinned by respect, confidentiality, and equality among attendees .

A Community that works to understand carers

What stood out to me most was the diversity of lived experience in the room. Carers supporting loved ones with dementia, autism, and complex health needs came together, each bringing their own story, challenges, and resilience. It reinforced something I’ve long believed: carers often feel invisible in wider society, but in spaces like this, they are seen, heard, and valued.

The group is supported by organisations and professionals who are genuinely committed to reducing isolation and improving access to services. From digital inclusion to transport and community support, there’s a real effort to make sure carers are not left navigating the system alone

Sharing My Journey as a Mental Health Carer

As the invited speaker, I spoke from my own lived experience as a mental health carer. My journey began as a young carer supporting my mother, who developed schizophrenia, while also helping care for my brothers with non-verbal autism. Over the years, that experience has shaped not only my life, but my purpose.

During my talk, I shared:

  • The emotional reality of becoming a carer—often suddenly, without preparation
  • The confusion and isolation that can come with navigating mental health systems
  • The importance of recognising carers as partners in care, not just bystanders
  • The long-term impact on mental health, identity, and wellbeing

I also spoke about the concept of “lived experience”—something I feel strongly should be embedded in health and social care systems. If professionals are to truly understand and support carers, they need to hear directly from those who live it every day.

One of the key messages I left with the group was this:
Carers are the hidden link that holds everything together. Without them, the system simply could not function.

This was taken from my poem off my book.

The Conversations of the group

What made the session particularly powerful wasn’t just the presentation, it was the discussion that followed. Carers openly spoke about:

  • Not knowing where to go for help
  • The complexity of accessing services
  • Feeling that outcomes often depend on how well you can advocate
  • The emotional toll of long-term caring

These are not small issues, they are systemic challenges. But spaces like this group allow those conversations to happen honestly, and more importantly, collectively.

Why Groups Like This Matter

The West Kent Paddock Wood Group is actually a lifeline to carers as it provides:

  • A supportive peer network
  • Access to information and local services
  • A platform for carers’ voices to be heard
  • A sense of belonging that many carers lack

For anyone who is caring for a loved one, especially in mental health, I cannot stress enough how important it is to connect with others who understand. You don’t have to do this alone.

Final Thoughts

Leaving the session, I felt both humbled and encouraged. Humbled by the strength of the carers in the room, and encouraged by the existence of a group that is actively working to support them.

If you are a carer in Kent, or even just exploring what support is available, I would strongly recommend attending the West Kent Paddock Wood Group. It is a space where your voice matters, your experience is valid, and your wellbeing is recognised.

For me, it was not just an opportunity to speak, it was an opportunity to connect, learn, and continue advocating for carers everywhere.

If you want to find out more about Kent County Council support for unpaid carers, see link below.

https://www.kent.gov.uk/social-care-and-health/adult-social-care/care-and-support/caring-for-other-people/support-for-carers

Nothing About Us Without Us: A Poem on Carer Voice and Co-Production

By Matthew McKenzie – Carer

I feel Unpaid carers play a vital role in supporting loved ones experiencing mental health challenges. Much of this caring happens quietly in homes, during sleepless nights, through appointments, advocacy, and everyday acts of protection and support.

For many carers from minority communities, this experiences also includes navigating the cultural understanding, language differences, and systems that sometimes do not always recognise or reflect communities. Despite the knowledge carers hold, I feel our voices can sometimes feel overlooked in those decisions about care.

I recently wrote and recorded a short spoken word poem titled “Nothing About Us Without Us.” This poem reflects a simple and important message: carers bring lived experience that should be included in conversations about mental health services.

The poem is taken from the book I am developing called “Unpaid, Unseen and Yet Unbroken”

Carers are not just supporters in the background. Carers can carry knowledge shaped by lived reality by caring, advocating, and supporting our families through complex systems.

The poem also speaks to the importance of co-production. When carers, communities, and professionals work together, services can become more understanding and culturally responsive, and equitable.

