Tag Archives: Mental Health Services

Triangle of Care Community Meeting: December 2025 update

By Matthew McKenzie – TOC Community Chair

Our final Triangle of Care (ToC) Community Group meeting of the year brought together carers, professionals, and ToC members from across the UK to share updates, raise concerns, and discuss priorities for 2026 and beyond. Although Microsoft Teams provided some surprises, we made it work, thanks to teamwork and patience. The conversation was rich, heartfelt, and often very moving.

1. Opening & Agenda

As chair of the meeting, I acknowledged technical teething problems as the group used Teams for the first time in this format. Mary (ToC Programme Lead) welcomed attendees and explained the privacy-driven decision to hide email addresses, which also unfortunately hid attendees’ names. A fix will be implemented before the January meeting.

The agenda included:

  • Triangle of Care national updates (Mary)
  • Carer co-production and lived experience input (Matthew)
  • Surrey & Borders’ co-production example (postponed)
  • Research priority-setting presentation (Richard, University of Manchester)
  • Carer questions and discussion

2. Triangle of Care National Update (Mary)

Mary provided a comprehensive end-of-year update structured around ToC’s three priority areas for 2024–25.


2.1 Embedding the Relaunched Triangle of Care Framework

Growth & progress

  • 16 new members have joined the scheme since April, bringing ToC membership to over 80.
  • The first Welsh hospital achieved a ToC Star Award, prompting the creation of a new Welsh-language logo and Welsh materials.
  • A social care pilot is underway with Livewell South West, with West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospital reviewing ToC criteria for an acute setting.
  • Nine Star Awards have been achieved this year, with a further 12 annual reviews approved. Many more annual reports are pending review before year-end.

Standardising data
Mary emphasised the push for consistent reporting across Trusts, including:

  • numbers of carers identified
  • uptake of carer awareness training
  • numbers of carer champions

This will help build a national picture of impact.

Webinars
ToC’s Lunch & Learn series continues, with the recent Carers Rights Day webinar (in partnership with University of Bristol) focusing on the Nearest Relative role under the Mental Health Act (MHA). Resources are available via Carers Trust’s YouTube channel.


2.2 Young Carers: Identification & Support

A major update was the successful national policy win relating to young carers and the Mental Health Act.

Mental Health Act Reform – Safety Net for Young Carers

Following campaigning by Carers Trust, the Young Carers Alliance, and ToC members who wrote to MPs:

  • Government has agreed to update the MHA Code of Practice to require:
    • identification of children when an adult is detained
    • sharing of information about available support
    • referrals for young carer needs assessments
  • Updates to advance choice documents will require practitioners to ask about dependent children.
  • Expected implementation: Summer 2026.

This win was warmly welcomed by the group.


2.3 Racially Minoritised Carers & PCREF

Mary updated members on ToC’s work to ensure carers are fully represented in the Patient & Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF).

Key updates

  • A national Task & Finish Group has now completed its review of the first four ToC standards; the final standard is underway.
  • Piloting of new culturally sensitive criteria is planned with 10 NHS Trusts beginning April 2026.
  • Example of early good practice: Livewell South West is implementing a new “essential data template” that includes carers, enabling services to better identify and support racially minoritised carers.
  • Carers Trust is calling for a statutory duty for NHS mental health providers to implement PCREF in full, including community governance.

2.4 Changing the Narrative on Care – New Research

Mary introduced new research (supported by the Health Foundation and Oxfam GB) titled Changing the Narrative on Care, highlighting:

  • Although 80% of the public value unpaid care, this does not translate into policy action or investment.
  • Three recommended reframes:
    1. Care is a universal experience, not a niche issue.
    2. No care without support, make support visible and tangible.
    3. Care is a partnership between families, communities and systems—not something families must do alone.

The full report is available on Carers Trust’s website.


3. Carer Involvement, Co-Production & Lived Experience (Matthew McKenzie)

I then presented an in-depth reflection on the value of authentic carer involvement, drawing on his lived experience and his role working with multiple NHS organisations.

Key points included:

  • Carers are not passive observers, they hold critical lived knowledge that improves services.
  • Real co-production goes beyond consultation; carers must be equal partners in shaping policy, documentation, training, and strategic decisions.
  • Examples Matthew gave from his own involvement:
    • redesigning welcome packs and leaflets
    • addressing confidentiality misapplication
    • involvement in recruitment panels
    • delivering training to staff at induction
    • reviewing complaints and compliments themes
    • advising on discharge processes and family-inclusive safety protocols
    • participating in research steering groups
  • Carers’ insight is especially essential in safeguarding, quality boards, and identifying service gaps often invisible to professionals.

4. Surrey & Borders Co-Production Example

A planned presentation from Surrey & Borders was postponed, as the relevant colleague could not attend with materials. They hope to present at a future meeting.


5. Research Priority Setting in Secure & Forensic Mental Health (Richard Kears)

Richard introduced a national project with the James Lind Alliance (JLA) aiming to identify the top 10 research priorities for secure and forensic mental health services across England, Scotland and Wales.

Who is the survey for?

  • Carers
  • People with lived experience of secure/forensic services
  • Staff working in these services
  • Anyone indirectly connected (victims, families)

Purpose

To ensure future mental health research is led by the real concerns of those most affected, not only by academics or pharmaceutical interests.

