Tag Archives: co-production

National Ethnic mental health Carer Forum : March Update 2026

Chaired by Matthew McKenzie – Carer Activist

The March session of the National Ethnic Mental Health Carer Forum brought together carers, researchers, NHS professionals and community organisations for a conversation that felt both familiar and urgent.

Chaired by Matthew McKenzie, the forum stayed rooted in what it does best: creating a national grassroots space where lived experience meets systems, and where difficult truths are not avoided.

The agenda reflected that balance clearly:

  • 10:35 – Professor Saffron Karlsen (University of Bristol)
  • 11:20 – King’s College London (Phoebe Averill & team)
  • 11:50 – Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
  • 12:00 – Thomas Ince – Universal Care Plan

Racism and Mental Health: Naming What We Already Know

Professor Saffron Karlsen opened the forum with a presentation that didn’t just describe inequality it explained how it is produced, sustained, and experienced in everyday life.

Drawing on over 30 years of research, Professor Saffron Karlsen is a sociologist at the University of Bristol whose research examines how racism and social inequality affect health, particularly within ethnic minority communities.

she spoke about racism not as a single act or incident, but as something woven into the fabric of society. It operates quietly and persistently, through institutions, through policies, through media narratives, and through the ways people interact with one another. The effect is cumulative. It builds over time, shaping not just opportunities, but health itself.

What made the presentation particularly powerful was how it connected these structural ideas to real human consequences. Racism was described as something that works on multiple levels at once: from overt abuse or violence, to the less visible but equally damaging experience of simply knowing that you live in a society where you may be treated unfairly. That awareness alone carrying the expectation of discrimination creates a constant undercurrent of stress and anxiety.

She explained how this stress doesn’t just sit in the mind. It translates into physical outcomes. People exposed to racism are more likely to experience anxiety, depression, and long-term distress, but also physical health inequalities such as cardiovascular disease. These outcomes are often misunderstood or misrepresented. Too frequently, they are explained away as lifestyle issues diet, exercise, personal choice without recognising the deeper social conditions that shape those behaviours in the first place.

A particularly striking part of the presentation focused on how people respond to these pressures. When individuals feel powerless to change their circumstances, they may turn to coping mechanisms smoking, drinking, or withdrawing from services. These responses are then judged in isolation, rather than understood as part of a wider context. In this way, the system not only fails to address the root causes but can end up reinforcing blame on the individual.

Perhaps the most important insight came when the discussion turned to healthcare itself. Even when services are available, they are not always experienced as safe or trustworthy. Saffron shared research showing that people may avoid seeking help not necessarily because of direct negative experiences, but because of what they have seen and heard about racism more broadly. The perception of risk becomes enough to keep people away.

One example described a woman who, during the COVID period, chose to avoid hospital care entirely. Her decision was shaped by what she had seen in public discourse and online reactions to racial justice movements. It left her feeling that she could not trust how she would be treated. This kind of anticipatory fear of not being treated with dignity or fairness adds another layer of stress to an already difficult situation.

The presentation also challenged the way healthcare systems understand illness. Many services still operate within a narrow biomedical framework, focusing on symptoms and diagnoses while overlooking the social realities that contribute to them. For people from marginalised communities, this can lead to experiences where their perspectives are dismissed or misunderstood. They may try to explain how racism, housing, poverty, or life circumstances have shaped their health, only to find those explanations sidelined.

This is where the concept of “epistemic injustice” becomes important, although Saffron didn’t dwell on jargon, the meaning was clear. It is about whose knowledge counts. When patients and carers are not listened to, or when their experiences are not taken seriously, care becomes something done to them, rather than with them. For many, this is not just frustrating it is re-traumatising.

Professor Saffron also showed a video – Nilaari delivering hope A community mental health provider for people of colour, which you can watch below.

Nilaari delivering hope

Q&A Section : From Evidence to Frustration

1. “You’ve explained the problems, but what are the solutions?”

Answer:
Saffron acknowledged that addressing racism at its root is complex and long-term, but highlighted practical steps:

  • Services must be co-produced with people who have lived experience
  • Communities need to be actively involved in decision-making spaces
  • Grassroots and voluntary organisations should be:
    • properly funded
    • meaningfully included in policy and service design

She emphasised that change should be done with communities, not to them, and that learning from effective third-sector approaches is key.

2. “Do you look at drug and alcohol use as part of racism-related issues?”

Answer:
Yes, but not in the way systems often frame it.

Saffron explained that:

  • Substance use is often a response to difficult life experiences, including racism and poverty
  • Systems tend to treat it as an individual problem, rather than understanding the wider causes
  • These behaviours can reflect a lack of:
    • support
    • options
    • alternative coping mechanisms

She stressed the importance of shifting away from blame and towards understanding context.

3. “Is trauma-informed care part of the solution?”

Answer:
Trauma-informed care is important, but not sufficient on its own.

Saffron highlighted that:

  • Current models of trauma-informed care can be too narrow
  • They often fail to fully account for:
    • systemic racism
    • structural inequalities
  • Services also need to recognise that they themselves can contribute to trauma

She suggested that trauma-informed approaches must be:

  • culturally sensitive
  • shaped by different communities’ understandings of trauma

4. “What do you mean by ‘racism is a virus’?”

Answer:
Saffron used this idea as a metaphor.

She explained that:

  • Racism spreads and reproduces across society, much like a virus
  • It moves through:
    • institutions
    • policies
    • social interactions
  • It grows and reinforces itself over time

At the same time, she used this idea to challenge overly individualised thinking—highlighting that racism is structural, not just personal.

King’s College London: When Crisis Care Comes Too Late presented by Phoebe Averill.

After the earlier discussion on racism and inequality, the presentation from King’s College London brought the conversation into something more immediate what actually happens when someone reaches crisis point and needs urgent mental health support.

Phoebe Averill and her team focused on pathways under the Mental Health Act, but what emerged wasn’t a technical discussion. It was a picture of a system that often struggles at the exact moment it is supposed to respond.

They began by looking at the period just before crisis. In many cases, there are early warning signs. Carers and families notice changes subtle at first, then more obvious. They often try to raise concerns early, hoping intervention might prevent things from escalating. But too often, those early signals are not acted on.

By the time the system responds, the situation has already deteriorated.

The research highlighted that delays are not caused by a single issue, but by a combination of pressures within the system. These include:

  • shortages in hospital beds
  • fragmented coordination between services
  • breakdowns in communication across teams

While these explanations are familiar, the impact of them feels anything but routine. During the waiting period, people do not remain stable. They become more unwell, more distressed, and more at risk. What could have been addressed earlier becomes a crisis that is harder to manage.

One of the most striking parts of the presentation was the focus on what happens in that gap between “something is wrong” and “help arrives.” That space is where much of the pressure shifts onto carers.

