By Matthew McKenzie, Co-Facilitator – South West London Mental Health Carers Forum
Our September forum brought carers together with Nisha from the South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust Recovery College.
We explored the courses available to carers, how to join them, and a question that matters well beyond the college: what happens when a carer still needs support after a time-limited service ends?
What the Recovery College offers carers
Nisha explained that Recovery College courses are co-produced and delivered by a practitioner trainer alongside a peer trainer with lived experience. The college offers face-to-face courses across Kingston, Richmond, Sutton, Merton and Wandsworth, as well as online learning.
Five online courses run each term specifically for friends, family members and carers: Your Role in Recovery, What Is Recovery?, Responding to Extremes, Planning for Well-being, and Navigating Support Services. Carers who meet the college’s eligibility criteria can also explore its wider range of courses.
We also heard about Navigating the Wards, a newer course for families and carers whose loved one has been admitted to a mental health ward. It brings together practical information, contact with ward staff and a chance to meet others who understand that experience. A carer may need time before feeling ready to attend, so it was reassuring to hear that the course is intended to run again rather than being a one-off opportunity.
Caring does not end after 12 months
The most important discussion came from a carer who had benefited from Recovery College courses but questioned the limit on access after a loved one leaves trust services. Nisha explained that eligible carers can continue to access courses for up to 12 months after discharge, while webinars remain available more widely.
A caring role rarely follows that timetable. Someone may need to pause their learning during a difficult period, return to a course when they are better able to take it in, or seek support years later as circumstances change. A second member also asked about eligibility, showing how relevant this question is to carers trying to find the right help.
Nisha listened to these concerns and said she would take the question of eligibility back for further discussion. She also described work to strengthen links with community and voluntary organisations, so that carers have clearer routes to support when their access to the college ends. It was a constructive exchange, and one we hope can continue.
Members also spoke about how hard it can be to discover support in the first place. Carers should not have to find every course or service by chance while managing an already demanding role. Clear information, accessible formats and active outreach matter, including for carers from ethnic minority communities and people who may face other barriers to taking part.
How carers can take part
Nisha explained that prospective students can look through the Recovery College timetable and complete an online registration form, selecting courses that interest them. The team checks eligibility and confirms a place if one is available; if a course is full, there may be a waiting list. Open days offer a chance to talk through the options, but a registered student does not need to attend an open day each term to book another course. Courses in a different borough may also be an option.
We asked how carers from this forum could help shape future courses. Nisha welcomed continued discussion about carer involvement in course design and delivery. We also talked about sharing information both ways: making more carers aware of the college, and helping people who attend its carer courses find our forum.
A space for carers to connect
At the start of the meeting, I shared a glimpse of a recent carers’ art and poetry session. Creative expression can give carers another way to speak about experiences that are difficult to put into everyday conversation. I would welcome the chance to explore a similar opportunity in South West London with interested carers and local partners.
Thank you to Nisha for joining us and answering members’ questions openly, and to the carers who shared their experiences. Their questions helped move the conversation from a list of courses to the practical issue of whether support remains accessible when carers need it.
The South West London Mental Health Carers Forum meets monthly and welcomes unpaid mental health carers across the five boroughs. Our next meeting is planned for Monday 26 October 2026. To ask about joining, email info@swlondonmhcarers.org.uk.
By Matthew McKenzie – Chair, National Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum
The August meeting of the National Ethnic Mental Health Carer Forum brought together unpaid carers, NHS leaders, healthcare professionals, academic researchers, and voluntary sector advocates from across the country. The session provided a vital space to address race equity, systemic racism, lived experience, and ongoing research into minoritised caring experiences.
Matthew McKenzie opened the meeting by welcoming attendees and reinforcing the core purpose of the national forum. He reflected on how the platform has grown into a crucial space where family carers can directly challenge health structures, influence decision-makers, and learn about national policy developments such as the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF). Matthew acknowledged that while discussions around institutional racism and health inequalities can be heavy and emotional, the forum remains a safe, respectful, and healing space dedicated to driving real, actionable change across the NHS.
Minute of Silence: Professor Jason Ardey
The forum opened with a poignant minute’s silence led by Debbie Best in honour of the life, legacy, and memory of Professor Jason Ardey following his passing.
Members paused to reflect on his landmark contributions to racial equality, education, and social justice. His legacy of challenging institutional barriers and amplifying minoritised voices continues to inspire the core work and mission of the forum.
Reflections on Race Equality: Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust (NSFT)
Speakers: Cath Byford (Deputy Chief Executive / Chief Nurse / Director of Patient Experience) & Annie (PCREF Carer Lead)
Cath Byford opened the trust’s update by offering an open and unvarnished reflection on NSFT’s ongoing race equity journey. Acknowledging that the trust has faced significant scrutiny and structural challenges over recent years, Cath emphasized that building genuine trust with minoritised communities requires moving beyond policy statements to deliver measurable, lasting systemic change. She explained that over the past 18 months, NSFT has embarked on a deliberate path to rebuild its patient experience framework, ensuring that health equity, anti-racism, and lived experience are embedded into every layer of clinical governance and strategic planning.
PCREF Carer lead Annie brought a vital lived-experience perspective to the presentation, sharing how the trust is working to bridge the gap between executive decision-making and the everyday realities of unpaid family carers. Together, they outlined the core pillars driving NSFT’s current equity transformation:
Dedicated Health Equity Team & Clinical Reform: The trust has invested heavily in establishing a specialist Health Equity team, created to audit clinical pathways and directly confront institutional disparities. The team’s operational focus is centered on dismantling disproportionate clinical interventions, specifically working to significantly reduce the use of physical and chemical restrictive practices, address the over-representation of Black and minority ethnic service users detained under the Mental Health Act, and monitor and reduce the disproportionate application of Community Treatment Orders (CTOs).
Diversifying Governance & Locality Councils: Cath shared candidly that an internal review of the trust’s governance structures revealed a stark under-representation of global majority voices across its five locality councils. Recognizing that local health strategies cannot succeed if key decision-making bodies remain ethnically unrepresentative, NSFT has launched targeted community outreach initiatives designed to recruit diverse community members, carers, and experts by experience onto these councils to ensure grassroot priorities shape service delivery.
Workforce Transformation & Reciprocal Mentorship: Highlighting broader organizational culture, Cath detailed how workforce race equity has been integrated into the trust’s 12 major transformation programmes. A central highlight of this work is the Transformational Reciprocal Mentorship Programme, coordinated by Ethan Charles, which was recently recognized nationally for healthcare excellence. The initiative pairs senior trust executives and board members with staff members from minoritised backgrounds in a reciprocal learning partnership, helping leadership understand systemic workplace barriers while creating clear pathways for career progression and equity across the trust.
Questions and Discussion
Q1. How is Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust embedding cultural awareness within service evaluation and PCREF implementation?
A question was raised regarding how patient and carer feedback is systematically captured, and whether cultural awareness is meaningfully integrated into trust surveys, service audits, and PCREF rollouts rather than treated as a tick-box exercise.
Response:
Cath Byford acknowledged that standard feedback mechanisms often fail to capture the nuanced experiences of minoritised communities. She explained that the trust is refining its data collection tools alongside its Health Equity team and local carers to ensure feedback loops directly inform clinical practice and PCREF operational plans.
Q2. How are intersectional barriers such as neurodivergence and criminal justice involvement being addressed for minoritised families?
A detailed discussion focused on the severe intersectional challenges faced by minoritised families, particularly where mental health conditions overlap with neurodivergence or involvement in the criminal justice system. Concerns were raised that carers face immense financial and logistical hurdles to attend meetings or advocate for relatives.
Response:
Cath and Annie agreed that intersectionality must be at the forefront of service design. The panel emphasized that research teams and trust steering groups must formally budget for carer access needs—including funding for sitters, respite, and transport—to enable equitable participation from grassroot carers.
Q3. How can NHS trusts move away from generic terminology like “BAME” to build trust with specific communities?
Contributors stressed the importance of discarding outdated, homogenized labels such as “BAME” in favor of recognizing specific ethnic and cultural identities. Members questioned how trusts plan to engage directly with local grassroot organizations rather than relying on top-down communications.
Response:
The presenters affirmed that language matters deeply in establishing trust. NSFT is focusing on direct partnerships with Voluntary, Community, and Social Enterprise (VCSE) sector organizations that already hold trusted relationships within specific cultural communities, ensuring engagement is authentic and localized.
Keynote Address: Competence, Leadership, and Race Equity
Speaker: Lord Victor Adebowale (Chair, NHS Confederation & Founder, NHS Race and Health Observatory)
Lord Victor Adebowale delivered a sweeping keynote address that fundamentally challenged traditional healthcare perspectives on race equity, anti-racism, and organizational accountability. Moving the discussion away from performative pledges and symbolic gestures, Lord Victor framed racial equity not as an optional moral, social, or political stance, but as a core requirement of clinical and operational competence.
He began by reframing the definition of leadership within the healthcare ecosystem, asserting that unpaid family carers act as leaders every single day. Through their daily advocacy, continuous care coordination, and tireless protection of vulnerable family members, carers demonstrate true leadership long before health systems officially acknowledge their presence.
Lord Victor drew stark attention to the persistent impact of the Inverse Care Law, illustrating how individuals from the global majority routinely receive poorer quality services and face worse health outcomes despite presenting with the highest levels of clinical need. He warned that system-wide failure to serve minoritised families cannot be viewed as an isolated issue; when a healthcare trust tolerates substandard, culturally unsafe care for Black and ethnic minority service users, the overall quality, safety, and effectiveness of care inevitably degrades for every patient using that service.
A central theme of his address focused on moving the national conversation away from an endless reliance on individual conscious or unconscious bias training. Lord Victor argued that over-emphasizing implicit bias often allows healthcare systems to evade operational accountability. Instead, anti-racism must be treated as a strict benchmark of professional capability. Leaders and clinicians who fail to deliver equitable care across diverse populations are not simply displaying personal bias they are actively choosing to operate incompetently. He insisted that health trust boards must begin holding executive leadership to the exact same rigorous accountability standards for race equity as they do for clinical safety and financial management.
Furthermore, Lord Victor emphasized that unpaid family carers represent the primary early-warning system within the entire healthcare structure. Carers are routinely the first to spot subtle signs of deterioration or service failure, often weeks before clinical teams become aware of an emerging crisis. He condemned the institutional practice of dismissing carer insights under the blanket rationale of “patient confidentiality,” warning that using information governance as an excuse to shut out family members discards the most valuable clinical intelligence available and actively compromises patient safety.
Four Rules for Authentic Community Engagement
To guide health trusts and Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) toward genuine structural reform, Lord Victor outlined four non-negotiable rules of engagement when working alongside minoritised communities and family carers:
Listen with Evidence of Being Heard: Listening exercises and consultation events are entirely meaningless unless community members and carers are provided with clear, practical evidence showing exactly how their feedback altered decisions, policies, or service delivery.
Transfer Real Power: Authentic engagement requires a fundamental shift in traditional power dynamics. Healthcare institutions must share authority and transfer tangible resources so that minoritised communities are empowered to act independently and lead changes themselves.
Equal Partnership over Superficial Co-production: Health systems must move beyond tokenistic co-production exercises, which often amount to seeking quick feedback on pre-written plans—and commit to long-term, equal governance partnerships where carers sit at the decision-making table from inception to evaluation.
Describable and Transparent Outcomes: Any service alteration or policy development resulting from community engagement must produce clear, tangible outcomes that are easily understood, described, and validated by the community itself, rather than hidden behind dense NHS jargon.
Matthew’s Question
Matthew raised concerns regarding the persistent barriers unpaid carers face—specifically questioning how health systems can stop excluding ethnic minority carers through medical jargon and information gatekeeping (such as using “confidentiality” as an excuse to exclude families), and how trusts can be held genuinely accountable under frameworks like the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF).
Lord Victor Adebowale’s Response
Lord Victor addressed this by framing race equity and carer involvement as a matter of operational and clinical competence rather than optional policy:
Reframing Carer Insights: He emphasized that family carers are the primary early-warning system in healthcare who spot signs of deterioration weeks before clinical teams. Dismissing carer insights using “confidentiality” throws away vital clinical data and actively compromises patient safety.
Competence over Bias: He stated that leaders who fail to provide equitable care to minoritised families or exclude carers are choosing to operate incompetently. Boards must hold executive leadership accountable for race equity to the exact same standards as clinical safety and financial management.
Rules of Engagement: He outlined that genuine engagement requires health trusts to listen with evidence of being heard, transfer real power to communities, build equal partnerships, and deliver transparent, describable outcomes that the community can easily see and verify.
Questions and Discussion
Q1. Why are Black men in mental health services disproportionately subjected to high doses of medication rather than holistic therapies?
A critical question was raised regarding why Black men entering acute mental health pathways are frequently managed through high-dose psychiatric medications and prolonged admissions rather than being offered timely talking therapies, early intervention, and holistic community support.