Process

  1. National survey gathering research questions.
  2. Analysis to identify common themes.
  3. Second, more focused survey to refine priorities.
  4. National workshops with carers, staff and people with lived experience to finalise the top 10.

A QR code and flyer were shared for distribution. The group expressed strong support.


6. Attendee Discussion & Questions

This was the richest section of the meeting, with many heartfelt contributions. The themes below reflect the key concerns raised.

6.1 Scotland & UK-wide ToC Alignment

A carer asked why Scotland’s ToC framework is separate and not integrated into the UK ToC accreditation model.
Mary explained:

  • Scotland currently uses ToC only as a free policy framework.
  • Implementing the accreditation model in Scotland would require groundwork to assess willingness and ability of providers to fund membership.
  • Integration is being discussed but is not imminent.

6.2 Clarity on Co-Production

Several carers voiced concerns that:

  • “Co-production” is often used as a buzzword.
  • Some NHS Trusts label work as co-produced after completing it.
  • Carers need clarity on what ToC means when using the term.

Mary responded that ToC uses a ladder of engagement, distinguishing:

  • carer engagement
  • carer involvement
  • full co-production

Carers Trust is developing a formal principles-based statement on involvement for future meetings.


6.3 Older Carers: Visibility, Support & Inequalities

The majority of carer questions focused on the unmet needs of older adult carers, many of whom are supporting people with severe mental illness—not dementia—and often have been caring 20–40 years.

Attendees reported:

  • Feeling “invisible” within both policy and services.
  • Being incorrectly grouped under “older carers = dementia”.
  • Their own poor health affecting their caring ability.
  • Increasing struggle to get responses from professionals.
  • Serious concerns about who will care for their loved ones when they die.
  • Feeling less heard as they age, compared with younger carers or newer voices.

One carer (age 78) shared:

“I can’t retire from caring. Benefits stop at 65, but the caring doesn’t.”

Another said:

“We have to shout louder as older women to be heard—and still we aren’t.”

Mary acknowledged the seriousness of these issues and committed to:

  • bringing older carers’ concerns into ongoing ToC work
  • exploring dedicated guidance and better mainstreaming within the ToC standards
  • sharing good practice on carer contingency planning in upcoming meetings

I have placed the guide below

I also reiterated the group’s role in surfacing policy gaps and influencing future national lobbying.


6.4 Carer Registration & Meeting Access

Several carers raised issues with:

  • The length of the ToC sign-up form
  • Not receiving meeting links despite signing up
  • Verification barriers when joining Teams

Mary agreed to:

  • review and shorten the form
  • clarify which fields are optional
  • address email deliverability issues
  • adjust MS Teams settings to reduce joining friction while maintaining security

6.5 Concerns About Confidentiality Misuse

One carer reported that in a CQC meeting at an NHS Trust, raising questions about communication was dismissed as “confidentiality”, preventing meaningful dialogue.
I then encouraged carers to bring such examples into:

  • ToC Star peer reviews
  • Carer involvement forums
  • Local advocacy routes

He noted that misuse of confidentiality is a common and unacceptable barrier and must be challenged.


6.6 Petition on Antipsychotic Medication Research

Carers highlighted concerns about:

  • long-term prescribing of antipsychotics
  • lack of regular medication review
  • inadequate research into long-term effects

A carer shared a petition calling for investigation of psychiatric medications. Richard noted that he had signed and shared it previously.


7. Closing Remarks

Matthew thanked all attendees for their honesty, passion and persistence:

“Carers’ voices shape policies and improve care. That is exactly what this group is here to do.”

Mary acknowledged:

  • the importance of every concern raised
  • the need to better support older carers
  • improvements to ToC communications and meeting accessibility
  • that the next meeting will be in January (provisionally 19th)

The meeting closed with gratitude from carers who said they felt heard, supported, and connected.


Ethnic mental health Carer Forum Update August 2025

by Matthew McKenzie – National Ethnic Mental Health Carer Forum Chair

In August, the online National Ethnic Mental Health Carer Forum came together once again to confront difficult but necessary conversations about systemic racism, discrimination, and the experiences of ethnic minority carers within health and social care. The forum, hosted by Matthew McKenzie, provided a platform for carers, professionals, and researchers to share insights, frustrations, and plans for change.


Focus on Racism and Discrimination

This month’s forum was unflinching in its focus: racism in health and mental health systems. Attendees shared powerful testimonies of racial abuse and discrimination, highlighting how these experiences undermine trust in services and affect both carers and those they support. There was a clear call for honesty – participants stressed the importance of naming racism directly, rather than disguising it behind euphemisms.

The group also discussed the overrepresentation of Black and brown people in prisons, the lack of tailored initiatives for older Black carers, and the persistent inequalities faced by ethnic minority families trying to navigate mental health and social care support.


Research and Evidence from Carers Trust

A key presentation came from Andrew of Carers Trust, who shared research into the barriers faced by Black, Asian, and minoritised ethnic carers. The findings highlighted widespread issues: discrimination, language barriers, lack of cultural competence, and difficulties in accessing benefits. Andrew emphasised the need for culturally inclusive services and stronger outreach strategies, while acknowledging feedback from the forum that research and advocacy must be explicit about racism rather than avoiding the term.