Carers described being left to manage situations that are escalating in real time. They are expected to keep someone safe, to monitor behaviour, and to absorb the emotional weight of what is happening all while waiting for services to respond. In some cases, this can last days or even weeks.

This isn’t a formal role, and it’s not one carers are prepared for. It’s something they step into because there is no alternative.

The consequences of these delays don’t end when care finally arrives. By that point, the impact can already be significant. The research pointed to outcomes such as:

  • worsening mental health leading to longer hospital stays
  • increased risk of avoidable harm during the waiting period
  • disruption to housing, employment, and relationships

In other words, the delay itself becomes part of the problem, shaping what happens next.

Another important thread running through the presentation was the role of carers’ knowledge. Carers are often the first to recognise when something is changing. They understand patterns, triggers, and early warning signs in a way that professionals may not see immediately. Yet this insight is not always taken seriously or acted upon.

The result is a system that tends to respond late rather than early intervening at crisis point, rather than preventing it.

The KCL team were clear that their research is trying to address this gap. They spoke about building a lived experience advisory group and involving carers and service users directly in shaping the work. There was a clear intention to move beyond observation and towards something more collaborative, where lived experience informs how the research develops.

At the same time, there was a quiet recognition in the room that much of this is not new. Similar issues have been raised repeatedly over the years. The difference here was not the discovery of the problem, but the clarity of where it sits in that critical moment where response is needed, and the system is slow to act.

Placed alongside the earlier discussion on racism, this presentation added another layer of understanding. It showed how broader inequalities are not abstract—they play out in very real ways at the point of crisis. Where trust is already fragile, delays make it harder to engage. Where carers are already stretched, the system’s response can increase that pressure rather than relieve it.

By the end of the session, one idea stood out clearly: this is not just about whether care is available. It is about whether it comes at the right time, whether the right people are listened to, and whether the system is able to act before situations reach breaking point.

Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman: When Accountability Feels Out of Reach

The next presentation of the forum came from the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman team, who joined to explain how carers and families can raise concerns when NHS care goes wrong.

On the surface, this was a session about process how complaints move through the system and when the Ombudsman becomes involved. But as the discussion unfolded, it became clear that this was really about something deeper: whether accountability is genuinely accessible to carers in practice.

The team described their role as an independent body that steps in once local complaints processes have been completed. In theory, the pathway is clear. Before approaching the Ombudsman, people are expected to go through several stages:

  • raise concerns with the service directly
  • receive a formal response, often referred to as the “final response letter”
  • only then escalate the complaint for independent review

What sounds straightforward on paper quickly became more complex when viewed through lived experience.

Carers shared how difficult it can be to even reach that final stage. The process can take months, sometimes longer, and often requires sustained effort just to keep it moving. Following up, chasing responses, and navigating unclear communication becomes part of the experience.

One comment in the chat captured this reality clearly:

“It can be hard to get to the point of getting a final outcome letter… the amount of advocacy and chasing that needs to happen…”

Another highlighted how far removed the process can feel from everyday awareness:

“It takes far more than 12 months to even come into awareness…”

In response, the Ombudsman team acknowledged that delays particularly at the final response stage are common. They explained that in some cases, where delays are extreme, they may contact organisations directly, and they encouraged people to use their helpline for guidance when processes stall.

But even with that support, there was a sense in the room that the system places a significant burden on those trying to access it. By the time someone considers making a complaint, they are often already dealing with the aftermath of a difficult experience. Adding a lengthy and sometimes frustrating process on top of that can feel overwhelming.

The conversation also turned to accessibility. Questions were raised about language, digital access, and the assumptions built into how information is shared. Not everyone engages with systems in the same way, and not everyone finds it easy to navigate written guidance or formal processes.

Participants pointed out that some communities may never reach the complaints stage at all—not because issues don’t exist, but because the pathway itself is difficult to access.

This was reflected in a simple but powerful comment:

“We are assuming that everyone reads…”

There were also wider reflections about how systems could better meet people where they are, including:

  • making information available in more accessible formats and languages
  • reaching people through community networks, not just formal channels

Even within this practical discussion, the themes from earlier in the forum remained present. Trust, accessibility, and lived experience all shaped how people understood the complaints process.

Placed alongside the earlier presentations, this session added an important dimension. If the system fails as described in the discussions on racism and crisis care—then the ability to challenge that failure becomes critical. But if the route to accountability is difficult to navigate, many experiences may never be formally recognised.

What emerged was not a rejection of the Ombudsman’s role, but a recognition of the gap between what exists and what is accessible.

Because accountability is not just about having a process in place.
It is about whether people can realistically use it especially at a time when they may already be stretched, exhausted, and navigating multiple pressures.

Universal Care Plan and Carer Contingency Planning Update

The final contribution to the forum came from Thomas Ince, introducing the Universal Care Plan often referred to as UCP. After the earlier discussions on racism, crisis care, and accountability, this felt like a shift towards something more practical: what the system is trying to build in response to the gaps carers have been describing.

At its core, the Universal Care Plan is a digital tool designed to allow people to record and share information about their care. It sits within the NHS App and is intended to bring together health, social care, and voluntary services around a shared understanding of a person’s needs and preferences.

Thomas described how the system has evolved over time. It began with a focus on end-of-life care, making sure that a person’s wishes could be accessed quickly by professionals such as ambulance crews. It then expanded into areas like sickle cell crisis planning and is now being extended further to cover a wider range of conditions and situations.

The direction of travel is clear: moving from a professionally controlled system towards something more person-owned, where individuals can enter their own information and shape how their care is understood.

A Tool That Centres “What Matters to You”

One of the key features Thomas highlighted was a section within the plan that allows people to describe themselves in their own words. Rather than being defined only by diagnosis or clinical notes, individuals can record what matters to them information that can then be seen by anyone involved in their care.

In principle, this is a shift towards more personalised and human-centred care. It offers a way to capture context, preferences, and lived experience in a system that often reduces people to categories.

But for this forum, the most significant element was something more specific.

The Carer Contingency Plan

Thomas introduced a feature that immediately resonated with the group: the carer contingency plan.

This allows carers to record what should happen if they are suddenly unable to provide care. For example:

  • if they become unwell or need urgent medical attention
  • if there is a sudden change in their circumstances

In those situations, the system can alert professionals to the fact that someone is dependent on that carer and provide information about what support is needed.

For many carers, this addressed a very real and often unspoken concern:
what happens to the person they care for if something happens to them?

The idea that this information could be visible across services—rather than held informally or not at all felt like a meaningful step.

From Concept to Reality: The Challenge of Engagement

While the tool itself was broadly welcomed, the discussion quickly moved beyond what it does to how it will actually be used.

Thomas was open about the current stage of development. Although the system is available, it remains largely driven by professionals, with limited public awareness. One of the key aims now is to shift towards wider engagement encouraging people to take ownership of their care plans and input their own information.

This raised an important question in the room: how do you introduce a digital solution into communities where trust in services is already fragile?