Response:
Lord Victor emphasized that over-reliance on medication and restrictive practices reflects systemic clinical failure and risk-averse institutional cultures. He stressed that true clinical competence requires services to offer culturally appropriate psychological interventions and preventative care early in the care pathway, rather than defaulting to chemical containment during crises.
Q2. How can healthcare systems better support the emotional, financial, and legal well-being of long-term family carers?
A forum contributor shared their personal experience as a sole carer managing a mother with vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s in rural Gloucestershire. They highlighted the severe isolation, legal hurdles, and financial exhaustion experienced by carers, asking directly: “Who is caring for the carer?”
Response:
Lord Victor and forum members acknowledged the systemic neglect of carer well-being. The discussion highlighted that supporting carers is a clinical necessity, not an optional luxury. Practical signposting was shared, pointing members toward specialist support networks and helplines, including Dementia UK, while calling on Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) to fund dedicated carer respite initiatives.
Research Updates: Amplifying Carer Voices
1. Black Carers and Learning Disability Services
Presenter: Lorraine Heath (Trainee Clinical Psychologist, University of Southampton)
Lorraine Heath introduced her doctoral research project exploring the complex, intersectional barriers that Black family carers encounter when navigating mental health and learning disability services on behalf of their relatives. Lorraine explained that while national policy increasingly highlights health equity, Black families caring for loved ones with learning disabilities continue to face profound structural, institutional, and cultural hurdles. These challenges frequently result in delayed access to vital support, misdiagnosis, or total exclusion from essential statutory services.
The research focuses on capturing the lived realities of Black carers across both child and adult services including Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) and adult community mental health teams to understand how healthcare systems can better support families before crisis points occur. Lorraine emphasized that unpaid Black carers often have to act as fierce advocates, interpreters of complex care systems, and primary safety nets, often without receiving adequate recognition or formal support from service providers.
Research Objectives: The study aims to map out the specific diagnostic pathways, institutional barriers, and negative experiences that Black families face when seeking care. By identifying where services fail to provide culturally sensitive, timely support, the project seeks to build a robust evidence base to influence future clinical practice, service design, and commissioning standards across NHS mental health and learning disability teams.
Methodology & Care for Participants: Recognizing that discussing institutional barriers and negative service interactions can be emotionally draining, the study utilizes 90-minute flexible online interviews via Microsoft Teams, designed around the participant’s schedule and comfort. To ensure lived experience is meaningfully valued rather than exploited, all participants receive a £25 shopping voucher as a token of appreciation for their time and contribution. Furthermore, strict data protection protocols are embedded throughout the study to guarantee complete anonymity for all participating carers.
Lorraine invited members of the forum to share details of the study within their local networks, encouraging Black family carers with relevant lived experience to participate and ensure their voices shape future mental health provision.
Questions and Discussion
Q1. How will the study protect Black carers from re-traumatisation when discussing negative service experiences?
Forum members inquired about the safeguarding protocols in place for participants who may experience distress while recalling challenging interactions with health and social care services.
Response:
Lorraine confirmed that emotional safety is central to the study design. Pre-interview briefings, built-in debriefing sessions, and immediate signposting to culturally sensitive psychological support are provided to all participants.
2. Supporting the Supporters: Integrating Informal Carers
Presenter: Carol Garbutt (King’s College London)
Carol Garbutt introduced her master’s research project, Supporting the Supporters, which addresses the critical breakdown in communication and partnership between professional healthcare services and informal family carers. Carol explained that despite longstanding national directives highlighting the importance of involving family members, unpaid carers from minoritised backgrounds are routinely sidelined, excluded from decision-making, or left without basic support when supporting a relative through the mental health system.
The study explores the organizational culture, professional attitudes, and systemic practices that dictate how informal carers are treated across clinical settings. Carol highlighted that while professional staff often view safety and treatment solely through the lens of individual patient care, unpaid carers are the ones managing day-to-day crises, monitoring medication side effects, and providing essential emotional and practical stabilization at home. Failing to integrate these informal support networks into formal care planning not only places an overwhelming burden on family members, but actively compromises patient safety and recovery.
Research Scope & Focus: The study focuses on gathering perspectives from across the mental health ecosystem including professional healthcare workers, clinical staff, patient advocates, and voluntary sector leaders. By examining how professionals define, view, and interact with family carers, the research aims to pinpoint the precise organizational obstacles and misalignments that lead to carer exclusion.
Project Goals & Impact: The overarching objective is to build a robust, practice-informed evidence base that pushes mental health trusts to embed family carers into standard clinical workflows. Carol emphasized that true integration requires moving beyond informal signposting toward establishing clear communication protocols, ensuring carers are formally identified at the point of admission, and treating them as equal, valued partners in care planning and discharge processes.
Questions and Discussion
Q1. How does the research address instances where professionals hide behind confidentiality rules to exclude carers?
Members highlighted that staff frequently cite information governance to withhold basic care updates from family members.
Response:
Carol explained that her study specifically examines professional attitudes and organizational policies surrounding communication. The goal is to highlight best-practice frameworks that allow clinicians to share essential care planning details with families while respecting patient rights.
3. Partners’ Experiences of Gynaecological Cancer
Presenter: Lara (Trainee Clinical Psychologist, University of Hertfordshire)
Lara introduced her doctoral research exploring the lived experiences of partners supporting individuals diagnosed with gynaecological cancer.
Research Focus: Examining the complex emotional, physical, relational, and financial impacts on partners navigating a gynaecological cancer diagnosis.
Project Goal: Tackling cultural taboos and stigma surrounding gynaecological health, providing evidence to help cancer charities and NHS trusts design tailored psychological and practical support packages for partners.
Questions and Discussion
Q1. How does the study account for cultural stigmas surrounding gynaecological health within minoritised communities?
Carers noted that discussion of gynaecological health remains heavily stigmatized in many ethnic communities, which can prevent partners from seeking external help.
Response:
Lara acknowledged these cultural complexities, explaining that the interview frameworks are designed to be sensitive to diverse cultural norms, allowing participants to share their experiences in a safe, non-judgmental environment.
Creative Advocacy: Combatting Gatekeeping Through Poetry
Matthew McKenzie presented a video poem developed as part of his ongoing advocacy work surrounding the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF).
Using creative media and spoken word, the poem visually and emotionally illustrates the everyday barriers faced by ethnic minority carers including institutional gatekeeping, dense medical jargon, exclusion from multi-disciplinary team meetings, and the sensation of being rendered invisible by healthcare professionals.
Matthew emphasized that creative media and arts-based advocacy are powerful mechanisms for staff training. By translating complex policy frameworks like PCREF into lived emotional narratives, creative media helps NHS staff understand the human impact of structural exclusion and drives empathetic, anti-racist practice across clinical teams.
Key Takeaways and Next Steps
The August meeting highlighted several critical action points for the forum and its partner organizations:
Accountability over Intent: Moving beyond policies, anti-racism charters, and pledges to demand measurable, transparent outcomes in patient care and carer satisfaction.
Dismantling Institutional Gatekeeping: Working with NHS trusts to ensure family carers are identified and involved early in treatment pathways, dismantling the misuse of confidentiality as a barrier.
Embedding Co-Production: Supporting minoritised carers to join trust boards, steering groups, and PCREF advisory panels to ensure lived experience directly shapes local health delivery.
Looking Ahead to September:
The next national forum meeting will feature updates from Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, the Race Equality Foundation, Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, and regional carer networks.
By Matthew McKenzie, Co-Facilitator – South West London Mental Health Carers Forum
The South West London Mental Health Carers Forum met again during August 2026, bringing together unpaid carers to share experiences, discuss how the forum is developing and look at ways we can strengthen the voice of carers across South West London.
The forum continues to be a peer-led space shaped by carers themselves. An important message from the August meeting was that this is a group for carers, run with carers and influenced by carers. Members spoke about wanting people who join the forum to feel recognised, valued and able to support one another, rather than the group becoming overly formal or service-led.
By Matthew McKenzie – Cygnet PCREF Carer Lead & Carer Ambassador
Cygnet PCREF Carer Lead & Carer Ambassador
On 4 August 2026, unpaid carers, professionals and people with lived experience came together at Cygnet Churchill for the second Voices & Verses Carers Poetry Event. The purpose of the afternoon was not simply to read poetry, but to create a safe space where carers could express experiences that are often overlooked within mental health services.
The event formed part of Cygnet’s ongoing commitment to the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) by exploring how creativity, culture and storytelling can strengthen co-production and improve relationships between carers and services.
By Matthew McKenzie – Chair, National Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum
The July meeting welcomed unpaid carers, NHS organisations, universities, researchers and community groups from across England to discuss how mental health services can become more inclusive for carers from ethnic communities.
Matthew McKenzie opened the meeting by reflecting on over thirteen years of facilitating the forum and explained how its purpose has grown alongside national initiatives such as the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) and the Triangle of Care. The forum continues to provide a national platform where carers can influence NHS services, hear about new research and share experiences with professionals and decision-makers.
Matthew introduced the day’s programme, which included research presentations, NHS England engagement, updates from mental health trusts and national organisations, and opportunities for carers to influence future policy
Dr Ida Doherty – King’s College London
Supporting Ethnic Carers in South West London
Dr Ida Doherty presented her doctoral research exploring how adult mental health services support ethnic minority families where a parent experiences mental illness.
She explained that despite national policy promoting a Think Family approach, implementation across England remains inconsistent. Many parents receiving mental health support are never asked about their children, meaning opportunities for preventative family support are often missed.
Discussion Highlights
This presentation generated one of the longest discussions of the meeting.
Carers highlighted:
Adult and children’s services continue to work separately.
Families often have to repeat their stories to multiple organisations.
Parents fear seeking support because of concerns about children being removed.
Structural racism continues to affect safeguarding and mental health services.
Disabled parents and carers experience multiple layers of discrimination.
Services often respond only during crisis rather than providing early intervention.
There was also an important discussion about safeguarding carers who participate in research. Participants stressed that research should include emotional support, culturally appropriate safeguarding and co-produced approaches to prevent re-traumatisation. Dr Doherty welcomed these suggestions and explained the safeguarding measures built into her study.
Dr Doherty encouraged forum members to promote the study across South West London to help ensure ethnic families are represented within the research.
Certainly. Here’s a more professional version that focuses on the discussion rather than identifying who asked each question.
Questions and Discussion
Q1. How can mental health services better implement the “Think Family” approach?
A question was raised about the continuing separation between children’s and adult mental health services, with concern that families are often required to navigate multiple systems that fail to communicate with one another. It was suggested that supporting one family member in isolation overlooks the wider impact of mental illness on the entire household.
Response
Dr Doherty agreed that this is a significant challenge and explained that her research is centred on improving whole-family support. She highlighted that current services often operate in silos, limiting opportunities for early intervention and joined-up care. The aim of her research is to identify practical ways of embedding the Think Family approach more effectively within adult mental health services.
Q2. How will the research address the inequalities experienced by ethnic minority families?
A discussion focused on the additional challenges faced by ethnic minority families, particularly where disability, poverty, language barriers and mental health intersect. Concerns were raised about institutional racism, unequal treatment and the fear some parents experience when engaging with services.
Response
Dr Doherty acknowledged that these intersecting inequalities can significantly affect families’ experiences. She recognised that services can often adopt a risk-focused rather than strengths-based approach and explained that her research seeks to identify earlier, more supportive interventions that better meet the needs of ethnic minority families.
Q3. How will carers participating in the research be protected from emotional harm?
The discussion explored the importance of safeguarding participants involved in research. It was suggested that sharing lived experiences can be emotionally challenging and that researchers should have appropriate support mechanisms in place before, during and after participation.
Response
Dr Doherty explained that safeguarding had been a key consideration throughout the development of the study. She described how support, supervision, training and ongoing review have been built into the project, alongside close collaboration with Experts by Experience from the earliest stages of the research.
Q4. Will participants receive ongoing emotional support after difficult discussions?
A further question explored whether structured debriefing and emotional support would be available for participants who may experience distress after discussing traumatic experiences.
Response
Dr Doherty confirmed that the study includes a comprehensive safeguarding framework, including debrief sessions and wellbeing support. She explained that the project had undergone rigorous NHS ethics approval and that participant welfare continues to be reviewed throughout the research process.
Q5. How is co-production embedded within the research?
The final discussion focused on ensuring that the research is genuinely co-produced with ethnic communities rather than being designed solely from a professional perspective. There was also support for developing safeguarding approaches jointly with carers.
Response
Dr Doherty explained that co-production is fundamental to the project. She has worked alongside Experts by Experience since the study was first developed and described the research as something being undertaken in partnership with people who have lived experience. She also welcomed suggestions for strengthening carer-led safeguarding approaches as the project progresses.
Dr Maeve (King’s College London)
Research Study: The Nearest Relative under the Mental Health Act
Dr Maeve introduced a new King’s College London research project examining experiences of the Nearest Relative provisions within the Mental Health Act. She explained that the study aims to understand how the current legislation works in practice and gather views ahead of the proposed reforms to mental health law. The researchers are interested in hearing directly from people who have lived experience of the system, recognising that the Nearest Relative can play a crucial role in supporting someone during assessment, detention and treatment.