Andrew expanded on the importance of equity in benefit advice, pointing out that many carers miss out on their entitlements because information is inaccessible, overly complex, or not communicated in culturally relevant ways. He called for dedicated advice services that are not only multilingual but also sensitive to carers who may not self-identify as such.

He also spoke about the impact of social isolation on carers from ethnic minority backgrounds, who often have fewer support networks and face stigma within their own communities. Addressing this requires building trust with local organisations and ensuring carer support is visible in spaces where communities already gather, such as faith centres or community hubs.

Finally, Andrew outlined the Carers Trust’s national strategy, which involves working more closely with local carer organisations, producing research that amplifies marginalised voices, and lobbying for systemic reforms. He highlighted how this forum’s feedback directly shapes their advocacy, showing a real commitment to partnership.

Questions raised during Carers Trust’s presentation:

  1. How can Carers Trust ensure its research explicitly names racism rather than using softer language?
  2. What specific support can be offered to carers who do not self-identify as carers and miss out on benefits?
  3. How can Carers Trust improve its complaints handling processes, particularly for carers facing racism and discrimination?
  4. What role can MPs and lobbying groups play in supporting Carers Trust’s advocacy for ethnic minority carers?
  5. How will Carers Trust ensure its multilingual materials are distributed widely enough to reach isolated communities?

Hampshire & Isle of Wight NHS Anti-Racism Initiatives

Usually NHS Mental Health trust representatives update on anti-racism initiatives at the forum. This time Hampshire and Isle of Wight engaged with minority carers.

Elton who is the Diversity and Inclusion Partner from Hampshire and Isle of Wight NHS Trust provided an update on their anti-racist programmes, including the rollout of the Patient and Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF). The trust has begun implementing cultural competence training, engaging with local communities, and embedding anti-racism into its wider mental health services. While early in its journey, the trust is already seeing changes in communication and engagement across different wards and services.

Elton shared that the trust is actively developing training modules on implicit bias, with the aim of reaching every staff member across its services. This training is intended not as a one-off exercise but as part of a sustained culture change programme. Early feedback from staff has been encouraging, with more frontline workers recognising how unconscious bias can influence treatment decisions.

He also described the trust’s efforts to engage directly with service users and carers, ensuring that their lived experiences feed into decision-making. Listening events, surveys, and advisory panels are being used to capture diverse perspectives, with a particular focus on groups who historically felt excluded from consultation.

In addition, Elton emphasised the need for transparency and accountability. The trust will publish regular updates on its PCREF action plan, allowing communities and stakeholders to scrutinise progress. He acknowledged that this is just the beginning, but stressed that embedding anti-racism into healthcare systems requires openness, humility, and sustained commitment.

Participants raised questions about how these initiatives address specific groups, such as older Black carers and prisoners’ families, as well as concerns about public misconceptions of anti-racism work. Elton acknowledged these challenges and committed to following up with colleagues on gaps raised during the discussion.

Questions raised during NHS Trust’s presentation:

  1. How will PCREF specifically address the needs of older Black adults who often feel invisible in services?
  2. What is being done to support the mental health of prisoners (e.g. Albany and Parkhurst prisons) and their families within this anti-racist framework?
  3. How will the trust prevent the public misconception that PCREF “excludes” white people?
  4. What mechanisms are in place to ensure transparency and accountability in publishing progress updates?
  5. How will the trust measure the long-term impact of cultural competence and implicit bias training?

Academic Research Contributions

The forum also heard from Shylet, a PhD researcher from University of Glasgow, who is focusing on learning disabilities. She presented her work on the lived experiences of Black African families caring for adults with learning disabilities, and invited participants to take part in interviews. Their contributions highlighted the importance of academic research in documenting and amplifying carers’ lived realities.

For more details you can contact her at S.Musabayana.1@research.gla.ac.uk


Carers’ Experiences of Benefits and Support

Another important theme was the financial challenges facing carers. The group discussed the complexity of benefits like Carer’s Allowance and how misinformation or fear of losing other entitlements often deters carers from claiming support. A carer expressed reluctance to claim due to concerns about how it might affect their relative’s benefits, while another highlighted the importance of valuing one’s own contribution and recognising caring work. There was frustration with bureaucratic systems that seem designed to exclude, particularly when layered with the additional barriers of language, culture, and discrimination.

Carers also highlighted the immense value of unpaid care, with estimates placing its worth at over £180 billion per year if it were to be paid for by the NHS. This figure underscored the urgent need for better recognition and support of carers’ contributions.


Strengthening Complaints and Accountability

There was a debate around how carers can raise complaints when faced with racism or poor treatment. Many participants expressed a lack of trust in formal systems like the CQC or Ombudsman, feeling that complaints disappear into bureaucracy without change. Suggestions included working with MPs, lobbying groups, or the media to ensure voices are heard.


Final Reflections

The August forum showed once again how necessary it is to hold these difficult conversations. Carers spoke bravely about racism and exclusion, professionals shared updates on anti-racist strategies, and researchers sought to bring lived experience into policy. Yet the message was clear: systemic change requires more than frameworks and research reports. It requires honesty, collaboration, and persistence.