I think this message is especially relevant to ongoing work around the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF), which encourages meaningful involvement of people with lived experience in shaping mental health services.

The poem is a small creative contribution to that conversation. It invites us to reflect on a few simple questions:

  • Are carers from different backgrounds being listened to?
  • Are those lived experiences shaping services?
  • Are decisions being made with carers, not about them?

Listening to carers is not just a gesture of inclusion it can lead to better understanding, stronger partnerships, and better care.

If you would like to watch the poem, you can find the video here:

I hope my poem encourages reflection and conversation about how we can continue building services with communities, and not just for them.

Involve Kent Carers’ Forum – 25th February 2026

By Matthew McKenzie

On 25th February 2026, I had the privilege of speaking at the Carers’ Forum hosted by Involve Kent.

Involve is a voluntary sector infrastructure organisation in Kent that supports unpaid carers by providing information, advice and practical help to make caring more manageable.

They organise regular carers’ forums and events where carers can meet each other, access specialist support services, hear from guest speakers on issues like benefits, legal rights and wellbeing, and contribute their lived experience to local planning and decision-making. Involve also connects carers with tailored resources, signposts to relevant services across health, social care and community sectors, and advocates for carers’ voices to be heard by policymakers and service providers

The forum ran from 10:30am to 1:30pm and brought together unpaid carers from across Kent to connect, learn and have their voices heard.

It was my second time speaking at this forum, and once again I was struck by something powerful: the room was full. That might sound simple, but in the world of unpaid caring which can often feel isolating and invisible a full room means solidarity. It means people are choosing, despite exhaustion and competing demands, to show up for themselves and each other.

Arriving and the atmosphere

From the moment I walked in, there was a real sense of warmth. Information stands lined the hall Involve, Citizens Advice, mental health services, energy advice, leisure services and more. Tables were covered in leaflets, conversations were already flowing, and carers were reconnecting with familiar faces.

The purpose of the forum was clear:

To enable those caring unpaid for an adult family member, partner or friend to meet, gain information about services in their community and have their voices heard .

That last part to have their voices heard is what resonated most with me.

It was also good to see Carer leads from Cygnet Maidstone engaging with carers in the community of Kent.

My talk: Caring for someone with a mental health diagnosis

I spoke about caring for someone with a mental health diagnosis and the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework .

As many know, I cared for my mother who lived with schizophrenia, and I now support a close friend who lives with personality disorder and addiction challenges. I don’t speak as a clinician. I spoke as someone who has sat in GP waiting rooms, on inpatient wards, in crisis meetings, and at home during those “screaming silences” that carers know too well.

I shared:

  • The confusion I felt when I didn’t even realise I was a “carer”
  • The frustration of confidentiality barriers
  • The loneliness of not being listened to
  • The emotional exhaustion that comes from constantly firefighting crises

I then shared a poem to promote carers rights

But I also shared something equally important: growth, advocacy and solidarity.

I encouraged carers to:

  • Educate themselves about the condition they are supporting
  • Learn the difference between symptoms and personality
  • Understand triggers
  • Forgive themselves for mistakes
  • And most importantly, look after their own wellbeing

One message I always return to was – You cannot pour from an empty cup.

I also spoke about The Patient Carer Race Equality Framework

It exists because there is clear evidence of:

  • Disproportionate detentions under the Mental Health Act
  • Poorer outcomes for Black and minority ethnic patients
  • Higher levels of distrust between communities and services
  • Carers feeling unheard or excluded

I spoke about how minority carers can face:

  • Cultural misunderstandings
  • Language barriers
  • Stigma around mental health within communities
  • Fear of services due to past discrimination
  • A lack of culturally appropriate support

Discussion tables: Carers influencing change

After my talk, Clara from Involve led discussions feeding into Kent’s Health Needs Assessment for carers. Carers were asked:

  • How do you recognise when it’s time to ask for help?
  • What causes burnout?
  • What would a carer-friendly community look like?