Participants pointed out that many people particularly from ethnic minority backgrounds—do not engage easily with primary care systems. If the entry point to the Universal Care Plan is through those same systems, there is a risk that the people who could benefit most may not use it at all.

Suggestions began to emerge organically from the group, reflecting a more community-led approach:

  • working through carer centres, peer groups, and local networks
  • engaging cultural organisations and community leaders
  • using spaces where trust already exists, rather than relying solely on formal channels

There was a clear sense that communication could not be an afterthought. It needed to be built into the design of how the tool is introduced.

Language and Accessibility: A Tension Exposed

One of the most striking moments in this section came when language accessibility was discussed.

At present, the NHS App and therefore the Universal Care Plan is only available in English (and Welsh). Thomas acknowledged that this is a limitation and that while there are conversations about future solutions, no immediate changes are in place.

This prompted a strong reaction from participants. There was frustration that a tool described as “universal” could exclude large sections of the population from the outset. For some, this was not just a technical issue but a reflection of a wider pattern—systems being designed without fully considering the diversity of the communities they serve.

It brought the discussion back to a familiar theme from earlier in the forum:
inclusion cannot be added later, it has to be built in from the beginning.

A Step Forward With Conditions

Despite these concerns, there was recognition that the Universal Care Plan has real potential.

The idea of having:

  • shared, accessible information across services
  • visibility of carers and their responsibilities
  • a contingency plan that reduces risk in emergencies

addresses issues that carers have been raising for years.

But the conversation made it clear that the success of the tool will depend on more than its functionality. It will depend on whether people:

  • know about it
  • trust it
  • can access it
  • and feel that it reflects their needs and realities

Without that, there is a risk that it becomes another well-intentioned solution that doesn’t reach the people it was designed for.

Placing It in the Wider Conversation

Coming at the end of the forum, this presentation connected in an important way to everything that had been discussed earlier.

Where Saffron’s presentation explored the structural roots of inequality, and the KCL research showed how system delays affect people in crisis, the Universal Care Plan represented an attempt however early to respond to those issues in practice.

But it also revealed the ongoing challenge.

Because even when new tools are introduced, they are still shaped by the same system dynamics:
questions of trust, access, communication, and inclusion do not disappear they simply take new forms.

Why Unpaid Carers Must Be in the Lecture Theatre – Not Just the Waiting Room

By Matthew McKenzie, A Caring Mind (Carers UK Ambassador)

As an unpaid mental health carer, I have spent years navigating hospital corridors, GP practices, care plans, juggling crises, and long silences where carers are too often left out. I am sure unpaid carers are expected to hold families together, while notice early warning signs, and keep loved ones safe. Still I always mention most of us receive no formal training, and our knowledge is rarely recognised as expertise.

That is why recently teaching a module for the Masters course to mental health nursing students at King’s College London felt so important. Not after they qualify. Not once they are overwhelmed in practice. But before they step out into the field. The session took place 15th of January.

Why carer-led teaching matters

Unpaid carers sit at the sharp edge of the mental health system. We see what works, what harms, and what gets missed when professionals don’t fully understand the family context. When students hear directly from carers, learning moves beyond textbooks into real life into the emotional, practical, and ethical realities of care.

Training mental health professionals without carer voices is like teaching navigation without a map.

What I taught: lived experience as learning

The session I delivered was built entirely from a carer’s perspective and centred on one core message: you cannot deliver effective mental health care without working with carers.

The module covered:

  • My lived experience as an unpaid mental health carer
    How I became a carer, the emotional impact, the daily responsibilities, and the toll caring can take on mental and physical health.
  • The hidden impact on carers
    Burnout, stigma, isolation, guilt, and the reality that many carers are supporting professionals while receiving little support themselves.
  • Carers as partners, not problems
    Exploring what happens when carers are ignored – and how outcomes improve when they are listened to, informed, and included.
  • The Triangle of Care
    A strong emphasis on the Triangle of Care framework: the partnership between service user, carer, and professional. I challenged students to see carers as a vital link in the chain, not an optional extra.
  • Carers UK and carer identification
    Highlighting the role of Carers UK in advocacy, rights, resources, and why professionals must help carers identify themselves early so they can access support.
  • Practical skills for future nurses
    Listening without defensiveness, sharing information appropriately, involving carers in care planning, and understanding when carers need support themselves.
  • Interactive discussion and reflection
    Students worked through real-life scenarios, asking: What would I do differently now that I understand the carer experience?

The shift we need in education

Most unpaid carers are not trained for their role. We learn through crisis, exhaustion, and trial and error. Mental health professionals, however, are trained, which means universities have a responsibility to ensure that training includes those of us living this reality every day.

Carer-led teaching builds empathy, improves communication, and ultimately leads to safer, more effective care. When students learn early that carers matter, they carry that mindset into practice.

A final thought

Unpaid carers are already part of the mental health workforce, it’s just the title unpaid, unsupported, and often unheard. So I feel bringing carers into universities is not a “nice extra”. It is absolutely essential.

If we want a mental health system that truly works, we must start by listening to those who never clock off.

Triangle of Care Community Meeting: January 2026 update

By Matthew McKenzie – Triangle of Care Community Chair.

The meeting opened with a welcome to carers, professionals, and partner organisations, reinforcing the importance of the Community Group as a collaborative and inclusive space. The Chair highlighted the ongoing commitment to co-production, ensuring that lived experience remains central to all Triangle of Care development and decision-making.

The purpose of the meeting was outlined, with emphasis on shared learning, constructive challenge, and influencing national work. Members were reminded that discussions within the group directly inform improvements to Triangle of Care standards, guidance, and implementation across services.

2. Triangle of Care Update (with Q&A)

Mary Patel – Carers Trust

The Triangle of Care update focused on how the programme continues to evolve as a learning-led, improvement-focused framework rather than a compliance or inspection tool. Members were reminded that the Triangle of Care is designed to support services to reflect honestly on how well carers are recognised, involved, and supported, and to identify practical actions for improvement.

The update highlighted the growing maturity of the self-assessment and peer review process. Increasingly, organisations are using the framework not only to evidence good practice but to challenge themselves, learn from others, and embed carer partnership more consistently across teams and pathways.

Self-Assessment and Peer Review: What’s Working Well

The self-assessment process continues to be a key entry point for organisations engaging with the Triangle of Care. Where we were updated on how self-assessment encourages teams to pause and reflect on everyday practice, policies, and culture, rather than relying solely on written procedures. When combined with peer review, this reflection is strengthened by external challenge and lived-experience insight.

As part of the update, members were updated on emerging learning from Triangle of Care reports, including self-assessment submissions and peer review feedback. These reports were described as an important source of insight into how carer involvement is experienced on the ground, highlighting both areas of strong practice and recurring challenges across services

NOTE: These include reports going back 6 months, so not all NHS trusts listed

Peer review was described as most effective when organisations approach it with openness and curiosity. Lived-experience peer reviewers play a crucial role in asking different questions, highlighting blind spots, and grounding discussions in real-world carer experience.

