Written by Matthew McKenzie, Speaker, Carer, Campaigner and Poet
As part of Carers Week 2026, I had the privilege of travelling to East Dean in East Sussex to speak at the East Sussex Carers Voices – Celebrating Carers Week Event, organised by Care for the Carers. The event brought together unpaid carers, carers’ organisations, NHS representatives, local authority leaders, health professionals, community groups and carers from across East Sussex to discuss the realities of caring and identify ways to improve support for unpaid carers.
The event was hosted by Dr Neil Churchill, Chair of Care for the Carers, who guided the day’s discussions and emphasised the vital role carers play in society. Throughout the day, carers shared their personal stories, experiences and recommendations directly with decision-makers and service providers.
This blog post provides an overview of the key themes, speakers and discussions for those who were unable to attend.
Opening Remarks – Dr Neil Churchill
Dr Neil Churchill opened the event by welcoming attendees and recognising the significant contribution unpaid carers make to families, communities and public services.
He highlighted several key challenges currently facing carers:
• Rising financial pressures and cost-of-living concerns. • The growing number of carers leaving employment due to caring responsibilities. • Increased risks of poor physical and mental health among carers. • Social isolation and loneliness experienced by many carers. • Growing concerns around carer burnout.
Dr Churchill stressed that the country depends heavily on unpaid carers and that health and social care systems would struggle to function without them. He also spoke about the importance of moving towards a model where carers are treated as equal partners in care rather than simply being expected to cope alone.
A key message from his introduction was that carers should not be left to navigate fragmented services by themselves. Instead, health, social care and voluntary sector organisations must work together more effectively to recognise, support and value carers.
Carer Stories and Lived Experience
One of the most powerful aspects of the event was hearing directly from carers themselves.
Miles Bing – Caring Through Dementia
The first speaker was Miles Bing, author of “Deadheaded: An Alzheimer’s Memoir by Mother and Son”.
Miles shared his family’s experience of supporting both of his parents through Alzheimer’s disease. His presentation explored the emotional impact of caring at a distance, the guilt often experienced by family members who live far away, and the difficulties of coordinating support across multiple services.
He spoke about:
• The long-term impact of dementia on families. • The challenges of accessing services in rural areas. • The lack of coordination between health and social care systems. • The practical and emotional burden placed on carers.
Many attendees identified strongly with his comments regarding the need for carers to act as coordinators between multiple organisations that often fail to communicate effectively with one another.
Young Carers – Julia and Elsie
The audience then heard from young carers Julia and Elsie, whose presentations left a lasting impression on everyone in the room.
Both spoke honestly about growing up while caring for family members with complex needs. They described responsibilities that included supporting parents during health crises, helping siblings with disabilities and managing situations involving emergency services.
Their stories demonstrated:
• The hidden nature of young caring responsibilities. • The emotional impact caring can have on children and young people. • The importance of early intervention and support. • The value of dedicated young carers services.
Perhaps most importantly, they highlighted that while caring can build resilience, no child should have to face these responsibilities without support.
The standing ovation they received reflected the courage and honesty with which they shared their experiences.
Round Table Discussions
Following the morning speakers, attendees participated in facilitated round table discussions.
These conversations focused on:
• The biggest issues facing carers over the next six months. • Practical actions that could help carers in their caring role. • Barriers to accessing support. • Positive examples of support that should be expanded.
Several common themes emerged from these discussions:
Earlier Identification
Many carers reported not being recognised as carers until they had reached crisis point. Participants called for earlier identification within GP surgeries, hospitals and community services.
Access to Information
Attendees highlighted how difficult it can be to find accurate and timely information about available support.
Financial Pressures
Many carers discussed the financial impact of caring, including reduced employment opportunities and increasing household costs.
Mental Health and Wellbeing
Carers spoke about the emotional strain of caring and the importance of counselling, respite and peer support services.
Speaker sessions resumes
Diverse Communities and Caring
A particularly thought-provoking presentation was delivered by Manal Ahmed, who supports carers from ethnically diverse and refugee communities.
She discussed additional challenges experienced by carers from minority communities, including:
• Language barriers. • Cultural differences. • Social isolation. • Displacement trauma. • Immigration-related issues. • Financial and emotional dependency.
Manal explained that many carers experience multiple layers of disadvantage and that support services must be culturally aware and accessible to everyone.
She also highlighted positive examples of community-building activities that help carers connect with one another and reduce isolation.
Her presentation reinforced the importance of ensuring that no carer is excluded from support because of their background, language or circumstances.
My Presentation – A Carer’s Journey
I was invited to speak about my own experiences as a young carer and later as an adult carer supporting family members with autism and serious mental illness.
One of the key messages I shared was that many carers do not initially recognise themselves as carers. Like many people, I simply viewed what I was doing as helping my family.
However, over time I found myself:
• Coordinating care. • Supporting hospital admissions and discharges. • Managing appointments. • Advocating with professionals. • Navigating complex systems. • Supporting multiple family members simultaneously.
I spoke about how difficult it can be when carers are not listened to or involved in important decisions.
I also highlighted the importance of recognising carers as equal partners in care and ensuring that professionals understand the expertise carers develop through lived experience.
One of the central themes of my presentation was carers’ rights.
I encouraged carers to:
• Identify themselves as carers. • Seek support from local carers organisations. • Request carers assessments. • Learn about their rights. • Participate in co-production and service improvement. • Share their experiences to help reduce stigma.
To conclude, I performed my poem “It’s My Right”, which focuses on the rights every carer should expect to receive, including recognition, respect, involvement, information and support.
Afternoon Reflections and Future Priorities
The afternoon session included reflections from senior leaders from Care for the Carers, East Sussex County Council and NHS Sussex.
Discussions focused on:
• Improving identification of carers. • Supporting carers before crises occur. • Encouraging carers to access support services. • Learning from positive experiences of care. • Strengthening partnerships between carers and professionals.
Representatives acknowledged the crucial role carers play and listened to feedback gathered throughout the day.
Many carers expressed concerns about navigating systems that can often feel complicated and difficult to access. There was broad agreement that services should be simpler, more joined-up and more responsive to carers’ needs.
Key Messages from the Day
Several important messages emerged consistently throughout the event:
Carers Need Recognition
Many carers remain hidden and unidentified. Earlier recognition can lead to earlier support.
Carers Need Practical Support
Information, respite, emotional support and financial advice remain essential.
Carers Must Be Involved
Carers are experts in the lives of the people they support and should be treated as partners in care.
Young Carers Need Protection
Children and young people with caring responsibilities require dedicated support and opportunities to thrive.
Communities Matter
Strong local networks can help reduce isolation and improve wellbeing.
Prevention Is Better Than Crisis Management
Supporting carers early can prevent breakdowns in caring arrangements and reduce pressure on services.
Conclusion
The East Sussex Carers Voices Event was an excellent example of what can happen when carers, professionals and decision-makers come together to listen, learn and work collaboratively.
Throughout the day, carers shared powerful stories of resilience, commitment and compassion. They also spoke honestly about the challenges they face and the changes they want to see. I also recognised Agi who does lots of work raising carer awareness in Sussex, she recently spoke at my national ethnic mental health carers forum. So it was great to see her there.
Dr Neil Churchill’s leadership as host helped create an environment where carers felt able to speak openly and where decision-makers could hear directly from those with lived experience.
As Carers Week 2026 comes to a close, the challenge now is to turn these conversations into meaningful action. Carers should not have to struggle to be recognised, supported or heard.
The event demonstrated that when carers’ voices are placed at the centre of discussions, better solutions can emerge for everyone.
Thank you to Care for the Carers, all speakers, volunteers, professionals and carers who contributed to such a valuable and inspiring day.
On Wednesday 3 June 2026, colleagues from all eight London Mental Health Trusts, alongside carers, service users, community organisations, researchers, regulators and system leaders, gathered at ISH Venues in central London for the Pan London Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) Conference.
Chaired by Erica deti from North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT), the conference provided a unique opportunity to showcase progress, share learning and strengthen London’s collective commitment to race equity within mental health services.
The conference was built around the principle that advancing race equity requires both organisational commitment and meaningful partnership with people who use services, carers and communities. Throughout the day, speakers challenged delegates to move beyond discussion and towards action, recognising that the inequalities experienced by racialised communities within mental health services remain one of the most significant challenges facing the NHS.
South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust
The first trust presentation was delivered by Amdad Ibrahim, Associate Director of Health Inequalities, and Dr Mona Dhesi, Consultant Forensic Psychologist and Associate Medical Director at South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust. Their presentation provided one of the clearest examples of how PCREF can be fully integrated into organisational strategy. Beginning with an explicit acknowledgement that racism exists within healthcare organisations and wider society, they demonstrated how their trust had used this recognition as the foundation for meaningful action.
The speakers outlined a comprehensive anti-racism programme linking governance, workforce development, community engagement and service transformation. Race equity has been embedded into business planning, leadership accountability and quality improvement processes, supported by cultural capability programmes, anti-racism steering groups and health equity assessments.
Their presentation demonstrated how PCREF can become part of the organisational DNA of a trust rather than a standalone initiative and provided a practical blueprint for others seeking sustainable implementation.
1. Commitment and Foundations
The Trust began by establishing a clear organisational commitment to becoming an anti-racist organisation. This commitment is supported through a range of strategic frameworks and governance structures, including the Trust’s Anti-Racism Framework, Board Equality, Diversity and Inclusion objectives, and the implementation of the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF).