These wete not token questions. Staff took notes (without identifying details) so carers’ lived experiences could directly inform local planning .

I moved around the room speaking with carers. Some were open and vocal. Others were quieter, but their listening was just as powerful. Not everyone wants to speak publicly and that’s okay. Being present is also participation too.

Power of Attorney – protecting your voice

Later in the morning, Glen Miles spoke about the Mental Capacity Act and Lasting Power of Attorney .

As carers, we often assume we will automatically be consulted in crises. The reality is different. Without legal authority, our ability to advocate can be limited.

One key takeaway:

  • Don’t delay in arranging Lasting Powers of Attorney.
  • If you want your voice – or your loved one’s voice – to be heard, formalise it.

For carers who have experienced being excluded from decisions, this was a particularly important session.

Citizens Advice & practical support

Ian from Citizens Advice spoke before lunch about benefits, debt, housing and confidential support .

With the cost of living crisis, carers are under immense financial pressure. Many reduce employment hours or leave work entirely. The session was a reminder that:

  • Advice is free
  • It is confidential
  • You can attend anonymously
  • You are not judged

Lunch followed – catered by Fusion – and honestly, some of the most meaningful conversations happen over sandwiches. Carers swapping stories. Sharing phone numbers. Recommending services. That peer-to-peer support is priceless.

What stayed with me

What stayed with me most wasn’t just the agenda or the presentations.

It was:

  • The older carer quietly nodding as I spoke about emotional exhaustion.
  • The new carer asking, “Is it normal to feel this angry sometimes?”
  • The male carers who stayed behind to speak to me privately.
  • The carers from minority backgrounds who spoke about cultural barriers and stigma.

These forums matter because carers matter.

Unpaid carers save the system billions. But beyond economics, we hold families together. We absorb crises. We advocate in rooms where we’re not always welcomed.

Involve Kent (Carers’ Support – West Kent)

Address:
30 Turkey Court, Turkey Mill, Ashford Road, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 5PP

Telephone: 03000 810 005
General email: hello@involvekent.org.uk
Carers support contact: communitynavigation@involvekent.org.uk
Website: http://www.involvekent.org.uk

Carers Connect Southwark: Why Your Voice Matters More Than Ever

By Matthew McKenzie – A Caring Mind

If you’re an unpaid carer in Southwark, chances are you’re used to putting everyone else first. You support a loved one day in, day out, emotionally, practically, often invisibly. And too often, decisions about “support” for carers are made without carers truly being heard.

Southwark Council is developing its Unpaid Carers Strategy, and they are inviting unpaid carers to take part in upcoming focus groups to share real experiences, which are your lived reality.

As an unpaid carer myself, I know how rare and valuable this opportunity is.

Why having your say is important because

Policies and strategies shape:

  • What support is available
  • How easy (or hard) it is to access help
  • Whether carers feel recognised, supported, and understood

When carers don’t speak up, systems are built around us, not with us. When we do speak up, its a chance to make change becomes possible.

This isn’t about complaining.
It’s about being honest: what works, what doesn’t, and what would genuinely make life easier for carers in Southwark.

Your voice could help shape:

  • Better access to information and services
  • More flexible, carer-friendly support
  • A strategy that reflects the real pressures carers face

A safe, non-judgemental space

One of the most important things about these focus groups is that they are designed to be:

  • Non-judgemental
  • Inclusive
  • Open to carers with any level of responsibility

You don’t need to have all the answers.
You don’t need to be an “expert”.
You just need your experience.

Whether you care full-time, part-time, occasionally, or don’t even label yourself as a “carer” your perspective still counts.

Focus group dates and details

In-person focus groups
📅 24th February
⏰ 11am – 1pm and 2pm – 4pm
📍 Harriet Hardy Community Centre
Harriet-Hardy Building, Aylesbury Estate, Albany Road, Walworth SE5 0AH

Online focus group
📅 25th February
⏰ 7pm
💻 Virtual session via Microsoft Teams

How to get involved

You can:

Even attending one session can make a difference — not just for you, but for other carers now and in the future.