A key discussion point was how to balance national consistency with local flexibility. Members acknowledged that while the Triangle of Care provides a shared framework and standards, services operate within different contexts, populations, and resource constraints.

Triangle of care and Patient Carer Race Equality Framework updates

The Triangle of Care and PCREF Phase 2 pilot will be launched in April 2026, to test co-produced specialist guidance to support integration of carers from racially marginalised communities into the Triangle of Care.

Alignment with Wider System Priorities

Members discussed how Triangle of Care activity aligns with broader system developments, including Mental Health Act reform, integrated care, and equality frameworks. There was strong agreement that Triangle of Care should not sit in isolation but be embedded within wider quality improvement, safeguarding, and workforce development agendas.

The need to visibly align Triangle of Care with the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework was reiterated. Members emphasised that carers must be able to see how equality commitments translate into tangible actions within standards, training, and evidence.

Key points

  • Aligning Triangle of Care with Mental Health Act reform
  • Embedding within wider system and quality frameworks
  • Stronger visibility of equality and race equity

Carer Voice and Evidence of Impact

A recurring theme was the importance of demonstrating impact. Members discussed how services can better evidence carer involvement and experience beyond policies and training records. This includes qualitative feedback, lived-experience insight, and examples of how carer input has influenced service design and delivery.

Emerging Challenges and Areas for Development

The update also acknowledged ongoing challenges, including workforce pressures, digital transformation, and uneven awareness of the Triangle of Care across organisations. Members noted that carer involvement can become fragile during periods of change unless it is firmly embedded in systems and culture.

Summary: Where the Programme Is Heading

The Triangle of Care update concluded with a shared understanding that the programme is well-established but still evolving. The focus for the next phase is on deepening impact, strengthening alignment with equality and legislative change, and supporting services to move from intention to consistent, inclusive practice.

Key discussion points

  • Peer review as a developmental, learning-focused process
  • Balancing national consistency with local flexibility
  • Alignment with Mental Health Act reform and equality frameworks
  • Keeping carer voices central to assessment and review

3. Sharing Experiences as a Peer Reviewer

Carer involved with Avon & whitlshire

A carer presented from her involvement at Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, where she is involved as a lived-experience peer reviewer contributing to Triangle of Care.

She shared reflections from her role as a lived-experience peer reviewer. She spoke about the importance of authenticity, trust, and transparency in the peer review process, and how lived experience strengthens both credibility and impact. Her contribution reinforced the value of co-production and highlighted how peer review can challenge assumptions, surface good practice, and promote more carer-inclusive cultures within organisations.

The discussion reinforced that organisational openness and leadership engagement are critical to turning peer review feedback into real change. Members reflected on how hearing directly from peer reviewers deepens understanding of the practical impact of policies on carers.

Q&A / Discussion

  • Members asked how organisations typically respond to lived-experience feedback.
  • The involved carer noted that openness and leadership support were key factors in whether reviews led to meaningful change.
  • Discussion reinforced the importance of preparing services for peer review so that carers feel genuinely welcomed and listened to.

4. Carer Contingency Planning – Presentation and Local Practice

Mary Patel
Local example: Carly Driscoll – Bradford District Care

This session focused on carer contingency planning as a key element of carer support and crisis prevention. The presentation outlined why contingency planning is critical in reducing carer anxiety, preventing emergency admissions, and ensuring continuity of care when carers are unable to continue their role.

link – https://carers.org/resources/all-resources/150-carer-contingency-campaign-pack-supporting-carers-and-strengthening-local-care-systems

Carer Contingency Planning (CCP), as championed by Carers Trust, is designed to support carers by planning ahead for times when they might suddenly be unable to continue caring. This might include illness, emergencies, hospitalisation, or other crises. CCP shifts the focus from reactive support during crisis moments to proactive planning that reduces anxiety and prevents avoidable breakdowns in care.

Carers Trust emphasises that CCP is a conversational, personalised process where the carer’s expertise is central. Carers know the routines, preferences, and cues that matter for the person they care for; the goal of CCP is to capture that knowledge in a way that can be shared quickly and effectively with services, families, and emergency responders when needed.

A local practice example from Bradford District Care demonstrated how contingency planning can work in practice, highlighting practical tools, partnership working, and engagement with carers. Discussion explored the benefits of clear, accessible plans, while also acknowledging challenges around awareness, consistency, and uptake

The local practice example demonstrated how contingency planning can be embedded into routine work through partnership approaches and proactive engagement with carers. Members discussed the importance of introducing plans early and reviewing them regularly.

Key features of the Bradford approach

  • Routine integration: CCP discussions happen early, not just in crisis moments
  • Partnership working: Health, social care, and voluntary sector staff work in concert
  • Accessible documentation: Plans are shared in forms that carers can use and update
  • Support for carers: Carers are supported to lead the planning, not be passive recipients
  • Ongoing review: Plans are revisited as needs and circumstances evolve

Benefits seen locally

  • Carers report feeling more confident and less anxious
  • Greater clarity across professionals when carers are unavailable
  • Fewer last-minute, unplanned crises or service escalations
  • Better use of local support networks when official services are stretched

Q&A / Discussion

  • Questions focused on how contingency plans are introduced to carers and reviewed over time.
  • Members raised concerns about low awareness of contingency planning among carers not already engaged with services.
  • Discussion highlighted the need for flexibility, recognising that carers’ circumstances can change rapidly.

5. Carer Contingency Planning – System Perspective

Sara Lewis – SW London ICB

Sara Lewis’s session focused on Carer Contingency Planning (CCP) as a core, preventative element of carer support rather than a reactive or optional add-on. CCP is a structured way of planning for what should happen if a carer is suddenly unable to continue caring due to illness, crisis, exhaustion, or an emergency. At its heart, CCP is about reducing uncertainty and anxiety for carers while ensuring continuity and safety for the person they support.

Sara emphasised that effective CCP recognises carers as partners with expert knowledge of the person they care for. The process supports carers to articulate what matters most, what routines and support are essential, and who needs to be contacted in an emergency. When done well, CCP helps prevent avoidable crises, emergency admissions, and breakdowns in care by making plans visible, accessible, and shared across relevant services.

Accessibility was a major theme, particularly the risks of digital exclusion. While digital tools can be effective, members stressed the need for non-digital options, language support, and culturally appropriate approaches to ensure equity.

Key Takeaways from Sara Lewis’s Session

  • Carer Contingency Planning is preventative, not reactive
  • CCP is built on early, ongoing conversations with carers
  • Plans should reflect what matters to carers and the cared-for person
  • CCP must be accessible, inclusive, and culturally appropriate
  • Digital tools can help, but must not increase exclusion
  • Successful CCP requires shared ownership across services
  • When embedded well, CCP reduces crisis, anxiety, and system pressure

Q&A / Discussion

  • Members questioned how to balance digital innovation with the risk of digital exclusion.
  • Language barriers and accessibility for carers with different communication needs were highlighted.
  • Discussion emphasised that contingency planning must be embedded into standard care planning processes, not treated as optional or additional.