As host, I was encouraged by the passion and determination in the room. The forum continues to grow as a national voice for ethnic minority carers, and our commitment to addressing racism head-on remains at the heart of this work.

Lewisham, Southwark & Lambeth Mental Health carer forum – July 2025 update

By Matthew McKenzie

LLS Carers Forum – July Update: Voices, Concerns & Community Strength

Welcome to the July update for the Lewisham, Lambeth, and Southwark Mental Health Carers Forum. This month’s meeting, chaired by Matthew McKenzie, provided space for powerful updates, critical reflections, and a sobering insight into national developments affecting carer support.

🔸 Growing the Carers Voice

Our forum continues to evolve, bringing together unpaid carers from across boroughs. It remains a space for empowerment, where carers can speak openly, challenge services, and influence support structures. Several attendees introduced themselves and reflected on their caring roles, often crossing borough boundaries and facing ongoing questions about their own place in the system.

🔸 Spotlight: Healthwatch Update

One of the major concerns raised was the planned abolition of Healthwatch England and its local branches, which is a development that has deeply unsettled many in our community.

Anna from Healthwatch Lambeth joined us (on her day off—thank you, Anne!) to explain what’s happening:

  • Healthwatch functions—listening to service users, signposting, and enter-and-view visits, which are set to be absorbed by local authorities and ICBs.
  • As a statutory body, Healthwatch cannot be dissolved without legislation, so operations continue for now.
  • Carers voiced serious concerns over the loss of Healthwatch’s independence and trust, especially as a safe channel for feedback.

Anne reminded us: Healthwatch is still active and listening. A final report on black men’s experiences in Lambeth mental health services is due by mid-August.

🔸 Key Questions Raised

  • How will services preserve independent feedback mechanisms once Healthwatch is gone?
  • What accountability structures will replace them?
  • What are the implications of the broader wave of health service body consolidations?

🔸 Updates from the Ground

We also heard from other carer members:

  • A carer from Lewisham shared feedback she submitted to the Lewisham Unpaid Carers Forum regarding carer engagement, with little response so far unfortunately highlighting an all-too-common issue.
  • Other Carers reflected on Lambeth’s carer engagement structures, noting some decline in carer-led decision-making over the years.
  • Another Carer emphasized the importance of real, consistent carer champions within NHS teams particularly in mental health crisis services.

🔸 Carers Forum Reflections

Matthew provided a helpful comparison between Lewisham and Lambeth carer engagement models. While Lewisham has a formal Unpaid Carers Forum, its independence is limited. Lambeth’s model leans more on the collaborative network and carer support groups. Both boroughs face challenges in consistency, clarity, and co-production.

A concern raised repeatedly: carer champions are often named but rarely visible and sometimes, not even known by their own teams.

📅 Next Forum: August 25 or 26

Due to the bank holiday, the next forum will likely be held on August 26. We’ll aim to have a guest speaker and will explore new ways for carers to hold services to account especially in light of the potential Healthwatch closure.


If you’d like to contribute to future discussions or attend the next forum, please reach out. This is your space.

📣 Let’s continue to speak up, stand together, and push for better mental health support for all carers.

Institutional Distrust Why Many Ethnic Carers Avoid Formal Services

Understanding the Hidden Struggles of Ethnic Minority Carers
Caring for a loved one with mental illness can come with challenges, but for many ethnic minority carers, the journey is made more challenging by cultural stigma, language barriers, and a deep-rooted mistrust of formal health systems.

These carers often carry immense responsibility behind closed doors, with little recognition or support. Despite their dedication, many avoid reaching out to mental health services—not because they don’t care, but because past experiences have taught them to be cautious, even fearful.

What Is Institutional Distrust and Why Does It Matter?
Institutional distrust refers to the lack of confidence in systems like healthcare, social care, or government services. For ethnic minority carers, this distrust is often grounded in real experiences of discrimination, cultural insensitivity, or the fear of losing control over a loved one’s care.

When services fail to understand or respect a carer’s background, the result is silence and isolation leaving carers to cope alone, without the help they may desperately need.

A Short Video Giving Voice to Unheard Stories
To shed light on this important issue, I’ve created a short video presentation:
“Institutional Distrust: Why Many Ethnic Carers Avoid Formal Services”


This video draws on the voices and lived experiences of unpaid carers, especially those from ethnic minority backgrounds. It explores the emotional weight they carry, the cultural barriers they navigate, and the urgent need for services to become more inclusive, respectful, and culturally aware.

Why Sharing These Stories Matters
If we truly want to support carers from all backgrounds, we must first listen and really listen to what they’re telling us. By naming institutional distrust and understanding its roots, we can begin to rebuild trust and create spaces where carers feel safe to seek help.

Please watch and share the video, and let’s continue the conversation about what real support looks like for ethnic minority carers in mental health.

South West London Mental Health carers group update for June 2025

A Space to Share, a Space to Be Heard

The session opened with updates and heartfelt check-ins. One of our carer members, shared a deeply personal and challenging situation regarding her loved ones declining mental and physical health. Despite strained family dynamics and the emotional burden of caring, a carer is courageously advocating for her loved one and seeking support through nursing services and assessments.