The study is seeking participants from a range of backgrounds, particularly unpaid carers who have supported someone detained or assessed under the Mental Health Act, as well as individuals who have themselves experienced detention or assessment. The research team is especially keen to hear from Black and other ethnic minority communities, along with younger people, to ensure that a wide range of perspectives help inform future policy and practice. Interviews are conducted online via Microsoft Teams at a convenient time for participants, last approximately one hour, and participants receive a £30 shopping voucher as a thank-you for contributing their experiences. Dr Maeve encouraged anyone interested to contact the research team or share the opportunity with others who may wish to participate.
Ruby Neish – University College London
Cancer Care and Black Women
Research Study: Supporting Carers of Women with Endometrial (Womb) Cancer
Ruby Neish, a Master’s researcher from University College London working in collaboration with the Centre for Early Detection, introduced a research project exploring the experiences of family members, friends and unpaid carers supporting women diagnosed with endometrial (womb) cancer. She explained that while much research focuses on the experiences of patients themselves, comparatively little is known about the challenges faced by those providing informal care throughout diagnosis, treatment and recovery. The study aims to build a more complete picture by understanding how carers experience the cancer pathway, the support they receive and the barriers they encounter. Ruby emphasised that carers often play a vital role in navigating appointments, providing emotional support, helping with treatment decisions and managing the practical realities of living with cancer, yet their experiences are frequently overlooked in research.
Following the presentation, forum members shared a wealth of lived experience highlighting why this research is particularly important for Black and minority ethnic communities. The discussion explored how delayed diagnosis, language barriers, cultural expectations, disability, poor communication and wider health inequalities can all contribute to poorer experiences for both patients and their families. Members also reflected on the importance of improving awareness of cancer symptoms within communities, encouraging uptake of screening programmes and ensuring services are culturally responsive. Several contributors stressed that carers often become advocates, interpreters and navigators of the healthcare system, particularly where individuals experience multiple forms of disadvantage. The discussion reinforced the importance of ensuring that future cancer services recognise and support carers as an essential part of the patient’s journey.
Questions and Discussion
Q1. Why is it particularly important to understand the experiences of Black and minority ethnic women living with cancer?
Forum members discussed how people from Black and minority ethnic communities can face additional barriers throughout the cancer pathway. These included language differences, lower awareness of symptoms, cultural beliefs about illness, disability, mental health needs and difficulties accessing appropriate support. It was suggested that these factors can contribute to delayed diagnosis and poorer outcomes if services fail to respond to people’s individual circumstances.
Response
Ruby welcomed these observations and explained that hearing directly from carers is essential to understanding these inequalities. She noted that while patients’ experiences are being explored separately, the research hopes to capture the perspectives of carers to identify barriers that may otherwise remain invisible. Together, these findings will help build a more complete understanding of how cancer services can better support families from diverse communities.
Q2. How can cancer services improve early diagnosis within ethnic communities?
The discussion highlighted the importance of encouraging earlier engagement with screening programmes and improving awareness of cancer symptoms within local communities. Examples were shared of women whose diagnoses were delayed after repeated visits to healthcare services, alongside reflections on the positive impact that culturally appropriate information and trusted community support can have in encouraging people to attend screening appointments. Participants emphasised that services need to communicate in ways that are accessible and sensitive to different cultural backgrounds.
Response
The discussion reinforced that improving awareness, reducing communication barriers and working more closely with communities could contribute to earlier diagnosis and improved outcomes. The research aims to identify where carers believe improvements can be made across the diagnostic and treatment journey, helping to inform future service development.
Q3. What role do unpaid carers play throughout the cancer journey?
A final discussion focused on the often unseen contribution of unpaid carers. Members described how carers frequently provide emotional reassurance, accompany relatives to appointments, help explain medical information, advocate for concerns to be taken seriously and support individuals throughout treatment and recovery. It was recognised that carers often become the link between patients, families and healthcare professionals, particularly where communication barriers or additional health conditions exist.
Response
Ruby explained that this is precisely why the study is focusing on carers’ perspectives. Understanding their experiences will provide valuable evidence about the practical and emotional challenges carers face and identify ways that cancer services can better recognise and support them alongside the person receiving treatment.
NHS England – Allied Health Professions Strategy
Steve Tolan (Deputy Chief Allied Health Professions Officer) & Barry O’Donovan (Senior Programme Manager)
Steve Tolan and Barry O’Donovan from NHS England joined the forum to begin an important conversation about developing a new national Allied Health Professions (AHP) Strategy. Rather than presenting a completed strategy for consultation, they explained that NHS England wanted to engage with carers, patients and communities before the strategy was written, ensuring that lived experience would help shape its priorities from the outset.
Steve introduced the Allied Health Professions as the third largest clinical workforce in the NHS, comprising fourteen professions including occupational therapists, physiotherapists, speech and language therapists, dietitians, radiographers and several others. He explained that these professionals work across virtually every part of health and care, from mental health and primary care to acute hospitals, rehabilitation and community services, making their contribution central to improving patient outcomes.
Barry explained that NHS England was seeking honest feedback on what Allied Health Professionals currently do well and, more importantly, where improvements were needed over the next five years. The discussion centred around several key questions, including how AHPs could help people stay healthier for longer, improve prevention, reduce health inequalities, remove barriers to accessing care, and work more effectively across different care settings. Forum members were also encouraged to complete a wider national survey, but NHS England emphasised that hearing directly from unpaid carers during the meeting would provide invaluable insight into the everyday realities experienced by families supporting loved ones with mental illness and other long-term conditions.
What followed was one of the richest discussions of the meeting, with carers sharing personal experiences of navigating health services and offering practical recommendations for change. Contributors acknowledged the important work undertaken by Allied Health Professionals but stressed that future success would depend upon moving beyond clinical interventions alone. Members called for greater emphasis on prevention rather than crisis management, stronger action to address racism and health inequalities, more personalised and culturally responsive care, improved communication with families and better recognition of unpaid carers as essential partners within the healthcare system. NHS England representatives listened carefully throughout the discussion, responding positively to the feedback and confirming that the experiences shared during the forum would help inform the development of the national strategy.
Feedback from Forum Members
There was a lot more feedback, but I have only included 4 feedback to the strategy
Feedback 1 – Prevention must become the priority, not simply responding to crisis
One of the strongest messages from the discussion was that health services often intervene too late. Contributors explained that many families recognise early warning signs long before services become involved, yet support is frequently unavailable until a situation has escalated into crisis. Members argued that Allied Health Professionals are well placed to identify emerging concerns earlier, particularly for people living with long-term mental health conditions, autism, learning disabilities and chronic physical illnesses. Earlier intervention, they suggested, would reduce avoidable hospital admissions while improving outcomes for both patients and carers.
NHS England acknowledged this feedback, explaining that one of the key ambitions of the new strategy is to support the wider NHS objective of shifting from reactive treatment towards prevention. Representatives welcomed examples from carers illustrating where earlier support could make the greatest difference.
Feedback 2 – Tackling racism and health inequalities requires more than training
Forum members spoke candidly about experiences of racism, discrimination and unequal treatment within health services. While acknowledging that cultural awareness training is becoming more common, contributors argued that training alone is insufficient unless accompanied by accountability and meaningful changes in practice. Some described inaccurate clinical records, assumptions based on ethnicity and situations where concerns raised by families were not properly reflected in care planning. There was a strong call for services to improve communication, record keeping and trauma-informed practice, ensuring that staff understand the impact of racism on health outcomes rather than viewing cultural competence as a one-off training exercise.
NHS England representatives recognised that tackling health inequalities and promoting anti-racist practice were already identified as “non-negotiable” priorities within the developing strategy. They explained that this was precisely why engagement with forums such as this was so valuable, helping ensure that policy reflects the real experiences of people using NHS services.
Feedback 3 – Unpaid carers must be recognised as equal partners in care
A recurring theme throughout the discussion was the role of unpaid carers within healthcare systems. Members explained that carers are often the people coordinating appointments, supporting communication, monitoring deterioration, providing emotional support and helping professionals understand an individual’s needs. Despite this, carers frequently remain unidentified by services or receive little information and support themselves. Contributors argued that Allied Health Professionals should routinely identify carers, involve them in care planning where appropriate and recognise them as equal partners whose knowledge can significantly improve patient outcomes.
NHS England welcomed these comments and recognised that carers play a fundamental role in delivering effective, preventative care. The examples shared demonstrated how stronger partnerships with carers could improve continuity of care while helping services better understand the needs of individuals and families.
Feedback 4 – Share and learn from examples of excellent practice
The discussion concluded with examples of positive experiences that illustrated what good care can look like. One contributor described receiving outstanding support from an Occupational Therapist who not only arranged practical adaptations within the home but also followed up afterwards to ensure everything was working well. Members suggested that NHS England should identify and promote examples of excellent practice across the Allied Health Professions so that high standards become the norm rather than the exception. Ideas included involving patients and carers more directly in evaluating services and using lived experience to help identify what compassionate, person-centred care looks like in practice.
West London Health Trust – PCREF Update
Linda Thomas – Co-producing an Independent PCREF Advisory Group
Linda Thomas, Co-production and Partnerships Development Manager at West London NHS Trust, opened the Trust’s presentation by describing how they have developed an independent PCREF Advisory Group designed to challenge, support and hold the Trust to account as a “critical friend.” Rather than creating a traditional advisory panel, West London NHS Trust commissioned three established community organisations GOS&D (Ealing), SHEWISE (Hounslow) and Managing Our Mental (Hammersmith & Fulham) to help design the model and understand how communities genuinely want to engage with mental health services. The approach seeks to increase diversity of voices, identify barriers preventing community involvement and rebuild trust between local communities and the Trust. Linda explained that members of the advisory group now sit alongside Trust leaders as equal partners on the Steering Group, while work is progressing to secure long-term funding to sustain the network and strengthen relationships with community organisations. The initiative demonstrates how co-production can move beyond consultation towards genuine shared decision-making between the NHS and the communities it serves.
Debbie Best – PCREF Carer Lead: Racial Trauma Workshops
Debbie Best, PCREF Carer Lead at West London NHS Trust, presented the development of the Trust’s Racial Trauma Workshops, which were co-designed alongside Natalie Mark (PCREF Lived Experience Lead), Dr Anne Aiyegbusi and Chief Nurse Gillian Kelly. Debbie explained that the workshops were created in response to the persistent racial inequalities experienced within mental health services, including disproportionate detention under the Mental Health Act, restrictive interventions, mistrust of services and the re-traumatisation experienced by many people from ethnic communities.
Rather than delivering traditional equality training, the workshops create reflective spaces where staff openly discuss difficult issues including trust, power, emotional labour, racialised assumptions and barriers to culturally safe care. Debbie emphasised that racial trauma affects not only patients but also carers and NHS staff, and that creating psychologically safe spaces for honest conversations is an essential step towards improving relationships, reducing inequalities and embedding the aims of the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) across mental health services.
Christine – Triangle of Care, Carer Awareness Training and PCREF
Christine, speaking as a carer representative involved in co-production, highlighted how West London NHS Trust has successfully embedded carers within staff training through the Triangle of Care programme. She explained that the Trust achieved Stage 2 Triangle of Care accreditation in March 2026 and has developed Carer Awareness Training that is designed and delivered alongside carers themselves.
The training introduces staff to both the Triangle of Care and the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework, helping colleagues understand the importance of recognising carers as equal partners while strengthening communication and collaboration with families. Christine also announced that West London NHS Trust has been selected as one of only thirteen national pilot sites testing the integration of Triangle of Care and PCREF guidance over the next twelve months. Ten clinical teams will take part in reviewing and implementing the updated guidance, ensuring that national best practice is informed by both professional expertise and lived experience.
Debbie Best – Ethnicity Data Capture Project
Debbie concluded the presentation by introducing West London NHS Trust’s Ethnicity Data Capture Project, funded through a small grant from the NHS Race and Health Observatory. She explained that the project aims to improve understanding of why ethnicity information is not always accurately recorded and why some communities remain reluctant to share this information. Working alongside community organisations including SHEWISE, Our Voices and Managing Our Mental, the Trust has co-produced a range of resources including information leaflets, awareness films, social media campaigns, frequently asked questions and staff training materials. The campaign, titled “Seen, Heard, Counted,” aims to reassure communities that ethnicity data is collected to improve healthcare, tackle inequalities and ensure services better reflect the needs of local populations. Debbie explained that the next phase of the project will focus on wider public awareness and rolling out staff training across the Trust to improve confidence, transparency and trust around ethnicity data collection.
Bren McInerney
Race Equality Observatory
Bren McInerney provided an update on behalf of the NHS Race and Health Observatory, explaining that although he works closely with the organisation through its Stakeholder Engagement Group, he was speaking from his role supporting engagement rather than as an NHS employee. He began by outlining the Observatory’s purpose, which is to identify, understand and help reduce ethnic inequalities across health and social care through research, evidence and partnership working.