6. Looking Ahead: Priorities for the Community Group

The “Looking Ahead” discussion focused on how the Triangle of Care Community Group can continue to influence meaningful change for carers in an evolving policy and practice landscape. Members reflected on the increasing complexity of health and care systems and the importance of ensuring that carers are not left behind as reforms, digital transformation, and workforce pressures accelerate.

A strong theme throughout the discussion was visibility, making carer involvement, equality, and partnership explicit in practice, evidence, and outcomes. Participants emphasised that carers must not only be recognised in principle but experience consistent involvement and support in real-world settings. The group agreed that the next phase of work should strengthen both strategic influence and practical implementation.

Mental Health Act Reform and Carer Involvement

Members discussed the implications of upcoming Mental Health Act reform, particularly around carers’ rights, information-sharing, and involvement in decision-making. There was recognition that Triangle of Care principles provide a strong foundation for supporting services to meet new expectations, but that further work will be needed to translate legislation into everyday practice.

The group highlighted the risk that carers could be inconsistently involved if workforce understanding is weak or if systems focus narrowly on legal compliance. Proactive guidance, training, and examples of good practice were seen as essential to ensure carers are meaningfully included rather than consulted as an afterthought.

Equality, Race Equity, and Inclusion

A central priority looking ahead is ensuring that Triangle of Care activity visibly aligns with the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF). Members stressed that carers from racialised and marginalised communities often face additional barriers to involvement, including mistrust, cultural misunderstandings, and unequal access to support.

The group agreed that equality must be embedded into standards, peer review evidence, and training—not treated as a parallel or optional agenda. This includes capturing meaningful data, listening to diverse carer voices, and ensuring culturally responsive practice is clearly demonstrated.

Workforce Training and Education

Workforce development was identified as a critical lever for long-term change. Members highlighted the need to strengthen carer awareness training across all roles, particularly for staff new to mental health and social care settings. Without this foundation, carer involvement remains inconsistent and dependent on individual attitudes rather than organisational culture.

There was strong support for influencing pre-registration education, including universities and training providers, to embed carer awareness earlier. This was seen as an opportunity to normalise partnership with carers from the start of professional careers rather than trying to retrofit it later.

Key points

  • Strengthening carer awareness across the workforce
  • Embedding Triangle of Care principles early in training
  • Influencing universities and pre-registration pathways
  • Moving from individual goodwill to system-wide culture change

Digital, Data, and Accessibility

Digital transformation featured prominently in the discussion, with members acknowledging both its potential and its risks. While improved data systems and digital tools can support information-sharing and coordination, there was concern that carers without digital access or confidence may be excluded.

Participants emphasised that digital solutions must be designed inclusively, with non-digital alternatives always available. Data collection should support understanding of carer experience and inequality, not become a barrier to support.

Key points

  • Digital tools should support, not replace, relationships
  • Risk of digital exclusion for some carers
  • Importance of non-digital alternatives
  • Using data to improve equity, not reinforce gaps

Young Carers and Marginalised Groups

Supporting young carers and carers from marginalised communities was highlighted as a continuing priority. Members noted that these groups are often under-identified and less likely to be involved in care planning or decision-making, despite carrying significant caring responsibilities.

The group agreed that future work should focus on visibility, early identification, and tailored approaches that recognise the specific needs and challenges faced by these carers. Partnership with education, community, and voluntary sector organisations was seen as essential.

Key points

  • Improving identification of young carers
  • Addressing barriers faced by marginalised carers
  • Tailored, age-appropriate and culturally sensitive support
  • Stronger partnership working beyond health services

Collective Commitment Moving Forward

The discussion concluded with a shared commitment to using the Community Group as a platform for influence, learning, and accountability. Members recognised the value of continuing to share practical examples alongside strategic discussion, ensuring that Triangle of Care principles are translated into everyday practice.

Looking ahead, the group aims to remain proactive, inclusive, and responsive—supporting services to recognise carers as equal partners and ensuring that no carer is left unseen or unsupported as systems evolve.

Key discussion points

  • Preparing for Mental Health Act reform
  • Embedding the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework
  • Improving workforce training and education pathways
  • Supporting young carers and marginalised communities
  • Improving data and digital systems without exclusion

As Chair I thanked contributors and reaffirmed the importance of continued collaboration to ensure carers are recognised as equal partners in care, with Triangle of Care principles translated into meaningful practice across services.

For those interested to hear more about triangle of care, see details below

Ethnic mental health Carer Forum Update July 2025


Author: Matthew McKenzie

Building Stronger Voices: A Powerful July Gathering of the National Ethnic Mental Health Carer Forum

On Friday, July 25th, the National Ethnic Mental Health Carer Forum held another online session, continuing our work in empowering diverse carers and influencing meaningful change across mental health services. With participation from community champions, NHS professionals, experienced unpaid minority carers. The discussion was on the Triangle of Care (ToC) and PCREF (Patient Carer Race Equality Framework) stakeholders.

This forum exists to elevate the voices of ethnically diverse carers, bringing their lived experiences to the forefront of service transformation. Whether it’s holding systems to account or shaping policy guidance, this space remains vital in creating inclusive, anti-racist care across the UK.

Highlights from July’s Forum

🔵 Debbie Hustings’ Presentation on Triangle of Care & PCREF Integration
Debbie, a long-standing Triangle of Care Programme Lead and carer herself, gave an in-depth presentation on reviewing the Triangle of Care through a PCREF (Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework) lens. Her talk provided an honest look at institutional challenges and offered solutions for embedding racial equity into carer support standards. A key takeaway was how crucial lived experience is in driving real policy change not just warm words. She emphasized the importance of re-examining existing standards through a racial equity lens, stating that “beyond warm words,” carers need frameworks that are operational, measurable, and locally adaptable.

🟣 Powerful Feedback from Carers
Contributors shared difficult yet necessary truths. Carers spoke about the lack of involvement in care planning, systemic racism, the need for meaningful co-production (not “faux-production”), and experiences of isolation when navigating majority environments. One carer reflected, “In 28 years of caring for my son, I have never been involved in his care planning.”

Several carers shared their painful, sometimes shocking, experiences navigating mental health services, especially in areas with limited diversity. One participant remarked, “Even after decades of caring, I’ve never been included in a care plan.” Others spoke of staff who misunderstood or dismissed cultural nuances, the misuse of confidentiality rules to exclude carers, and the silencing of Black and Asian voices. Concerns were also raised about immigration-related fears, lack of access for non-English speakers, and a troubling rise in racism in predominantly white areas. These reflections painted a vivid picture of systemic inequality but also made clear the power of collective advocacywhen carers come together, change begins.