Peer Support: Insights from Experience

Long-time members offered valuable perspectives from their own journeys. A carer shared their struggle supporting individuals, which showed a stark reminder of the emotional and logistical toll caring can take. Another carer encouraged fellow carers to prioritise their own well-being, even in small ways a cup of tea, a short walk, a moment to breathe.

Continue reading

Lewisham, Southwark & Lambeth Mental Health carer forum – June 2025 update

About the Forum:
The Lewisham, Lambeth & Southwark Carers Forum is a collaborative online space that brings together unpaid carers, carer leads, mental health professionals, and support organizations to share experiences, raise concerns, and influence change. Focused primarily on mental health caregiving, the forum serves as a platform for peer support, policy updates, training insights, and service development. Led by carer advocate Matthew McKenzie, the group fosters empowerment through regular discussions, creative expression, and co-produced solutions, ensuring carers’ voices are heard across local systems and beyond.

Carers Week Collaboration Discussion

The meeting began with introductions from Matthew McKenzie, who leads a merged online carers group, and other participants including Yvonne, a carers navigator at Southwark Carers, and Margaret, a carer representative with the Royal College of Psychiatrists. The group discussed Carers Week activities and their various roles in supporting carers across different organizations. Karen Hooper, connected with the Lambeth Living Well Collaborative, while Lee Roach, the carers lead for South London & Maudsley in Lambeth, shared his involvement with the Trustwide Family and Carers Committee.

Continue reading

Greenwich Mental Health carers forum update June 2025

Why Unpaid Carers Should Join Our Mental Health Carers Forum and Why Oxleas & Our Local Authorities Should Listen

By Matthew McKenzie

Caring for a loved one with mental health needs is a journey full of challenges, isolation, and too often lack of support. That’s why we run a dedicated Mental Health Carers Forum with Greenwich Carers Centre that brings together unpaid carers from across Greenwich and sometimes other boroughs since Oxleas covers Bromley and Bexley.

In our most recent forum, carers opened up about what it’s really like to navigate services and support their loved ones. The message was clear: unpaid carers are doing more than ever often alone and we need to work together to make sure they are not left behind.

The Power of Peer Support

One carer said:

“I’m a sandwich carer — looking after my elderly parents and my daughter with complex needs. Groups like this are a lifeline. It’s a space to share, learn, and recharge.”

For many carers, peer support is one of the few places where they are truly heard. Another participant explained:

“It helps so much to hear from others going through similar things. It’s the only way I know what services are available and what’s changing.”

Challenges That Carers Face

Through the forum, we heard repeated concerns:

  • Lack of joined-up care between GPs and mental health services
  • Delays in care planning and assessments — or carers being excluded altogether
  • Confusing systems — carers are often left chasing up GPs or social workers themselves
  • Failure to take carers’ expertise seriously in assessments and planning
  • Emotional strain — many carers at breaking point, needing better respite and emotional support

One mother of three autistic children shared:

“I told them my son cannot tolerate bright light that’s why the curtains were drawn. But the assessor just complained about the curtains and parking. They didn’t listen to what my son really needs.”

Presentation: Advocating for a Loved One During and After Mental Health Crisis

Matthew McKenzie delivered a detailed presentation on how unpaid carers can effectively advocate for their loved ones, particularly around mental health services.

Key points included:

  • Carers are not just supporters, they are also advocates for their loved ones
  • Building relationships with key professionals (GP, care coordinator, psychiatrist, social worker) is crucial
  • Carers should keep records of symptoms, interventions and communications to support advocacy
  • During a crisis, carers should:
    • Stay calm
    • Be factual about symptoms and risks
    • Be assertive (but respectful) in requests for urgent action
    • Request risk assessments and ask for information to be recorded
    • Understand confidentiality rights and use carers’ rights under the Care Act
  • The importance of self-care for carers, advocacy can be exhausting, and carers must seek peer support and breaks
  • Carers should also use the complaints process and escalate concerns when services fail

A Call to Oxleas NHS and Local Authority

We know big changes are coming, NHS England reorganisations, funding pressures, staff reductions. But one thing won’t change: the system depends on unpaid carers.

That’s why we urge Oxleas NHS Trust and the local authorities to:

✅ Regularly engage with this forum to hear carers’ voices
✅ Ensure carers are meaningfully included in care plans and reviews
✅ Offer more training and support for staff on carer involvement
✅ Improve clarity on who carers can contact in a crisis
✅ Work with us to strengthen co-production, not just in theory, but in practice

As one member put it:

“If the services won’t be there in full anymore — then carers will have to do even more. But we can’t do it if we’re broken.”

Join Us

If you’re an unpaid carer supporting someone with mental health needs, whether you’re new to caring, or have years of experience, please come along.

You’ll find a space to share, learn advocacy skills, and connect with others who truly understand. We also run a peer WhatsApp group, ask if you’d like to join.

Together we are stronger and louder. The more carers attend, the harder it is for services to ignore us.

For more info or to attend the next forum: contact

info@greenwichcarers.org
0300 300 2233

Triangle of Care Community group update May 2025

Here is a brief update of the Triangle of Care Community group for the month of May 2025. The Triangle of Care Community group is a collaborative forum that champions the voices of unpaid carers in mental health services. The group works in partnership with service users, carers, and professionals to embed the principles of the Triangle of Care, promoting shared decision-making, improved communication, and recognition of carers as equal partners in care.