Bren highlighted that the Observatory has now produced a growing body of evidence to support NHS organisations in tackling inequalities and emphasised that this work must ultimately lead to practical improvements in services rather than simply producing reports. He also noted that the Observatory’s current funding arrangement is due for renewal in 2027, making it increasingly important to demonstrate the value and impact of its work across the NHS. The presentation encouraged attendees to remain engaged with the Observatory’s programmes and continue sharing lived experience to strengthen the evidence base for future policy and service improvement.
Bren also highlighted several recent initiatives designed to strengthen collaboration between the NHS and local communities. These included the publication of the Trauma-Informed Care and Racialised Communities Report, which explores how trauma-informed approaches can better respond to the experiences of people affected by racism and discrimination. He also described the Observatory’s Small Grants Programme, which has supported community-led projects across England, and introduced a new Community Participation and Co-production Resource developed in partnership with the Race Equality Foundation. This resource aims to help NHS organisations and Integrated Care Boards build stronger relationships with communities, improve meaningful involvement in decision-making and ensure that local knowledge helps shape healthcare services. Bren concluded by encouraging carers, voluntary organisations and community leaders to make use of these resources, share them widely and continue influencing the national conversation on race equality within health services.
By Matthew McKenzie – Triangle of Care – Community group chair
Putting Carers at the Centre of Care
The latest Triangle of Care Community Group brought together carers, professionals and partner organisations from across England to share learning, celebrate progress and identify where further improvements are needed. The meeting highlighted the growing influence of the Triangle of Care across mental health and acute services, whilst reinforcing that there is still much work to do to ensure carers are consistently recognised, valued and supported.
One of the most powerful aspects of the meeting was hearing directly from carers about their experiences. Whilst many spoke positively about the progress that has been made over recent years, there was a shared view that carer involvement remains inconsistent across services. Carers described feeling more included than ever before, with greater awareness of the Triangle of Care principles and more opportunities to participate in steering groups, service developments and community discussions. However, concerns remain around automatic carer identification, information sharing and ensuring that carers are genuinely recognised as partners in care.
Several carers reflected on the importance of having their voices heard early in a patient’s care journey. Examples were shared of services introducing carer contribution templates that ensure family members are involved within 72 hours of admission, whilst others highlighted improvements to confidentiality processes that allow patients to determine what information can be shared with carers at different stages of their recovery. These practical changes demonstrate how relatively small adjustments can have a significant impact on relationships between carers, patients and professionals.
Progress Across the Triangle of Care Programme
Mary Patel, Triangle of Care Programme Lead at Carers Trust, provided an update on developments across the national programme. The Triangle of Care continues to grow, with a number of organisations progressing through the STAR accreditation process and demonstrating their commitment to embedding carer-inclusive practice across services.
Importantly, members were reminded that the STAR awards are not designed to rank organisations, but instead reflect the breadth of implementation across different service areas. STAR I focuses primarily on inpatient and crisis services, STAR II expands into community services, whilst STAR III recognises organisations delivering integrated services across multiple clinical areas.
Several trusts have recently achieved STAR awards, whilst others are progressing through the assessment process over the coming months. The programme’s peer review approach continues to ensure that carers remain central to the assessment process, with carers actively involved in reviewing evidence, identifying good practice and making recommendations for future development.
The Triangle of Care Member Hub continues to provide valuable opportunities for peer learning, resource sharing and collaborative working. Upcoming webinars will include sessions exploring Open Dialogue approaches developed by Devon Partnership NHS Trust, providing members with further opportunities to learn about therapeutic models that place families and carers at the heart of care planning.
Advancing Equality Through the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework
A significant development announced during the meeting was the launch of Phase Two of the Triangle of Care and Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) project.
PCREF represents the first mandatory anti-racism framework within mental health services in England. Recognising that carers from racially marginalised communities often experience poorer outcomes and face additional barriers when accessing support, the Triangle of Care programme has been working collaboratively with carers and mental health providers to strengthen the way services assess and respond to carers’ needs.
The revised self-assessment framework encourages services to move beyond assumptions and adopt a more professionally curious approach to understanding carers’ individual experiences. Rather than viewing carers as a homogenous group, the framework recognises that caring experiences are shaped by culture, identity, language, personal circumstances and wider health inequalities.
Pilot sites from across England are now testing the revised guidance, with learning being shared nationally throughout the project. Importantly, organisations do not need to be participating in the pilot to begin implementing the principles and learning that emerge from this work.
Alongside PCREF, Carers Trust continues to contribute to national policy developments, including the Modern Service Framework for Severe Mental Illness and the forthcoming Mental Health Strategy for England. Throughout these discussions, there has been a consistent message that carers must be recognised as partners in care and have access to appropriate support in their own right.
Confidentiality, Information Sharing and Carer Inclusion
Confidentiality remained one of the most prominent themes throughout the meeting. Whilst participants acknowledged the importance of protecting patients’ rights and preferences, carers highlighted that confidentiality can sometimes become a barrier to meaningful engagement.
Several contributors reflected that confidentiality should never prevent professionals from listening to carers’ concerns or receiving valuable information that may support a patient’s care. Others spoke about the importance of revisiting conversations around consent over time, recognising that patients’ preferences may change as their circumstances and wellbeing improve.
Practical examples of good practice included breaking confidentiality discussions down into specific areas, allowing patients to decide what information can be shared about medication, activities, wellbeing and treatment plans, rather than relying on simple ‘yes or no’ decisions. There was also discussion around the importance of staff training to improve confidence when navigating complex conversations around confidentiality and information sharing.
Participants agreed that carers should never be expected to provide significant levels of support without receiving the information necessary to do so safely and effectively. Achieving the right balance between confidentiality and partnership working remains an important priority for the Triangle of Care community.
Triangle of Care Principles Within Acute Services
The meeting concluded with an inspiring presentation from Wendy Doyle, Head of Patient Experience at St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Epsom and St Helier Hospitals, exploring how Triangle of Care principles can be successfully implemented within acute hospital settings.
Whilst the Triangle of Care originated within mental health services, Wendy demonstrated that its principles are equally applicable across acute care environments. Her organisation supports approximately 19,000 members of staff across multiple hospital sites and has developed a comprehensive approach to identifying, recording and supporting unpaid carers.
Staff are encouraged to identify carers at the earliest possible opportunity, with this information recorded within patient records to ensure continuity throughout the patient’s hospital journey. Comprehensive carer awareness training is delivered through virtual sessions, ward-based education and e-learning resources, helping staff understand both the practical and emotional importance of recognising carers.
Importantly, identifying carers is only the beginning of the process. Every carer recorded within the hospital system receives a follow-up wellbeing check from the Patient Experience Team to discuss their own support needs, identify any challenges and facilitate referrals to local carers’ organisations where appropriate.
Partnership working sits at the heart of this approach, with close collaboration between acute services and local carers’ centres ensuring carers can access a broad range of practical and emotional support. Adult and Young Carers’ Charters have also been co-produced with carers themselves, helping to shape organisational commitments around kindness, inclusion and meaningful engagement.
Perhaps most importantly, Wendy highlighted that supporting carers improves outcomes for everyone. Better communication strengthens discharge planning, reduces avoidable hospital admissions and readmissions, improves patient safety and helps prevent carer burnout. Acute hospital stays can provide valuable opportunities to identify carers who may previously have remained invisible and connect them with longer-term support.
Looking Ahead
The discussions throughout the meeting demonstrated both the progress that has been made and the challenges that remain. There is increasing recognition that carers are essential partners in delivering high-quality care across both mental health and acute services. However, meaningful involvement cannot rely upon individual goodwill alone; it requires consistent systems, robust policies and a genuine commitment to partnership working.
Looking ahead, the Triangle of Care programme will continue to expand opportunities for peer learning, influence national policy developments and support organisations to embed carer-inclusive practices across services. The ongoing work around PCREF and wider mental health policy developments provide important opportunities to ensure that carers’ voices remain central to future service transformation.
Above all, the meeting reinforced a simple but powerful message: carers must not be viewed as an afterthought or an optional addition to care planning. They are experts through experience, invaluable partners in care and individuals with support needs of their own. When carers are identified early, listened to meaningfully and supported appropriately, outcomes improve not only for carers themselves, but for patients, families and services alike.
The Triangle of Care Community Group continues to provide an important space where carers and professionals can learn from one another, challenge existing practices and work collectively towards more compassionate, inclusive and effective care.
By Matthew McKenzie – Carer & Chair of the National Ethnic MH carer Forum
The June 2026 National Ethnic Mental Health Carer Forum brought together carers, NHS Trusts, researchers, voluntary organisations and mental health professionals from across England to discuss one shared ambition improving mental health services through genuine co-production with ethnic minority carers.
Matthew reminded delegates that carers develop expertise through lived experience. Supporting a family member with severe mental illness means navigating NHS services, social care, benefits systems and advocacy. These experiences provide knowledge that cannot be learned through textbooks alone.
Opening Presentation
Matthew McKenzie
The Importance of Co-production
Forum Chair Matthew McKenzie opened the meeting by welcoming carers and professionals from across England and reflecting on more than a decade of leading the National Ethnic Mental Health Carer Forum.
He explained how the forum has evolved alongside the NHS Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF), providing an increasingly important national platform for ethnic minority carers to influence mental health services.
A recurring theme throughout the presentation was the internationally recognised principle:
“Nothing About Us Without Us.”
He explained that this principle has guided disability rights and patient involvement movements for many years and remains just as relevant today for carers supporting loved ones with serious mental illness. Family carers often spend years navigating mental health services, social care systems and community support, developing valuable knowledge through lived experience that professionals alone cannot acquire. This expertise is especially important for carers from minority ethnic communities who may also encounter cultural misunderstandings, language barriers, discrimination or unequal access to services. Matthew argued that services cannot fully understand these challenges without involving the people who experience them every day. He encouraged carers to recognise that their experiences are not simply personal stories but a form of expertise that should be valued equally alongside professional knowledge when designing, reviewing and improving services.
The presentation concluded with a powerful call for organisations to move beyond consultation towards genuine partnership working. Matthew explained that when co-production is absent, services risk misunderstanding community needs, developing policies that fail to reflect lived experience and missing opportunities to reduce long-standing inequalities. Conversely, meaningful engagement enables carers to become active partners in service improvement, helping organisations build trust with communities, improve cultural responsiveness and design services that are accessible to everyone.
He also highlighted complementary approaches, including the Triangle of Care, Open Dialogue, cultural competence and shared decision-making, all of which reinforce the importance of collaboration between professionals, service users and carers. Matthew ended by encouraging every organisation represented at the forum to ensure that diverse voices are heard throughout the decision-making process, not simply those that are easiest to reach. His closing message resonated throughout the rest of the meeting: meaningful change begins by listening, respecting lived experience and ensuring that carers have a genuine seat at the table whenever mental health services are being designed or improved.
Q&A Highlights
Q: Why is co-production particularly important for ethnic minority carers?
Because carers from minority communities often experience additional barriers including discrimination, cultural misunderstandings and language challenges. Their lived experience helps services recognise issues that routine data alone cannot identify.
Q: What happens when services fail to co-produce?
Participants suggested services become “them and us” organisations where carers feel excluded, policies fail to meet community needs and trust declines.
Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust
Bronte Dines-Allen
Bronte Dines-Allen, Reducing Health Inequalities Lead at Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, provided an inspiring overview of the Trust’s journey in implementing the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF). Introducing herself not only as a senior NHS leader but also as someone with lived experience as a family carer supporting her mother with mental ill health, Bronte spoke passionately about the importance of understanding services from both professional and personal perspectives.
She described Bradford as one of the most culturally diverse areas in England, with more than 150 languages spoken across the district and a population representing a wide range of ethnic communities. This rich diversity presents both opportunities and responsibilities for healthcare providers, requiring services to continually adapt, listen and ensure that care is culturally responsive and accessible to everyone. Bronte explained that Bradford’s approach to PCREF has been built around openness and transparency, with the Trust publishing annual progress reports and equality data to demonstrate both achievements and areas where further improvement is needed.
A major focus of Bronte’s presentation was the Trust’s recent “Amplifying Voices” event, which brought together NHS staff, voluntary and community organisations, chaplaincy services, neighbouring NHS Trusts and people with lived experience to discuss health inequalities and mental health care. Rather than concentrating solely on statistics, the event was designed to explore the stories behind the data, recognising that every figure represents a real person, family or community whose experiences deserve to be heard.
Participants shared personal accounts of navigating mental health services, building trust with professionals, overcoming barriers related to culture and language, and the importance of feeling genuinely listened to. Bronte stressed that collecting feedback is only meaningful if organisations demonstrate how that feedback influences future decision-making. One of the most encouraging outcomes of the event was the commitment from senior leaders that the experiences shared would directly inform the Trust’s refreshed organisational strategy, ensuring that health equity and reducing inequalities remain central to future service development.