A personal note from me

As unpaid carers, we are often exhausted, overlooked, and expected to “just cope”. Opportunities like this don’t come around often.

Triangle of Care Community Meeting: December 2025 update

By Matthew McKenzie – TOC Community Chair

Our final Triangle of Care (ToC) Community Group meeting of the year brought together carers, professionals, and ToC members from across the UK to share updates, raise concerns, and discuss priorities for 2026 and beyond. Although Microsoft Teams provided some surprises, we made it work, thanks to teamwork and patience. The conversation was rich, heartfelt, and often very moving.

1. Opening & Agenda

As chair of the meeting, I acknowledged technical teething problems as the group used Teams for the first time in this format. Mary (ToC Programme Lead) welcomed attendees and explained the privacy-driven decision to hide email addresses, which also unfortunately hid attendees’ names. A fix will be implemented before the January meeting.

The agenda included:

  • Triangle of Care national updates (Mary)
  • Carer co-production and lived experience input (Matthew)
  • Surrey & Borders’ co-production example (postponed)
  • Research priority-setting presentation (Richard, University of Manchester)
  • Carer questions and discussion

2. Triangle of Care National Update (Mary)

Mary provided a comprehensive end-of-year update structured around ToC’s three priority areas for 2024–25.

2.1 Embedding the Relaunched Triangle of Care Framework

Growth & progress

  • 16 new members have joined the scheme since April, bringing ToC membership to over 80.
  • The first Welsh hospital achieved a ToC Star Award, prompting the creation of a new Welsh-language logo and Welsh materials.
  • A social care pilot is underway with Livewell South West, with West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospital reviewing ToC criteria for an acute setting.
  • Nine Star Awards have been achieved this year, with a further 12 annual reviews approved. Many more annual reports are pending review before year-end.

Standardising data
Mary emphasised the push for consistent reporting across Trusts, including:

  • numbers of carers identified
  • uptake of carer awareness training
  • numbers of carer champions

This will help build a national picture of impact.

Webinars
ToC’s Lunch & Learn series continues, with the recent Carers Rights Day webinar (in partnership with University of Bristol) focusing on the Nearest Relative role under the Mental Health Act (MHA). Resources are available via Carers Trust’s YouTube channel.

2.2 Young Carers: Identification & Support

A major update was the successful national policy win relating to young carers and the Mental Health Act.

Mental Health Act Reform – Safety Net for Young Carers

Following campaigning by Carers Trust, the Young Carers Alliance, and ToC members who wrote to MPs:

  • Government has agreed to update the MHA Code of Practice to require:
    • identification of children when an adult is detained
    • sharing of information about available support
    • referrals for young carer needs assessments
  • Updates to advance choice documents will require practitioners to ask about dependent children.
  • Expected implementation: Summer 2026.

This win was warmly welcomed by the group.

2.3 Racially Minoritised Carers & PCREF

Mary updated members on ToC’s work to ensure carers are fully represented in the Patient & Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF).

Key updates

  • A national Task & Finish Group has now completed its review of the first four ToC standards; the final standard is underway.
  • Piloting of new culturally sensitive criteria is planned with 10 NHS Trusts beginning April 2026.
  • Example of early good practice: Livewell South West is implementing a new “essential data template” that includes carers, enabling services to better identify and support racially minoritised carers.
  • Carers Trust is calling for a statutory duty for NHS mental health providers to implement PCREF in full, including community governance.

2.4 Changing the Narrative on Care – New Research

Mary introduced new research (supported by the Health Foundation and Oxfam GB) titled Changing the Narrative on Care, highlighting:

  • Although 80% of the public value unpaid care, this does not translate into policy action or investment.
  • Three recommended reframes:
    1. Care is a universal experience, not a niche issue.
    2. No care without support, make support visible and tangible.
    3. Care is a partnership between families, communities and systems—not something families must do alone.