Speakers emphasised that meaningful progress begins with leadership acknowledging that racism exists within healthcare systems and taking responsibility for addressing it. This commitment has been reinforced at Board level and incorporated into wider organisational priorities to ensure race equity remains visible and accountable.
2. Capability and Awareness
Recognising that sustainable change requires learning and reflection, the Trust has invested heavily in developing staff awareness and cultural capability. This includes initiatives such as:
White Allies Programme
Anti-Racism Hub and Reflective Spaces
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Champions
Cultural Capability Training
These programmes create opportunities for staff to develop a deeper understanding of race, culture, privilege and inequality while providing safe spaces for reflection and discussion. The aim is to move beyond awareness and support staff to actively challenge inequity within their daily practice.
3. Embedding Anti-Racism into Practice
SWLSTG has focused on ensuring anti-racist values are embedded within decision-making processes and clinical practice rather than existing solely within training programmes.
Key areas of work include:
Embedding anti-racist values into organisational behaviours
Increasing diversity within leadership and decision-making structures
Delivering targeted race equity interventions
Using Health Equity Impact Assessments to inform service development
The Trust highlighted how race equity considerations are now being incorporated into service redesign programmes, policy development and clinical pathways, ensuring that decisions are assessed for their potential impact on different communities.
East London NHS Foundation Trust (ELFT)
Advancing Equity in All That We Do: ELFT Strategy 2026–2031
Presented by Carrie Sissons, Deputy Director of Integrated Care, East London NHS Foundation Trust shared how race equity and inclusion have been embedded at the heart of the Trust’s new 2026–2031 Strategy. Rather than developing a strategy behind closed doors, ELFT undertook an extensive engagement programme designed to ensure that the voices of service users, carers, staff and communities directly influenced the Trust’s future direction.
Carrie explained that the strategy was developed during a period of significant challenge for health and care services, but also a period of opportunity. The Trust recognised that if it was to improve outcomes for the diverse communities it serves across East London, Bedfordshire and Luton, equity could not be treated as a separate programme of work. Instead, it had to become a core principle underpinning every decision, every service and every improvement initiative undertaken by the organisation.
Building the Strategy Through the “Big Conversation”
A major feature of the strategy development process was the Trust’s extensive engagement exercise known as the “Big Conversation.” This programme was designed to ensure that the final strategy reflected the experiences, priorities and aspirations of the people who use and deliver services.
What People Told ELFT
One of the strongest messages emerging from the Big Conversation was the importance of equity. Participants consistently identified inequalities in access, experience and outcomes as issues that required sustained attention and action.
The engagement process highlighted several key themes:
Equity as a priority for action.
Equity for specific communities and groups.
Equity as a current and future risk.
Equity through co-production and lived experience.
Equity through population health and prevention.
Equity for staff as well as service users.
Equity through digital inclusion.
Equity as an essential part of value, not separate from it.
Carrie explained that these findings reinforced the need for equity to be visible throughout the Trust’s strategic objectives and operational plans. Participants wanted to see measurable action rather than broad commitments, with a focus on understanding and addressing disparities experienced by different communities.
The ELFT Strategy 2026–2031
The new strategy builds upon ELFT’s existing values and commitment to high-quality care. Serving approximately 1.8 million people across East London, Bedfordshire and Luton, the Trust recognised that reducing inequalities must remain central to its future ambitions.
The strategy identifies four broad priorities for the next five years:
Improve the quality and experience of care.
Make ELFT a great place to work.
Advance equity in all that we do.
Work with partners and communities to improve lives.
Of these priorities, the commitment to advancing equity was particularly relevant to the themes of the PCREF conference.
Priority Three: Advance Equity in All We Do
Carrie described this priority as a commitment to ensuring that equity becomes embedded within everyday practice rather than being treated as a specialist programme.
By 2031, ELFT aims to ensure that:
Teams routinely analyse access, experience and outcomes by population group.
Services take action when disparities are identified.
Progress continues against PCREF commitments.
The Trust’s Anti-Racism Plan and Charter are actively implemented.
Equity and inclusion are strengthened across the workforce.
Inequalities experienced by racialised communities are reduced.
The strategy recognises that data alone is not enough. Equity must be considered throughout service design, quality improvement, workforce development and organisational decision-making.
West London NHS Trust
Presented by Debbie Best (PCREF Lead), Natalie Mark (Living Experience PCREF Lead) and Dr Anne Aiyegbusi, West London NHS Trust delivered one of the most powerful and thought-provoking presentations of the conference. Their session focused on racial trauma, exploring how racism affects patients, carers and staff, and how organisations can create safe spaces to acknowledge, understand and respond to those experiences.
The presentation was rooted in the recognition that racial inequalities remain deeply embedded within mental health services. The team explained that their work developed in response to persistent concerns around disproportionate referrals, detention rates and restrictive interventions experienced by racialised communities. They also highlighted how mistrust of services and experiences of re-traumatisation continue to affect people’s willingness to engage with mental health support. Importantly, they stressed that racial trauma is not only experienced by service users but also by carers and staff, many of whom continue to navigate systems that can reproduce inequity.
Why This Work Matters
West London NHS Trust identified several key issues that informed the development of their racial trauma programme:
Disproportionate rates of referrals and detention among racialised communities.
Higher levels of restrictive interventions within mental health pathways.
Mistrust of services due to previous negative experiences.
The risk of re-traumatisation through interactions with healthcare systems.
The impact of racism on patients, carers and staff alike.
A particularly striking message from the presentation was that many racialised staff attending the workshops were not learning about racial trauma as a new concept. Instead, they were reflecting on experiences that formed part of their everyday reality. This observation reinforced the importance of creating environments where these experiences can be discussed openly and safely.
Co-produced Learning Spaces
The racial trauma workshops were developed through a co-production approach involving Debbie Best, Natalie Mark and Dr Anne Aiyegbusi, a forensic psychotherapist, group analyst and registered nurse who has published extensively on racial trauma. Together they designed reflective learning spaces where participants could explore difficult but essential conversations around race, identity and mental health.
The workshops encouraged participants to discuss:
Trust, power and emotional labour.
Racialised assumptions within healthcare.
Barriers to culturally safe care.
Experiences of racism in professional and personal settings.
Organisational responsibilities in responding to racial trauma.
Feedback from participants demonstrated the impact of these conversations. Attendees reported that hearing people’s lived experiences brought the issues to life in ways that data alone could not achieve. Many described the workshops as challenging but necessary, with one participant stating that conversations about racial trauma are essential even when they are uncomfortable.
Wider PCREF Implementation at West London NHS Trust
Alongside the racial trauma work, the presentation highlighted wider progress being made through PCREF implementation across the Trust.
Key achievements included:
Establishing PCREF leadership, steering groups and governance structures.
Increasing the number of PCREF leads and lived experience members.
Delivering Trust-wide PCREF awareness events.
Running community listening events and engagement activities.
Developing a Cultural Competency Framework and tailored action plans.
Creating co-produced communications led by patients and carers.
Improving ethnicity data collection and reporting systems.
Working with specialist racial trauma consultants to strengthen organisational understanding.
Particularly noteworthy was the emphasis on co-production. Patients and carers were not simply consulted but actively involved in shaping communications, governance structures, learning programmes and strategic priorities. This demonstrated a commitment to ensuring that those most affected by inequalities have a meaningful voice in driving change.
Key Learning from West London NHS Trust
The West London presentation demonstrated that addressing racial inequalities requires more than policy changes alone. It requires organisations to create spaces where difficult conversations can happen safely, where lived experience is valued as expertise and where learning leads directly to action.
Their work showed that racial trauma is not solely an individual experience but an organisational challenge that requires leadership, accountability and sustained commitment. By combining co-production, cultural competency, workforce development and organisational reflection, West London NHS Trust is helping to create the conditions for more equitable and culturally safe mental health services.
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Reducing Inequalities in Restrictive Practice: From Data to Action
Presented by Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, this session focused on reducing inequalities in restrictive practice through the lens of the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF). The presentation explored how data, lived experience, trauma-informed care and practical service improvements can work together to reduce the use of restraint, seclusion and restrictive interventions while addressing racial disparities.
The presenters explained that restrictive practices are not experienced equally across all communities. Evidence shows that people from some racialised groups are more likely to experience restrictive interventions, making this both a safety issue and a race equity issue. Oxleas therefore sought to identify practical actions that could improve care while simultaneously reducing inequalities.
Listening to Staff and Stakeholders
As part of their PCREF work, Oxleas engaged staff, service users and stakeholders to identify priorities for change. The feedback was grouped and ranked to establish the strongest starting points for improvement.
The consultation identified two immediate workstreams:
Debrief and Escalation
Trauma-Informed Care
The presentation emphasised that participants did not ask for abstract policy changes. Instead, they identified practical improvements that could be implemented directly within services.
Highest-Ranked Priorities
The most frequently identified priorities included:
A key message from the slide was that stakeholders wanted changes that would directly affect day-to-day care, staff behaviour and patient experience.
Workstream One: Debrief and Escalation
The first workstream focused on reducing escalation in the moment and improving learning after incidents occur.
The framework was organised into three stages:
Before Escalation
Staff are encouraged to:
Pause before escalating situations.
Ensure one lead staff member takes responsibility.
Consider alternatives earlier.
Use an equity prompt before moving to hands-on interventions.
The emphasis was on slowing decision-making enough to ensure staff are responding to the person’s needs rather than reacting automatically.
During Escalation
The presentation highlighted the importance of:
Clear staff roles.