Looking ahead, Bronte outlined several priorities that will continue to strengthen Bradford’s PCREF programme. These include expanding cultural competency training for staff, increasing awareness of PCREF throughout the organisation, developing educational resources that encourage conversations about race equality, and creating further opportunities for carers to contribute to service improvement.
She acknowledged that the Trust is still early in parts of its journey, particularly in strengthening engagement with carers and improving mechanisms for gathering feedback, but emphasised that genuine progress comes through honesty, collaboration and a willingness to learn from others. During the discussion that followed, delegates praised Bradford’s transparent approach and shared examples of similar work taking place across other NHS Trusts, reinforcing one of the key messages of the forum that improving mental health services is a shared national endeavour. Bronte concluded by reiterating that sustainable change depends upon building trusting relationships with communities, valuing lived experience as expertise and ensuring that carers remain active partners in shaping the future of mental health care.
Q&A Highlights
Q: What specific work is being undertaken with older adults?
Bronte acknowledged that Bradford is still developing this area and welcomed suggestions from carers and other Trusts, emphasising the importance of learning nationally.
Q: How is co-production influencing your work?
The event itself was co-designed with voluntary sector partners and accountability groups, ensuring community voices shaped both the programme and future priorities.
Q: How do you collect meaningful feedback?
Bradford continues improving its feedback systems following technical challenges and is exploring better ways of gathering and acting on carers’ experiences.
Research Presentation
Dr Meghana Kamble
Families of Children with Disabilities: Perspectives from South Asia
Dr M. Kamble from the University of East Anglia presented an insightful overview of an international research project exploring the experiences of South Asian families caring for children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
The study spans the United Kingdom, India, Sri Lanka and the United States, bringing together the voices of parents, siblings, carers, people with disabilities and professionals to better understand the challenges faced by families across different cultural settings. Dr Kamble explained that despite increasing awareness of health inequalities, the experiences of many ethnic minority families remain underrepresented in both research and service development. The project seeks to address this gap by examining not only access to services but also how cultural beliefs, family dynamics and lived experience influence the support that families receive. Underpinning the research is the principle of family-centred care, recognising that supporting one individual also means understanding and supporting the wider family network that cares for them.
Drawing on early findings from interviews, focus groups and surveys, Dr Kamble highlighted several recurring themes that resonated strongly with delegates at the forum. Families consistently reported difficulties accessing culturally appropriate services, navigating complex health and social care systems, and finding professionals who understood the realities of their lived experience. Stigma, social isolation and language barriers were frequently identified as obstacles that prevented families from seeking support at an early stage.
One particularly interesting finding challenged common assumptions about South Asian communities. While it is often believed that extended family networks naturally provide substantial support, many participants described relying far more heavily on peer support groups, community organisations and voluntary sector services than on relatives. Dr Kamble also observed that outside Europe many people do not identify themselves as “carers” in the formal sense; instead, they simply see themselves as sons, daughters, brothers or sisters fulfilling their family responsibilities. This distinction has important implications for how services identify and engage people who may be eligible for support but never recognise themselves under the label of “carer.”
The discussion following the presentation explored how research findings can influence future policy and practice. Delegates highlighted the need for clearer information about carers’ rights, improved communication with communities and greater transparency from statutory services about the support that is available. Several participants emphasised that trust can only be built when organisations consistently involve communities in decision-making and demonstrate that lived experience genuinely shapes service improvements. Dr Kamble agreed that while systems and policies are important, individual professionals often make the greatest difference by taking the time to guide families through complex services and helping them understand their rights. Looking ahead, the research team plans to share its findings through publications, webinars, community engagement events and partnerships with organisations across the UK and internationally. The presentation served as a powerful reminder that reducing inequalities requires not only better research but also culturally responsive services that recognise and value the diverse experiences of families from every community.
Q&A Highlights
Q: How will the research findings be shared?
The project plans to publish papers, webinars, newsletters and community engagement events, with researchers keen to work alongside carers in disseminating findings.
Q: How can services better reach ethnic minority carers?
Participants emphasised:
clearer information about rights
better community engagement
trusted local organisations
simpler access to support
transparent communication.
Q: Should organisations rethink the word “carer”?
Yes.
Several delegates suggested that many people never identify with the label “carer,” meaning they may never seek available support. Researchers agreed this requires further exploration.
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Ashley Bertie
Accelerating PCREF Implementation
Ashley Bertie, Associate Director for Participation, Co-production and Patient Care Experience at Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, provided an informative update on the Trust’s progress in implementing the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF). Ashley explained that although the Trust recognises there is still much work to do, PCREF has become a strategic priority across the organisation and is helping to drive meaningful cultural change.
Since taking up his role, one of his key objectives has been to accelerate implementation by embedding race equality, co-production and lived experience into the Trust’s everyday work. He described how the organisation has established a comprehensive governance structure, including a PCREF Steering Group chaired by the Chief Nurse, supported by specialist groups focusing on health inequalities, workforce development and lived experience. Importantly, carers, patients, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) ambassadors and voluntary sector representatives are all involved in shaping the Trust’s work, demonstrating a commitment to partnership rather than top-down decision making.
Ashley emphasised that improving mental health services cannot be achieved by the NHS working in isolation. A significant part of Nottinghamshire Healthcare’s strategy involves developing strong partnerships with voluntary and community organisations, local authorities, Integrated Care Boards and other NHS Trusts.
He explained that many people from ethnic minority communities have longstanding relationships with trusted community organisations but may be reluctant to engage directly with statutory services due to previous negative experiences or cultural barriers. As a result, the Trust is increasingly taking its engagement activities into local communities, holding events in community centres, places of worship and neighbourhood venues where people already feel comfortable and supported. Alongside this community-based approach, the Trust is investing in cultural capability training for staff, improving transparency through publicly available equality dashboards and developing a new Lived Experience Advisory Group to ensure that carers and service users play a central role in monitoring progress and influencing future service improvements.
Looking ahead, Ashley outlined an ambitious programme of work designed to embed PCREF throughout the organisation over the coming years. Funding secured through NHS England will support a wide range of initiatives, including cultural awareness workshops, staff development programmes, community capacity-building projects and expanded opportunities for people with lived experience to influence recruitment, service design and quality improvement.
One of the Trust’s key ambitions is to ensure that at least 80 per cent of its workforce receives training on the principles of PCREF, helping staff to better understand health inequalities and deliver more culturally responsive care. Throughout his presentation, Ashley reinforced the importance of meeting communities where they are, listening carefully to lived experience and building relationships based on trust rather than assumptions. His presentation reflected the wider theme of the forum: that lasting improvements in mental health services depend upon genuine collaboration between professionals, carers, service users and the communities they serve.
Q&A Highlights
Q: Why are community partnerships so important?
Ashley explained that local organisations often have trusted relationships with communities that NHS services may not yet possess.
Q: How will Nottinghamshire involve carers?
Through a new Lived Experience Advisory Group, strengthened co-production arrangements and wider involvement in service design, recruitment and evaluation.
King’s College London
Ida Doherty
Supporting Ethnic Carers in South West London
Although this presentation formed part of the meeting agenda, discussion focused on ongoing work supporting ethnic carers across South West London through research and partnership working. The emphasis was on better understanding carers’ experiences and ensuring that future services are informed directly by those experiences.
More on her talk will be for the next forum due to time.
Looking Ahead
The National Ethnic Mental Health Carer Forum continues to provide a valuable national platform where carers, researchers, NHS Trusts and community organisations can learn from one another.
The discussions demonstrated that progress is being made through PCREF, research and community partnerships, but also recognised that significant challenges remain.
Moving forward, success will depend on maintaining the principles that underpinned every presentation:
listening before acting
valuing lived experience
strengthening trust
improving cultural responsiveness
ensuring carers remain genuine partners in shaping mental health services.
The forum closed with networking and an invitation for organisations across England to continue sharing good practice, supporting one another and working collectively to reduce inequalities in mental health care.
Written by Matthew McKenzie, Speaker, Carer, Campaigner and Poet
As part of Carers Week 2026, I had the privilege of travelling to East Dean in East Sussex to speak at the East Sussex Carers Voices – Celebrating Carers Week Event, organised by Care for the Carers. The event brought together unpaid carers, carers’ organisations, NHS representatives, local authority leaders, health professionals, community groups and carers from across East Sussex to discuss the realities of caring and identify ways to improve support for unpaid carers.
The event was hosted by Dr Neil Churchill, Chair of Care for the Carers, who guided the day’s discussions and emphasised the vital role carers play in society. Throughout the day, carers shared their personal stories, experiences and recommendations directly with decision-makers and service providers.
This blog post provides an overview of the key themes, speakers and discussions for those who were unable to attend.
Opening Remarks – Dr Neil Churchill
Dr Neil Churchill opened the event by welcoming attendees and recognising the significant contribution unpaid carers make to families, communities and public services.
He highlighted several key challenges currently facing carers:
• Rising financial pressures and cost-of-living concerns. • The growing number of carers leaving employment due to caring responsibilities. • Increased risks of poor physical and mental health among carers. • Social isolation and loneliness experienced by many carers. • Growing concerns around carer burnout.
Dr Churchill stressed that the country depends heavily on unpaid carers and that health and social care systems would struggle to function without them. He also spoke about the importance of moving towards a model where carers are treated as equal partners in care rather than simply being expected to cope alone.
A key message from his introduction was that carers should not be left to navigate fragmented services by themselves. Instead, health, social care and voluntary sector organisations must work together more effectively to recognise, support and value carers.
Carer Stories and Lived Experience
One of the most powerful aspects of the event was hearing directly from carers themselves.
Miles Bing – Caring Through Dementia
The first speaker was Miles Bing, author of “Deadheaded: An Alzheimer’s Memoir by Mother and Son”.
Miles shared his family’s experience of supporting both of his parents through Alzheimer’s disease. His presentation explored the emotional impact of caring at a distance, the guilt often experienced by family members who live far away, and the difficulties of coordinating support across multiple services.
He spoke about:
• The long-term impact of dementia on families. • The challenges of accessing services in rural areas. • The lack of coordination between health and social care systems. • The practical and emotional burden placed on carers.
Many attendees identified strongly with his comments regarding the need for carers to act as coordinators between multiple organisations that often fail to communicate effectively with one another.
Young Carers – Julia and Elsie
The audience then heard from young carers Julia and Elsie, whose presentations left a lasting impression on everyone in the room.
Both spoke honestly about growing up while caring for family members with complex needs. They described responsibilities that included supporting parents during health crises, helping siblings with disabilities and managing situations involving emergency services.
Their stories demonstrated:
• The hidden nature of young caring responsibilities. • The emotional impact caring can have on children and young people. • The importance of early intervention and support. • The value of dedicated young carers services.
Perhaps most importantly, they highlighted that while caring can build resilience, no child should have to face these responsibilities without support.
The standing ovation they received reflected the courage and honesty with which they shared their experiences.
Round Table Discussions
Following the morning speakers, attendees participated in facilitated round table discussions.
These conversations focused on:
• The biggest issues facing carers over the next six months. • Practical actions that could help carers in their caring role. • Barriers to accessing support. • Positive examples of support that should be expanded.
Several common themes emerged from these discussions:
Earlier Identification
Many carers reported not being recognised as carers until they had reached crisis point. Participants called for earlier identification within GP surgeries, hospitals and community services.
Access to Information
Attendees highlighted how difficult it can be to find accurate and timely information about available support.
Financial Pressures
Many carers discussed the financial impact of caring, including reduced employment opportunities and increasing household costs.
Mental Health and Wellbeing
Carers spoke about the emotional strain of caring and the importance of counselling, respite and peer support services.
Speaker sessions resumes
Diverse Communities and Caring
A particularly thought-provoking presentation was delivered by Manal Ahmed, who supports carers from ethnically diverse and refugee communities.
She discussed additional challenges experienced by carers from minority communities, including:
• Language barriers. • Cultural differences. • Social isolation. • Displacement trauma. • Immigration-related issues. • Financial and emotional dependency.
Manal explained that many carers experience multiple layers of disadvantage and that support services must be culturally aware and accessible to everyone.
She also highlighted positive examples of community-building activities that help carers connect with one another and reduce isolation.
Her presentation reinforced the importance of ensuring that no carer is excluded from support because of their background, language or circumstances.
My Presentation – A Carer’s Journey
I was invited to speak about my own experiences as a young carer and later as an adult carer supporting family members with autism and serious mental illness.
One of the key messages I shared was that many carers do not initially recognise themselves as carers. Like many people, I simply viewed what I was doing as helping my family.
However, over time I found myself:
• Coordinating care. • Supporting hospital admissions and discharges. • Managing appointments. • Advocating with professionals. • Navigating complex systems. • Supporting multiple family members simultaneously.
I spoke about how difficult it can be when carers are not listened to or involved in important decisions.
I also highlighted the importance of recognising carers as equal partners in care and ensuring that professionals understand the expertise carers develop through lived experience.