The full report is available on Carers Trust’s website.

3. Carer Involvement, Co-Production & Lived Experience (Matthew McKenzie)

I then presented an in-depth reflection on the value of authentic carer involvement, drawing on his lived experience and his role working with multiple NHS organisations.

Key points included:

  • Carers are not passive observers, they hold critical lived knowledge that improves services.
  • Real co-production goes beyond consultation; carers must be equal partners in shaping policy, documentation, training, and strategic decisions.
  • Examples Matthew gave from his own involvement:
    • redesigning welcome packs and leaflets
    • addressing confidentiality misapplication
    • involvement in recruitment panels
    • delivering training to staff at induction
    • reviewing complaints and compliments themes
    • advising on discharge processes and family-inclusive safety protocols
    • participating in research steering groups
  • Carers’ insight is especially essential in safeguarding, quality boards, and identifying service gaps often invisible to professionals.

4. Surrey & Borders Co-Production Example

A planned presentation from Surrey & Borders was postponed, as the relevant colleague could not attend with materials. They hope to present at a future meeting.

5. Research Priority Setting in Secure & Forensic Mental Health (Richard Kears)

Richard introduced a national project with the James Lind Alliance (JLA) aiming to identify the top 10 research priorities for secure and forensic mental health services across England, Scotland and Wales.

Who is the survey for?

  • Carers
  • People with lived experience of secure/forensic services
  • Staff working in these services
  • Anyone indirectly connected (victims, families)

Purpose

To ensure future mental health research is led by the real concerns of those most affected, not only by academics or pharmaceutical interests.

Process

  1. National survey gathering research questions.
  2. Analysis to identify common themes.
  3. Second, more focused survey to refine priorities.
  4. National workshops with carers, staff and people with lived experience to finalise the top 10.

A QR code and flyer were shared for distribution. The group expressed strong support.

6. Attendee Discussion & Questions

This was the richest section of the meeting, with many heartfelt contributions. The themes below reflect the key concerns raised.

6.1 Scotland & UK-wide ToC Alignment

A carer asked why Scotland’s ToC framework is separate and not integrated into the UK ToC accreditation model.
Mary explained:

  • Scotland currently uses ToC only as a free policy framework.
  • Implementing the accreditation model in Scotland would require groundwork to assess willingness and ability of providers to fund membership.
  • Integration is being discussed but is not imminent.

6.2 Clarity on Co-Production

Several carers voiced concerns that:

  • “Co-production” is often used as a buzzword.
  • Some NHS Trusts label work as co-produced after completing it.
  • Carers need clarity on what ToC means when using the term.

Mary responded that ToC uses a ladder of engagement, distinguishing:

  • carer engagement
  • carer involvement
  • full co-production

Carers Trust is developing a formal principles-based statement on involvement for future meetings.

6.3 Older Carers: Visibility, Support & Inequalities

The majority of carer questions focused on the unmet needs of older adult carers, many of whom are supporting people with severe mental illness—not dementia—and often have been caring 20–40 years.

Attendees reported:

  • Feeling “invisible” within both policy and services.
  • Being incorrectly grouped under “older carers = dementia”.
  • Their own poor health affecting their caring ability.
  • Increasing struggle to get responses from professionals.
  • Serious concerns about who will care for their loved ones when they die.
  • Feeling less heard as they age, compared with younger carers or newer voices.

One carer (age 78) shared:

“I can’t retire from caring. Benefits stop at 65, but the caring doesn’t.”

Another said:

“We have to shout louder as older women to be heard—and still we aren’t.”