These testimonies highlighted how far we still need to go.

🟡 Inclusive Language & Representation
There was a passionate discussion around terminology whether to use “global majority” or “ethnically and racially diverse.” While some feared backlash from certain communities, the group leaned toward inclusivity and accountability over appeasement. This sensitivity around language underlines the forum’s thoughtful and intersectional approach.

🟢 The Work Ahead
Debbie shared the next steps in developing Standard 2 of the Triangle of Care through the PCREF lens: staff training. The goal? Mandatory, culturally safe, anti-racist care awareness education co-produced with carers from diverse backgrounds. By April 2026, the guidance will be finalized, field-tested, and launched nationally.

A Forum of Global Carers, Local Action

This month’s session proved again that our forum is more than discussion as it’s a driving force for equity. Participants from Southampton, Lewisham, Pennine, Norfolk, Leicester, South West London, Kent & Medway and beyond all shared insights into their local efforts, including cultural awareness training, community storytelling projects, and carer-led involvement initiatives.

One key message? Change is possible when carers are part of the conversation—not as guests, but as co-leaders.

Want to Get Involved?

The forum is open to carers and professionals across the UK and beyond. We meet monthly online, and everyone is welcome to join, contribute, or simply listen.

For bookings or questions, contact me at info@caringmindblog.com
📱 Or download and scan the QR code in the flyer above

Together, minority mental health carers can shape a mental health system that sees, hears, and supports all carers—ethnically, culturally, and fully.

Next National MH carer forum in August 29th 10:30 am
Matthew McKenzie
Founder – Caring Mind Blog
Facilitator – National Ethnic Mental Health Carer Forum

Triangle of Care Community Meeting: July 2025 update

On 21st of July 2025, carers, professionals, and stakeholders from across the UK gathered virtually for the latest Triangle of Care (ToC) Community Meeting. Chaired by Matthew McKenzie, this session was packed with insight, action points, and open dialogue. Whether you were new to the group or a long-time contributor, there was something valuable for everyone.

This meeting was particularly significant as it marked a turning point for carer participation. The formal recognition of the community group in ToC’s national governance structure. It affirmed that carer lived experience should not be sidelined, and that carers must continue to shape mental health services from the inside out.

If you weren’t able to attend, this blog will bring you up to speed. As the ToC community group covered a wide range of topics, from updates on national strategy and governance, to inclusive language, carer-led training, and advocacy for better research funding. At the heart of it all was a single message: when carers unite, systems must listen.

Official Recognition and Governance Progress

We are delighted to announce that the Triangle of Care Community Group is now formally integrated into the Triangle of Care governance structure. This gives the group a direct route to influence national decisions. The community will now sit alongside steering and regional groups in shaping policy, reviewing practices, and helping determine what carer inclusion should look like across all participating trusts.

What this means practically is improved alignment and visibility. For years, many carers and grassroots contributors have worked tirelessly behind the scenes, often without formal platforms. This change allows community voices to be heard before decisions are made not just consulted afterwards. Matthew described this shift as “a recognition of the years of unpaid care, leadership, and advocacy carers have always provided.”

It also means that our meetings will align with national timelines and decisions, ensuring a timely flow of updates between local groups, regional networks, and national forums. This is a pivotal opportunity to embed carers more meaningfully into NHS structures and accountability.

New Mailing List & Sign-Up System

Mary Patel from Carers Trust announced the launch of a new centralised mailing list for Triangle of Care community members. This will make sure everyone receives meeting invites, resources, and updates reliably. Participants will soon be asked to complete a Microsoft sign-up form, which will securely transfer contact details onto the Carers Trust system for ongoing communications.

The form will include a few demographic questions to help build a picture of the diversity within the ToC community. These questions are entirely optional but are designed to help Carers Trust identify who is engaging, and where gaps might exist—ensuring outreach strategies reflect real needs. For example, better regional balance, or increased visibility for underrepresented carer groups.

There was also discussion about moving from Zoom to Microsoft Teams for future meetings. Teams offers benefits like attendance tracking, secure file sharing, and easier scheduling. However, this won’t be a forced change, Matthew and Mary invited feedback, emphasising that any transition would be made collaboratively with community input.

Stronger Carer Involvement

Carer involvement was at the heart of the meeting. Matthew shared a passionate update on the need for carers particularly those from minority backgrounds or marginalised communities to step forward and engage in all aspects of the Triangle of Care. This includes involvement in peer reviews, shaping surveys, and suggesting new training or webinar content that reflects their lived experience.

The community was reminded that leading change doesn’t require a title or formal position. Sharing your story, participating in surveys, or simply raising your hand during a meeting is a form of leadership. Matthew emphasised that carers hold the kind of insight that no policy or textbook can replicate. As he put it, “This community is only as strong as the carers who show up.”

Peer reviewing was especially encouraged. Carers can play a vital role in reviewing mental health trust practices and making sure those trusts aren’t just ticking boxes but are genuinely improving the carer experience. Anyone interested in joining these review panels was invited to contact Mary Patel directly. The experience is meaningful and empowering and it places carers right where they should be: in positions of influence.

CQC Expectations and Carer Experiences

A powerful part of the meeting focused on the role of the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and how effectively it monitors carer inclusion in mental health services. Several carers and professionals shared their experiences some positive, others deeply concerning about how the CQC engages (or fails to engage) with carers during inspections.

A senior experience lead from an acute trust, explained that when CQC inspectors review services, they typically look for a clear carers policy, systems for identifying and supporting carers, and evidence of staff training. However, the level of scrutiny and the quality of carer-related feedback can vary significantly between inspections. The experience lead noted that while policy is important, it’s the systems around those policies that really matter, things like whether staff actually follow them, and whether carers know where to go for help.

Carers in the meeting shared contrasting experiences. A carer described a disappointing CQC visit where the inspector seemed dismissive, rushed, and uninformed about carers’ rights. Her feedback about lack of communication and exclusion was barely acknowledged, leaving her feeling invalidated. In contrast, Another carer spoke of a more recent inspection where the CQC officer seemed empathetic, asked thoughtful questions, and even disclosed their own possible caring experience. These differing accounts highlighted a common theme: carers’ confidence in the CQC is mixed, and their approach to carers can sometimes feel inconsistent.

There was strong consensus that CQC needs better training in carer engagement and not just understanding legal frameworks like the Care Act 2014, but also how to meaningfully include carers in service reviews. Kelvin added that cultural competence should also be part of the equation, noting that carers from minority backgrounds are too often left out of consultations. Matthew urged carers not to wait for trusts to invite them to speak during inspections ask to be involved, request to meet inspectors, and use carers’ councils or governors to raise visibility. It was clear from this session that carers want the CQC to be more than a compliance body, they want it to be a true advocate for accountability and equity in care.