Our most recent meeting brought together carers, NHS professionals, researchers, and advocates from across the UK, including representatives from Kent, Bristol, Lewisham, East Sussex, and Hertfordshire. The atmosphere was one of mutual respect, knowledge-sharing, and a shared drive to improve the experience of care for carers and their loved ones.

The meeting covered updates on Triangle of Care developments, including recent accreditations and ongoing pilots to adapt the model for various healthcare and social settings. Presentations were given on research studies related to mental health care, including pharmacist prescribers’ roles and experiences of underserved older male carers. The group also discussed campaigns for increased research funding in serious mental illnesses and initiatives to support carers, such as Carers Roadshows.

Triangle of Care Expansion Updates

Mary Patel one of the Triangle of Care leads, provided an update on Triangle of Care developments and accreditations. Several healthcare providers have recently gained Star awards. There are ongoing pilots to adapt Triangle of Care for social care settings and to incorporate criteria for better support of racially marginalized carers. Mary announced that the Triangle of Care community group will be formally brought on board with Carers Trust, with Matthew as the inaugural chair for a 2-year term. They are looking to bring on co-chairs to support Matthew in his role.

Triangle of Care Implementation Updates

The group discusses recent achievements in implementing the Triangle of Care model across various healthcare organizations. Gabrielle Richards who leads on carers at South London & Maudsley reported that her trust successfully completed their Star 2 accreditation assessment for community services.

Matthew McKenzie shared a video poem he created about the Triangle of Care as it was shown during the peer review at South London & Maudsley.

Kelvin thanked Gabrielle for her contributions as she prepares to leave her role. Louise from Kent and Medway NHS Trust reported they maintained their second star accreditation and have implemented new processes to ensure carer considerations are included in policy development.

https://www.kmpt.nhs.uk/carers/triangle-of-care/

Mental Health Care Research Study

Richard introduced Bashir Al Saeed, a PhD student from the University of Manchester, to present their research study on the experiences of people with mental illness and their carers when receiving care from pharmacist prescribers in the community.

Bashir explains that the study aims to understand and improve care provided by pharmacist prescribers for people with mental illnesses in community-based settings. Participants will be asked to take part in a one-hour interview and will receive £30 as compensation.

The study is seeking individuals aged 18 or older with mental illnesses or their unpaid carers who have received care from pharmacist prescribers in the UK. A discussion follows about the inclusion criteria, particularly regarding the requirement for fluency in English, with concerns raised about potential issues against non-English speakers

Mental Health Research Campaign Initiative

The group discussed a campaign for better research into long-term serious mental illness in working-age people. Irene explained that they have been working on this campaign for a year, collaborating with experts from Oxford and the Welcome Trust.

The campaign aims to gather signatures and includes a short video. Irene emphasizes the importance of this initiative, as many in their group have loved ones who have been ill since their teens and are now in their thirties and forties.

You can find out more about the campaign from the link below.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/725846

Advocating for Psychosis Research Funding

The discussion focuses on a petition to increase government funding for research into psychosis, including its diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Irene passionately advocates for more effective medications with fewer side effects, emphasizing the need for better understanding of the underlying causes of psychosis. A carer shared personal experiences of her son’s struggles with mental illness and medication side effects. The group discusses the importance of signing and sharing the petition to gain government support for accelerated research in this area.

Pharmacist Prescribing for Mental Health

The discussion focuses on pharmacists prescribing for mental health conditions. Richard explains that some pharmacists, especially those with specialized training, are caring for people with mental illnesses in various settings. However, the extent of their involvement in prescribing and monitoring is still unclear. A carer expressed concern about pharmacists prescribing for severe conditions like bipolar disorder without extensive training. The group discusses the need for proper qualifications and access to medical records. Richard emphasizes that the study aims to understand and improve the care provided by pharmacist prescribers in community services.

Carers Roadshows: Community Support Network

Trevor a carer involved at Notts NHS described his Carers Roadshows, which he has been organizing since 2013. These free events bring together various organizations dealing with health, mental health, and social care to provide information and support to carers and patients.

Trevor emphasizes the importance of communication in triangular care and sees the roadshows as an effective, sustainable tool for fostering connections between different organizations and the community. He expresses his ambition to expand the roadshows across the country, particularly in London boroughs, and offers to help others create their own roadshows using his four-step guide.

Older Male Carers Advisory Group

Steve Owen from the University of Hertfordshire presents his research project on exploring the experiences of underserved older male carers. The project aims to set up an advisory group of 7-10 older men, particularly from minority ethnic groups, same-sex relationships, and rural/coastal areas, to meet from June to December 2025.

The research group will discuss the benefits and challenges of caring, gender dynamics, and access to support. The project’s goals are to develop a grant proposal for further research and improve advisory group guidelines. Steve is still recruiting participants and welcomes help in sharing information about the project.

Final Reflections

The session highlighted both the progress and the gaps still faced by carers, particularly around communication, access to services, and recognition. The Triangle of Care model continues to be a vital tool in bridging these gaps, but it is the commitment of carers and professionals alike that drives real change.