Mary acknowledged the seriousness of these issues and committed to:

  • bringing older carers’ concerns into ongoing ToC work
  • exploring dedicated guidance and better mainstreaming within the ToC standards
  • sharing good practice on carer contingency planning in upcoming meetings

I have placed the guide below

Click to access Carer-Contingency-Planning-in-the-Universal-Care-Plan-Guidance-V1.0.pdf

I also reiterated the group’s role in surfacing policy gaps and influencing future national lobbying.

6.4 Carer Registration & Meeting Access

Several carers raised issues with:

  • The length of the ToC sign-up form
  • Not receiving meeting links despite signing up
  • Verification barriers when joining Teams

Mary agreed to:

  • review and shorten the form
  • clarify which fields are optional
  • address email deliverability issues
  • adjust MS Teams settings to reduce joining friction while maintaining security

6.5 Concerns About Confidentiality Misuse

One carer reported that in a CQC meeting at an NHS Trust, raising questions about communication was dismissed as “confidentiality”, preventing meaningful dialogue.
I then encouraged carers to bring such examples into:

  • ToC Star peer reviews
  • Carer involvement forums
  • Local advocacy routes

He noted that misuse of confidentiality is a common and unacceptable barrier and must be challenged.

6.6 Petition on Antipsychotic Medication Research

Carers highlighted concerns about:

  • long-term prescribing of antipsychotics
  • lack of regular medication review
  • inadequate research into long-term effects

A carer shared a petition calling for investigation of psychiatric medications. Richard noted that he had signed and shared it previously.

7. Closing Remarks

Matthew thanked all attendees for their honesty, passion and persistence:

“Carers’ voices shape policies and improve care. That is exactly what this group is here to do.”

Mary acknowledged:

  • the importance of every concern raised
  • the need to better support older carers
  • improvements to ToC communications and meeting accessibility
  • that the next meeting will be in January (provisionally 19th)

The meeting closed with gratitude from carers who said they felt heard, supported, and connected.

Reflections from the Royal College of Nursing PSI Alumni Conference 2025 – A Carer’s Perspective

Arriving and Opening Reflections

Walking into the RCN PSI Alumni Conference at Cowdray Hall on that crisp November morning, I felt a mix of pride, gratitude, and curiosity. It’s been many years since I first began speaking at RCN events like this, yet every time feels new because each gathering brings together nurses, carers, service users, and leaders who continue to shape the future of mental health care.

Before I continue to describe the event, let me sum up the Royal College of Nursing PSI programme. Basically the Psychosocial Interventions (PSI) programme is a nationally recognised training initiative designed to strengthen therapeutic skills of mental health professionals and embed recovery-focused, relationship-based care across services.

The PSI program is rooted in the principles of collaboration, reflection, co-production and empowerment, PSI equips practitioners with practical tools to support individuals experiencing mental distress, while also valuing the insight of carers and families.

I think what makes PSI stand out is its emphasis on seeing people beyond their diagnosis and fostering empathy, curiosity, and shared understanding between nurses, service users, and carers.

At the start of the conference and during it, I spoke to a few nurses over coffee, each reflecting on how PSI had shaped their practice one mental health nurse told me it had helped her “find her voice again.” For me, as a carer with lived experience, it was great to witness this sense of renewal. It reminded me why collaboration between professionals and lived experience communities is so essential.

Around 10 a.m., Catherine Gamble formally opened the event, setting a tone of gratitude and shared learning. Her introduction reminded us how much the alumni network had grown and how lived experience was now firmly part of the PSI culture.

As someone with lived experience of caring for my mum, who lived with schizophrenia, I approached the events not just as an observer but as someone deeply invested in the stories and struggles that bring us together as a triangle.

When I was invited to open the event and share my reflections as a carer, I knew I wanted to do more than talk about carers, I wanted to speak for them, and with them.

My Opening Talk – “The Nurses Who Walk With Us”

Standing at the podium, looking out at rows of passionate mental health nurses and lived experience, I began with gratitude. My words were simple but heartfelt:

“This is really about the nurses who walk with us, the ones who move beyond the labels, beyond the charts, and see the person, not the problem.”