Defined decision-making thresholds.
Safety scanning.
Choosing the least restrictive option available.
Clear documentation of rationale.
Protecting clinical judgement while maintaining accountability.
The objective is to ensure restrictive interventions are only used when absolutely necessary and are proportionate to the situation.
After the Incident
Learning after incidents was considered equally important.
Actions included:
Joint staff and patient learning.
Independent facilitation where possible.
Advocacy and peer support.
Reviewing and updating care plans.
The focus was not simply on recording incidents but on understanding what happened and preventing repetition.
Next Steps
The presentation concluded with a clear action plan for the coming period.
Planned Actions
Agree a Trust-wide escalation and post-incident learning standard.
Begin testing the “Pause Before Escalation” approach on selected wards.
Finalise a Trust Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) protocol and minimum training standard.
Strengthen dashboard reporting and improve protected-characteristics data quality.
Embed lived experience into the design and review of changes.
These actions reflect the Trust’s commitment to moving from discussion to implementation.
Learning Across London
The presenters also highlighted the importance of collaboration across London’s mental health trusts.
Areas identified for collaboration included:
Common data definitions.
Co-produced interventions.
Trauma-informed escalation practice.
Culturally informed post-incident learning.
Peer review of ward-level improvement projects.
This reflected one of the key themes running throughout the conference: that race equity work is strengthened when trusts learn from each other rather than working in isolation.
North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT)
North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT) presented its PCREF work through the lens of national competencies, demonstrating how race equity can be embedded into everyday clinical practice rather than being treated as a standalone initiative. The presentation, delivered by Erica Deti, Patient and Carer Race Equality Lead, highlighted the importance of developing a workforce that is confident, culturally competent and able to respond effectively to the needs of diverse communities. NELFT emphasised that meaningful change requires organisations to move beyond awareness and into practical action, ensuring that race equity is reflected in leadership, service design and frontline care.
A key focus of the presentation was the development and implementation of national PCREF competencies, designed to support staff at all levels in understanding racial inequalities and their impact on mental health outcomes. Erica explained how these competencies help staff build the knowledge, skills and confidence needed to challenge inequity, engage meaningfully with service users and carers, and contribute to culturally responsive services. The Trust also stressed the importance of involving people with lived experience throughout this process, ensuring that learning is informed by real experiences rather than theoretical concepts alone.
The presentation reinforced the message that achieving race equity is a continuous journey rather than a destination. NELFT shared examples of how the Trust is embedding co-production, reflective practice and accountability into its approach, while encouraging staff to consider how their decisions influence patient experiences and outcomes. By focusing on workforce development, lived experience leadership and organisational learning, NELFT demonstrated how PCREF can act as a catalyst for long-term cultural change, helping to create services that are safer, fairer and more responsive to the communities they serve.
A second NELFT presentation was delivered from local community organisations and Project Zero. This session focused on partnership working with local barbershops, voluntary organisations and community groups as a means of improving engagement with racialised communities. The speakers described how trusted community settings can help bridge gaps between services and populations that may feel excluded from traditional healthcare pathways.
Carer Spotlight
Matthew McKenzie and PCREF Carer Poetry
One of the most powerful moments of the afternoon came during the Carer Spotlight, where carers used poetry to share personal experiences of supporting loved ones through mental health services. The session moved beyond statistics, policies and organisational frameworks to remind attendees of the human stories that sit behind every discussion about race equity, access and care. The poetry was delivered by Matthew McKenzie and fellow carers, creating a reflective and emotional space that grounded the conference in lived experience. Through spoken word and personal reflection, the audience was invited to consider what it truly means to care, advocate and persevere within systems that do not always recognise the voices of carers.
A recurring theme across the poems was the often invisible role of carers. Several pieces explored the emotional labour involved in supporting a family member through periods of crisis, while also navigating complex services and systems.
Here is the poem from Matthew McKenzie taken from his collaborative book (in development) – Unpaid, Unseen and Yet Unbroken
The poems highlighted feelings of exhaustion, responsibility and uncertainty, but also resilience and determination. Listeners heard about the challenges of balancing personal wellbeing with caring responsibilities, and the reality that carers frequently become experts in supporting their loved ones while receiving little recognition themselves. The poetry gave voice to experiences that are often hidden from formal reports and performance data, yet have a profound impact on individuals and families.
Another important theme was the need for genuine partnership between services, service users and carers. The poems reflected frustrations when carers felt excluded from conversations, ignored during decision-making or treated as outsiders despite their deep understanding of the person they support. At the same time, they celebrated examples of compassionate practice, where professionals listened, worked collaboratively and recognised carers as valuable partners in recovery. These reflections connected strongly with the wider messages of PCREF, reinforcing that co-production is most effective when carers are respected, included and treated as equal contributors rather than passive observers.
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL)
Presented by J’nelle James, Acting Assistant Director of Culture and Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL) showcased one of the conference’s most innovative examples of co-production through the Black Men’s Wellbeing Festival 2026. The presentation focused on how Milton Keynes Talking Therapies worked with Black men, community leaders and local organisations to improve engagement with NHS mental health services. Rather than expecting communities to come to services, CNWL demonstrated how services can go out into communities, build relationships and create spaces where conversations about mental health feel safe, relevant and culturally meaningful.
The presentation explained that the project began during Black History Month in October 2022, when Milton Keynes Talking Therapies hosted a free face-to-face wellbeing session for Black men at Stantonbury Health Centre. The event explored themes including racial trauma, stigma, family relationships, cultural influences and self-worth. What began as a single wellbeing session quickly revealed a significant unmet need within the community. Participants spoke openly about barriers to accessing support and the lack of culturally relevant mental health conversations, leading the team to recognise that a longer-term programme of engagement was needed.
CNWL emphasised that trust cannot be created through a single event or consultation exercise. Instead, trust is earned through visibility, consistency and genuine partnership. The Trust described a three-year journey of listening, learning and working alongside local communities, which ultimately led to the development of the Black Men’s Wellbeing Festival. The project became an example of how PCREF principles can be applied in practice by ensuring that communities are involved in shaping solutions rather than simply being consulted after decisions have already been made.
Building Trust Through Co-Production
A central message throughout the presentation was that “trust isn’t built overnight.” The festival emerged through a deliberate process of relationship-building and community engagement. CNWL outlined six stages that helped transform an initial wellbeing event into a large-scale community-led initiative.
The first stage focused on initial engagement, beginning with the October 2022 wellbeing session. Following this, the team moved into a listening and learning phase, hosting webinars, training sessions and community discussions to understand what Black men wanted from mental health services. Rather than assuming solutions, the Trust spent time listening to experiences and identifying priorities directly from community members.
The next stages involved meeting people in community spaces, strengthening relationships with local organisations and businesses, amplifying messages through trusted community networks and broadening engagement across Milton Keynes. The presentation highlighted that every stage was developed collaboratively with community partners, ensuring that ownership of the programme remained shared rather than NHS-led.
Key Stages of the Journey
Initial engagement through Black History Month wellbeing events.
Listening sessions and community conversations.
Presence at local community gatherings and celebrations.
Building partnerships with local organisations and businesses.
Using trusted networks to amplify messages.
Expanding engagement through media, events and outreach.
The Black Men’s Wellbeing Festival 2026
The culmination of this work was the launch of the Black Men’s Wellbeing Festival 2026, a community-led programme designed to improve access and engagement for Black men within mental health services. Running weekly between April and May 2026, the festival brought together clinicians, community leaders, lived experience speakers and local organisations to create open conversations about wellbeing, identity and mental health.
The programme tackled subjects that participants themselves had identified as important. Rather than focusing solely on clinical mental health conditions, the festival explored the wider social, cultural and personal experiences that influence wellbeing. This reflected a more holistic understanding of mental health and recognised that issues such as identity, masculinity, family expectations and discrimination all play an important role in people’s wellbeing.
The festival also demonstrated how NHS services can become more accessible when support is delivered in partnership with trusted community figures. By bringing together professionals and community leaders, CNWL created opportunities for conversations that may not otherwise take place within traditional healthcare settings.
North London NHS Foundation Trust
Equity and Health Inequalities Strategy 2026–2030: “Inclusion in Action”
North London NHS Foundation Trust presented its new Equity and Health Inequalities Strategy 2026–2030, centred on the theme of “Inclusion in Action.” The presentation highlighted the Trust’s ambition to embed equity into every aspect of organisational culture, leadership, workforce development and service delivery. Rather than treating equality and health inequalities as separate workstreams, the strategy positions inclusion as a fundamental principle underpinning better mental health outcomes, improved staff experiences and stronger communities. The Trust’s vision was summarised through the phrase: “Better Mental Health. Better Lives. Better Communities.”
A key theme throughout the presentation was the recognition that addressing inequalities requires action at both organisational and system levels. The strategy aligns with the Trust’s broader five-year organisational goals and is supported by the North London Way, Trust values, leadership framework and staff network structures. The presenters emphasised that lived experience, staff insight and community partnership have been central to shaping the strategy, ensuring that it reflects the realities of the diverse populations served across North Central London.
The presentation also highlighted the importance of shared accountability. Equity was presented not as the responsibility of specialist equality teams alone, but as a collective responsibility across leadership, clinical services, operational teams and partner organisations. Through this approach, the Trust aims to create sustainable cultural change while reducing inequalities experienced by both service users and staff.