One of the central themes of my presentation was carers’ rights.
I encouraged carers to:
• Identify themselves as carers. • Seek support from local carers organisations. • Request carers assessments. • Learn about their rights. • Participate in co-production and service improvement. • Share their experiences to help reduce stigma.
To conclude, I performed my poem “It’s My Right”, which focuses on the rights every carer should expect to receive, including recognition, respect, involvement, information and support.
Afternoon Reflections and Future Priorities
The afternoon session included reflections from senior leaders from Care for the Carers, East Sussex County Council and NHS Sussex.
Discussions focused on:
• Improving identification of carers. • Supporting carers before crises occur. • Encouraging carers to access support services. • Learning from positive experiences of care. • Strengthening partnerships between carers and professionals.
Representatives acknowledged the crucial role carers play and listened to feedback gathered throughout the day.
Many carers expressed concerns about navigating systems that can often feel complicated and difficult to access. There was broad agreement that services should be simpler, more joined-up and more responsive to carers’ needs.
Key Messages from the Day
Several important messages emerged consistently throughout the event:
Carers Need Recognition
Many carers remain hidden and unidentified. Earlier recognition can lead to earlier support.
Carers Need Practical Support
Information, respite, emotional support and financial advice remain essential.
Carers Must Be Involved
Carers are experts in the lives of the people they support and should be treated as partners in care.
Young Carers Need Protection
Children and young people with caring responsibilities require dedicated support and opportunities to thrive.
Communities Matter
Strong local networks can help reduce isolation and improve wellbeing.
Prevention Is Better Than Crisis Management
Supporting carers early can prevent breakdowns in caring arrangements and reduce pressure on services.
Conclusion
The East Sussex Carers Voices Event was an excellent example of what can happen when carers, professionals and decision-makers come together to listen, learn and work collaboratively.
Throughout the day, carers shared powerful stories of resilience, commitment and compassion. They also spoke honestly about the challenges they face and the changes they want to see. I also recognised Agi who does lots of work raising carer awareness in Sussex, she recently spoke at my national ethnic mental health carers forum. So it was great to see her there.
Dr Neil Churchill’s leadership as host helped create an environment where carers felt able to speak openly and where decision-makers could hear directly from those with lived experience.
As Carers Week 2026 comes to a close, the challenge now is to turn these conversations into meaningful action. Carers should not have to struggle to be recognised, supported or heard.
The event demonstrated that when carers’ voices are placed at the centre of discussions, better solutions can emerge for everyone.
Thank you to Care for the Carers, all speakers, volunteers, professionals and carers who contributed to such a valuable and inspiring day.
On Wednesday 3 June 2026, colleagues from all eight London Mental Health Trusts, alongside carers, service users, community organisations, researchers, regulators and system leaders, gathered at ISH Venues in central London for the Pan London Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) Conference.
Chaired by Erica deti from North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT), the conference provided a unique opportunity to showcase progress, share learning and strengthen London’s collective commitment to race equity within mental health services.
The conference was built around the principle that advancing race equity requires both organisational commitment and meaningful partnership with people who use services, carers and communities. Throughout the day, speakers challenged delegates to move beyond discussion and towards action, recognising that the inequalities experienced by racialised communities within mental health services remain one of the most significant challenges facing the NHS.
South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust
The first trust presentation was delivered by Amdad Ibrahim, Associate Director of Health Inequalities, and Dr Mona Dhesi, Consultant Forensic Psychologist and Associate Medical Director at South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust. Their presentation provided one of the clearest examples of how PCREF can be fully integrated into organisational strategy. Beginning with an explicit acknowledgement that racism exists within healthcare organisations and wider society, they demonstrated how their trust had used this recognition as the foundation for meaningful action.
The speakers outlined a comprehensive anti-racism programme linking governance, workforce development, community engagement and service transformation. Race equity has been embedded into business planning, leadership accountability and quality improvement processes, supported by cultural capability programmes, anti-racism steering groups and health equity assessments.
Their presentation demonstrated how PCREF can become part of the organisational DNA of a trust rather than a standalone initiative and provided a practical blueprint for others seeking sustainable implementation.
1. Commitment and Foundations
The Trust began by establishing a clear organisational commitment to becoming an anti-racist organisation. This commitment is supported through a range of strategic frameworks and governance structures, including the Trust’s Anti-Racism Framework, Board Equality, Diversity and Inclusion objectives, and the implementation of the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF).
Speakers emphasised that meaningful progress begins with leadership acknowledging that racism exists within healthcare systems and taking responsibility for addressing it. This commitment has been reinforced at Board level and incorporated into wider organisational priorities to ensure race equity remains visible and accountable.
2. Capability and Awareness
Recognising that sustainable change requires learning and reflection, the Trust has invested heavily in developing staff awareness and cultural capability. This includes initiatives such as:
White Allies Programme
Anti-Racism Hub and Reflective Spaces
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Champions
Cultural Capability Training
These programmes create opportunities for staff to develop a deeper understanding of race, culture, privilege and inequality while providing safe spaces for reflection and discussion. The aim is to move beyond awareness and support staff to actively challenge inequity within their daily practice.
3. Embedding Anti-Racism into Practice
SWLSTG has focused on ensuring anti-racist values are embedded within decision-making processes and clinical practice rather than existing solely within training programmes.
Key areas of work include:
Embedding anti-racist values into organisational behaviours
Increasing diversity within leadership and decision-making structures
Delivering targeted race equity interventions
Using Health Equity Impact Assessments to inform service development
The Trust highlighted how race equity considerations are now being incorporated into service redesign programmes, policy development and clinical pathways, ensuring that decisions are assessed for their potential impact on different communities.
East London NHS Foundation Trust (ELFT)
Advancing Equity in All That We Do: ELFT Strategy 2026–2031
Presented by Carrie Sissons, Deputy Director of Integrated Care, East London NHS Foundation Trust shared how race equity and inclusion have been embedded at the heart of the Trust’s new 2026–2031 Strategy. Rather than developing a strategy behind closed doors, ELFT undertook an extensive engagement programme designed to ensure that the voices of service users, carers, staff and communities directly influenced the Trust’s future direction.
Carrie explained that the strategy was developed during a period of significant challenge for health and care services, but also a period of opportunity. The Trust recognised that if it was to improve outcomes for the diverse communities it serves across East London, Bedfordshire and Luton, equity could not be treated as a separate programme of work. Instead, it had to become a core principle underpinning every decision, every service and every improvement initiative undertaken by the organisation.
Building the Strategy Through the “Big Conversation”
A major feature of the strategy development process was the Trust’s extensive engagement exercise known as the “Big Conversation.” This programme was designed to ensure that the final strategy reflected the experiences, priorities and aspirations of the people who use and deliver services.
What People Told ELFT
One of the strongest messages emerging from the Big Conversation was the importance of equity. Participants consistently identified inequalities in access, experience and outcomes as issues that required sustained attention and action.
The engagement process highlighted several key themes:
Equity as a priority for action.
Equity for specific communities and groups.
Equity as a current and future risk.
Equity through co-production and lived experience.
Equity through population health and prevention.
Equity for staff as well as service users.
Equity through digital inclusion.
Equity as an essential part of value, not separate from it.
Carrie explained that these findings reinforced the need for equity to be visible throughout the Trust’s strategic objectives and operational plans. Participants wanted to see measurable action rather than broad commitments, with a focus on understanding and addressing disparities experienced by different communities.
The ELFT Strategy 2026–2031
The new strategy builds upon ELFT’s existing values and commitment to high-quality care. Serving approximately 1.8 million people across East London, Bedfordshire and Luton, the Trust recognised that reducing inequalities must remain central to its future ambitions.
The strategy identifies four broad priorities for the next five years:
Improve the quality and experience of care.
Make ELFT a great place to work.
Advance equity in all that we do.
Work with partners and communities to improve lives.
Of these priorities, the commitment to advancing equity was particularly relevant to the themes of the PCREF conference.
Priority Three: Advance Equity in All We Do
Carrie described this priority as a commitment to ensuring that equity becomes embedded within everyday practice rather than being treated as a specialist programme.
By 2031, ELFT aims to ensure that:
Teams routinely analyse access, experience and outcomes by population group.
Services take action when disparities are identified.
Progress continues against PCREF commitments.
The Trust’s Anti-Racism Plan and Charter are actively implemented.
Equity and inclusion are strengthened across the workforce.
Inequalities experienced by racialised communities are reduced.
The strategy recognises that data alone is not enough. Equity must be considered throughout service design, quality improvement, workforce development and organisational decision-making.
West London NHS Trust
Presented by Debbie Best (PCREF Lead), Natalie Mark (Living Experience PCREF Lead) and Dr Anne Aiyegbusi, West London NHS Trust delivered one of the most powerful and thought-provoking presentations of the conference. Their session focused on racial trauma, exploring how racism affects patients, carers and staff, and how organisations can create safe spaces to acknowledge, understand and respond to those experiences.
The presentation was rooted in the recognition that racial inequalities remain deeply embedded within mental health services. The team explained that their work developed in response to persistent concerns around disproportionate referrals, detention rates and restrictive interventions experienced by racialised communities. They also highlighted how mistrust of services and experiences of re-traumatisation continue to affect people’s willingness to engage with mental health support. Importantly, they stressed that racial trauma is not only experienced by service users but also by carers and staff, many of whom continue to navigate systems that can reproduce inequity.
Why This Work Matters
West London NHS Trust identified several key issues that informed the development of their racial trauma programme:
Disproportionate rates of referrals and detention among racialised communities.
Higher levels of restrictive interventions within mental health pathways.
Mistrust of services due to previous negative experiences.
The risk of re-traumatisation through interactions with healthcare systems.
The impact of racism on patients, carers and staff alike.
A particularly striking message from the presentation was that many racialised staff attending the workshops were not learning about racial trauma as a new concept. Instead, they were reflecting on experiences that formed part of their everyday reality. This observation reinforced the importance of creating environments where these experiences can be discussed openly and safely.
Co-produced Learning Spaces
The racial trauma workshops were developed through a co-production approach involving Debbie Best, Natalie Mark and Dr Anne Aiyegbusi, a forensic psychotherapist, group analyst and registered nurse who has published extensively on racial trauma. Together they designed reflective learning spaces where participants could explore difficult but essential conversations around race, identity and mental health.
The workshops encouraged participants to discuss:
Trust, power and emotional labour.
Racialised assumptions within healthcare.
Barriers to culturally safe care.
Experiences of racism in professional and personal settings.
Organisational responsibilities in responding to racial trauma.
Feedback from participants demonstrated the impact of these conversations. Attendees reported that hearing people’s lived experiences brought the issues to life in ways that data alone could not achieve. Many described the workshops as challenging but necessary, with one participant stating that conversations about racial trauma are essential even when they are uncomfortable.
Wider PCREF Implementation at West London NHS Trust
Alongside the racial trauma work, the presentation highlighted wider progress being made through PCREF implementation across the Trust.
Key achievements included:
Establishing PCREF leadership, steering groups and governance structures.
Increasing the number of PCREF leads and lived experience members.
Delivering Trust-wide PCREF awareness events.
Running community listening events and engagement activities.
Developing a Cultural Competency Framework and tailored action plans.
Creating co-produced communications led by patients and carers.
Improving ethnicity data collection and reporting systems.
Working with specialist racial trauma consultants to strengthen organisational understanding.
Particularly noteworthy was the emphasis on co-production. Patients and carers were not simply consulted but actively involved in shaping communications, governance structures, learning programmes and strategic priorities. This demonstrated a commitment to ensuring that those most affected by inequalities have a meaningful voice in driving change.
Key Learning from West London NHS Trust
The West London presentation demonstrated that addressing racial inequalities requires more than policy changes alone. It requires organisations to create spaces where difficult conversations can happen safely, where lived experience is valued as expertise and where learning leads directly to action.
Their work showed that racial trauma is not solely an individual experience but an organisational challenge that requires leadership, accountability and sustained commitment. By combining co-production, cultural competency, workforce development and organisational reflection, West London NHS Trust is helping to create the conditions for more equitable and culturally safe mental health services.
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Reducing Inequalities in Restrictive Practice: From Data to Action
Presented by Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, this session focused on reducing inequalities in restrictive practice through the lens of the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF). The presentation explored how data, lived experience, trauma-informed care and practical service improvements can work together to reduce the use of restraint, seclusion and restrictive interventions while addressing racial disparities.
The presenters explained that restrictive practices are not experienced equally across all communities. Evidence shows that people from some racialised groups are more likely to experience restrictive interventions, making this both a safety issue and a race equity issue. Oxleas therefore sought to identify practical actions that could improve care while simultaneously reducing inequalities.
Listening to Staff and Stakeholders
As part of their PCREF work, Oxleas engaged staff, service users and stakeholders to identify priorities for change. The feedback was grouped and ranked to establish the strongest starting points for improvement.