I read a poem I had written to honour the compassion and resilience of those in the room a piece I called The Nurses Who Walk With Us.

The poem spoke about presence, about listening, and about the small acts of care that ripple into great change.

After my talk, I was moved by the warmth of the response. Many came up to share how my words mirrored their experiences or reminded them of why they came into nursing. That moment of connection that shared understanding set the tone for the day.

The Locksmiths Animation and Alumni Showcase

Following our opening session, Ellie Gordon and Stephen Jones launched the new animation “We Are the Locksmiths.” The film poetically portrayed mental health nurses as key-cutters shaping, adapting, and helping people find the right fit for recovery.

Watching it, I was struck by how accurately it captured the emotional labour of care, the balancing of vulnerability, patience, and professionalism

Next we had the Mentimeter session that morning, which was led by Professor Sally Hardy. She guided participants through reflective wellbeing questions using the interactive Mentimeter tool, encouraging everyone to think about how to sustain personal and professional wellbeing in mental health practice. Sally’s session wasn’t just about gathering feedback

Afterwards, the Alumni and Facilitators’ “Show and Tell Time” began. Groups from Sheffield NHS Trust, Sussex Mental Health Partnership, Lancashire Mental Health NHS trust, and Hereford NHS Trust sharing creative projects and reflections from their PSI practice. There were posters, poems, and community initiatives that had grown directly from the training. I wandered around the tables, speaking with participants who described how PSI had changed their teams. I think One mental health nurse told me, “We stopped seeing interventions as techniques and started seeing them as relationships.” It was inspiring

Workshop One – Working Together in Risk and Safety

After refreshments, we broke into workshops. I joined Workshop One: Lived Experience and Co-Production – Utilising Our Expertise, led by Hannah Cadogan and colleagues. It was energising to see lived experienced and mental health nurses working side by side.

I spoke about what co-production really means from a carer’s point of view. I shared my journey as someone who has cared for a family member living with schizophrenia and another with autism, and how those experiences taught me the importance of being included as an equal partner in care.

I explained that carers often hold a deep understanding of the person they support insights that can make a real difference if professionals take the time to listen and involve us from the start, not as an afterthought. Drawing on my work with Carers UK, the Carers Trust, and the Triangle of Care as many nurses from the mental health trusts were members of triangle of care programme., I spoke about how true co-production is built on trust, openness, and shared learning.

We discussed barriers time, fear, power differences but also solutions, like embedding co-production in supervision and reflective practice.

In this session, the discussion turned to how we can meaningfully involve carers and service users in planning safety not as tick-box exercises, but as genuine collaborations. I found myself reflecting on my own experiences of sitting in meetings where decisions were made about my mum rather than with us.

Hearing the nurses speak so openly about their challenges about time pressures, fear of getting it wrong, and the emotional toll of risk reminded me that we’re all human in this process. True co-production means sharing not only responsibility but also vulnerability.

One participant spoke about the importance of patience: “We’re not here to fix; we’re here to find a way in.” That line stayed with me. It echoed my own philosophy that care starts with listening, not solving.

By the end of the workshop, we agreed that co-produced safety isn’t about removing risk; it’s about building trust so we can face risk together.

Workshop Two – Co-Production and Carer Involvement

Lunch provided another opportunity for networking. The Mental Health Forum stand and MHP stall displayed resources on psychosocial practice.

I met others who had recently completed the course.

Conversations were open, curious, and full of mutual respect the kind of professional empathy that sustains hope in challenging work.

After lunch we heard from Professor Nicola Ranger, RCN General Secretary, who welcomed everyone back, commending the alumni for sustaining PSI’s legacy. Her words “you are the custodians of compassion” perfectly captured the spirit of the day.

The evaluation session of the RCN PSI Alumni Conference was presented in partnership with London South Bank University (LSBU), who have been key academic collaborators in examining the outcomes and long-term impact of the Psychosocial Interventions (PSI) programme. This section was introduced by Stephen Jones, and Professor Chris Flood, a leading figure in mental health nursing and research at LSBU.