Strategic Ambitions and Organisational Change
A major focus of the presentation was how the Trust intends to turn principles into practical action. The strategy builds upon existing organisational priorities while introducing a stronger and more explicit focus on equity and inclusion. The presenters described a framework that links the Trust’s strategic aims, leadership expectations, workforce culture and service improvement activity into a single coherent approach.
The strategy is closely connected to the work of the Staff Networks Alliance, which brings together a range of staff networks representing diverse communities and experiences. The Trust described these networks as essential partners in shaping policy, challenging inequalities and ensuring that organisational decisions are informed by lived experience. This collaborative model reflects a commitment to co-production and shared leadership rather than top-down decision making.
The presentation emphasised a set of organisational values that support inclusive practice, including visibility, accountability, compassion, collaboration and empowerment. These principles are intended to guide both staff behaviour and organisational decision-making. By embedding these values throughout the Trust, leaders hope to create a culture where inclusion becomes a routine part of everyday practice rather than a separate programme of work.
Building on Existing Foundations
The final section of the presentation focused on progress already achieved and the foundations that have been established to support future work. The Trust outlined a number of significant developments, including the creation of an Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) Programme Board, which provides governance and oversight for inclusion and health inequalities initiatives. This governance structure helps ensure that equity remains a strategic priority and is monitored at senior levels of the organisation.
The Trust has also introduced several initiatives aimed at strengthening accountability and supporting underrepresented groups. These include the launch of the Staff Networks Alliance, the development of anti-racism principles, positive action programmes, reciprocal mentoring opportunities and improvements in disability inclusion through the Reasonable Adjustments Passport scheme. The Trust reported achieving Disability Confident Level 2 status, reflecting progress in creating a more inclusive workplace environment.
Importantly, the presentation highlighted the implementation of the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) as a key mechanism for advancing anti-racist practice and addressing inequalities within mental health pathways. Alongside embedding the North London Way as a shared organisational framework, the Trust views PCREF as a central component of its strategy for reducing inequities and improving outcomes. The overall message was that meaningful progress has already begun, but sustained effort, partnership and accountability will be required to achieve the ambitions set out in the Equity and Health Inequalities Strategy 2026–2030.
A recurring message from the closing discussion was that race equity remains everybody’s responsibility. While significant progress has been made, panellists acknowledged that much work remains. Delegates left with a renewed commitment to collaboration, stronger partnerships with carers and communities, and a shared determination to ensure that PCREF continues to drive meaningful and measurable change across London’s mental health services.
Blog by Ethnic Mental Health Carer forum Chair – Matthew McKenzie
The May 2026 Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum brought together carers, researchers, clinicians, community leaders, and representatives from mental health organisations across England. Although attendance was smaller than usual, the discussion was rich, honest, and highly informative, covering Mental Health Act reform, carers’ experiences, service inequalities, innovative approaches to care, and new research opportunities.
For those who were unable to attend, this blog provides a comprehensive overview of the meeting, including key presentations, audience questions, responses from speakers, and useful resources shared during the session.
Opening Remarks
As the chair, I welcomed attendees and outlined the agenda. The meeting focused on following:
Mental Health Act research and reform
Carers’ experiences supporting loved ones through detention
Findings from a major East Sussex carers research project
Resources for carers under the Mental Health Act
Electronic Health Records and future developments
Wider discussions on racial trauma, inequalities, and service improvement
The meeting also provided opportunities for networking, sharing lived experiences, and highlighting innovative projects happening across the country.
Research Study: Supporting a Loved One Through Mental Health Detention
Dr Maeve Conneely from University College London opened the meeting with a presentation on a new research study exploring the experiences of people who have been assessed or detained under the Mental Health Act, as well as the experiences of family members and carers who supported them through that process. The study has been commissioned as part of the wider programme of Mental Health Act reform and aims to understand how the current “Nearest Relative” provisions operate in practice before changes are introduced under the new legislation.
Dr Conneely explained that researchers are particularly interested in hearing from carers who were involved in supporting a loved one but who were not formally recognised as the “Nearest Relative” under the existing legal framework. She highlighted that these experiences are especially important because they can reveal where carers have been excluded from decision-making, denied access to information, or prevented from contributing to assessments despite playing a significant role in supporting the individual concerned. The study is open to anyone aged 16 or over who has direct experience of Mental Health Act assessments, detentions, Community Treatment Orders, holding powers, or related interventions, whether as a patient or as a supporter.
The research is linked to ongoing reforms of the Mental Health Act and seeks to understand how the “Nearest Relative” provisions currently operate before changes are implemented.
Who Can Take Part?
The study is looking for:
People who have been detained under the Mental Health Act
Family members and carers who supported someone during detention or assessment
Individuals who should have been involved as a nearest relative but were not
Anyone aged 16 or over with relevant experience
Interviews are conducted online and participants receive a £30 shopping voucher as a thank-you for their time.
Key Question from Participants
Q: Does the study include situations where someone should have been involved but wasn’t?
Response: Yes. Researchers are particularly interested in understanding experiences where carers or family members were excluded from decision-making processes despite playing a significant caring role.
Another Important Question
Q: Do carers need permission from the person who was detained before participating?
Response: No. Carers are sharing their own experiences and therefore only need to provide their own consent.
Discussion Themes
Participants highlighted:
Long-standing inequalities affecting Black communities under the Mental Health Act.
The overuse of psychiatric labels without sufficient exploration of trauma.
The need to understand why some individuals receive significantly different experiences of care, including access to private mental health facilities.
Concerns about trust in mental health services and the lasting impact of poor experiences across generations.
Several carers committed to taking part in the study to ensure lived experience informs future policy.
East Sussex Carers Research Project: What Carers Told Us
Age Angiolini presented findings from a year-long carers-led research project examining the experiences of family carers supporting people with serious mental illness across East Sussex. The study was developed in response to repeated concerns raised by carers at local support meetings and sought to capture their experiences of interacting with mental health services provided by the Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust (SPFT).
Although the research received 71 responses, representing only a proportion of the carers population in the region, the findings revealed a striking consistency in the challenges carers face. The survey explored themes including carers’ involvement in care planning, communication with services, consent and confidentiality, quality of care, crisis support, and priorities for improvement. Among the most significant findings were that 72% of carers reported being only sometimes involved or not involved at all in their loved one’s care, 73% felt services relied too heavily on carers, and 72% said they regularly had to advocate to secure appropriate support. The research concluded that many carers feel undervalued, excluded from decision-making, and left carrying significant responsibilities without adequate recognition or support.
The study gathered responses from carers supporting people with:
Schizophrenia
Bipolar disorder
ADHD
Autism
Complex neurodiverse conditions
Although the sample size was relatively modest, the findings revealed significant and consistent concerns.
Key Findings from the report
Carers Feel Excluded
72% reported being only sometimes involved or not involved at all.
73% felt services relied too heavily on carers.
72% said they had to advocate strongly to secure appropriate care.
Communication Failures
Participants reported poor communication between:
Mental health services
Assessment teams
Social services
Mental health liaison teams
Many carers described communications as inconsistent, unclear, and difficult to navigate.
Consent and Confidentiality
A recurring concern was that confidentiality procedures are often applied rigidly, preventing carers from sharing vital information during crises.
Carers argued that this can actively undermine effective care.
Quality of Care Concerns
The research found:
90% reported insufficient care.
Significant concerns around continuity of care.
A strong desire for dedicated care coordinators.
Widespread frustration with crisis services.
Crisis Support is Not Working
Many carers reported that:
NHS 111 is often inadequate for mental health crises.
A&E is frequently unsuitable for people experiencing mental distress.
Services remain reactive rather than preventative.
Calls for Change
Recommendations included:
Better crisis pathways
Improved coordination between services
More trauma-informed approaches
Greater therapeutic support
Increased family involvement
Better support for neurodiverse individuals
The presentation sparked considerable discussion, with many attendees noting that the findings reflected experiences they had encountered for years.
Carers Speak Out: Frustration, Trauma and the Need for Change
One of the most powerful aspects of the meeting was hearing directly from carers.
Several participants reflected on decades of involvement with mental health services and expressed concern that despite repeated reviews, consultations, and reforms, many of the same issues continue to persist.
Common themes included:
Institutional racism
Poor communication
Exclusion of carers
Over-medicalisation
Lack of trauma-informed care
Inadequate support during crises
A number of attendees emphasised that families often become de facto care coordinators, managing appointments, services, medications, and crises while receiving little support themselves.
One participant observed:
“They plan, medicate and treat. We care. Our worlds don’t meet.”
Others highlighted the impact of racial trauma and the way mental health services can fail to recognise the cultural context of distress.
Open Dialogue: A Different Way Forward?
Ren Reins introduced the concept of Open Dialogue, an internationally recognised approach to mental health care that focuses on relationships, networks, and collaborative conversations.
Open Dialogue aims to:
Bring families and professionals together
Reduce fragmentation between services
Focus on lived experience
Build trust
Improve recovery outcomes
Ren explained that major NHS-funded trials are underway and encouraged carers to learn more about the approach.
The discussion generated significant interest, particularly from attendees looking for alternatives to traditional medical models of care.
Nearest Relative Resources Project
Professor Judy Laing from the University of Bristol provided an update on an innovative project designed to support family members and carers who hold, or may hold, responsibilities under the Mental Health Act’s “Nearest Relative” provisions. Drawing on previous research with carers and mental health professionals, Professor Laing explained that many family members who find themselves in the Nearest Relative role often receive little information, guidance, or emotional support despite carrying significant legal responsibilities. In response, her team secured funding to develop a free, co-produced online resource that helps carers understand their rights, responsibilities, and options when supporting a loved one through mental health assessment, detention, and treatment.