Confidentiality Roadshow by Donna Bradford

A standout session was led by Donna Bradford, who presented her team’s work on the Confidentiality Roadshow a training programme developed by Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust. Designed to upskill staff on consent, confidentiality, and communication, the roadshow is tailored around carer inclusion and co-produced with the Carers Council.

The training helps staff understand not only what they can share legally, but also how to navigate nuanced emotional and ethical situations with carers. Donna reminded attendees that sharing basic, non-confidential information, such as medication side effects, is not only lawful but essential. “If you can Google it, you can say it,” she noted, driving home the importance of clarity over confusion.

Over 550 staff have already received the training, with 100% reporting that it improved their confidence. The programme includes real-life carer scenarios, emotional video testimonials, and interactive quizzes to help reinforce learning.

Beyond the training content itself, what makes the Confidentiality Roadshow so impactful is its co-production with carers. Donna highlighted that every scenario used in the sessions came from real-life examples shared by carers and families. This ensures the training isn’t theoretical so it’s grounded in lived experience. The emotional and practical realities of caring for someone with mental health needs are at the heart of the learning, helping staff understand why clear, compassionate communication is so essential. The training also underscores the importance of listening to carers, not just as bystanders but as active contributors to a person’s care journey.

Several attendees raised the idea of incorporating this training into broader staff induction and continuing professional development programmes. Others asked about adapting it for use in different trust settings, such as acute hospitals or community services. Donna encouraged trusts to reach out if they’d like to adopt or customise the resource. The message was clear: confidentiality shouldn’t be a barrier, it should be a bridge, and with the right training and tools, staff can navigate those conversations with confidence, legality, and humanity.

Mental Health Research Petition

Irene Harris spoke passionately about a new parliamentary petition calling for improved research funding into serious mental illnesses (SMIs) like psychosis. The petition aims to shine a spotlight on how outdated treatments and under-researched conditions continue to place carers and their loved ones in difficult, often heartbreaking positions.

Here is the video about Psychosis medication and its impact by the Stockport carers forum.

She shared how mental health medications for SMIs haven’t evolved as rapidly as physical health treatments, and how this results in long-term side effects and compromised quality of life. Research is desperately needed, not only to improve diagnosis and treatment, but also to create support structures that ease the burden on unpaid carers.

Irene asked attendees to sign and circulate the petition widely, with a goal of hitting 10,000 signatures by November 15th.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/725846

She also announced plans to launch new social media channels to raise awareness. This initiative is about more than funding it’s about giving carers and service users a louder voice in national healthcare priorities.

For more details feel free to visit https://www.mhcarersgroupstockport.co.uk

or contact Irene on irene@mhcarersgroupstockport.co.uk

Language, Inclusivity, PCREF & the ‘Global Majority’ Debate

Language and inclusivity were major themes of the meeting, particularly around the term “global majority.” Some attendees expressed concern that the phrase could be divisive or misinterpreted, particularly by politically sensitive audiences or media outlets. A carer shared a personal anecdote illustrating how words can carry unintended consequences.

Others responded by highlighting the intention behind the term to emphasise that those historically described as “minorities” are, in fact, the global majority in population terms. They called for continued use of the phrase in contexts that promote empowerment, equity, and lived experience.

The discussion didn’t produce a consensus, but it modelled what respectful disagreement and co-learning should look like. Matthew reinforced that ToC should be a space for constructive dialogue, not debate for its own sake. Ultimately, we are united in our aim to ensure no carer is left behind regardless of background, heritage, or identity.

Next Steps & Community Actions

The session wrapped up with a summary of action points and responsibilities. Carers Trust will soon circulate the new mailing list sign-up form. Matthew will share updated meeting dates for 2026 once confirmed, and he will continue to distribute posters for the upcoming National Ethnic Carers Group, taking place on the last Friday of each month.

There will be support the rollout of the Confidentiality Roadshow materials and follow up with those interested in joining peer review panels. A reminder was issued for everyone to contribute to current surveys, share their feedback, and suggest future topics for community meetings.

Finally, participants were encouraged to stay connected beyond the meetings. Whether through peer networks, local carers centres, or email updates, the message was clear: carers must stay visible, vocal, and valued. You are the change-makers, and this group is your platform.

Final Thoughts: “Carers Are Not Just a Cog in the Wheel”

Matthew ended the session with a rallying call to action: “We’re not just a cog in the wheel as we are the energy behind it.” His words served as a reminder that carers are not passive recipients of services. They are drivers of quality, advocates for change, and protectors of dignity in the mental health system.

He also reminded everyone that systems often change slowly, but they do change when people keep showing up, keep speaking up, and keep sharing their truths. “This isn’t just about the Triangle of Care,” he said. “It’s about reshaping the whole narrative around mental health and care.”

If you missed the meeting and would like to receive the slides, recordings, or further resources, feel free to contact Matthew McKenzie directly:
📧 mmckenzie@carers.org

Thanks to to all who attended, contributed, and championed carers’ voices. The next meeting should in September where we hope to see you there.

Cygnet National Carers Event – Carers Week 2025

By Matthew McKenzie, Carer Ambassador, Cygnet Health Care

On Friday 13th June 2025, I had the privilege of attending and speaking at Cygnet Health Care’s National Carers Event, hosted at Cygnet Churchill in Lambeth, London. The event brought together carers, staff, professionals, and advocates to reflect on the vital role of unpaid carers who step up daily out of love, resilience, and responsibility, often with little recognition.

Carers Week is always a powerful reminder that caring touches us all – and Cygnet’s event this year was especially moving and informative. It offered a platform for carers to share their lived experience, influence policy, and strengthen our collective voice.

Agenda Highlights

The day opened with a warm welcome from Laura Sheridan & Shane Mills, setting the tone for a day grounded in empathy and collaboration. We heard from a range of speakers including:

  • Susan Hartnell-Beavis, sharing practical tools for supporting carers.
  • Kate Mercer and Carly Ellicott, who both championed carer involvement in care planning and research.
  • John Bangs OBE, who brought a national perspective on carer rights and policy.
  • Dr Angela Misra, who tackled the health implications of caregiving.
  • Julian de Takats and Matthew McKenzie (myself), focusing on empowering carers’ voices.
  • We also had insights from Dr Henk Swanepoel & Sophie Borg, who presented on collaborative approaches with carers in mental health services.
Continue reading →

Triangle of Care Community group update May 2025

Here is a brief update of the Triangle of Care Community group for the month of May 2025. The Triangle of Care Community group is a collaborative forum that champions the voices of unpaid carers in mental health services. The group works in partnership with service users, carers, and professionals to embed the principles of the Triangle of Care, promoting shared decision-making, improved communication, and recognition of carers as equal partners in care.

Our most recent meeting brought together carers, NHS professionals, researchers, and advocates from across the UK, including representatives from Kent, Bristol, Lewisham, East Sussex, and Hertfordshire. The atmosphere was one of mutual respect, knowledge-sharing, and a shared drive to improve the experience of care for carers and their loved ones.