“Thank you for another great meeting Matthew and everyone.” – Linda Thomas
“These meetings have been such a resource for us all.” – Gabrielle Richards
“Powerful video, powerful voices. Thank you everyone.” – Claire Wood

I’m proud to be involved and help lead as triangle of care community as Chair and look forward to building our impact together. If you’re interested in co-chairing or getting more involved, please reach out let’s continue to shape mental health care that values and includes carers at every level.

Challenges of Carer Over involvement in Mental Health Caregiving

Understanding Over-Involvement as a Mental Health Carer

Welcome to another lecture taken off my YouTube channel. If you want to watch the lecture please see the video below.

Caring for a loved one with long-term mental ill health is a profound act of compassion, resilience, and often necessity. For countless unpaid carers, the daily reality involves advocating, supporting, and filling in the ever-widening gaps left by under-resourced mental health systems. But amid this dedication, a challenging reality emerges: what happens when you become “too involved” as a mental health carer?

Navigating the boundary between healthy support and over-involvement is fraught with emotional, social, and systemic complexities. For many carers, especially those without significant backup or support from services, over-involvement isn’t a deliberate choice. Rather, it’s a reaction to anxiety, lack of resources, unavailable respite, or a deep sense of responsibility, factors often compounded by the failures of the very systems meant to help.

This article explores the nuanced challenges of over-involvement, the psychological and social fallout for carers, the systemic pitfalls that fuel this cycle, and constructive pathways forward.


What Does It Mean to Be “Too Involved”?

Over-involvement as a mental health carer doesn’t refer to love or dedication, but to a state where healthy boundaries are blurred. It can look like:

  • Constantly monitoring or managing every decision or behavior: Driven by anxiety, the carer feels compelled to oversee every aspect of their loved one’s life.
  • Neglecting one’s own needs and identity: Support shifts from helping to living solely for the cared-for person, with carers sidelining their own health and well-being.
  • Becoming the sole or primary source of support with little to no backup: In the absence of adequate services, carers take on overwhelming responsibility.
  • Feeling unable to step away—even when necessary: Carers may feel there’s simply no option to rest, leading to chronic exhaustion.

While not every carer will experience all of these, most will likely encounter at least some, especially during crises or prolonged periods of under-resourcing.


The Emotional and Social Toll of Over-Involvement

Burnout and Fatigue

The most immediate impact of over-involvement is caregiver burnout. Continual vigilance, lack of sleep, and emotional strain take a heavy toll. Fatigue accumulates until carers can no longer function effectively, putting their own mental health at risk.

Guilt, Anxiety, and Isolation

Carers often wrestle with overwhelming guilt—fearful of not doing enough, or of something going wrong in their absence. Anxiety about possible crises or relapses becomes a constant presence. Over time, this anxiety, coupled with a lack of support, leads to profound isolation: friends, hobbies, and social ties erode under the relentless demands of caring.

Loss of Identity

Many carers experience a blurring, or even a loss, of their personal identity. They become “the carer,” subsuming roles as a partner, parent, sibling, or friend. The world shrinks to the immediate needs of the cared-for person, often at the expense of the carer’s own aspirations and selfhood.

Depression and Hopelessness

Without respite or validation, carers can slip into depression. Hopelessness stems from the sense that there is no help available and nobody understands the unrelenting emotional labor.

Neglect of Personal Health and Finances

Skipping one’s own medical appointments, neglecting health, and losing the ability to work full or even part-time are all too common. The financial strain can be devastating, adding yet another layer of stress.

Social Withdrawal and Relationship Strain

Over-involvement is a key driver of relationship breakdowns—not just with friends and work, but with the cared-for person. Overreliance on the carer can breed resentment on both sides, fueling conflicts, codependency, and, on the part of the cared-for person, a diminished sense of autonomy and independence.


Systemic Failures: Why Carers Become Over-Involved

Underfunded and Overstretched Services

The reality for many mental health carers is that the system simply doesn’t provide for the needs of those with mental health conditions—let alone their carers. Cuts to services, lack of staff, and waiting lists mean that carers are left to fill the gaps. They become, by necessity, the constant support, regardless of personal capacity.

Lack of Communication and Training

Poor communication from health or social services leaves carers in the dark. With no clear guidance or explanation of the cared-for person’s needs, diagnosis, or care plan, carers are left to guess, manage, and advocate alone. Often, vital training around role limitations or healthy boundaries is missing entirely.

Delayed or Insufficient Care Provision

When care is delayed or inadequate, carers are expected to step up, often without assessment or recognition. Insufficient professional support forces carers to take on roles they may not feel prepared for.

Weak Support and Community Networks

With respite care and carer centers decreasing in number and capacity, finding relief or support is increasingly difficult. Carers are isolated, unable to share experiences, access information, or receive the validation needed to carry on effectively.


The Double-Edged Sword of Professional Involvement

When Professionals Flag “Over-Involvement”

Health professionals may at times flag a carer as being “too involved” and, in some cases, limit or block their involvement in treatment or information sharing. While, in theory, this is a safeguard to protect the autonomy and recovery of the person with mental health needs, in practice it often plays out as a means of gatekeeping, especially in overburdened services.