Developed in partnership with carers, family members, mental health professionals, and organisations including Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, and Carers Trust, the website provides practical information, downloadable tools, guidance for conversations with professionals, and resources to help carers look after their own wellbeing. Professor Laing stressed that the project has been shaped directly by the experiences of those who have undertaken the role themselves, ensuring that the guidance reflects the realities and challenges carers face in practice rather than simply explaining legal processes.
The project emerged from research identifying significant gaps in information and support for people carrying out the “Nearest Relative” role.
What Has Been Developed?
The project has created a free online resource containing:
Information about legal rights
Guidance on conversations with professionals
Practical tools for meetings
Support for carers’ wellbeing
Resources explaining upcoming legal changes
The materials have been co-produced with carers and family members.
Questions Raised
How are diverse communities included?
Participants asked how the project ensures equity and accessibility.
Professor Laing explained that:
People from ethnic minority backgrounds have contributed to development.
Resources are being improved to increase accessibility.
Additional funding is supporting work around inclusion and accessibility.
Translation and alternative formats are being explored.
How is the project promoted?
Discussion focused on ensuring communities are aware of available support rather than resources existing only online.
Professor Laing outlined efforts involving:
Mind
Carers Trust
Mental health services
Local media
Carer forums
How will the new Nominated Person role protect carers who have traditionally been involved in supporting a loved one?
Several participants expressed concern that replacing the Nearest Relative role could unintentionally weaken the involvement of family members who have historically provided substantial support during periods of mental ill-health. Questions were raised about situations where a person may choose someone other than their primary carer to act as their Nominated Person, potentially reducing carers’ ability to access information or participate in key decisions. Professor Laing acknowledged that these concerns have been raised by many carers and explained that the practical details of how the new system will operate are still being developed. She stressed the importance of carers contributing their experiences to ensure that future guidance recognises the valuable role families often play in supporting recovery and maintaining continuity of care.
What support is available when professionals fail to recognise or understand carers’ legal rights?
Attendees also discussed the reality that many mental health professionals are not always familiar with the legal powers and rights associated with the Nearest Relative role. Participants described situations where carers were excluded from discussions, not informed of important decisions, or felt unable to challenge professional opinions because they lacked confidence in their understanding of the law. In response, Professor Laing highlighted that one of the main objectives of the Bristol resources project is to bridge this knowledge gap by providing practical tools, suggested questions, and clear explanations of carers’ rights. She noted that the project is also developing resources aimed at professionals themselves, with the goal of increasing awareness and ensuring that carers’ legal rights are better understood and respected across mental health services.
Attendees welcomed the commitment to increasing visibility.
Electronic Health Records and Future Developments
Dr Anna De Simoni, an Academic GP and Associate Professor of Primary Care at Queen Mary University of London, presented an early-stage research proposal focused on how electronic health records could be used to better understand and map the social support networks surrounding people living with multiple long-term health conditions.
Dr De Simoni sought direct feedback from carers to help shape the project before a formal funding application is submitted. She explained that while healthcare professionals can usually identify a patient’s next of kin and household members through existing GP records, they often have very limited understanding of the wider support networks that play a vital role in a person’s wellbeing.
These networks may include family members, neighbours, friends, faith groups, community organisations, carers, and others who provide practical and emotional support. The research aims to explore whether technology and electronic health records can help healthcare professionals better recognise these support systems and use that information to improve care planning, reduce unnecessary hospital admissions, and enhance quality of life for people living with complex health conditions.
The discussion generated considerable interest, particularly regarding:
Information sharing
Integration across services
Support for carers
Data protection concerns
Improving continuity of care
Several participants expressed enthusiasm about the potential benefits while also raising questions regarding privacy and access to NHS information.
Questions and Answers from Dr Anna De Simoni’s Presentation
Q: What problem is this research trying to solve? A: Dr De Simoni explained that healthcare professionals often know very little about the wider support network surrounding a patient. While medical records may identify a next of kin or people living in the same household, they rarely capture the full picture of who is actually providing practical, emotional, or day-to-day support. The project aims to better understand these social networks and use that information to improve care planning and patient outcomes.
Q: Who is the research aimed at? A: The initial focus is on people living with multiple long-term health conditions, including illnesses such as COPD and other complex health needs e.g mental health. The project seeks to understand how stronger recognition of support networks could improve quality of life, reduce hospital admissions, and support people to remain independent for longer.
Q: How would patients contribute information about their support network? A: The proposal includes the use of a Universal Care Plan through the NHS App. Patients would be able to enter information themselves about what matters to them, who supports them, how they prefer to be treated, and what should happen if their health deteriorates. This information could then be viewed and updated by relevant healthcare professionals.
Q: What role could carers play within the proposed system? A: Participants highlighted that carers often provide the majority of practical support but are frequently invisible within healthcare systems. The proposed approach could make carers more visible by helping professionals understand who is involved in supporting a patient and what role they play in maintaining wellbeing and independence.
Q: How will patient confidentiality and data protection be managed? A: Concerns were raised about privacy and the security of NHS data. Dr De Simoni explained that information governance, GDPR compliance, and data protection would be central to the project. Specialists in privacy and information governance would be involved to ensure that any information collected is handled safely, appropriately, and with proper consent.
Key Discussion: Why Are Carers Still Fighting the Same Battles?
A recurring theme throughout the meeting was the sense that many challenges identified today are the same challenges carers raised ten or twenty years ago.
Questions included:
Why are services still fragmented?
Why do carers continue to feel excluded?
Why are communication problems so persistent?
Why is trauma often overlooked?
Why do inequalities remain entrenched?
Participants reflected on whether the issue is primarily one of resources, leadership, service design, or culture.
Many agreed that meaningful change requires carers to remain actively involved in shaping policy and service delivery.
A carers support group recommended during discussion as a source of peer support and shared experience.
Final Reflections
The May 2026 Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum highlighted both the challenges carers continue to face and the determination across the sector to improve outcomes.
From Mental Health Act reform and carers’ rights to innovative approaches such as Open Dialogue, the meeting demonstrated the importance of bringing together lived experience, research, policy, and practice.
Several speakers reminded attendees that change often begins with carers sharing their stories, participating in research, challenging poor practice, and helping shape future services.
The forum remains an important space where those voices can be heard.
Update by Matthew McKenzie – Chair of South London Mental Health Carers Forum
The South London Mental Health Carers Group met for the month of May for a wide-ranging and thoughtful discussion covering carers’ experiences, mental health support systems, involvement opportunities, and an important research presentation focused on support networks and long-term care.
The group covers areas of Lewisham, Southwark, Lambeth & Croydon, although Mental Health Carers from outside those areas are welcime to attend
The session brought together carers, advocates, involvement leads, and guest speaker Dr Anna De Simone from Queen Mary University of London. As always, the discussion highlighted both the challenges carers continue to face and the value of shared lived experience and peer support.
Opening Discussions: Challenges in Mental Health Care Systems
The meeting began with carers sharing experiences of navigating mental health services for loved ones with complex needs. There was extensive discussion around:
difficulties accessing appropriate placements,
safeguarding concerns,
discharge planning,
lack of continuity between NHS trusts and local authorities,
and ongoing challenges around funding responsibility between different services.
A recurring issue raised was the pressure on inpatient beds and the concern that discharge decisions can sometimes feel driven more by system pressures than by clinical readiness. Carers spoke openly about the emotional impact of repeatedly having to advocate for vulnerable loved ones while navigating fragmented systems.
There was also discussion around the importance of carers being recognised and included in communication and planning processes. Participants highlighted how carers are often the people most aware of deterioration, risks, or safeguarding concerns, and how vital it is that services engage meaningfully with families and informal supporters where appropriate.
Despite frustrations, carers also acknowledged examples of good practice and supportive professionals within mental health services. Several attendees noted that they had seen gradual improvements in carer involvement and listening exercises within parts of South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM), particularly in Lambeth.
Updates on Carer Involvement and Support Activities
The group received updates from carers and representatives involved in local mental health engagement work and carers’ organisations.
Carers Week Activities
Karen from Carers Hub Lambeth shared details of upcoming Carers Week activities, including:
outreach events,
wellbeing sessions,
information stalls,
and activities for both adult and young carers.
The events aim to provide carers with opportunities for support, networking, practical advice, and wellbeing activities.
There was also discussion around changes and developments within SLAM involvement structures, including:
continuation of family and carers meetings,
changes to involvement leads,
and ongoing reviews of the involvement register.
Attendees reflected positively on the increasing recognition of carers’ voices in some forums and clinical meetings, while acknowledging that there is still much work to do to ensure consistent involvement across all boroughs and services.
Guest Presentation: Mapping Patient Support Networks
The second half of the meeting focused on a presentation from Dr Anna De Simone, GP and Associate Professor of Primary Care at Queen Mary University of London.
Anna introduced a proposed research project exploring how healthcare systems might better understand and map patients’ support networks using electronic health records and social network tools.
The research proposal focuses particularly on patients with long-term conditions such as COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), many of whom also experience multiple additional health conditions and varying levels of social isolation.
The Core Idea
Anna explained that while healthcare professionals can currently access limited information such as next of kin or household members, they often lack a fuller understanding of:
who actually supports the patient,
how reliable that support is,
whether support networks are connected or fragmented,
and how socially isolated a patient may be.