The meeting covered updates on Triangle of Care developments, including recent accreditations and ongoing pilots to adapt the model for various healthcare and social settings. Presentations were given on research studies related to mental health care, including pharmacist prescribers’ roles and experiences of underserved older male carers. The group also discussed campaigns for increased research funding in serious mental illnesses and initiatives to support carers, such as Carers Roadshows.

Triangle of Care Expansion Updates

Mary Patel one of the Triangle of Care leads, provided an update on Triangle of Care developments and accreditations. Several healthcare providers have recently gained Star awards. There are ongoing pilots to adapt Triangle of Care for social care settings and to incorporate criteria for better support of racially marginalized carers. Mary announced that the Triangle of Care community group will be formally brought on board with Carers Trust, with Matthew as the inaugural chair for a 2-year term. They are looking to bring on co-chairs to support Matthew in his role.

Triangle of Care Implementation Updates

The group discusses recent achievements in implementing the Triangle of Care model across various healthcare organizations. Gabrielle Richards who leads on carers at South London & Maudsley reported that her trust successfully completed their Star 2 accreditation assessment for community services.

Matthew McKenzie shared a video poem he created about the Triangle of Care as it was shown during the peer review at South London & Maudsley.

Kelvin thanked Gabrielle for her contributions as she prepares to leave her role. Louise from Kent and Medway NHS Trust reported they maintained their second star accreditation and have implemented new processes to ensure carer considerations are included in policy development.

https://www.kmpt.nhs.uk/carers/triangle-of-care/

Mental Health Care Research Study

Richard introduced Bashir Al Saeed, a PhD student from the University of Manchester, to present their research study on the experiences of people with mental illness and their carers when receiving care from pharmacist prescribers in the community.

Bashir explains that the study aims to understand and improve care provided by pharmacist prescribers for people with mental illnesses in community-based settings. Participants will be asked to take part in a one-hour interview and will receive £30 as compensation.

The study is seeking individuals aged 18 or older with mental illnesses or their unpaid carers who have received care from pharmacist prescribers in the UK. A discussion follows about the inclusion criteria, particularly regarding the requirement for fluency in English, with concerns raised about potential issues against non-English speakers

Mental Health Research Campaign Initiative

The group discussed a campaign for better research into long-term serious mental illness in working-age people. Irene explained that they have been working on this campaign for a year, collaborating with experts from Oxford and the Welcome Trust.

The campaign aims to gather signatures and includes a short video. Irene emphasizes the importance of this initiative, as many in their group have loved ones who have been ill since their teens and are now in their thirties and forties.

You can find out more about the campaign from the link below.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/725846

Advocating for Psychosis Research Funding

The discussion focuses on a petition to increase government funding for research into psychosis, including its diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Irene passionately advocates for more effective medications with fewer side effects, emphasizing the need for better understanding of the underlying causes of psychosis. A carer shared personal experiences of her son’s struggles with mental illness and medication side effects. The group discusses the importance of signing and sharing the petition to gain government support for accelerated research in this area.

Pharmacist Prescribing for Mental Health

The discussion focuses on pharmacists prescribing for mental health conditions. Richard explains that some pharmacists, especially those with specialized training, are caring for people with mental illnesses in various settings. However, the extent of their involvement in prescribing and monitoring is still unclear. A carer expressed concern about pharmacists prescribing for severe conditions like bipolar disorder without extensive training. The group discusses the need for proper qualifications and access to medical records. Richard emphasizes that the study aims to understand and improve the care provided by pharmacist prescribers in community services.

Carers Roadshows: Community Support Network

Trevor a carer involved at Notts NHS described his Carers Roadshows, which he has been organizing since 2013. These free events bring together various organizations dealing with health, mental health, and social care to provide information and support to carers and patients.

Trevor emphasizes the importance of communication in triangular care and sees the roadshows as an effective, sustainable tool for fostering connections between different organizations and the community. He expresses his ambition to expand the roadshows across the country, particularly in London boroughs, and offers to help others create their own roadshows using his four-step guide.

Older Male Carers Advisory Group

Steve Owen from the University of Hertfordshire presents his research project on exploring the experiences of underserved older male carers. The project aims to set up an advisory group of 7-10 older men, particularly from minority ethnic groups, same-sex relationships, and rural/coastal areas, to meet from June to December 2025.

The research group will discuss the benefits and challenges of caring, gender dynamics, and access to support. The project’s goals are to develop a grant proposal for further research and improve advisory group guidelines. Steve is still recruiting participants and welcomes help in sharing information about the project.

Final Reflections

The session highlighted both the progress and the gaps still faced by carers, particularly around communication, access to services, and recognition. The Triangle of Care model continues to be a vital tool in bridging these gaps, but it is the commitment of carers and professionals alike that drives real change.

“Thank you for another great meeting Matthew and everyone.” – Linda Thomas
“These meetings have been such a resource for us all.” – Gabrielle Richards
“Powerful video, powerful voices. Thank you everyone.” – Claire Wood

I’m proud to be involved and help lead as triangle of care community as Chair and look forward to building our impact together. If you’re interested in co-chairing or getting more involved, please reach out let’s continue to shape mental health care that values and includes carers at every level.

Ethnic mental health Carer Forum Update March 2025

The Importance of Ethnic Minority Mental Health Carer Voices: Empowering Unpaid Carers from the Global Majority by Matthew McKenzie

In today’s world, the voices of ethnic minority carers in mental health services must be heard and valued. The National Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum meeting, held on March 28, 2025, underscored the vital role that co-production and lived experience play in shaping better services for those who care for loved ones with mental health needs.

Continue reading →

National Triangle of Care Community meeting – March 2025

By Triangle of Care community chair Matthew McKenzie FRSA BEM

For the month of March, unpaid carers, NHS professionals, and key stakeholders came together for another Triangle of Care National Community Meeting, which is a powerful space of collaboration, reflection, and shared purpose. Chaired by Matthew, the meeting spotlighted significant developments in carer engagement, mental health service standards, and equity frameworks across the NHS.

Continue reading →

Ethnic mental health Carer Forum Update February 2025

The National Ethnic Mental Health Carer Forum convened to discuss the ongoing challenges faced by minority carers in accessing mental health services. The meeting focused on strategies to improve cultural competence, equitable treatment, and accessibility within mental health care systems. A key topic was the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF), with organizations sharing their experiences and plans for implementation. Additionally, the discussion covered language barriers, education initiatives, and the role of co-production in fostering inclusive care.

Mental Health act research

Dr Judy, a researcher from the University of Bristol, discussed her ongoing project on the nearest relative provision in the Mental Health Act and the need for co-produced resources to support those in this role. She also mentioned the support from charitable organizations like Mind and Rethink.

Continue reading →