The consultation identified two immediate workstreams:
Debrief and Escalation
Trauma-Informed Care
The presentation emphasised that participants did not ask for abstract policy changes. Instead, they identified practical improvements that could be implemented directly within services.
Highest-Ranked Priorities
The most frequently identified priorities included:
A key message from the slide was that stakeholders wanted changes that would directly affect day-to-day care, staff behaviour and patient experience.
Workstream One: Debrief and Escalation
The first workstream focused on reducing escalation in the moment and improving learning after incidents occur.
The framework was organised into three stages:
Before Escalation
Staff are encouraged to:
Pause before escalating situations.
Ensure one lead staff member takes responsibility.
Consider alternatives earlier.
Use an equity prompt before moving to hands-on interventions.
The emphasis was on slowing decision-making enough to ensure staff are responding to the person’s needs rather than reacting automatically.
During Escalation
The presentation highlighted the importance of:
Clear staff roles.
Defined decision-making thresholds.
Safety scanning.
Choosing the least restrictive option available.
Clear documentation of rationale.
Protecting clinical judgement while maintaining accountability.
The objective is to ensure restrictive interventions are only used when absolutely necessary and are proportionate to the situation.
After the Incident
Learning after incidents was considered equally important.
Actions included:
Joint staff and patient learning.
Independent facilitation where possible.
Advocacy and peer support.
Reviewing and updating care plans.
The focus was not simply on recording incidents but on understanding what happened and preventing repetition.
Next Steps
The presentation concluded with a clear action plan for the coming period.
Planned Actions
Agree a Trust-wide escalation and post-incident learning standard.
Begin testing the “Pause Before Escalation” approach on selected wards.
Finalise a Trust Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) protocol and minimum training standard.
Strengthen dashboard reporting and improve protected-characteristics data quality.
Embed lived experience into the design and review of changes.
These actions reflect the Trust’s commitment to moving from discussion to implementation.
Learning Across London
The presenters also highlighted the importance of collaboration across London’s mental health trusts.
Areas identified for collaboration included:
Common data definitions.
Co-produced interventions.
Trauma-informed escalation practice.
Culturally informed post-incident learning.
Peer review of ward-level improvement projects.
This reflected one of the key themes running throughout the conference: that race equity work is strengthened when trusts learn from each other rather than working in isolation.
North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT)
North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT) presented its PCREF work through the lens of national competencies, demonstrating how race equity can be embedded into everyday clinical practice rather than being treated as a standalone initiative. The presentation, delivered by Erica Deti, Patient and Carer Race Equality Lead, highlighted the importance of developing a workforce that is confident, culturally competent and able to respond effectively to the needs of diverse communities. NELFT emphasised that meaningful change requires organisations to move beyond awareness and into practical action, ensuring that race equity is reflected in leadership, service design and frontline care.
A key focus of the presentation was the development and implementation of national PCREF competencies, designed to support staff at all levels in understanding racial inequalities and their impact on mental health outcomes. Erica explained how these competencies help staff build the knowledge, skills and confidence needed to challenge inequity, engage meaningfully with service users and carers, and contribute to culturally responsive services. The Trust also stressed the importance of involving people with lived experience throughout this process, ensuring that learning is informed by real experiences rather than theoretical concepts alone.
The presentation reinforced the message that achieving race equity is a continuous journey rather than a destination. NELFT shared examples of how the Trust is embedding co-production, reflective practice and accountability into its approach, while encouraging staff to consider how their decisions influence patient experiences and outcomes. By focusing on workforce development, lived experience leadership and organisational learning, NELFT demonstrated how PCREF can act as a catalyst for long-term cultural change, helping to create services that are safer, fairer and more responsive to the communities they serve.
A second NELFT presentation was delivered from local community organisations and Project Zero. This session focused on partnership working with local barbershops, voluntary organisations and community groups as a means of improving engagement with racialised communities. The speakers described how trusted community settings can help bridge gaps between services and populations that may feel excluded from traditional healthcare pathways.
Carer Spotlight
Matthew McKenzie and PCREF Carer Poetry
One of the most powerful moments of the afternoon came during the Carer Spotlight, where carers used poetry to share personal experiences of supporting loved ones through mental health services. The session moved beyond statistics, policies and organisational frameworks to remind attendees of the human stories that sit behind every discussion about race equity, access and care. The poetry was delivered by Matthew McKenzie and fellow carers, creating a reflective and emotional space that grounded the conference in lived experience. Through spoken word and personal reflection, the audience was invited to consider what it truly means to care, advocate and persevere within systems that do not always recognise the voices of carers.
A recurring theme across the poems was the often invisible role of carers. Several pieces explored the emotional labour involved in supporting a family member through periods of crisis, while also navigating complex services and systems.
Here is the poem from Matthew McKenzie taken from his collaborative book (in development) – Unpaid, Unseen and Yet Unbroken
The poems highlighted feelings of exhaustion, responsibility and uncertainty, but also resilience and determination. Listeners heard about the challenges of balancing personal wellbeing with caring responsibilities, and the reality that carers frequently become experts in supporting their loved ones while receiving little recognition themselves. The poetry gave voice to experiences that are often hidden from formal reports and performance data, yet have a profound impact on individuals and families.
Another important theme was the need for genuine partnership between services, service users and carers. The poems reflected frustrations when carers felt excluded from conversations, ignored during decision-making or treated as outsiders despite their deep understanding of the person they support. At the same time, they celebrated examples of compassionate practice, where professionals listened, worked collaboratively and recognised carers as valuable partners in recovery. These reflections connected strongly with the wider messages of PCREF, reinforcing that co-production is most effective when carers are respected, included and treated as equal contributors rather than passive observers.
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL)
Presented by J’nelle James, Acting Assistant Director of Culture and Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL) showcased one of the conference’s most innovative examples of co-production through the Black Men’s Wellbeing Festival 2026. The presentation focused on how Milton Keynes Talking Therapies worked with Black men, community leaders and local organisations to improve engagement with NHS mental health services. Rather than expecting communities to come to services, CNWL demonstrated how services can go out into communities, build relationships and create spaces where conversations about mental health feel safe, relevant and culturally meaningful.
The presentation explained that the project began during Black History Month in October 2022, when Milton Keynes Talking Therapies hosted a free face-to-face wellbeing session for Black men at Stantonbury Health Centre. The event explored themes including racial trauma, stigma, family relationships, cultural influences and self-worth. What began as a single wellbeing session quickly revealed a significant unmet need within the community. Participants spoke openly about barriers to accessing support and the lack of culturally relevant mental health conversations, leading the team to recognise that a longer-term programme of engagement was needed.
CNWL emphasised that trust cannot be created through a single event or consultation exercise. Instead, trust is earned through visibility, consistency and genuine partnership. The Trust described a three-year journey of listening, learning and working alongside local communities, which ultimately led to the development of the Black Men’s Wellbeing Festival. The project became an example of how PCREF principles can be applied in practice by ensuring that communities are involved in shaping solutions rather than simply being consulted after decisions have already been made.
Building Trust Through Co-Production
A central message throughout the presentation was that “trust isn’t built overnight.” The festival emerged through a deliberate process of relationship-building and community engagement. CNWL outlined six stages that helped transform an initial wellbeing event into a large-scale community-led initiative.
The first stage focused on initial engagement, beginning with the October 2022 wellbeing session. Following this, the team moved into a listening and learning phase, hosting webinars, training sessions and community discussions to understand what Black men wanted from mental health services. Rather than assuming solutions, the Trust spent time listening to experiences and identifying priorities directly from community members.
The next stages involved meeting people in community spaces, strengthening relationships with local organisations and businesses, amplifying messages through trusted community networks and broadening engagement across Milton Keynes. The presentation highlighted that every stage was developed collaboratively with community partners, ensuring that ownership of the programme remained shared rather than NHS-led.
Key Stages of the Journey
Initial engagement through Black History Month wellbeing events.
Listening sessions and community conversations.
Presence at local community gatherings and celebrations.
Building partnerships with local organisations and businesses.
Using trusted networks to amplify messages.
Expanding engagement through media, events and outreach.
The Black Men’s Wellbeing Festival 2026
The culmination of this work was the launch of the Black Men’s Wellbeing Festival 2026, a community-led programme designed to improve access and engagement for Black men within mental health services. Running weekly between April and May 2026, the festival brought together clinicians, community leaders, lived experience speakers and local organisations to create open conversations about wellbeing, identity and mental health.
The programme tackled subjects that participants themselves had identified as important. Rather than focusing solely on clinical mental health conditions, the festival explored the wider social, cultural and personal experiences that influence wellbeing. This reflected a more holistic understanding of mental health and recognised that issues such as identity, masculinity, family expectations and discrimination all play an important role in people’s wellbeing.
The festival also demonstrated how NHS services can become more accessible when support is delivered in partnership with trusted community figures. By bringing together professionals and community leaders, CNWL created opportunities for conversations that may not otherwise take place within traditional healthcare settings.
North London NHS Foundation Trust
Equity and Health Inequalities Strategy 2026–2030: “Inclusion in Action”
North London NHS Foundation Trust presented its new Equity and Health Inequalities Strategy 2026–2030, centred on the theme of “Inclusion in Action.” The presentation highlighted the Trust’s ambition to embed equity into every aspect of organisational culture, leadership, workforce development and service delivery. Rather than treating equality and health inequalities as separate workstreams, the strategy positions inclusion as a fundamental principle underpinning better mental health outcomes, improved staff experiences and stronger communities. The Trust’s vision was summarised through the phrase: “Better Mental Health. Better Lives. Better Communities.”
A key theme throughout the presentation was the recognition that addressing inequalities requires action at both organisational and system levels. The strategy aligns with the Trust’s broader five-year organisational goals and is supported by the North London Way, Trust values, leadership framework and staff network structures. The presenters emphasised that lived experience, staff insight and community partnership have been central to shaping the strategy, ensuring that it reflects the realities of the diverse populations served across North Central London.
The presentation also highlighted the importance of shared accountability. Equity was presented not as the responsibility of specialist equality teams alone, but as a collective responsibility across leadership, clinical services, operational teams and partner organisations. Through this approach, the Trust aims to create sustainable cultural change while reducing inequalities experienced by both service users and staff.
Strategic Ambitions and Organisational Change
A major focus of the presentation was how the Trust intends to turn principles into practical action. The strategy builds upon existing organisational priorities while introducing a stronger and more explicit focus on equity and inclusion. The presenters described a framework that links the Trust’s strategic aims, leadership expectations, workforce culture and service improvement activity into a single coherent approach.
The strategy is closely connected to the work of the Staff Networks Alliance, which brings together a range of staff networks representing diverse communities and experiences. The Trust described these networks as essential partners in shaping policy, challenging inequalities and ensuring that organisational decisions are informed by lived experience. This collaborative model reflects a commitment to co-production and shared leadership rather than top-down decision making.
The presentation emphasised a set of organisational values that support inclusive practice, including visibility, accountability, compassion, collaboration and empowerment. These principles are intended to guide both staff behaviour and organisational decision-making. By embedding these values throughout the Trust, leaders hope to create a culture where inclusion becomes a routine part of everyday practice rather than a separate programme of work.
Building on Existing Foundations
The final section of the presentation focused on progress already achieved and the foundations that have been established to support future work. The Trust outlined a number of significant developments, including the creation of an Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) Programme Board, which provides governance and oversight for inclusion and health inequalities initiatives. This governance structure helps ensure that equity remains a strategic priority and is monitored at senior levels of the organisation.
The Trust has also introduced several initiatives aimed at strengthening accountability and supporting underrepresented groups. These include the launch of the Staff Networks Alliance, the development of anti-racism principles, positive action programmes, reciprocal mentoring opportunities and improvements in disability inclusion through the Reasonable Adjustments Passport scheme. The Trust reported achieving Disability Confident Level 2 status, reflecting progress in creating a more inclusive workplace environment.
Importantly, the presentation highlighted the implementation of the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) as a key mechanism for advancing anti-racist practice and addressing inequalities within mental health pathways. Alongside embedding the North London Way as a shared organisational framework, the Trust views PCREF as a central component of its strategy for reducing inequities and improving outcomes. The overall message was that meaningful progress has already begun, but sustained effort, partnership and accountability will be required to achieve the ambitions set out in the Equity and Health Inequalities Strategy 2026–2030.
A recurring message from the closing discussion was that race equity remains everybody’s responsibility. While significant progress has been made, panellists acknowledged that much work remains. Delegates left with a renewed commitment to collaboration, stronger partnerships with carers and communities, and a shared determination to ensure that PCREF continues to drive meaningful and measurable change across London’s mental health services.
Blog by Ethnic Mental Health Carer forum Chair – Matthew McKenzie
The May 2026 Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum brought together carers, researchers, clinicians, community leaders, and representatives from mental health organisations across England. Although attendance was smaller than usual, the discussion was rich, honest, and highly informative, covering Mental Health Act reform, carers’ experiences, service inequalities, innovative approaches to care, and new research opportunities.