Together, they outlined how LSBU’s evaluation seeks to capture not just the quantitative outcomes of PSI such as improved confidence and competence among practitioners but also the qualitative stories of change, growth, and compassion that the alumni community embodies.

There will be several teams at LSBU, but I was impressed on the make up of the Advisory and Supervisory Team provides academic oversight and strategic direction.

  • Professor Patrick Callaghan, Professor of Mental Health Science at LSBU, offers extensive expertise in psychosocial interventions and nursing research leadership.
  • Professor Chris Flood, a leading mental health and adult nurse researcher, specialises in health economics, survey design, and qualitative inquiry.
  • Professor Neil Brimblecombe, Professor of Mental Health and Learning Disability, contributes his expertise in workforce development, nurse prescribing, and policy analysis linking the PSI evaluation to broader NHS workforce strategies.
  • Professor Eddie Chaplin, an expert in intellectual disabilities and psychosocial interventions, supports the development of inclusive frameworks for peer support, guided self-help, and service co-production.

Afternoon workshop

In the afternoon, I attended Workshop Three: Working Together in Risk – Co-Production, Suicide and Personalised Safety. It was deeply emotional. We discussed how carers can be crucial in early warning and safety planning, but only if professionals create safe spaces for them to speak. The workshop was presented by Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trus

During the workshop, we took part in reflective exercises that encouraged us to consider what “shared safety” truly means. We were asked to think of times when communication broke down between families, patients and professionals, and how different outcomes might have been possible if trust and collaboration had been stronger.

Celebrating Archievements

Those who finished the RCN PSI programm were presented with a RCN PSI alumni badge, which i felt was a small but powerful symbol of commitment, compassion, and continued learning. For many, receiving that badge wasn’t just about completing a programme; it represented belonging to a network that values empathy, partnership, and the courage to keep improving mental health care together.

Reflections and Looking Ahead

As the day drew to a close, we took a quiet moment to reflect. Conferences like this are not just about learning they are about belonging. They remind me that, while the caring role can often feel isolating, there is a wider network of understanding and solidarity.

I missed out a lot more that took place at the alumni event, but watch out for more exciting news from the RCN in future.

To find out more about the RCN PSI Progamme, click link below.

https://www.rcn.org.uk/Professional-Development/Educational-programmes-and-services/Psychosocial-Intervention-Programme

Black History Month: Standing Firm in Power and Pride

By Matthew McKenzie – Founder of A Caring Mind, unpaid carer, and advocate for ethnic minority carers

This October 2025, I had the privilege of joining Carers Support West Sussex to speak during their Black History Month celebrations under the theme “Standing Firm in Power and Pride.”

Carers Support West Sussex provides advice, emotional support, and practical help to unpaid carers across the county of West Sussex, ensuring they are recognised, valued, and empowered in their caring roles. Their work helps thousands of carers connect with the right information, resources, and community networks when it matters most.

As a Black, unpaid carer of lived experience, I spoke about Race, Inequality, and Carer Voices exploring how racism and structural inequality continue to shape the experiences of carers from ethnic minority backgrounds.

Continue reading →

What Makes for Meaningful Carer Involvement?

By Matthew McKenzie FRSA BEM, Chair, Triangle of Care Community Group

This week’s Triangle of Care Member Webinar, hosted by Carers Trust, which focused on a vital question: What makes for meaningful carer involvement?

We heard from across the Triangle of Care network, these being carers, professionals, and trust representatives coming together to share what genuine involvement looks like in practice.

I spoke about my own lived experience as a carer, supporting two non-verbal brothers with autism and my late mother with mental health challenges and how this journey has shaped my advocacy for stronger partnerships between carers and professionals.

Over the years, through the Triangle of Care, I’ve seen how much difference early and equal involvement can make.

Continue reading →