The proposed research would explore whether creating visual “maps” of support networks could help:
improve care planning,
reduce crises,
improve coordination between services,
and enhance patients’ quality of life.
The project would also examine how social prescribing, community services, online support groups, and carers fit into these wider support networks.
Carers’ Feedback on the Research Proposal
The discussion following Anna’s presentation was extremely rich and constructive, with carers offering both enthusiasm and important cautionary perspectives.
Strong Support for the Concept
Many attendees felt the project addressed an important gap in healthcare planning. Several carers spoke about how informal support networks had been essential to helping them or their loved ones survive periods of crisis.
Participants agreed that professionals often underestimate the role played by:
friends,
neighbours,
online communities,
peer groups,
and unpaid carers.
The ability to visualise these networks was seen as potentially valuable for both professionals and patients themselves.
Importance of Non-Traditional Support Networks
A strong theme throughout the discussion was that support does not always come from family.
Some carers explained that family relationships can sometimes be unsafe or abusive, and that support may instead come from trusted friends, neighbours, carers’ groups, or online communities.
The group stressed that any future system should avoid assuming that family automatically equals safety or support.
Online Communities and Digital Support
Participants also highlighted the increasing importance of online support systems.
Several carers explained that:
Zoom groups,
Facebook communities,
online peer support,
and digital communication can provide essential social connection, especially for disabled or isolated people.
One participant noted that online support networks had directly helped them access practical support and reduce isolation when physical mobility was limited.
At the same time, carers cautioned that not everyone has equal access to digital services. Concerns were raised about:
digital exclusion,
accessibility barriers,
lack of digital skills,
and the risk of widening inequalities.
The importance of offering both digital and non-digital forms of support was strongly emphasised.
Privacy, Consent, and Mental Health
Carers also discussed potential challenges around privacy and consent, particularly for people experiencing paranoia or severe mental illness.
Some attendees noted that patients may not always feel comfortable sharing details about their social networks, and that trust and safeguarding would need to be central to any future system.
There was discussion about the delicate balance between:
confidentiality,
safety,
carer involvement,
and patient autonomy.
Role of Social Prescribers
The group generally agreed that social prescribers could play an important role in helping patients map support networks, because they often have more time and a stronger focus on community support than standard GP appointments allow.
However, concerns were raised about long-term funding and sustainability for social prescribing services.
Looking Ahead
Anna thanked the group for their detailed feedback and explained that carers’ insights would help shape the next stage of the research proposal before submission later this year.
There was strong interest from attendees in remaining involved should the project move forward, particularly around future patient and public involvement opportunities.
The meeting once again demonstrated the depth of knowledge, experience, and expertise held by unpaid carers. The discussion reflected not only the challenges carers continue to face, but also the importance of ensuring carers are recognised as essential partners in both healthcare delivery and future research.
I recently attended the “Making Time for Black Mental Health” event hosted by Bella from Think Tenacity Academy CIC at Cottons Caribbean Restaurant in Vauxhall. The event took place on friday 22nd of May 2026
it was a reminder of the importance of safe community spaces that centre Black wellbeing. The event brought together over 100 attendees, including families, carers, advocates, therapists, Plus Healthwatch Southwark, Healthwatch Lambeth, CNWL Talking Therapies Service Westminster, Carers UK, alongside other community organisations supporting mental health awareness and wellbeing.
We were all united around conversations on mental health, lived experience, and reducing stigma within the Black community.
The event was officially opened by Folake Segun, CEO of Healthwatch Lambeth which led on to meaningful conversations, which I have created a video to show highlights of the event.
As a carer advocate, I found the event especially valuable because it highlighted how community-led support can create genuine impact.
The evening included a Q&A session with Black therapists and speakers who openly discussed mental health challenges, cultural understanding, and the importance of representation in support services.
There were also wellness stalls, books, information tables, and opportunities for local organisations to connect directly with the community. Seeing families, children, and professionals all engaging together showed how mental health conversations can become more accessible and less stigmatised when events are designed with inclusion at the centre.
What stood out most to me was the sense of togetherness and intentional care throughout the event. Think Tenacity’s mission to tackle health inequalities and create spaces where Black people feel seen, heard, and supported was evident in every part of the evening. Hosting the event at a vibrant riverside venue with free entry, wellbeing activities, and opportunities to socialise created an environment where people could relax while also engaging in serious and necessary discussions around mental health.
Events like this are essential because they remind us that advocacy, wellbeing, and community support all go hand in hand.
If you weren’t able to join us for this month’s online forum, you missed a deeply insightful session packed with research updates and honest conversations. As a carer myself, I know how hard it is to find time for these meetings, so I’ve put together this expanded summary to keep you in the loop on the vital work being done for our community.
Meeting Agenda
Welcome and Intro: The role of the Patient Care Race Equality Framework (PCREF).
Speaker 1: Brenda Hayaka (King’s College London): Findings on ethnic inequalities in healthcare and the new “Interception” study.
Q&A Session: Addressing dementia stigma, medication, and language barriers.
Spirituality & Faith: Insights from Tuulia Castledine (Chaplain at SWLSTG) on recovery and holistic care.
Speaker 2: Becky Forster (University of Southampton): Supporting carers facing harmful or upsetting behaviors.
Local Advocacy: Healthwatch Croydon’s role in gathering carer feedback.
Closing: “Rooted and Growing” (A PCREF poem).
Key Speaker: Brenda Hayaka – The Interception Project
Brenda shared findings from her previous work on ethnic inequalities and introduced her new study on Multiple Long-Term Conditions (MLTCs).
Brenda Hayaka opened her keynote by sharing the heart behind her work on ethnic inequalities in healthcare. Drawing on her previous research, she described how minoritised ethnic patients and their carers often face significant challenges navigating multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) with little support or recognition. She emphasized that while global interventions exist for conditions like diabetes and depression, there is a notable gap in UK-based research specifically addressing MLTCs in minoritised communities. This “major evidence gap” became the driving force behind her current study, The Interception Project.
What the Research Shows:
Systemic Disadvantage: Minoritized ethnic groups are disadvantaged from the development to the management of multiple conditions.
Poor Continuity of Care: Many experience poor therapeutic relationships with practitioners.
The UK Evidence Gap: While interventions for depression and diabetes exist globally, Brenda found zero studies specifically targeting MLTCs for minoritized groups within the UK healthcare system.
The “Interception” Study:
The Interception Project uses a creative and collaborative method called journey mapping to trace the lived experiences of patients and unpaid carers. Brenda explained that this approach goes beyond merely collecting data: it seeks to identify the pathways people take when seeking help, the barriers they encounter, and the moments where the healthcare system fails them. By listening deeply and reflecting these experiences back to communities, the research provides actionable insights into improving care quality and equity. The study is expanding beyond London to include Coventry and Manchester, recognizing that every community has unique strengths, challenges, and solutions.
Brenda highlighted that a central aim of the project is to co-create actionable recommendations with communities. These recommendations are intended for NHS leaders, commissioners, and policymakers, ensuring that the voices of carers and patients directly inform service design and delivery. She also spoke about the role of trusted community leaders in building access and overcoming barriers such as language differences, mistrust of institutions, and cultural stigma around certain health conditions. Faith communities, she noted, can play a crucial role not only as support networks for participants but also as partners in research, data collection, and advocacy for change.
Throughout her presentation, Brenda emphasized that understanding the journey of carers and patients requires attention to both systemic and relational factors. Minoritised ethnic groups often experience disadvantages in developing and managing multiple conditions, and poor continuity of care can weaken therapeutic relationships with practitioners. By documenting these experiences in detail, the Interception Project aims to fill the evidence gap and provide a roadmap for more equitable, culturally sensitive care. Brenda closed her keynote by reminding attendees that meaningful equity in healthcare begins when previously invisible experiences are recognized and acted upon—a call to transform insight into change.
Spirituality in Care: Forum Introduction by Matthew McKenze
I had the honor of opening the spirituality segment of the forum, emphasizing the vital role that faith and cultural practices play in supporting carers and patients from minoritised ethnic communities. I framed the discussion around the idea that mental health care cannot be fully effective unless it recognizes the whole person, including their spiritual and cultural identity. I highlighted that carers often draw strength, resilience, and meaning from their faith, and that this dimension is frequently overlooked in traditional mental health services.
I encouraged participants to consider spirituality not as an abstract concept, but as a tangible resource that can inform recovery, foster belonging, and enhance coping strategies. By acknowledging spiritual needs, mental health providers can build trust with communities that have historically experienced marginalization or misunderstanding within healthcare systems. I also set the tone for an open and reflective conversation, inviting attendees to share experiences, insights, and challenges related to integrating faith and mental health support.
By positioning spirituality as both a personal and systemic consideration, the forum aimed to explore how services can better engage with faith perspectives in a respectful, inclusive, and practical way. This introduction laid the groundwork for Tuulia Castledine’s keynote, which delved deeper into the spiritual tools and frameworks that support carers and patients in their mental health journeys.
Spirituality in Care: Insights from Tuulia Castledine (SWLSTG)
We were joined by Tula, a Chaplain from South West London and St George’s (SWLSTG), who led a vital discussion on the spiritual dimension of mental health.
Tuulia highlighted that for many carers and patients, faith is not just a personal practice but a framework through which they make sense of mental health crises. Spirituality often provides a lens for understanding why challenges occur and offers a source of hope, helping individuals navigate uncertainty with resilience.