For those who were unable to attend, this blog provides a comprehensive overview of the meeting, including key presentations, audience questions, responses from speakers, and useful resources shared during the session.
Opening Remarks
As the chair, I welcomed attendees and outlined the agenda. The meeting focused on following:
Mental Health Act research and reform
Carers’ experiences supporting loved ones through detention
Findings from a major East Sussex carers research project
Resources for carers under the Mental Health Act
Electronic Health Records and future developments
Wider discussions on racial trauma, inequalities, and service improvement
The meeting also provided opportunities for networking, sharing lived experiences, and highlighting innovative projects happening across the country.
Research Study: Supporting a Loved One Through Mental Health Detention
Dr Maeve Conneely from University College London opened the meeting with a presentation on a new research study exploring the experiences of people who have been assessed or detained under the Mental Health Act, as well as the experiences of family members and carers who supported them through that process. The study has been commissioned as part of the wider programme of Mental Health Act reform and aims to understand how the current “Nearest Relative” provisions operate in practice before changes are introduced under the new legislation.
Dr Conneely explained that researchers are particularly interested in hearing from carers who were involved in supporting a loved one but who were not formally recognised as the “Nearest Relative” under the existing legal framework. She highlighted that these experiences are especially important because they can reveal where carers have been excluded from decision-making, denied access to information, or prevented from contributing to assessments despite playing a significant role in supporting the individual concerned. The study is open to anyone aged 16 or over who has direct experience of Mental Health Act assessments, detentions, Community Treatment Orders, holding powers, or related interventions, whether as a patient or as a supporter.
The research is linked to ongoing reforms of the Mental Health Act and seeks to understand how the “Nearest Relative” provisions currently operate before changes are implemented.
Who Can Take Part?
The study is looking for:
People who have been detained under the Mental Health Act
Family members and carers who supported someone during detention or assessment
Individuals who should have been involved as a nearest relative but were not
Anyone aged 16 or over with relevant experience
Interviews are conducted online and participants receive a £30 shopping voucher as a thank-you for their time.
Key Question from Participants
Q: Does the study include situations where someone should have been involved but wasn’t?
Response: Yes. Researchers are particularly interested in understanding experiences where carers or family members were excluded from decision-making processes despite playing a significant caring role.
Another Important Question
Q: Do carers need permission from the person who was detained before participating?
Response: No. Carers are sharing their own experiences and therefore only need to provide their own consent.
Discussion Themes
Participants highlighted:
Long-standing inequalities affecting Black communities under the Mental Health Act.
The overuse of psychiatric labels without sufficient exploration of trauma.
The need to understand why some individuals receive significantly different experiences of care, including access to private mental health facilities.
Concerns about trust in mental health services and the lasting impact of poor experiences across generations.
Several carers committed to taking part in the study to ensure lived experience informs future policy.
East Sussex Carers Research Project: What Carers Told Us
Age Angiolini presented findings from a year-long carers-led research project examining the experiences of family carers supporting people with serious mental illness across East Sussex. The study was developed in response to repeated concerns raised by carers at local support meetings and sought to capture their experiences of interacting with mental health services provided by the Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust (SPFT).
Although the research received 71 responses, representing only a proportion of the carers population in the region, the findings revealed a striking consistency in the challenges carers face. The survey explored themes including carers’ involvement in care planning, communication with services, consent and confidentiality, quality of care, crisis support, and priorities for improvement. Among the most significant findings were that 72% of carers reported being only sometimes involved or not involved at all in their loved one’s care, 73% felt services relied too heavily on carers, and 72% said they regularly had to advocate to secure appropriate support. The research concluded that many carers feel undervalued, excluded from decision-making, and left carrying significant responsibilities without adequate recognition or support.
The study gathered responses from carers supporting people with:
Schizophrenia
Bipolar disorder
ADHD
Autism
Complex neurodiverse conditions
Although the sample size was relatively modest, the findings revealed significant and consistent concerns.
Key Findings from the report
Carers Feel Excluded
72% reported being only sometimes involved or not involved at all.
73% felt services relied too heavily on carers.
72% said they had to advocate strongly to secure appropriate care.
Communication Failures
Participants reported poor communication between:
Mental health services
Assessment teams
Social services
Mental health liaison teams
Many carers described communications as inconsistent, unclear, and difficult to navigate.
Consent and Confidentiality
A recurring concern was that confidentiality procedures are often applied rigidly, preventing carers from sharing vital information during crises.
Carers argued that this can actively undermine effective care.
Quality of Care Concerns
The research found:
90% reported insufficient care.
Significant concerns around continuity of care.
A strong desire for dedicated care coordinators.
Widespread frustration with crisis services.
Crisis Support is Not Working
Many carers reported that:
NHS 111 is often inadequate for mental health crises.
A&E is frequently unsuitable for people experiencing mental distress.
Services remain reactive rather than preventative.
Calls for Change
Recommendations included:
Better crisis pathways
Improved coordination between services
More trauma-informed approaches
Greater therapeutic support
Increased family involvement
Better support for neurodiverse individuals
The presentation sparked considerable discussion, with many attendees noting that the findings reflected experiences they had encountered for years.
Carers Speak Out: Frustration, Trauma and the Need for Change
One of the most powerful aspects of the meeting was hearing directly from carers.
Several participants reflected on decades of involvement with mental health services and expressed concern that despite repeated reviews, consultations, and reforms, many of the same issues continue to persist.
Common themes included:
Institutional racism
Poor communication
Exclusion of carers
Over-medicalisation
Lack of trauma-informed care
Inadequate support during crises
A number of attendees emphasised that families often become de facto care coordinators, managing appointments, services, medications, and crises while receiving little support themselves.
One participant observed:
“They plan, medicate and treat. We care. Our worlds don’t meet.”
Others highlighted the impact of racial trauma and the way mental health services can fail to recognise the cultural context of distress.
Open Dialogue: A Different Way Forward?
Ren Reins introduced the concept of Open Dialogue, an internationally recognised approach to mental health care that focuses on relationships, networks, and collaborative conversations.
Open Dialogue aims to:
Bring families and professionals together
Reduce fragmentation between services
Focus on lived experience
Build trust
Improve recovery outcomes
Ren explained that major NHS-funded trials are underway and encouraged carers to learn more about the approach.
The discussion generated significant interest, particularly from attendees looking for alternatives to traditional medical models of care.
Nearest Relative Resources Project
Professor Judy Laing from the University of Bristol provided an update on an innovative project designed to support family members and carers who hold, or may hold, responsibilities under the Mental Health Act’s “Nearest Relative” provisions. Drawing on previous research with carers and mental health professionals, Professor Laing explained that many family members who find themselves in the Nearest Relative role often receive little information, guidance, or emotional support despite carrying significant legal responsibilities. In response, her team secured funding to develop a free, co-produced online resource that helps carers understand their rights, responsibilities, and options when supporting a loved one through mental health assessment, detention, and treatment.
Developed in partnership with carers, family members, mental health professionals, and organisations including Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, and Carers Trust, the website provides practical information, downloadable tools, guidance for conversations with professionals, and resources to help carers look after their own wellbeing. Professor Laing stressed that the project has been shaped directly by the experiences of those who have undertaken the role themselves, ensuring that the guidance reflects the realities and challenges carers face in practice rather than simply explaining legal processes.
The project emerged from research identifying significant gaps in information and support for people carrying out the “Nearest Relative” role.
What Has Been Developed?
The project has created a free online resource containing:
Information about legal rights
Guidance on conversations with professionals
Practical tools for meetings
Support for carers’ wellbeing
Resources explaining upcoming legal changes
The materials have been co-produced with carers and family members.
Questions Raised
How are diverse communities included?
Participants asked how the project ensures equity and accessibility.
Professor Laing explained that:
People from ethnic minority backgrounds have contributed to development.
Resources are being improved to increase accessibility.
Additional funding is supporting work around inclusion and accessibility.
Translation and alternative formats are being explored.
How is the project promoted?
Discussion focused on ensuring communities are aware of available support rather than resources existing only online.
Professor Laing outlined efforts involving:
Mind
Carers Trust
Mental health services
Local media
Carer forums
How will the new Nominated Person role protect carers who have traditionally been involved in supporting a loved one?
Several participants expressed concern that replacing the Nearest Relative role could unintentionally weaken the involvement of family members who have historically provided substantial support during periods of mental ill-health. Questions were raised about situations where a person may choose someone other than their primary carer to act as their Nominated Person, potentially reducing carers’ ability to access information or participate in key decisions. Professor Laing acknowledged that these concerns have been raised by many carers and explained that the practical details of how the new system will operate are still being developed. She stressed the importance of carers contributing their experiences to ensure that future guidance recognises the valuable role families often play in supporting recovery and maintaining continuity of care.
What support is available when professionals fail to recognise or understand carers’ legal rights?
Attendees also discussed the reality that many mental health professionals are not always familiar with the legal powers and rights associated with the Nearest Relative role. Participants described situations where carers were excluded from discussions, not informed of important decisions, or felt unable to challenge professional opinions because they lacked confidence in their understanding of the law. In response, Professor Laing highlighted that one of the main objectives of the Bristol resources project is to bridge this knowledge gap by providing practical tools, suggested questions, and clear explanations of carers’ rights. She noted that the project is also developing resources aimed at professionals themselves, with the goal of increasing awareness and ensuring that carers’ legal rights are better understood and respected across mental health services.
Attendees welcomed the commitment to increasing visibility.
Electronic Health Records and Future Developments
Dr Anna De Simoni, an Academic GP and Associate Professor of Primary Care at Queen Mary University of London, presented an early-stage research proposal focused on how electronic health records could be used to better understand and map the social support networks surrounding people living with multiple long-term health conditions.
Dr De Simoni sought direct feedback from carers to help shape the project before a formal funding application is submitted. She explained that while healthcare professionals can usually identify a patient’s next of kin and household members through existing GP records, they often have very limited understanding of the wider support networks that play a vital role in a person’s wellbeing.
These networks may include family members, neighbours, friends, faith groups, community organisations, carers, and others who provide practical and emotional support. The research aims to explore whether technology and electronic health records can help healthcare professionals better recognise these support systems and use that information to improve care planning, reduce unnecessary hospital admissions, and enhance quality of life for people living with complex health conditions.
The discussion generated considerable interest, particularly regarding:
Information sharing
Integration across services
Support for carers
Data protection concerns
Improving continuity of care
Several participants expressed enthusiasm about the potential benefits while also raising questions regarding privacy and access to NHS information.
Questions and Answers from Dr Anna De Simoni’s Presentation
Q: What problem is this research trying to solve? A: Dr De Simoni explained that healthcare professionals often know very little about the wider support network surrounding a patient. While medical records may identify a next of kin or people living in the same household, they rarely capture the full picture of who is actually providing practical, emotional, or day-to-day support. The project aims to better understand these social networks and use that information to improve care planning and patient outcomes.
Q: Who is the research aimed at? A: The initial focus is on people living with multiple long-term health conditions, including illnesses such as COPD and other complex health needs e.g mental health. The project seeks to understand how stronger recognition of support networks could improve quality of life, reduce hospital admissions, and support people to remain independent for longer.
Q: How would patients contribute information about their support network? A: The proposal includes the use of a Universal Care Plan through the NHS App. Patients would be able to enter information themselves about what matters to them, who supports them, how they prefer to be treated, and what should happen if their health deteriorates. This information could then be viewed and updated by relevant healthcare professionals.
Q: What role could carers play within the proposed system? A: Participants highlighted that carers often provide the majority of practical support but are frequently invisible within healthcare systems. The proposed approach could make carers more visible by helping professionals understand who is involved in supporting a patient and what role they play in maintaining wellbeing and independence.
Q: How will patient confidentiality and data protection be managed? A: Concerns were raised about privacy and the security of NHS data. Dr De Simoni explained that information governance, GDPR compliance, and data protection would be central to the project. Specialists in privacy and information governance would be involved to ensure that any information collected is handled safely, appropriately, and with proper consent.
Key Discussion: Why Are Carers Still Fighting the Same Battles?
A recurring theme throughout the meeting was the sense that many challenges identified today are the same challenges carers raised ten or twenty years ago.
Questions included:
Why are services still fragmented?
Why do carers continue to feel excluded?
Why are communication problems so persistent?
Why is trauma often overlooked?
Why do inequalities remain entrenched?
Participants reflected on whether the issue is primarily one of resources, leadership, service design, or culture.
Many agreed that meaningful change requires carers to remain actively involved in shaping policy and service delivery.
A carers support group recommended during discussion as a source of peer support and shared experience.
Final Reflections
The May 2026 Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum highlighted both the challenges carers continue to face and the determination across the sector to improve outcomes.
From Mental Health Act reform and carers’ rights to innovative approaches such as Open Dialogue, the meeting demonstrated the importance of bringing together lived experience, research, policy, and practice.
Several speakers reminded attendees that change often begins with carers sharing their stories, participating in research, challenging poor practice, and helping shape future services.
The forum remains an important space where those voices can be heard.