Confidentiality laws may be invoked, sometimes rightly, sometimes in a blanket manner—leaving carers excluded from vital care discussions. “Gatekeeping” behaviors can include:

  • Restricting carers from meetings, updates, or ward visits
  • Using complex jargon to confuse or minimize a carer’s role
  • Citing a carer’s emotional state as evidence they may be a hindrance, thereby weaponizing carer fatigue

The Controversy: Persistence vs. Over-Involvement

A difficult question arises: when does persistence and advocacy for a loved one become “over-involvement”? Too often, carers asking difficult questions or pushing for better care are labeled obstructive or overbearing, sometimes as a way for professionals to deflect accountability for insufficient services or to reduce pressure on their own overstretched roles.

Yet, the very qualities needed in good carers—advocacy, persistence, commitment to high standards of care—may be used against them. Without structure, dialogue, and mutual respect, the risk is that carers are shut out, leaving both carer and cared-for at greater risk.


The Vicious Cycle: Carer Fatigue as a Reason for Exclusion

Systemic failure has a way of compounding itself. Carers are forced to step in because services are lacking. This necessary over-involvement leads to fatigue, stress, and sometimes mistakes or emotional responses. Professionals then point to this fatigue as a reason to exclude the carer or question their suitability—without offering alternatives or meaningful support. The end result: everyone loses, most of all the person in crisis.


Best Practices: Constructive Solutions and Support Strategies

Respite and Connection: The Need for Rest and Support Networks

Respite care, though increasingly scarce—is essential. Time off to rest, reset, and re-engage with passions outside the caring role is not a luxury but a lifeline.

Equally vital are carer support groups and centers, whether formal (hospital, community organizations) or informal (peer-organized). These provide:

  • Connection and reduced isolation
  • Information about navigating the mental health system
  • Validation and shared experience
  • Opportunities to strengthen one’s own identity

Many carers find that meeting others, even infrequently, offers practical ideas and emotional relief.

Learning to Set Healthy Boundaries

Establishing boundaries is crucial, but incredibly hard—especially when no backup options exist. Carers benefit greatly from structured education about:

  • The scope and limits of their role
  • When to step back, and how to do so without guilt
  • How to communicate their boundaries to professionals and family

Such education is often, unfortunately, lacking. Professional services have a duty to provide training and guidance, both for the carer’s health and for the relationship with the cared-for person.

Professional Education and Constructive Inclusion

Mental health professionals need ongoing training—not just on mental health conditions, but on carer engagement and support. Constructive inclusion means:

  • Sharing appropriate (non-confidential) information with carers
  • Involving carers in care planning and discussions
  • Recognizing their unique insights, without over-relying on them
  • Actively supporting carers to take breaks or step back as needed

Shared Responsibility, Not Transferred Responsibility

Mental health systems must prioritize shared responsibility. Carers should neither be left to do everything (“just get on with it”) nor shut out completely. Effective service provision means:

  • Joint care planning that integrates professionals, patients, and carers
  • Policies that match available resources—rather than just shifting risk onto families
  • Building a culture of respect and inclusion, not suspicion or blame

Carers’ Right to Step Back

Carers should feel empowered to step back from their role, even temporarily, without fear of catastrophe or overwhelming guilt. This is only possible in systems that provide meaningful support and backup—not merely moral encouragement.


Final Reflections: Moving Forward with Awareness and Compassion

The challenges of over-involvement as a mental health carer are not a sign of personal failure. More often, they reflect the shortcomings of a fragmented, under-resourced system that expects too much while providing too little.

No approach will be perfect. Sometimes, even with the best intentions, carers will cross the line into over-involvement. What’s essential is recognizing these moments not as failures, but as signals to seek connection, education, respite, or professional guidance.

For professionals, the task is to move beyond gatekeeping and work with carers as partners, acknowledging both their knowledge and their limits. For families, building peer support networks and for carers individually, permission to step back—are keys to sustainability.

Ultimately, meaningful mental health care must be rooted in shared responsibility, communal support, and flexible, compassionate boundaries. Only then can carers continue to support their loved ones not just out of necessity, but out of a place of balance, health, and hope.


Resources for Mental Health Carers

  • Carers UK: Offers a wide range of advice and community forums for carers.
  • Mind: Provides specific support on mental health caring, advocacy, and rights.
  • Rethink Mental Illness: Campaigning and advice for families and carers.
  • Local Carer Centers: Contact your local authority or NHS Trust for groups and training.
  • Peer Support Networks: Consider informal groups or online forums for shared experience and validation.

If you are a carer, professional, or someone with lived experience: remember, caring is both a gift and a challenge. Prioritize your own well-being as part of the journey. The health of the whole community depends on supporting you too.

Ethnic mental health Carer Forum Update March 2025

The Importance of Ethnic Minority Mental Health Carer Voices: Empowering Unpaid Carers from the Global Majority by Matthew McKenzie

In today’s world, the voices of ethnic minority carers in mental health services must be heard and valued. The National Ethnic Mental Health Carers Forum meeting, held on March 28, 2025, underscored the vital role that co-production and lived experience play in shaping better services for those who care for loved ones with mental health needs.

Continue reading