Beyond offering meaning, Tuulia explained that spirituality can serve as a practical tool in recovery. It provides a “language for recovery” that allows carers and patients to express experiences and emotions that might otherwise be difficult to articulate. This sense of connection fosters belonging and strengthens the psychological resources people draw upon when coping with mental health challenges.
Tuulia also stressed the importance of services adopting what she called “spiritual curiosity.” Mental health professionals are encouraged to engage openly with faith perspectives rather than making assumptions or ignoring them. By integrating spirituality into holistic, person-centered care, services can better meet the needs of minoritised ethnic communities.
Finally, Tuulia highlighted a critical concern: when services fail to acknowledge faith, they risk deepening the mistrust that many minority communities feel toward mental health providers. Recognizing and valuing spiritual needs, she emphasized, is not just compassionate—it is a crucial component of equitable care, fostering trust, understanding, and more effective therapeutic relationships.
Summing up Tuulia’s talk
Making Sense of Illness: For many, faith is how they make sense of why a crisis is happening and where they can find hope.
A Tool for Recovery: Spirituality provides a “language for recovery” and can build resilience and a sense of belonging.
Moving Beyond Assumptions: Tula emphasized that services need to show “spiritual curiosity” and include faith as part of holistic, person-centered care.
The “Mistrust” Gap: When services ignore faith, it can deepen the mistrust minority communities feel toward mental health providers.
Carer Voice: Questions & Feedback
The Q&A session was one of the most powerful segments of the forum, offering an unfiltered view of the real-world barriers faced by carers and minoritised ethnic communities. Participants shared candid experiences, highlighting gaps in current mental health support and pressing for practical solutions.
A professional opened the discussion by addressing the critical issue of language and access. She pointed out that many research projects and healthcare initiatives fail because they do not allocate adequate resources for language interpretation or accessibility for disabled individuals. Without these provisions, vital services and studies inadvertently exclude those who may benefit most, leaving carers and patients marginalized.
A carer contributed a particularly thought-provoking critique regarding medication versus conversation. He challenged the system on why Black men are often prescribed stronger medication for longer periods rather than being offered meaningful dialogue and psychosocial support. This raised an important conversation about the need for culturally sensitive approaches to treatment that value listening, understanding, and relationship-building alongside pharmacological intervention.
The unpaid carer also highlighted the challenge of dementia stigma within older generations of minoritised communities. He described how deeply ingrained cultural perceptions can make it difficult for families to seek early support or even acknowledge the condition, creating additional stress for carers. The discussion emphasized that tackling stigma requires both education and culturally attuned engagement, alongside support networks that respect the values and experiences of carers and patients.
A mental health professional from another mental health NHS trust added a vital perspective on community engagement and trust-building. He emphasized that carers often encounter inconsistent communication from services and a lack of culturally informed support, which can leave families feeling isolated and unsupported. He urged healthcare providers to work more closely with community leaders, faith groups, and carers themselves to co-design services that truly respond to the specific needs of minoritised ethnic communities.
Overall, the feedback session underscored that systemic improvements must be informed by the lived experiences of carers. Their insights illuminated the gaps between policy, research, and practical care, reminding the forum that real change is rooted in listening to and amplifying these voices.
Support for Carers in Crisis
Becky Forster introduced a deeply important new study funded by Marie Curie, focusing on carers who find themselves in extremely challenging and sometimes frightening situations. The research aims to better understand the experiences of carers who have faced harmful, aggressive, or abusive behaviors from the person they care for, particularly at the end of life. Becky emphasized that these situations are often overlooked in traditional guidance, leaving carers without the support or strategies they need to cope safely and effectively.
The study seeks to gather real-life experiences from carers, acknowledging that their insights are invaluable in shaping practical and compassionate guidance for healthcare providers. Becky explained that the goal is not only to document these difficult experiences but also to translate them into actionable tools and recommendations for the NHS, ensuring that carers receive timely support, protection, and training when dealing with complex end-of-life care scenarios. By centering the voices of those who have lived through these crises, the project hopes to reduce isolation, increase safety, and enhance the wellbeing of carers facing some of the most emotionally and physically demanding circumstances.
Becky encouraged attendees to participate and share their stories, reassuring them that contributions would remain confidential and that their experiences could directly influence policy and practice. This initiative highlighted the critical need for systemic recognition of carers’ emotional and practical needs, ensuring that they are not left to navigate trauma and stress alone. The session reinforced that understanding, guidance, and compassionate support are essential for carers’ resilience and for providing safe, dignified care to those at the end of life.
Croydon Healthwatch
We concluded the forum with an important reminder from Anna of Healthwatch Croydon, who emphasized that anyone in England has the right to provide anonymous feedback on their care. Anna highlighted that this is more than a formal process, it is a powerful tool for carers, patients, and communities to have their voices heard. By sharing experiences of both excellent and inadequate care, individuals can directly influence how services are shaped, highlight gaps in provision, and push for improvements where they are most needed.
Anna also underscored that feedback plays a crucial role in holding policymakers and healthcare leaders accountable. When carers and patients report their experiences, patterns of inequality, or systemic barriers, it creates evidence that decision-makers cannot ignore. This feedback is particularly vital for minoritised ethnic communities, where historical mistrust and underrepresentation have often left issues unaddressed. She encouraged all attendees to see feedback not as a bureaucratic exercise, but as an instrument of empowerment, helping to drive change at both local and national levels.
I closed the session with my poem “Rooted and Growing,” celebrating that we don’t have to lose our identity to get the care we deserve.
Stories are powerful. They carry memory, experience, and truth in ways that forms and systems often cannot. For unpaid minority carers, our stories are not just reflections, they are essential to understanding the full picture of care.
I’ve recently shared a poem, “Our Stories Matter,” from my upcoming poetry book. It explores the importance of lived experience, intergenerational memory, and the voices that are too often overlooked within health and social care systems.
While assessments, care plans, and clinical notes tell part of the story, they rarely capture the depth of what families and carers experience every day. Our stories provide context. They bring meaning and complete the picture.
This is especially important within the context of PCREF, where recognising lived experience and cultural understanding is key to improving care and addressing inequalities. When carers’ voices are not heard, something vital is missing.
This poem is a reminder that our stories are central.
If you’ve supported someone through a stay in mental health services, your experience could help improve care for others.
Researchers at The University of Manchester are inviting people with lived experience—including carers to take part in an online workshop focused on improving how mental health services support people during hospital discharge, particularly for individuals from Black heritage communities.
Reason for research
Evidence shows that people from Black communities often face poorer outcomes in mental health care, including barriers to access and challenges during discharge from hospital.
To address this, researchers are working to make future services and research more inclusive, culturally responsive, and grounded in real experiences. Hearing directly from carers is a key part of that work .
Who is running this?
The workshop is being led by Dr Natasha Tyler, a Research Fellow at The University of Manchester, as part of work linked to improving future research and care approaches.
The session will also be supported by facilitators with lived experience, including carers, to ensure discussions are grounded and meaningful .
Who can take part?
You may be interested if you:
Have cared for someone who has been an inpatient in adult mental health services
Have experience of discharge from mental health care
Want to share your perspective to improve future support
What’s involved?
Format: Online (MS Teams)
Duration: 2 hours
Dates: Sessions planned between 23rd April and 8th May 2026
Payment: £60 as a thank-you for your time
Participants will receive questions in advance to help prepare for the discussion.
Why get involved?
Taking part is a chance to:
Help shape future mental health research and services
Ensure carers’ voices are included in decision-making
Contribute to reducing inequalities in care
Share your experience in a supportive environment
How to express interest
If you’d like to take part, you can follow the link in the invitation to share your availability or contact the research team directly.
Caring for someone with multiple long-term health conditions can be both rewarding and challenging. More people than ever are living with conditions like diabetes, asthma, arthritis, or hypertension and these health challenges often affect minoritised ethnic communities disproportionately.
King’s College London is running the INTERCEPTION study to better understand the experiences of carers like you and the people you support. The goal is to improve how community leaders, healthcare professionals, and policymakers perceive and support those living with multiple conditions.
Your Voice Matters
Your experiences as a carer provide invaluable insights into what works, what could be better, and what support is most needed. By sharing your story, you help shape the future of care for people in similar situations, both locally and nationally.
Who Can Take Part
You can join the study if you:
Are 18 years old or above
Live in Coventry, London, or Manchester
Care for someone with two or more long-term physical or mental health conditions
Can communicate in English for an interview
What Participation Involves
The study involves a one-to-one interview lasting 60–90 minutes at a time and place that suits you. Everything you share will be kept confidential. As a thank you for your time, participants receive a £25 voucher.
How to Get Involved
To learn more or sign up, scan the QR code on the flyer or visit this link . If you have any questions, you can contact the research team, Dr Brenda Hayanga and Dr Sujith Prankumar, at interception@kcl.ac.uk.
Your experiences truly matter. By participating, you help researchers understand what carers need and influence better care for minoritised ethnic communities living with multiple long-term conditions.
I chaired our March hospital discharge network meeting with a real sense of momentum building across the system. What continues to strike me is the mix of voices in the room, commissioners, carers centres, hospital representatives, and grassroots advocates all trying to tackle the same persistent issue: how we properly involve and support unpaid carers during and after hospital discharge.
As someone with lived experience, particularly in mental health and complex care, I always come back to one key question: Are carers being treated as partners, or are they still being treated as visitors?
This meeting gave us a very honest answer progress is happening, but there is still a long way to go.
Key Presentation: Derbyshire HConnect Project
Emma’s presentation was, for me, an important part of the meeting not because it introduced something completely new, but because it clearly articulated what many carers have been saying for years, and then actually did something about it.
What stood out immediately was that this wasn’t a project designed in isolation. It was built directly from carer voice and lived experience. The starting point wasn’t “how do we improve discharge?” it was “what are carers actually experiencing right now?”
And what carers described was difficult to hear, but not surprising.
Carers spoke about not being recognised at all. Some said no one had even asked if they were a carer. Others described situations where their knowledge of the person they care for was ignored, even when it was critical. One example that stayed with me was a carer describing their loved one being discharged in the middle of winter, late at night, without proper clothing or preparation.
There was a consistent feeling that once someone enters hospital, the carer’s role is almost paused or worse, dismissed entirely.
What the HConnect project does differently is acknowledge that this isn’t just a communication issue it’s a system and culture issue.
Instead of relying on one intervention, the model works across multiple layers of the hospital system. It introduces dedicated hospital liaison workers who build relationships with wards, while also ensuring carers themselves are visible and supported directly on-site. At the same time, it invests in staff through training, guidance, and practical tools so that engaging carers becomes part of everyday practice rather than an optional extra.
What I found particularly important is that the project doesn’t assume staff are unwilling—it recognises that many staff simply lack the confidence, knowledge, or structure to engage carers properly. In fact, the findings showed that many hospital teams had never received any formal carer awareness training and were often unaware that carers even have a legal right to be involved in discharge planning.
The research element of the project adds another layer of depth. Through interviews with carers, several consistent themes emerged.
Carers described feeling invisible—treated as visitors rather than partners in care. They talked about their expertise being dismissed, even when they knew the patient best. Communication was often unclear or inconsistent, and discharge frequently felt rushed, with little notice or preparation. In many cases, carers ended up acting as the safety net catching mistakes, coordinating care, and managing complex needs on their own once the person returned home.
What struck me most is that these issues aren’t just isolated incidents they are patterns.
But importantly, the presentation didn’t just focus on what’s going wrong. It also highlighted what good looks like. In situations where carers were listened to, involved early, and treated as equal partners, the entire experience changed for both the carer and the patient. The challenge now is making that level of practice consistent, not exceptional.
The project is already showing tangible impact. There has been a noticeable increase in carers being identified within hospital settings, more referrals coming directly from health professionals, and hundreds of carers receiving support through the programme.
For me, the biggest takeaway from this presentation is this:
This isn’t about adding more services it’s about changing behaviour across the system.
The HConnect model recognises that for carers to be properly involved, three things need to be in place: staff need the capability to identify carers, the opportunity within the system to engage them, and the motivation to see this as a core part of care. Without all three, change simply won’t stick.
And that’s why this work matters. Because until carers are consistently seen, heard, and included, we will continue to see the same issues repeating no matter how many initiatives we introduce.
Lewisham Commissioner Update
From Lewisham’s commissioning side, there were some strong practical developments.
A key initiative is the rollout of a carer welcome pack, designed to be:
Clearly visible in hospital settings
Easily accessible to carers at the point of need
This is being strengthened through:
Increased collaboration with hospital staff
Plans to expand distribution across wards
From Lewisham, we also received a really significant update around system-level change, particularly the development of a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for engaging unpaid carers in hospital settings.
This work has been led across South East London ICB, with an external partner supporting the design. The aim of the SOP is to provide:
Clear guidance to hospital wards
Practical prompts and questions for staff
A consistent approach to identifying and engaging carers during hospital stays
What stood out to me is that this isn’t just a document, it’s designed to change behaviour on the ground. It focuses on something simple but powerful: how staff start conversations with carers and recognise the people already supporting patients.
In Lewisham, University Hospital Lewisham was selected as one of the pilot sites, with two wards testing the approach. The next stage is particularly important:
The SOP is being embedded into Trust templates
It is due to be presented to the Trust board for formal approval
There are plans to roll this out across Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, including Queen Elizabeth Hospital (Woolwich)
What I found especially encouraging is that carers have been involved throughout:
Input gathered through workshops
Further feedback taken to the Lewisham Council’s Open Carers Forum
Ongoing opportunity for boroughs to adapt the SOP to local needs
Alongside this, Lewisham is continuing practical work on the ground:
Strengthening links between commissioned carers services and hospital staff
Expanding visibility through carer welcome packs and information points within the hospital
For me, this is one of the most important developments discussed in the meeting. If implemented properly, a shared SOP like this has the potential to:
Reduce inconsistency across wards
Embed carer identification into everyday practice
Move us closer to a system where carers are routinely recognised—not accidentally discovered
Hospital Update: Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust
A really important contribution came from the patient experience perspective at Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, which covers University Hospital Lewisham and Queen Elizabeth Hospital (Woolwich).
From the Trust side, there was clear recognition that:
The work carers are doing is valuable and essential to patient outcomes
There is a need to improve physical visibility of carer support within hospital settings
Space and infrastructure need to better support engagement (for example, identifying a permanent location for carer engagement and resources)
There was also a willingness to:
Explore how carer-led engagement (including my own involvement) can be better embedded within the hospital environment
Strengthen links between patient experience teams and carers organisations
From my perspective, this was a positive and practical discussion. Too often we talk about engagement in theory—but here we were talking about where the table actually goes on the ward, and that level of detail matters.
Because if carers can’t see you, they can’t access you.
Greenwich (Commissioning & Mental Health)
Greenwich colleagues spoke about their broader system approach, particularly within mental health.
Their focus includes:
Identifying gaps in carer support across services
Embedding carers within commissioning priorities
Understanding what carers themselves want from local systems
They also posed an important question to the group: What should local authorities prioritise for carers?
My answer was straightforward: We need clear leadership and accountability, a named person or role responsible for carers across the system.
Without that, good work risks becoming fragmented.
Lambeth Carers Hub (King’s College Hospital & St Thomas’ Hospital)
Lambeth shared a detailed and honest update regarding their work across King’s College Hospital and Guys and St Thomas Hospital
Key points included:
Their hospital discharge project is continuing, but with reduced capacity due to funding constraints
They have secured a short-term extension, allowing work to continue until September
A major focus is now embedding carer awareness training into staff induction processes
Importantly, they raised a systemic issue:
The need to hold commissioned care agencies accountable, particularly when carers report poor-quality care after discharge
This is critical. Discharge doesn’t end at the hospital door—if the care package fails, the whole system fails.
Southwark Council Update
From Southwark, we heard about work being done at a system level, particularly linked to:
Development of discharge information resources across South East London
Collaboration across boroughs and NHS partners
The intention is for these resources to be:
Widely accessible and adaptable
Used across multiple organisations, rather than siloed locally
Given the proximity to major hospitals like King’s College Hospital and GSTT hosptal, this kind of coordinated approach is essential.
City & Hackney Carers Centre (Homerton Hospital)
A more concerning update came from City & Hackney, particularly regarding work linked to Homerton Hospital.
They reported:
The loss of a hospital discharge worker role
A significant drop in referrals to the carers centre as a result
Reduced presence within the hospital environment
This clearly demonstrates something we often say but don’t always quantify:
When you remove dedicated roles, you remove outcomes.
The worker’s presence had been directly contributing to engagement and referrals. Without that, carers are once again at risk of being missed.
Richmond Carers Centre (Kingston Hospital)
Updates from Richmond Carers Centre highlighted both strong engagement and opportunities to build further.
Positives:
Strong referral pathways coming through from Kingston Hospital, particularly linked to discharge activity
Ongoing professional awareness work, helping improve understanding of carers across services
There is a clear foundation here, with established relationships already supporting carers into services. The opportunity now is to build on that by increasing visibility and strengthening in-hospital engagement further.
Richmond Borough Mind (Springfield Hospital – SWLSTG)
From Richmond Borough Mind, the focus was more specifically on their work within South West London and St George’s Mental Health Trust (SWLSTG), particularly at Springfield Hospital.
Key challenges highlighted:
Difficulty accessing wards within Springfield Hospital, limiting direct engagement with carers
Limited contact with carers when based in general hospital areas rather than embedded on wards
Ongoing challenge in identifying where carers are most visible and reachable within mental health settings
What came through strongly is that, despite proactive efforts such as setting up stands and being present on-site, footfall from carers remains low unless services are embedded directly into ward environments.
This reinforces a key point for me:
In mental health settings especially, access is everything—if you’re not where carers are, you simply won’t reach them.
Bexley Carers (Post-Discharge & Reablement Focus)
Bexley brought an important perspective that often gets overlooked what happens after discharge.
Their work is focusing on:
Supporting carers once reablement packages end
Recognising that carers often deprioritise themselves during discharge, only to struggle later
Increasing concern around safeguarding and mental health, particularly in dementia care
This is where we need to shift thinking: Discharge is not the endpoint—it’s the start of a new phase of care.
Cross-Cutting Reflections
Across all updates, several consistent themes emerged:
Inconsistent carer identification across wards and trusts
Funding fragility, with projects often short-term
Need for embedded training, not optional sessions
Importance of visibility within hospital environments
Gaps in post-discharge support, especially after reablement
My Closing Thoughts
Chairing this meeting, I was struck by both the progress and the gaps.
There is innovation happening in Derbyshire, in Lambeth, in Lewisham, across South East London. But it’s uneven. And carers feel that inconsistency every day.
For me, the priority remains clear:
Identify carers early
Involve them properly
Support them beyond discharge
Because when we get that right, everything else improves—outcomes, safety, and experience.
And until we get that right consistently, we still have work to do.
A Caring Mind 